To: "'Ocariz, Humberto H. (SHB)'"
Summary
From: To: "'Ocariz, Humberto H. (SHB)'" Subject: RE: Update Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:18:41 +0000 Importance: Normal Hi Bert — Judge Davis was selected. I think Jeff Sloman called him on Thursday or Friday. Mr. Epstein has delayed his guilty plea until November asserting that his attorney was unavailable on the scheduled day. From: Ocariz, Humberto H. (SHB) [mallto Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 9:05 AM To: Subject: RE: Update Hi I wanted to follow up and find out if Epstein had pled and Judge Davis selected as a special master because I would like him to consider me. Thanks. Bert Ocariz From: Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 5:30 PM To: Ocariz, Humberto H. (SHB) Subject: Update Hi Bert — The office has decided that to avoid an appearance of favoring any lawyer or law firm, a Special Master will select the attorney representative and that we cannot even provide the Special Master with a list of attorneys from which to choose. Retired Judge Davis is going to be the
Persons Referenced (2)
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
ROY BIACK
ROY BIACK HOWARD M. SREBNICK SCOTT A. KORNSPAN LARRY A. srumpt. MARIA NEYRA JACKIE PERCZEK MARK A.J. SHAPIRO JARED LOPEZ Jeff Sloman, Esq. United States Attorney 99 N.E. 4th Street Miami, FL 33132 BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN STUMPF - P.A. March 29, 2010 Assistant United States Attorney 99 N.E. 4th Street Miami, FL 33132 RE: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Counsel: JESSICA FONSECA-NADER KATifunrii P. PHILUPS AARON AMMON MARCOS BEATON, JR. MATTHEW P. O'BRIEN JENIPER J. SOUUKIAS NOAH Fox Assistant United States Attorney 500 South Australian Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6223 Jeffrey Epstein has an April 5, 2010 deadline for the filing of a Motion to Dismiss, and thereafter an Answer, to claims brought by Jane Doe 103 pursuant to 18 USC §2255 that were referenced in our earlier letter to you dated March 5, 2010, to which there has been no response. We firmly believe that the issues raised in the draft motion that is appended to this letter do not conflict with, n
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 I UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR FINDING OF VIOLATIONS OF THE CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT, REQUEST FOR AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING IF FACTS ARE CONTESTED, AND REQUEST FOR HEARING ON APPROPRIATE REMEDIES COMES NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for a finding from this Court that their rights as crime victims under the Crime Victims Rights Act (CVRA) have been repeatedly violated by the U.S. Attorney's Office, to request an evidentiary hearing to establish those violations if the U.S. Attorney's Office contests the underlying facts, and to request a brief schedule and a hearing on the appropriate remedies for these violations. As recounted in more detail below, the victims have recently-obtained correspondence between the U.S. Attorney's Office and defendant Jeffrey
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-MarratIVIatthewman JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June 18, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Third Supplemental Privilege Log. The index has been marked with Bates Numbers P-014924 thru P-015267. The documents referenced in the Third Supplemental Privilege Log will be delivered tomorrow to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra for ex parte in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Order. Respectfully submitted, WIFREDO A. FERRER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: s/A. Marie Villafafia A. MARIE VILLAFAFIA Assistant United States Attorney Florida Bar No. 0018255 500 South Australian Ave, Suite 40
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res
STATEMENT OF FACTS
STATEMENT OF FACTS Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 offer the following statement of facts, which they are prepared to establish at any evidentiary hearing that the Court might schedule. I. Between about 2003 and 2006, defendant Jeffrey Epstein (a billionaire with significant political connections) sexually abused more than 40 minor girls at his mansion in West Palm Beach, Florida, and elsewhere. 2. In 2006, at the request of the Palm Beach Police Department, the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") opened an investigation into allegations that Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and his personal assistants had used facilities of interstate commerce to induce young girls between the ages of thirteen and seventeen to engage in prostitution, among other offenses. The case was presented to the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, which accepted the case for investigation. See Declaration of Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. at 1 (hereinafter "Edwards Declaration"
(USAFLS)"
From: • (USAFLS)" To: ' Subject: Fw: Revised Epstein Disclosure Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 15:53:26 +0000 Importance: Normal Can you take another look? This is shorter. If you are ok, I am going to send to Jeff Sloman for his review next. From: (mains° Sent: Saturdayllay_Mi 2011 11:50 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Revised Epstein Disclosure I was the line attorney assigned to the federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein into allegations of sexual misconduct with minor females. As explained by The New York Times, Mr. Epstein had been charged by a Florida grand jury with an offense that would have resulted in no prison time. "But then the United States Attorney's Office in Miami became involved. Last summer, Mr. Epstein got an ultimatum: plead guilty to a charge that would require him to register as a sex offender, or the government would charge him with sexual tourism[.]" ("Financier Starts Sentence in Prostitution Case," The New York Times, July 1, 2008.) One of the other te
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.