Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
USAFIS)" </O=USA/OU=FLS/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Nomms
USAFIS)"
(USAFLS)"
(USAFLS)"
Apparently
already worked with
to get all of his emails and electronic documents. I just need
to get a copy of that disc to do the review.
Can you send the relevant request to ISS
andenails?
This happened less than 7 years ago.
Thank you.
Assistant U.S. Attorney
From:
(USAFLS)
23, 2011 1:35 PM
To:
USAFLS);NoimoljUSAFLSIIIIIIMUSAFLS)
-
Current employees identify and preserve (those are the forms you completed a couple of months ago). Departed users
still in the retain period (3 years) will be done by ISS. AUSA's preservation is 7 years if I'm not mistaken.
From:
(USAFLS)
To:
(USAFLS);
(USAFLS); 11.11.(USAFLS)
-
- 004
Hai
Does that apply to
email, too? Or only attorneys who are no longer employed here?
And am 1 correct that
and
emails are no longer accessible, even at EOUSA?
Assistant U.S. Attorney
EFTA00212356
To:
(USAFLS);
(USAFLS);
(USAFLS)
Understood however, search for emails is done at the EOUSA level. The District has no access to mailboxes, mailboxes not
longer reside in local servers.
(USAFLS)
Seni;Xlidaggigy• Erikiway 23, 2011 1:20 PM
To:
(USAFLS);
(USAFLS);
USAFLS)
-
I am not aware that OPR has started any process regarding a search of e-mails of the previous U.S. Attorneys in Miami.
OPR received an allegation of misconduct, and they asked for e-mails pertaining to the Epstein case, presumably so they
could determine whether to open a full investigation.
Since OPR was seeking preliminary information, they asked me to
obtain certain e-mails regarding certain topics.
From:
(USAFLS)
2011 1:16 PM
To:
USAFLS);
(USAFLS)d
USAFLS)
I lid
has had all contact with OPR, so I do not know.
Assistant U.S. Attorney
From:
USAFLS)
(USAFLS);
USAFLS)
Please note that per
EOUSA Preservation Officer, EOUSA will be the one doing the search for
the emails. This is done by the EOUSA's Information Systems Security Staff. OPR should contact them directly with the
desired search strings. Do you know if your OPR POC has started the process ?
EFTA00212357
From
USAEO)
To:
USAFLS)
Cc:
(USAFLS)
(USAFLS)
Definitely it goes through
staff. Anytime OPR is involved in the reviewing something, it goes to
him an email and am waiting on a response—I will verify this, but I'm 98% certain.
It shouldn't have had to be at your request—OPR should have known to contact. I'll let you know as soon as I know.
Thanks for all of your help!
From:
(USAFLS)
To:
(USAEO)
Cc:
USAFLS);
(USAFLS)
staff first. I sent
I don't believe
roup has been involved on this. At least not per our request.
Yea
and
ere USAs during the 2005-present period.
Another question, if OPR needs to review current AUSAs mailboxes is the search also done bMgroup or do we put
the emails on a PST for them to review.
From
(USAEO)
(USAFLS)
Cc:
(USAFLS);
(USAFLS)
if
ncillinilkeparted prior to USAMail implementation in FLS, we won't have theirs. I can talk to our tech folks
to see if it's even worth doing additional searching, but I believe the answer is that it's simply not available because of the
way our systems were set up prior to USAMail.
and
were USAs during the 2005-present applicable period, right? I think that for the OPR question I need
to double check with
I believe what happens is that
provides access to their account data to
someone on
staff and they run the relevant searches and provide the search results.
Do you know whether anyone from
staff is aware of the OPR interest in this hold?
Thanks,
EFTA00212358
From
(USAFLS)
aUSAEO)
Cc:
(USAFLS);
=
1=
Need help again O. Lit Hold 2010-FLS-0004
(USAFLS)
I don't have Attachment 1 or 5 for
or
all no longer
with us.
and nerved
as USA and their email should be at
How do we go about finding out if
archived email for
.and
exist in our system.
How about getting
and NM= emails for review, I understand OPR is asking.
We do have copies of their N drives.
departure was previous to USAMail.
Any help with this will be greatly appreciated.
EFTA00212359