Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00212184DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: "

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00212184
Pages
3
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: " . (USAFLS)" </ To: " (USAFLS)" < Subject: RE: Question re Preservation of Electronically Stored Information re Epstein/lane Does Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 16:22:15 +0000 Importance: Normal Great. Thanks. From: USAFLS) Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 9:40 AM To: I(USAFLS) Subject: RE: Question re Preservation of Electronically Stored Information re Epstein/Jane Does Their email is at the NAC, we will need EOSUAs assistance on this. I'll find out what the steps are and let you know. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thursda January 06, 2011 9:38 AM To: SAFLS) Subject: RE: Question re Preservation of Electronically Stored Information re Epstein/Jane Does Yes. DOJ wants us to find communications between FBI and our office regarding the plea deal with Epstein. I know that Alex Acosta and had some communications and possibly others in the chain etc., From: USAFLS) Se 2011 9:36 AM To: USAFLS) Subject: RE: Question re Preservation of Electronically Stored Information r

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: " . (USAFLS)" </ To: " (USAFLS)" < Subject: RE: Question re Preservation of Electronically Stored Information re Epstein/lane Does Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 16:22:15 +0000 Importance: Normal Great. Thanks. From: USAFLS) Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 9:40 AM To: I(USAFLS) Subject: RE: Question re Preservation of Electronically Stored Information re Epstein/Jane Does Their email is at the NAC, we will need EOSUAs assistance on this. I'll find out what the steps are and let you know. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thursda January 06, 2011 9:38 AM To: SAFLS) Subject: RE: Question re Preservation of Electronically Stored Information re Epstein/Jane Does Yes. DOJ wants us to find communications between FBI and our office regarding the plea deal with Epstein. I know that Alex Acosta and had some communications and possibly others in the chain etc., From: USAFLS) Se 2011 9:36 AM To: USAFLS) Subject: RE: Question re Preservation of Electronically Stored Information re Epstein/Jane Does EFTA00212184 Other people involved on the Lit. Hold you mean ? From: USAFLS) Sen • January 06, 2011 9:35 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Question re Preservation of Electronically Stored Information re Epstein/Jane Does Great. Do you have copies of other people's emails, too? From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thursda January 06, 2011 9:34 AM To: (USAFLS); . (USAFLS); (USAFLS); Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Question re Preservation of Electronically Stored Information re Epstein/Jane Does (USAFLS) will be contacting you. We made copies of the documents on your N and .PST. That will be what you need to review, not the originals. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesda Janua 05, 2011 6:02 PM To: USAFLS • (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Question re Preservation of Electronically Stored Information re Epstein/Jane Does Thanks for your caution with this. Please have IT do this. They can capture the information. As a Lit Hold is already in place, I would suggest contacting as perhaps the information has already been captured. I am copying on this email so that she or another IT person can assist you. Best wishes for the new year. Assistant United States Attorney Office of the United States Attorney Southern District of Florida EFTA00212185 From: USAFLS) Sent: Wednesda January 05, 2011 5:50 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: Question re Preservation of Electronically Stored Information re Epstein/Jane Does Good evening, everyone. The Justice Department has made an inquiry ofi lthat he has passed along to me, to review our records and gather some information for them to review. This is groin to require me to search and retrieve emails and electronic documents (Word Perfect documents) to give to so that he can send them to Washington. Obviously I will not be altering the documents or emails in any way, but I know that just opening the documents can change the data. Is there a way for me to do this safely? Thank you. EFTA00212186

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-MarratIVIatthewman JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June 18, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Third Supplemental Privilege Log. The index has been marked with Bates Numbers P-014924 thru P-015267. The documents referenced in the Third Supplemental Privilege Log will be delivered tomorrow to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra for ex parte in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Order. Respectfully submitted, WIFREDO A. FERRER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: s/A. Marie Villafafia A. MARIE VILLAFAFIA Assistant United States Attorney Florida Bar No. 0018255 500 South Australian Ave, Suite 40

446p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Memorandum

Memorandum Subject Re: Operation Leap Year Date May 1, 2007 (Revised 9/13/07) (2nd Revision 2/19/08)' To From R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney First Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division MAUSA, Northern Region , Chief, Northern Region I. Introduction This memorandum seeks approval for the attached indictment char in Jeffrey Epstein, Min a/k/a' JEGE Inc., and Hyperion Air, Inc. The proposed indictment contains 60 counts and seeks the forfeiture of Epstein's Palm Beach home and two airplanes? The FBI has information regarding Epstein's whereabouts on May 16th and May 19th and they would like to arrest him on one of those dates. Epstein is considered an extremely high flight risk' and, from information we have received, a continued danger 'The second revision amends the Jane Doe numbering system to correspond with the most recent indictment. It also removes the references to the overt acts and substantive allegations related to each

53p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. 'Ovid Pam ftoisl pet WWW.PATITTOJUSTKE.COM 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 4 00 "ti e 6.‘ tk i r atire CalkAllfle alvdtr aIINNEV rar ,NYTTENNINIP PITNEY 'OWES 02 !F $003 , 50 0 000i3V, wit JAN 2i 2,2!3 .a4P En M ZIP t20-12E 3330 Dexter Lee A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00191396 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT EFTA00191397 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT MOTION TO SEAL Petitioners Jane Doc No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, joined by movants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4, move to file the attached pleading and supporti

71p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

U.S. Department atJustice

U.S. Department atJustice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 South .4ustraltan Ave_ Suite 400 West Palm Reach. FL 3340 September 2, 2008 .NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICTIM NOTICE: IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 3509(d) AND FLORIDA LAW, THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT IS TO BE TREATED AS CONFIDENTIAL AND SHALL NOT BE DISCLOSED EXCEPT IN CONNECTION WITH A LEGAL PROCEEDING. EFTA00215906 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach. FL 33401 (561)8204711 Facslutik: (561) 820-8777 September 2, 2008 VIA UNITED STATES MAIL Jeffrey Herman, Esq. Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Ste 2218 Miami, FL 33160 Re: Jeffrey Epstei AMENDED NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFM. Dear Mr. I lerman: By virtue of this letter, the United States Attorney's Office for the of Florida asks that you provide the following amended notice to Some of the informa

16p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S OPPOSITION TO VICTIMS' MOTION TO UNSEAL NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT Respondent, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Opposition to Victims' Motion to Unseal Non-Prosecution Agreement, and states: I. THE MOTION TO UNSEAL SHOULD BE DENIED BECAUSE THE NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT HAS NEVER BEEN FILED UNDER SEAL IN THIS COURT. Petitioners have filed their motion to unseal the non-prosecution agreement, claiming that no good cause exists for sealing it. As an initial matter, the motion should be denied because the non-prosecution agreement entered into between the United States Attorney's Office and Jeffrey Epstein was never filed in the instant case by the United States, either under seal or otherwise. On August 14, 2008, this Court held a telephonic hearing to discuss petitioners' r

7p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.