(USAFLS)"

From: (USAFLS)" </CUSAJOU=FLS/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN > To: ' Subject: RE: Jay and Ken Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 21:43:31 +0000 Importance: Normal That should be fine. My doctor's appt is at 11:15, so I will need to leave at around 10:45. Assistant U.S. Attorney Ori inal Messa e From: Sent: Wednesda , A ril 02, 2008 5:09 PM To: . (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Jay and Ken Let's meet Mon @ 9:15am just to review everything and go over any discovery issues. Ori inal Messa e From: . (USAFLS) To: Sent: Wed Apr 02 16:35:46 2008 Subject: FW: Jay and Ken FYI. I followed up with an e-mail to Ken and Jay telling them they have to talk to me, but haven't heard back. No one knows why they are calling and no one has heard anything from =. Assistant U.S. Attorney From: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesda Aril 02, 2008 3:44 PM To: .(USAFLS Cc: Subject: RE: Jay and Ken FLS) I believe you are the prosecutors on the case. They should speak with you in the first instance. If they have concerns, they can speak with or . There is a chain of command, and we need to follow it. EFTA00214516 Also, I think an indictment here is more and more likely, and if we do indict, we need to be clear that every decision or discovery issue is not instantly appealable to or I. Unless you disagree.... Alex. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesda , April 02, 2008 3:27 PM To: Cc: SAFLS); Acosta, Alex USAFLS) (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: Jay and Ken Hi Alex and M— and I just spoke with Jay. I told him that you had asked me to return the call from Jay and Ken. First he said that he wanted to "catch up with you," then to follow up on a conversation that you had a few weeks ago. I told him that you had asked me to find out and answer their questions and they said that their message to you is, "We want to talk to Alex." I am happy to call back and say that you want all conversations to occur with me, or something like that, but I felt I should communicate their message to you and ask for your direction. Thank you. Assistant U.S. Attorney EFTA00214517