Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00213850DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: "Robert D. Critton Jr."

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00213850
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: "Robert D. Critton Jr." To: Subject: epstem Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:19:09 +0000 Importance: Normal Priority: normal Inline-Images: bc1c.gif; bestlawyersjpg W I represent mr. Epstein in the civil cases as you know. I left voice messages at ft. I and wpb, as per your message . Epstein was sent a request to produce in fedi and st ct cases where mr edwards asked for all does given/sent, includes correspondence, by the feel govt to Epstein or his attys. We objected, the magistrate ruled ag us , took a rule 4 appeal and j marra upheld mag's decision. See de-462 and 572 in 80119. I wanted to make sure you had actual knowledge of this in that the materials must be turned over on wed in fedi and Thursday in st. ct. in case you /usao desired to assert a position as an intervenor. I think I understand the policy reasons why defense attys and the usao would not want this type of material subject to discovery, but I am merely providing notice to you. Will request a confidentiali

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "Robert D. Critton Jr." To: Subject: epstem Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:19:09 +0000 Importance: Normal Priority: normal Inline-Images: bc1c.gif; bestlawyersjpg W I represent mr. Epstein in the civil cases as you know. I left voice messages at ft. I and wpb, as per your message . Epstein was sent a request to produce in fedi and st ct cases where mr edwards asked for all does given/sent, includes correspondence, by the feel govt to Epstein or his attys. We objected, the magistrate ruled ag us , took a rule 4 appeal and j marra upheld mag's decision. See de-462 and 572 in 80119. I wanted to make sure you had actual knowledge of this in that the materials must be turned over on wed in fedi and Thursday in st. ct. in case you /usao desired to assert a position as an intervenor. I think I understand the policy reasons why defense attys and the usao would not want this type of material subject to discovery, but I am merely providing notice to you. Will request a confidentiality provision, but do not know whether mr edwards will agree. If any ?s , please call me, bob WI Robert D Critton Jr. - Attorney at Law BURMAN, CRITTON LUTTIER&COLEMAN.up YOUR. TRUSTED ADVOCATES LISTED IN in Best Lawyers THE WORLD'S PREMIER GUIDE This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the individual or entity named within the message. Should the intended recipient forward this message to another person or party, that action could constitute a waiver of the attorney/client privilege. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communications was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message. D scla "ler added by CodeTwo Exchange Rules www.codetwo.com EFTA00213850

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.