Subject: RE: Epstein -- Rule 6(e) issue
From: To: Cc: Subject: RE: Epstein -- Rule 6(e) issue Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:50:43 +0000 Importance: Normal Okay. I will just sit tight. I am supposed to receive another 200 pages. Assuming it is more of the same, I will not bother you all again. Thank you. From: USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 2:38 PM To: Cc: Subject: RE: Epstein -- Rule 6(e) issue I agree with , especially in light of the fact that Judge Marra has ordered that the dots be produced. From: USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 2:04 PM To: Cc: Subject: RE: Epstein -- Rule 6(e) issue MI anyone else have a different view? From (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 1:56 PM EFTA00212647 To: Subject: Epstein -- Rule 6(e) issue Good afternoon, everyone. Thank you. EFTA00212648
Summary
From: To: Cc: Subject: RE: Epstein -- Rule 6(e) issue Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:50:43 +0000 Importance: Normal Okay. I will just sit tight. I am supposed to receive another 200 pages. Assuming it is more of the same, I will not bother you all again. Thank you. From: USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 2:38 PM To: Cc: Subject: RE: Epstein -- Rule 6(e) issue I agree with , especially in light of the fact that Judge Marra has ordered that the dots be produced. From: USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 2:04 PM To: Cc: Subject: RE: Epstein -- Rule 6(e) issue MI anyone else have a different view? From (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 1:56 PM EFTA00212647 To: Subject: Epstein -- Rule 6(e) issue Good afternoon, everyone. Thank you. EFTA00212648
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.