Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00215086DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: Ja Lefkowitz

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00215086
Pages
2
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: Ja Lefkowitz To: Subject: Re: Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 00:38:59 +0000 Importance: Normal You may want to consider simply appointing a representative. We would agree to someone you considered appropriate. I am just not sure the guardian is the right procedural vehicle. Anyway, we can keep looking into that question tonight. It won't hold things up. Ori final Message From: Sent: 09/23/2007 08:37 PM AST To: Jay Lefkowitz Subject: RE: A trustee means there is a trust that has been approved by a court and that the court has appointed a trustee. That doesn't apply here. I cannot bind the girls to a trust. If a guardian is appointed, the girls elect to use him as their attorney and they all agree that a trust is in their best interests, that is their decision, not mine. I would not be making the motion for appointment of the guardian under 17(c) anyway. Original Message From: Jay Lefkowitz [mailto Sent: Sunda Se tember 23 2007 8:35 PM To: Subject: See below - a

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Ja Lefkowitz To: Subject: Re: Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 00:38:59 +0000 Importance: Normal You may want to consider simply appointing a representative. We would agree to someone you considered appropriate. I am just not sure the guardian is the right procedural vehicle. Anyway, we can keep looking into that question tonight. It won't hold things up. Ori final Message From: Sent: 09/23/2007 08:37 PM AST To: Jay Lefkowitz Subject: RE: A trustee means there is a trust that has been approved by a court and that the court has appointed a trustee. That doesn't apply here. I cannot bind the girls to a trust. If a guardian is appointed, the girls elect to use him as their attorney and they all agree that a trust is in their best interests, that is their decision, not mine. I would not be making the motion for appointment of the guardian under 17(c) anyway. Original Message From: Jay Lefkowitz [mailto Sent: Sunda Se tember 23 2007 8:35 PM To: Subject: See below - a trustee might be more appropriate. Federal rule of civil procedure 17(c): (c) Infants or Incompetent Persons. Whenever an infant or incompetent person has a representative, such as a general guardian, committee, conservator, or other like fiduciary, the representative may sue or defend on behalf of the infant or incompetent person. An infant or incompetent person who does not have a duly appointed representative may sue by a next friend or by a guardian ad litem. The court shall appoint a guardian ad litem for an infant or incompetent person not otherwise represented in an action or shall make such other order as it deems proper for the protection of the infant or incompetent person. EFTA00215086 The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. ** ***** ******************* ********************************* The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. EFTA00215087

Related Documents (6)

House OversightEmailUnknown

The email chain between Ann Marie Villafana and Jay Lefkowitz discusses the potential charges and ag...

The email chain between Ann Marie Villafana and Jay Lefkowitz discusses the potential charges and agreements related to Mr. Epstein's case, including a plea agreement and non-prosecution agreement, and the need for factual basis to support the charges.

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: RE: Epstein

Subject: RE: Epstein Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 22:26:56 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: Signed_Plea_Agreement.pdf; Final_Addendum.pdf Here is the signed agreement and an addendum. Please note that it has a confidentiality clause. Thanks. SEMI Subject: Re: Epstein Ok thx. Would you send me your last proposed nonpros with them with the 2255 language? Sent: Wed Nov 28 16:48:48 2007 Subject: FW: Epstein This is the first that I have heard about another attempt to meet with someone in Washington. I thought I would give you a heads up. Hope all is well, Andy. EFTA00214817 Subject: Fw: Epstein Can u send Jay the proposed letter and redact the names? Thx, Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Jay Lefkowitz <[email protected]> Sent: Wed Nov 28 16:29:09 2007 Subject: Re: Epstein I received your email yesterday and was a little surprised at the tone of your letter, given the fact that we spoke last week and had what I thought was a prod

4p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01729176

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00013619

0p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

DOJ fax cover sheet referencing Jeffrey Epstein sent to former White House counsel Jay Lefkowitz (Nov 5, 2007)

The document is a routine fax cover sheet containing no substantive allegations, details, or transactions. It merely indicates that privileged material concerning Jeffrey Epstein was transmitted to Ja Date and sender: U.S. Attorney's Office, Southern District of Florida, Nov 5, 2007 Recipient: Jay Lefkowitz, former White House counsel Subject line explicitly mentions Jeffrey Epstein

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Prosecutors allegedly colluded with Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyers to downplay federal charges and secure a lenient plea

The passage alleges that senior U.S. attorneys and a federal prosecutor (Andrew Acosta, Paul Villafafia) worked with Epstein’s legal team to limit federal prosecution, manipulate venue, and keep victi Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Lourie attempted to strike references to a defendant’s prior sexual c U.S. Attorney Paul Villafafia negotiated with Epstein’s lawyers while an FBI investigation was act

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.