From: '
Summary
From: ' To: ' Cc: (USAFLS)" < Subject: Jane Does I. U.S. -- Motion to Unseal Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 17:57:01 +0000 Importance: Normal Dear Hope you are doing well. I wondered whether you had a chance to review the In re Smith case, 656 F.2d 1101, that I had discussed with you earlier. Based on that case and its progeny, in particular Senate of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico United States Dep't of Justice, 1992 WL 119127 at *3 (D.D.C. May 13, 1992) and United States g Anderson, 55 F. Supp. 2d 1163, 1168 (D. Kan. 1999), I believe that the following portions of your Exhibit A should remain under seal (and any related portions of DE48): 005 [words "1512 and 113"] 006-007 008 [paragraph 1 only] 016 [words "Sarah Kellen," "403," "113," and "371 conspiracy"] 017-018 019 [paragraph 1 only] 028 ["15121 029 [first 2 paragraphs] 030 [numbered paragraphs 2, 3, and 4] 036 [numbered paragraphs 1(a) and 1(c)] 042 [word "1512"] 045 [word "1512(d)") 046-048 049 [paragraph 1]
Persons Referenced (3)
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
Alfredo Rodriguez’s stolen “golden nugget” – a bound book linking Jeffrey Epstein to dozens of world leaders and billionaires
The passage describes a former Epstein employee, Alfredo Rodriguez, who allegedly stole a bound book containing the names, addresses and phone numbers of high‑profile individuals (e.g., Henry Kissinge Rodriguez claims the book lists names, addresses and phone numbers of dozens of influential individu He tried to sell the book to an undercover FBI agent for $50,000, indicating awareness of its valu
Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2008 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80804-CIV-MARRA/JOIINSON JANE DOE, a/k/a, JANE DOE NO. I, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, S SN1 and Defendants. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE AND EXPEDITE CERTAIN DISCOVERY Plaintiff Jane Doe moves, pursuant to Rules 26 and 34 to Preserve Evidence and Expedite the Discovery of this Evidence and states: 1. Defendants removed this action to federal court on July 21, 2008. (DE 1). 2. Plaintiff has filed a motion to remand on August 18, 2008. (D.E. 11). 3. It has come to the attention of Plaintiff's counsel that on July 21, 2008, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN filed a Motion with the Florida State Court to return the evidence seized at his home in conjunction with his criminal prosecution. (Ex. 1). 4. This evidence is relevant and critical to the prosecution of not only the instant claim, but for six (6) other
Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,
Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. 'Ovid Pam ftoisl pet WWW.PATITTOJUSTKE.COM 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 4 00 "ti e 6.‘ tk i r atire CalkAllfle alvdtr aIINNEV rar ,NYTTENNINIP PITNEY 'OWES 02 !F $003 , 50 0 000i3V, wit JAN 2i 2,2!3 .a4P En M ZIP t20-12E 3330 Dexter Lee A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00191396 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT EFTA00191397 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT MOTION TO SEAL Petitioners Jane Doc No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, joined by movants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4, move to file the attached pleading and supporti
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR FINDING OF VIOLATIONS OF THE CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT AND REQUEST FOR A HEARING ON APPROPRIATE REMEDIES COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for a finding from this Court that the victims' rights under the Crime Victims Rights Act (CVRA), 18 U.S.C. § 3771, have been violated by the U.S. Attorney's Office, and to request a hearing on the appropriate remedies for these violations. The victims have proffered a series of facts to the Government, which they have failed to contest. Proceeding on the basis of these facts,' it is clear that the U.S. Attorney's Office has repeatedly violated the victims' protected CVRA rights, including their right to confer with prosecutors generally about the case and specifically abou
Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 1 of 10 5/29/2009 4:41:55 PM UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119- MARRVJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232- MARRVJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380- MARRVJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. EFTA00201180 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 2 of 10 5/29/2009 4:41:55 PM JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381- MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994- MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80993- MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, VS. EFTA00201181 Case 9:08-cv-80811-K
Virginia Roberts v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation
The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.