Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00212710DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: "

From: " To: "Paul Cassell" < >, "Brad Edwards" < Cc: " Subject: Request for Investigation Of Jeffrey Epstein Prosecution Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:03:08 +0000 Importance: Normal Brad and Paul, We enjoyed meeting in person with you and last Friday. I wanted to update you on the matters we discussed that day. First, Paul's request for an investigation of the Jeffrey Epstein prosecution has been referred to the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility. OPR is the component within the DOJ which investigates allegations of misconduct relating to the authority of DO1 attorneys to investigate, litigate, and give legal advice. The December 10, 2010 letter asks this office "to investigate through appropriate and independent channels the handling of the Epstein (non)prosecution." OPR is the appropriate and independent body within the DOJ to investigate and determine whether misconduct has occurred. Second, during the meeting on December 10, we advised you

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00212710
Pages
1
Persons
3
Integrity

Summary

From: " To: "Paul Cassell" < >, "Brad Edwards" < Cc: " Subject: Request for Investigation Of Jeffrey Epstein Prosecution Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:03:08 +0000 Importance: Normal Brad and Paul, We enjoyed meeting in person with you and last Friday. I wanted to update you on the matters we discussed that day. First, Paul's request for an investigation of the Jeffrey Epstein prosecution has been referred to the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility. OPR is the component within the DOJ which investigates allegations of misconduct relating to the authority of DO1 attorneys to investigate, litigate, and give legal advice. The December 10, 2010 letter asks this office "to investigate through appropriate and independent channels the handling of the Epstein (non)prosecution." OPR is the appropriate and independent body within the DOJ to investigate and determine whether misconduct has occurred. Second, during the meeting on December 10, we advised you

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: " To: "Paul Cassell" < >, "Brad Edwards" < Cc: " Subject: Request for Investigation Of Jeffrey Epstein Prosecution Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:03:08 +0000 Importance: Normal Brad and Paul, We enjoyed meeting in person with you and last Friday. I wanted to update you on the matters we discussed that day. First, Paul's request for an investigation of the Jeffrey Epstein prosecution has been referred to the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility. OPR is the component within the DOJ which investigates allegations of misconduct relating to the authority of DO1 attorneys to investigate, litigate, and give legal advice. The December 10, 2010 letter asks this office "to investigate through appropriate and independent channels the handling of the Epstein (non)prosecution." OPR is the appropriate and independent body within the DOJ to investigate and determine whether misconduct has occurred. Second, during the meeting on December 10, we advised you of the ethical standards applicable regarding a potential prosecution of Epstein by our office, and that a recusal would likely ensue. Given your request for an investigation of this Office's conduct in the Jeffrey Epstein case, and the referral of that request to OPR, we are seeking guidance from DOJ on whether this office can continue to defend the Crime Victim Rights Act case. Third, we discussed the sequence in the litigation. You asked us that, in the event the court decides that the CVRA applied, in the absence of a formal charge, that the government concede (1) the U.S. Attorney's Office failed to comply with the CVRA; and (2) the district court should set aside the Non-Prosecution Agreement. In light of what has occurred, we cannot give you an answer on those two points. You had told us earlier that you would be filing a dispositive motion by December 17, 2010. I expect to find out whether our office needs to recuse itself within the next week. I will be on leave from December 17-28, but will be back at the office on December 29. I am asking if you would defer filing any motion until after I return on December 29. Thank you. I can be reached by e-mail and cell phone, during my annual leave. EFTA00212710

Related Documents (6)

House OversightUnknown

James Patterson claims false charges were fabricated by attorney Bradley Edwards and professor Paul Cassell, linking them to Scott Rothstein’s fraud scheme

James Patterson claims false charges were fabricated by attorney Bradley Edwards and professor Paul Cassell, linking them to Scott Rothstein’s fraud scheme The passage provides a specific allegation that attorneys involved in the Epstein case fabricated charges, and it ties them to a known fraudster (Scott Rothstein). It names several high‑profile figures (Prince Andrew, Bradley Edwards, Paul Cassell, Scott Rothstein) and suggests a coordinated smear campaign, which could merit further investigation. However, the claims are vague, lack concrete dates, transaction details, or documentary evidence, limiting immediate investigative utility. Key insights: Patterson alleges that Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell fabricated false sexual assault charges against him.; He asserts that Cassell misused his former federal judge title and university affiliation to lend credibility.; Edwards is described as a partner of convicted fraudster Scott Rothstein.

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Filing # 35429605 E-Filed 12/11/2015 10:08:04 AM

26p
DOJ Data Set 9Financial RecordUnknown

Filing # 31897743 E-Filed 09/10/2015 12:44:35 PM

66p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

DS9 Document EFTA00807765

5p
DOJ Data Set 9Financial RecordUnknown

Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 92 Filed 04/11/16 Page 1 of 22

22p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.