From: "Barry Krischer"
Summary
From: "Barry Krischer" To: XUSAFLS1)" tpi sa15.state.fl. us> Subject: RE: Meeting with Epstein's attorneys Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:19:17 +0000 Importance: Normal if you can make a mtg at US Atty ofc Monday at 9, I should make it there by 10 after CJC mtg, that would be helpful to all. From: (USAFLS) [mailtc Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 2:16 PM To: Barry Krischer Subject: RE: Meeting with Epstein's attorneys Thanks. Do you want to be there, too? Maybe she could come at 9:00 in case any issues arise? I want to avoid having them try to play us off each other. Assistant U.S. Attorney From: Barry Krischer [mallto Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 1:42 PM To: .(USAFLS) Subject: RE: Meeting with Epstein's attorneys Good luck... From: (USAFLS) [mailto: Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 1:28 PM To: Barry Krischer Subject: RE: Meeting with Epstein's attorneys Hi Barry — Great. I will set it up for here, and try to get them started a little earlier so w
Persons Referenced (3)
“...Krischer" To: XUSAFLS1)" tpi sa15.state.fl. us> Subject: RE: Meeting with Epstein's attorneys Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:19:17 +0000 Importance: Normal if you can make a mtg at US Atty ofc Mon...”
U.S. Attorney“...s arise? I want to avoid having them try to play us off each other. Assistant U.S. Attorney From: Barry Krischer [mallto Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 1:42 PM To: .(USAFLS) Subject: RE: M...”
Barry Krischer“...From: "Barry Krischer" To: XUSAFLS1)" tpi sa15.state.fl. us> Subject: RE: Meeting with Epstein's attorneys Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:19:17 +0000 Importance: Normal if you can make a mtg at US...”
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
Epstein
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. _____________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's
ROY BLACK
ROY BLACK HOWARD M. SREBNICK SaYIT A. KORNSPAN LARRY A. STUMPY? MARIA NEYRA JACKIE PERCZEK MARK A.J.lAPIRO JARED BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN STUMPF P.A. May 18, 2010 VIA EMAIL AND U.S. MAIL Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Avenue Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 RE: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Counsel: JESSICA FONSECA-NADER KATHLEEN P. PHILLIPS AARON ANTHON MARCOS BEATON, JR. JENIPER J. SOULUCIAS NOAH FOX JOSHUA SHORE E-Mail: RBlack(lfioyBlack.com Jeff Sloman, Esq. United States Attorney 99 N.E. 4th Street Miami, FL 33132 Assistant United States Attorney 99 N.E. 4th Street Miami, FL 33132 We received notice this morning that Podhurst Orseck, P.A. has filed a civil complaint seeking over $2,000,000 in addition to the $526,000 they have already been paid by Jeffrey Epstein for their work as attorney representatives. As we communicated to you during our February 3, 2010
savE frtofN tiuQSUAL
savE frtofN tiuQSUAL EFTA00183935 THE PALM BEACH POST - MONDAY, NNE IS, 2009 The Palm Beach Post ALEX TAYLOR, Publisher TIM BURKE, Executive Editor RANDY SCHULTZ, Editor of the Editorial Page Unseal the Epstein deal A rich, middle-aged Palm Reacher who preyed on girls almost 40 years younger already has received too many breaks from the system. He doesn't deserve another. In July 2008, at the age of 55 and after paying the equiva- lent of a small countryb gross domestic product in legal fees, Jeffrey Epstein escaped federal charges and pleaded guilty in state court to a pair of charges related to his luring five girls — ages 14 to 17 -- to his house. The girls undressed and massaged him in return for $200 to $300. He's serving only 18 months in the. Palm Beach County Jail, and heb serving only nights. And now he wants just one more favor. When Epstein entered his state plea, the terms of his federal deal were sealed from the public. That violated norma
(USAFLS)
(USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednes December 19. 2007 4 03 PM To: (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: our questions I didn't see any reference to an immediate decision, but the only December 17'" letter that I have is one d both by Jay and by Ken Star. If there is another letter, can you ask Annette to scan and e-mail it? The December 17th letter that I have does contain a repetition of their allegation that someone in our office referred to the State Attorney's Office as "a joke." This is something that someone from the defense rou acilldberger) told Barry Krischer that we had said. During the meeting between I, had to spend several minutes convincing Barry that it had never been said. e t en to e defense group (Goldberger, Lefcourt, and Lefkowitz) that it had never been said, and they then denied that they had made such a statement to Barry. Since this is going up to DOJ, you may want to reiterate that we never have made such a statement. You also may want to remi
Read the judge's ruling
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. _____________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's
Case 9:08•cv-80736•KAM Document 190 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2013 Page 1 of 3
Case 9:08•cv-80736•KAM Document 190 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2013 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE NI and JANE DOE #2, petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, respondent. FILED by D.C. JUN 1 8 2013 STEVEN M LARIMORE CLERK U S DIST. CT S 0 of FLA - W PB OMNIBUS ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the court on various motions. Upon consideration, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: I. The petitioners' protective motion seeking recognition of the availability of various remedies attaching to the CVRA violations alleged in this proceeding [DE 128] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to renew the request for any particular form of relief or remedy in connection with the court's fmal disposition of petitioners' CVRA petition on the merits. 2. The intervenors' motion to strike the petitioners' supplemental authority regarding privilege claims [DE 177] is DENIED AS MOOT. 3. The petitioners' sealed motion for the co
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.