Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00215301DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: Jay Lefkowitz

From: Jay Lefkowitz To: Subject: Re: Follow up Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:04:17 +0000 Importance: Normal Thx. I am available late this pm, or over the weekend to speak. Orginal Message From: Sent: 09/14/2007 09:55 AM AST To: Jay Lefkowitz Subject: RE: Follow up Sony, Jay. I just got this and have to run off to the hospital. I will revise and re-email you tomorrow or late tonight. Original Message From: Jay Lefkowitz [mailto Subject: Follow up Confidential thanks very much for speaking this am. Have conferred with my client and I think we are on the same page. When you send me your draft today, would you please also include a paragraph with 403 in lieu of 1512. I want to understand better how you would characterize the 403 violation. (What was actually said?). I want to keep studying that avenue today as well. The other possible option is to charge three 113s. Also, one other idea. Can you look at 47 use 227(b), which is another 6 month statute which might

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00215301
Pages
2
Persons
1
Integrity

Summary

From: Jay Lefkowitz To: Subject: Re: Follow up Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:04:17 +0000 Importance: Normal Thx. I am available late this pm, or over the weekend to speak. Orginal Message From: Sent: 09/14/2007 09:55 AM AST To: Jay Lefkowitz Subject: RE: Follow up Sony, Jay. I just got this and have to run off to the hospital. I will revise and re-email you tomorrow or late tonight. Original Message From: Jay Lefkowitz [mailto Subject: Follow up Confidential thanks very much for speaking this am. Have conferred with my client and I think we are on the same page. When you send me your draft today, would you please also include a paragraph with 403 in lieu of 1512. I want to understand better how you would characterize the 403 violation. (What was actually said?). I want to keep studying that avenue today as well. The other possible option is to charge three 113s. Also, one other idea. Can you look at 47 use 227(b), which is another 6 month statute which might

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Jay Lefkowitz To: Subject: Re: Follow up Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:04:17 +0000 Importance: Normal Thx. I am available late this pm, or over the weekend to speak. Orginal Message From: Sent: 09/14/2007 09:55 AM AST To: Jay Lefkowitz Subject: RE: Follow up Sony, Jay. I just got this and have to run off to the hospital. I will revise and re-email you tomorrow or late tonight. Original Message From: Jay Lefkowitz [mailto Subject: Follow up Confidential thanks very much for speaking this am. Have conferred with my client and I think we are on the same page. When you send me your draft today, would you please also include a paragraph with 403 in lieu of 1512. I want to understand better how you would characterize the 403 violation. (What was actually said?). I want to keep studying that avenue today as well. The other possible option is to charge three 113s. Also, one other idea. Can you look at 47 use 227(b), which is another 6 month statute which might work for the 6 months. We could do three of them, and they seem to fit the facts well. EFTA00215301 I will call you late this pm (if you leave me a number to reach you), and then we can plan on getting this done Monday. The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. EFTA00215302

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Related Documents (6)

House OversightEmailUnknown

The email chain between Ann Marie Villafana and Jay Lefkowitz discusses the potential charges and ag...

The email chain between Ann Marie Villafana and Jay Lefkowitz discusses the potential charges and agreements related to Mr. Epstein's case, including a plea agreement and non-prosecution agreement, and the need for factual basis to support the charges.

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: jeffrey epstein

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: RE: Epstein

Subject: RE: Epstein Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 22:26:56 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: Signed_Plea_Agreement.pdf; Final_Addendum.pdf Here is the signed agreement and an addendum. Please note that it has a confidentiality clause. Thanks. SEMI Subject: Re: Epstein Ok thx. Would you send me your last proposed nonpros with them with the 2255 language? Sent: Wed Nov 28 16:48:48 2007 Subject: FW: Epstein This is the first that I have heard about another attempt to meet with someone in Washington. I thought I would give you a heads up. Hope all is well, Andy. EFTA00214817 Subject: Fw: Epstein Can u send Jay the proposed letter and redact the names? Thx, Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Jay Lefkowitz <[email protected]> Sent: Wed Nov 28 16:29:09 2007 Subject: Re: Epstein I received your email yesterday and was a little surprised at the tone of your letter, given the fact that we spoke last week and had what I thought was a prod

4p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01729176

0p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Prosecutors allegedly colluded with Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyers to downplay federal charges and secure a lenient plea

The passage alleges that senior U.S. attorneys and a federal prosecutor (Andrew Acosta, Paul Villafafia) worked with Epstein’s legal team to limit federal prosecution, manipulate venue, and keep victi Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Lourie attempted to strike references to a defendant’s prior sexual c U.S. Attorney Paul Villafafia negotiated with Epstein’s lawyers while an FBI investigation was act

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.