Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00213898DOJ Data Set 9Other

Subject: Jeffrey Epstein

From: To: Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:44:48 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: Jane_Doe_DE214-4.pdf; Jane_Doe_DE214_re_Motn_Protective_0rder.pdf; Jane_Doe_DE214-1.pdf; Jane_Doe_DE214-2.pdf; Jane_Doe_DE214-3.pdf Good afternoon, everyone. This is an FYI email regarding potential press coverage. All of the Epstein civil suits have been settled and the cases are supposed to be closed, but this came to me through CM/ECF today. It is a motion by Epstein to keep one of the plaintiff's lawyers (Brad Edwards) from disclosing documents he received through the discovery process. The specific discovery that they are trying to keep confidential is the correspondence between Epstein's attorneys and the U.S. Attorney's Office related to the negotiation of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. According to the pleading and attachments, Edwards plans to use the documents: (I) to rejuvenate the victim's rights suit that he filed against our Office a few years ago; (2) to

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00213898
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity

Summary

From: To: Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:44:48 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: Jane_Doe_DE214-4.pdf; Jane_Doe_DE214_re_Motn_Protective_0rder.pdf; Jane_Doe_DE214-1.pdf; Jane_Doe_DE214-2.pdf; Jane_Doe_DE214-3.pdf Good afternoon, everyone. This is an FYI email regarding potential press coverage. All of the Epstein civil suits have been settled and the cases are supposed to be closed, but this came to me through CM/ECF today. It is a motion by Epstein to keep one of the plaintiff's lawyers (Brad Edwards) from disclosing documents he received through the discovery process. The specific discovery that they are trying to keep confidential is the correspondence between Epstein's attorneys and the U.S. Attorney's Office related to the negotiation of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. According to the pleading and attachments, Edwards plans to use the documents: (I) to rejuvenate the victim's rights suit that he filed against our Office a few years ago; (2) to

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:44:48 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: Jane_Doe_DE214-4.pdf; Jane_Doe_DE214_re_Motn_Protective_0rder.pdf; Jane_Doe_DE214-1.pdf; Jane_Doe_DE214-2.pdf; Jane_Doe_DE214-3.pdf Good afternoon, everyone. This is an FYI email regarding potential press coverage. All of the Epstein civil suits have been settled and the cases are supposed to be closed, but this came to me through CM/ECF today. It is a motion by Epstein to keep one of the plaintiff's lawyers (Brad Edwards) from disclosing documents he received through the discovery process. The specific discovery that they are trying to keep confidential is the correspondence between Epstein's attorneys and the U.S. Attorney's Office related to the negotiation of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. According to the pleading and attachments, Edwards plans to use the documents: (I) to rejuvenate the victim's rights suit that he filed against our Office a few years ago; (2) to file some sort of internal Justice Department complaint regarding a violation of the victims' rights; (3) to lobby for changes to the victims' rights laws; and (4) to defend against the lawsuit that Epstein filed against Edwards himself (Edwards formerly worked for the Rothstein firm, and Rothstein allegedly used the Epstein lawsuits as a lure for his Ponzi scheme investors). Lilly Ann Sanchez, who has not been involved in the civil defense of Epstein, has suddenly reappeared and her firm filed this motion. Some of the key correspondence on these issues, some of which I have never been privy to, were authored by Ms. Sanchez. While Epstein's other civil lawyers showed me some of the correspondence that they were ordered to produce, I have never been shown any of the correspondence between Ms. Sanchez and Mr. Menchel and/or Mr. Acosta from the period when the original agreement terms were reached. I was told that correspondence was produced that was not shown to me, hut I do not know what it was. I anticipate that there will be more press coverage, and. perhaps there will be something more on the civil suit against our office. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00213898

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

14p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office Recuses Itself from Jeffrey Epstein Case Amid DOJ Oversight Questions

The passage reveals that a federal prosecutor's office recused itself from the high‑profile Epstein victims’ rights case and notes a pending DOJ review prompted by Senate questioning of AG nominee Wil Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office formally recused itself from the Epstein victims’ rights case. The case was reassigned to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Atlanta. Sen. Ben Sasse questioned AG nominee Will

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Alleged testimony that Jeffrey Epstein paid a 17‑year‑old $15k to have sex with Prince Andrew and flew other young women for similar encounters

The passage links Jeffrey Epstein to a claim that a witness was paid $15,000 to have sex with Prince Andrew at age 17 and mentions additional flights of young women for sexual purposes. It provides sp Witness alleges she was flown to London by Epstein and paid $15k to have sex with Prince Andrew at a Epstein allegedly arranged flights for other young women for sexual encounters Bradley Edwards is

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Attorney Edwards alleges U.S. Attorney's Office withheld evidence from Epstein abuse victims' counsel

The passage provides a concrete claim that federal prosecutors deliberately refused to share evidence collected in the Epstein search warrant with victim attorneys, suggesting possible obstruction or Edwards represented multiple alleged Epstein victims in mid‑2008. He contacted AUSA Villafafia, who indicated a possible indictment despite a purported plea deal. The U.S. Attorney’s Office refused t

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.