Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00215270DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: Ja Lefkowitz

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00215270
Pages
2
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: Ja Lefkowitz To: Subject: RE: Draft Agreements? Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:09:03 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: Agreement_updated.doc.rtf Confidential -- For Settlement purposes only. - Please look this over and let's see if we can identify any issues that we need to discuss in greater detail. Since you can't go to only one count of obstruction, but 18 would become about 15 with gain time, I have made a proposal of a total 24 month sentence based on two informations. This would include a period of home detention. We can then follow this with a state lea as well so he serves the additional time there. I need to see your language for proffers on the two charges - (taking out of the jurisdiction to avoid process.) Alternatively, at this stage, we could have just one count for 12 months and then 6 months incarceration under the state, followed by community control and probabtion. I am not sure which is more practicable. Please let me know when you are free to spea

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Ja Lefkowitz To: Subject: RE: Draft Agreements? Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:09:03 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: Agreement_updated.doc.rtf Confidential -- For Settlement purposes only. - Please look this over and let's see if we can identify any issues that we need to discuss in greater detail. Since you can't go to only one count of obstruction, but 18 would become about 15 with gain time, I have made a proposal of a total 24 month sentence based on two informations. This would include a period of home detention. We can then follow this with a state lea as well so he serves the additional time there. I need to see your language for proffers on the two charges - (taking out of the jurisdiction to avoid process.) Alternatively, at this stage, we could have just one count for 12 months and then 6 months incarceration under the state, followed by community control and probabtion. I am not sure which is more practicable. Please let me know when you are free to speak. Thanks -- Jay 09118:2007 09:14 MI To "Jay Letkowite cc Subject RE: Draft Agreements? Hi Jay - I know that the U.S. Attorney will not go below 18 months of prison/jail time (and I would strongly oppose the suggestion). From: Jay Lefkowitz Sent: Tuesda Se tember 18 2007 8:59 AM To: Subject: Re: Draft Agreements? an alternative to what we discussed just now might be to plead to one count of 1512, serve 12 months plus supervised release which would be one year of home detention (if we can make that work), followed by two years of probation in the state on the EFTA00215270 state charges with the first 6 months being community control. 09/18/2007 08:44 AM To 'Jay Lefkowitf CLefkowazialtirkland.com> cc Subject Draft Agreements? Hi Jay — I was hoping there would be things for me to read this morning, but I will try to remain patient. I believe there are only two types of agreements that would apply to this case: (1) a plea agreement to a federal charge or charges; and (2) a non-prosecution agreement (which is really a deferred prosecution agreement because the defendant agrees that if he violates the agreement, the U.S. can prosecute him). A plea agreement is part of the court file. It is not accessible on-line via PACER, but someone can go to the Clerk's Office to obtain a copy. A non-prosecution agreement would not be made public or filed with the Court, but it would remain part of our case file. It probably would be subject to a FOIA request, but it is not something that we would distribute without compulsory process. On the obstruction charges, many of the fa in that first proffer were hypothesized based upon our discussions and the agents' observations of We will need to interview her to confirm the accuracy of a second count, we could rely on the incident where Mr. Epstein's private investigators followed forcing him off the road. Or, if there is something more recent related to any grand jury subpoenas, we could consider that. Hope that helps. Assistant U.S. Attorney West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00215271

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: Jay Lefkowitz

From: Jay Lefkowitz To: Subject: RE: Draft Agreements? Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:17:43 +0000 Importance: Normal i hear you, and understand your position. But it's really only a 90 day difference, if he gets gain time. That said, let me know if you think your suggestion can work. I will study it too. 09/1812007 09:14 AM To "Jay Lefkowitz" cc Subject RE: Draft Agreements? Hi Jay — I know that the U.S. Attorney will not go below 18 months of prison/jail time (and I would strongly oppose the suggestion). From: Jay Le&owitz [mailto: Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 8:59 AM To: Subject: Re: Draft Agreements? an alternative to what we discussed just now might be to plead to one count of 1512, serve 12 months plus supervised release which would be one year of home detention (if we can make that work), followed by two years of probation in the state on the state charges with the first 6 months being community control. 09!18:2007 08:44 MI To *Jay Lefkowde cc Subject Draft

2p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Prosecutors Discussed Concealing Full Scope of Jeffrey Epstein’s Crimes and Granting Immunity in Exchange for Plea Deal

The passage reveals internal communications showing U.S. attorneys deliberately limited disclosure of Epstein’s extensive sex‑trafficking conduct, negotiated with his lawyers, and arranged federal imm Emails show Villafafia and Acosta discussed charging Epstein in Miami rather than Palm Beach to redu Prosecutors agreed to keep victims uninformed of a settlement until after sentencing, violating vi

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Prosecutors allegedly colluded with Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyers to downplay federal charges and secure a lenient plea

The passage alleges that senior U.S. attorneys and a federal prosecutor (Andrew Acosta, Paul Villafafia) worked with Epstein’s legal team to limit federal prosecution, manipulate venue, and keep victi Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Lourie attempted to strike references to a defendant’s prior sexual c U.S. Attorney Paul Villafafia negotiated with Epstein’s lawyers while an FBI investigation was act

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Rol Slack lir „kite'

Rol Slack lir „kite' 2/949 Arcrwite a." 2434 7 Antai, Liu) 3 cut, , 4,/e EFTA00183732 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP AND AfilL/ArtO PART/H.3We; ' Cntercup Cantor 163 East 53'd Street New York, New York 10022-4611 WNW rwerA.COM September 2, 2008 VIA FACSIMILE (56D 820-8777 United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re:Jeffrey Bpstein Dear • Facsimile: In response to your letter dated August 26, 2008, I am confirming that Mr. Goldberger should continue to be listed as the contact pawn in the' mended victim notification letters and should receive the carbon copies of thoso letters as they are sent. • Also, we plan on speaking to Mr. Josofsberg this week to discuss a procedure for paying his fees. We intend to comply fully with the agreement and Mr. Epstein will pay Mr. Josfsberg's usual and customary hourly rates for his work pursuant to the agreement facilitating settlements unde

136p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019

From: Cc: Bcc Subject: SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019 Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 21:12:37 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 2019_7-9.pdf SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019 EFTA00076625 Contents Public Corruption Epstein Complex Frauds lure Terrorism & Narcotics Wise Honest Matters of Interest Trump Can't Block Twitter Followers US Appeals Court Rules Judicial Review of Claims of Government Misconduct in Parallel Investigations Barr Says Legal Path to Census Citizenship Question Exists but He Gives No Details Public Corruption Epstein Who Protected Jeffrey Epstein? New York Times By The Editorial Board 7/8/19 On Monday, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York unsealed a 14-page indictment against Jeffrey Epstein, charging the wealthy financier with operating and conspiring to operate a sex trafficking ring of girls out of his luxe homes on Manhattan's Upper East Side and in Palm Beach, Fla., "among other locations."

32p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 99

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 99 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/2672011 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOES #1 AND #2, Plaintiffs, vs. UNITED STATES, Defendant. / ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiffs' Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (DEs 48, 52), Plaintiffs' Motion to Have Their Facts Accepted Because of the Government's Failure to Contest Any of the Facts (DE 49), Plaintiffs' Motion for Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence (DE 50), and Bruce E. Reinhart's Motion to Intervene or in the Alternative for a Sua Sponte Rule 11 Order (DE 79).1 All motions are fully briefed and ripe for review, and the Court has heard oral arguments on all motions. The Court has carefully considered the briefing and the parties' arguments and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court is awaiting supplemental brie

14p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.