Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 214-1
Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 214-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/02/2010 Page 1 of 5 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 207 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2010 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV- 80893 - MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendants. Joint Stipulation Plaintiff, JANE DOE and Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Epstein"), hereby file their Joint Stipulation Regarding Certain Correspondence Obtained By Jane Doe's attorneys during discovery, and each state: I. In July 2010, the law firm of Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos and Lehrman, PL. (the "Law Finn"), Paul G. Cassell, Esq. and Jay Howell, Esq. ("Counsel") received through discovery certain correspondence and documents (including content thereof) between Epstein's attomeys/agents and federal prosecutors (the "Correspondence"). 2. Counsel for Jane Doe and Counsel for Epstein disagree whether the Correspondence is confidential. 3.
Summary
Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 214-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/02/2010 Page 1 of 5 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 207 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2010 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV- 80893 - MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendants. Joint Stipulation Plaintiff, JANE DOE and Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Epstein"), hereby file their Joint Stipulation Regarding Certain Correspondence Obtained By Jane Doe's attorneys during discovery, and each state: I. In July 2010, the law firm of Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos and Lehrman, PL. (the "Law Finn"), Paul G. Cassell, Esq. and Jay Howell, Esq. ("Counsel") received through discovery certain correspondence and documents (including content thereof) between Epstein's attomeys/agents and federal prosecutors (the "Correspondence"). 2. Counsel for Jane Doe and Counsel for Epstein disagree whether the Correspondence is confidential. 3.
Persons Referenced (4)
“...ng cases of Epstein v, Rothstein, CASE NO. 502009CA040800/OOOCMB AO and In Re: Jane Does 1 and 2, CASE 1 EXHIBIT EFTA00213912 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 214-1...”
Kenneth Marra“...010. Limns R. Johnson United States Magistrate Judge Courtesy Copies: Judge Kenneth Marra Counsel of Record EFTA00213916”
Bradley EdwardsJeffrey Epstein“...OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV- 80893 - MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendants. Joint Stipulation Plaintiff, JANE DOE and Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Epstein"), hereby...”
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (18)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
9:08-CV-80893-KAMjinzegebellsouth.netoathtoiustice.com[email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]Fax: 954-524-2822243-0164401-5012561-659-8300561-835-8691801-585-5202801-585-6833842-2820954-524-2820954-524-2822Related Documents (6)
[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation
The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded
Jeffrey Epstein non‑prosecution agreement and alleged high‑level connections revealed in multiple Palm Beach filings
Jeffrey Epstein non‑prosecution agreement and alleged high‑level connections revealed in multiple Palm Beach filings The passage aggregates numerous contemporaneous reports about a secret non‑prosecution agreement that allowed billionaire Jeffrey Epstein to avoid federal charges, mentions specific federal actors (U.S. Attorney's Office, FBI, Assistant U.S. Attorneys), and lists a roster of powerful individuals allegedly on Epstein’s private jet (Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Andrés Pastrana, Lawrence Summers, Ron Burkle, Kevin Spacey, Chris Tucker). It also cites procedural irregularities, victim exclusion, and potential immunity for co‑conspirators. These details provide concrete leads – names, dates, court actions, and alleged financial flows – that merit further investigation into possible prosecutorial misconduct, quid‑pro quo arrangements, and foreign‑political influence. Key insights: Sealed non‑prosecution agreement between Epstein and U.S. Attorney's Office (2007‑2008) prevented federal charges.; Agreement granted immunity to co‑conspirators Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, Nadia Marcinkova.; Victims were not consulted; attorneys claim the deal is unprecedented for an individual.
J. MICHAEL BURMAN. RA'
NAME SEARCHED: Jeffrey Epstein
DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01296720
EFTA01660040
Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile Figures
Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile Figures The filing enumerates numerous specific leads that, if verified, tie Jeffrey Epstein to a wide network of powerful individuals (Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, etc.) and to alleged obstruction of federal investigations, witness intimidation, and a non‑prosecution agreement. It also references concrete documents (exhibits, deposition excerpts, flight logs, FBI emails) that could be pursued for forensic analysis, discovery requests, or FOIA requests. The combination of high‑profile actors, alleged criminal conduct, and detailed procedural allegations makes this a strong investigative lead. Key insights: Edwards alleges Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering substantive questions, creating adverse inferences.; The motion cites a “Holy Grail” journal allegedly listing underage victims and high‑profile contacts (Trump, Clinton, etc.).; Claims that Epstein’s attorneys (including Alan Dershowitz) may have helped suppress victim testimony and influence the U.S. Attorney’s Office.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.