Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00213183DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: "Jay Lefkowitz" ‹Lefkowitz@kirkland.com>

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00213183
Pages
2
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: "Jay Lefkowitz" ‹Lefkowitz@kirkland.com> To: Cc: "Roy Black" Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein: Correspondence from Robert Critton Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:47:49 +0000 Importance: Normal I will do so. Best, Jay From: Sent: 07/14/2009 06:09 PM AST To• flay Letkowitz Cc: Subject: Jeffrey Epstein: Correspondence from Robert Critton Dear Jay: I am in receipt of a letter from Robert Critton, counsel to Mr. Epstein in connection with the civil suits. His letter asks me to review and comment upon a pleading that Mr. Epstein intends to file in one of the civil cases. Please refer him to my earlier correspondence wherein our Office declined to provide such advisory opinions. Thank you for your assistance. Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33394 *WWW**WWW**WWW**WWW************WWW**WWW************WWW**WWW The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside informat

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "Jay Lefkowitz" ‹Lefkowitz@kirkland.com> To: Cc: "Roy Black" Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein: Correspondence from Robert Critton Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:47:49 +0000 Importance: Normal I will do so. Best, Jay From: Sent: 07/14/2009 06:09 PM AST To• flay Letkowitz Cc: Subject: Jeffrey Epstein: Correspondence from Robert Critton Dear Jay: I am in receipt of a letter from Robert Critton, counsel to Mr. Epstein in connection with the civil suits. His letter asks me to review and comment upon a pleading that Mr. Epstein intends to file in one of the civil cases. Please refer him to my earlier correspondence wherein our Office declined to provide such advisory opinions. Thank you for your assistance. Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33394 *WWW**WWW**WWW**WWW************WWW**WWW************WWW**WWW The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by EFTA00213183 return e-mail or by e-mail to and destroy this communication an , including all attachments. •www*•www*•www*•www*•www**www*•www*twww*kwww*kwww*kwww*twww EFTA00213184

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 70

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 70 EXHIBIT A PRIVILEGE LOG - WITH VICTIMS' OBJECTIONS EFTA00208682 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 2 of 70 PRIVILEGE LOG - WITH VICTIMS' OBJECTIONS Key to Objections (linking to Victims' Motion to Compel Production of Docments that Are Not Prig ileged Objection General Objections -- Inadequate Privilege Log Failure to Prove Factual Underpinnings of Privilege Claim Waiver of Confidentiality Government's Fiduciary Duty to Crime Victims Bars Privilege Communications Facilitating Crime-Fraud-Misconduct Not Covered Factual Materials Not Covered Documents Not Prepared in Anticipation of CVRA Litigation Attorney Client Objections - Ordinary Governmental Communications Not Covered Attorney-Client Relationship Not Established Deliberative Process Objections - Privilege Not Properly Invoked Final Decision Exempted from Privilege Qualified Privilege Ove

70p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Alfredo Rodriguez’s stolen “golden nugget” – a bound book linking Jeffrey Epstein to dozens of world leaders and billionaires

The passage describes a former Epstein employee, Alfredo Rodriguez, who allegedly stole a bound book containing the names, addresses and phone numbers of high‑profile individuals (e.g., Henry Kissinge Rodriguez claims the book lists names, addresses and phone numbers of dozens of influential individu He tried to sell the book to an undercover FBI agent for $50,000, indicating awareness of its valu

88p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Rol Slack lir „kite'

Rol Slack lir „kite' 2/949 Arcrwite a." 2434 7 Antai, Liu) 3 cut, , 4,/e EFTA00183732 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP AND AfilL/ArtO PART/H.3We; ' Cntercup Cantor 163 East 53'd Street New York, New York 10022-4611 WNW rwerA.COM September 2, 2008 VIA FACSIMILE (56D 820-8777 United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re:Jeffrey Bpstein Dear • Facsimile: In response to your letter dated August 26, 2008, I am confirming that Mr. Goldberger should continue to be listed as the contact pawn in the' mended victim notification letters and should receive the carbon copies of thoso letters as they are sent. • Also, we plan on speaking to Mr. Josofsberg this week to discuss a procedure for paying his fees. We intend to comply fully with the agreement and Mr. Epstein will pay Mr. Josfsberg's usual and customary hourly rates for his work pursuant to the agreement facilitating settlements unde

136p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

c -vntit 4t 13/acicari1/4

c -vntit 4t 13/acicari1/4 6olotionf EFTA00192767 (USAFLS) From: ..pi (USAFLS) Sent: ues ay, une , 8 3:08 PM To: Roy BLACK Subject: RE: FW: Jeffrey Epstein Hi Roy -- Is this the best number to call? Assistant U.S. Attorne West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone Fax Original Message From: Roy BLACK [mailto: Sent: Tuesda , June 24, 2008 3:02 PM To: . (USAFLS) Cc: jack goldberger Subject: Re: FW: Jeffrey Epstein I that is a good time. I also want to conference Jack Goldberger into the call. This will be a wrap up call. Roy USAFLS)" > 6/24/2008 12:23 PM >>> Dear Roy: contacted me and asked me to return your call regarding the Epstein matter. I am forwarding to you an e-mail that I sent to Jay Lefkowitz last night. and I can call you at 3:30 to speak about your list of issues. If that time does not work, please let me know what times you are available. Thank you. Assistant U.S. Attorne West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone Fax From: . (USAFLS) Sent: Monda June

4p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 99

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 99 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/2672011 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOES #1 AND #2, Plaintiffs, vs. UNITED STATES, Defendant. / ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiffs' Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (DEs 48, 52), Plaintiffs' Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49), Plaintiffs' Motion for Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence (DE 50), and Bruce E. Reinhart's Motion to Intervene or in the Alternative for a Sua Sponte Rule 11 Order (DE 79).1 All motions are fully briefed and ripe for review, and the Court has heard oral arguments on all motions. The Court has carefully considered the briefing and the parties' arguments and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court is awaiting supplemental brie

14p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.