Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00215188DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: "Barry Krischer"

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00215188
Pages
2
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: "Barry Krischer" To: "Lanna Belohlavek" , Subject: RE: Meeting with Epstein's attorneys Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 19:37:17 +0000 Importance: Normal .1(1.1SAFLS1)" If not Monday, Tuesday is doable, buy like Lanna Wednesday is optimal. From: Lanna Belohlavek Sent: Wed 9/19/2007 8:31 PM To: Barry Krischer; (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Meeting with Epstein's attorneys I really think I need to be there but I am teaching a seminar for the Children's Services Council on Monday morning. Wednesday is optimal for me. Lanna From: Barry Krischer Sent: Wed 9/19/2007 2:19 PM To: . (USAFLS); Lanna Belohlavek Subject: RE: Meeting with Epstein's attorneys Lanna if you can make a mtg at US Atty ofc Monday at 9, I should make it there by 10 after CJC mtg, that would be helpful to all. From: (USAFLS) [mailto: Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 2:16 PM To: Barry Krischer Subject: RE: Meeting with Epstein's attorneys Thanks. Do you want Lanna to be there, too? Maybe she could come at

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "Barry Krischer" To: "Lanna Belohlavek" , Subject: RE: Meeting with Epstein's attorneys Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 19:37:17 +0000 Importance: Normal .1(1.1SAFLS1)" If not Monday, Tuesday is doable, buy like Lanna Wednesday is optimal. From: Lanna Belohlavek Sent: Wed 9/19/2007 8:31 PM To: Barry Krischer; (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Meeting with Epstein's attorneys I really think I need to be there but I am teaching a seminar for the Children's Services Council on Monday morning. Wednesday is optimal for me. Lanna From: Barry Krischer Sent: Wed 9/19/2007 2:19 PM To: . (USAFLS); Lanna Belohlavek Subject: RE: Meeting with Epstein's attorneys Lanna if you can make a mtg at US Atty ofc Monday at 9, I should make it there by 10 after CJC mtg, that would be helpful to all. From: (USAFLS) [mailto: Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 2:16 PM To: Barry Krischer Subject: RE: Meeting with Epstein's attorneys Thanks. Do you want Lanna to be there, too? Maybe she could come at 9:00 in case any issues arise? I want to avoid having them try to play us off each other. Mom From: Barry Krischer [mailto Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 1:42 PM To: . (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Meeting with Epstein's attorneys Good luck... From: (USAFLS) [mailto: Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 1:28 PM To: Barry Krischer Subject: RE: Meeting with Epstein's attorneys EFTA00215188 Hi Barry — Great. I will set it up for here, and try to get them started a little earlier so we will only have to finishing touches when you arrive. They are already trying to drag this into Tuesday, so I need to keep their feet to the fire. Assistant U.S. Attorney From: Barry Krischer [mailto: Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 12:55 PM To: . (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Meeting with Epstein's attorneys I I have a CJC meeting so any time after 10 a.m. is fine. As to location I'll defer to the will of the group. Your shop is fine with me. From: (USAFLS) [mallto Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 12:35 PM To: Barry Krischer Subject: RE: Meeting with Epstein's attorneys Hi Barry — Monday works for them, too. What time do you want to get together? And do you prefer your offices or ours? Thanks. Assistant U.S. Attorney From: Barry Krischer [mallto: Sent: Wednesda Se tember 19, 2007 11:40 AM To: USAFLS • Lanna Belohlavek; Cc: Lanna Belohlavek Subject: RE: Meeting with Epstein's attorneys (USAFLS) I am out of the county tomorrow chairing a child abuse committee for Sec. Butteiworth. Next Monday is better. From: (USAFLS) [mailto Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 11:17 AM To: Barry Krischer; Lanna Belohlavek; Subject: Meeting with Epstein's attorneys Importance: High (USAFLS) Hi all — Just received an e-mail from Jay Lefkowitz agreeing that a joint meeting is needed to finalize all of the agreements. Are all of you available tomorrow (Thursday)? If not, how does very early on Monday sound? Thank you. Assistant U.S. Attorney EFTA00215189

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08•cv-80736•KAM Document 190 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2013 Page 1 of 3

Case 9:08•cv-80736•KAM Document 190 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2013 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE NI and JANE DOE #2, petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, respondent. FILED by D.C. JUN 1 8 2013 STEVEN M LARIMORE CLERK U S DIST. CT S 0 of FLA - W PB OMNIBUS ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the court on various motions. Upon consideration, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: I. The petitioners' protective motion seeking recognition of the availability of various remedies attaching to the CVRA violations alleged in this proceeding [DE 128] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to renew the request for any particular form of relief or remedy in connection with the court's fmal disposition of petitioners' CVRA petition on the merits. 2. The intervenors' motion to strike the petitioners' supplemental authority regarding privilege claims [DE 177] is DENIED AS MOOT. 3. The petitioners' sealed motion for the co

51p
DOJ Data Set 7CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00009229

0p
Dept. of JusticeFeb 21, 2019

Epstein

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. _____________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's

33p
Dept. of JusticeFeb 21, 2019

Read the judge's ruling

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. _____________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's

33p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Epstein Investigation Files Reveal Potential High‑Level Collusion, Suppressed Evidence, and Questionable Plea Deal

The document contains multiple concrete leads that, if verified, tie a roster of powerful individuals—including Prince Andrew, Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Henry Kissinger, Ted Kennedy, and others—to J Alfredo Rodriguez possessed a bound notebook containing names, addresses, and phone numbers of dozen Rodriguez attempted to sell this notebook to an undercover FBI operative for $50,000, indicating p

63p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.