Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00215332DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: "

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00215332
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: " . (USAFLS)" </O=USA/OU=FLS/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN To: "Slom an, Jeff (USAFLS)" (USAFLS)" " (USAFLS)" < Cc: " (USAFLS)" ‹ > Bcc: (USAFLS)" < Subject: LEAP YEAR -- URGENT Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:45:01 +0000 Importance: High Hi all — I just got off the phone with She received another call from the Vanity Fair writer. He was calling to ask her to confirm info that he got from his source — namely, that "the government is meeting with Epstein on September 7th to discuss a plea to a lewd and lascivious conduct charge." responded that she wouldn't confirm anything because she was so angry that he had told Ken Starr that the FBI was the source of the information about Starr. The reporter responded that he absolutely did not tell anyone that the FBI was the source of the info because the FBI was not the source of the info. He also said that all he did was call Ken Starr's office for a comment, and Starr refused to speak with him. Based upon this, it sounds like the sourc

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: " . (USAFLS)" </O=USA/OU=FLS/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN To: "Slom an, Jeff (USAFLS)" (USAFLS)" " (USAFLS)" < Cc: " (USAFLS)" ‹ > Bcc: (USAFLS)" < Subject: LEAP YEAR -- URGENT Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:45:01 +0000 Importance: High Hi all — I just got off the phone with She received another call from the Vanity Fair writer. He was calling to ask her to confirm info that he got from his source — namely, that "the government is meeting with Epstein on September 7th to discuss a plea to a lewd and lascivious conduct charge." responded that she wouldn't confirm anything because she was so angry that he had told Ken Starr that the FBI was the source of the information about Starr. The reporter responded that he absolutely did not tell anyone that the FBI was the source of the info because the FBI was not the source of the info. He also said that all he did was call Ken Starr's office for a comment, and Starr refused to speak with him. Based upon this, it sounds like the source is closely affiliated with Epstein. I would venture to guess that it is one of the pilots, but it could even be one of the attorneys. The writer also says that he intends to publish his article by next Wednesday — two days before our meeting. Assistant U.S. Attorney EFTA00215332

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02616307

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Rol Slack lir „kite'

Rol Slack lir „kite' 2/949 Arcrwite a." 2434 7 Antai, Liu) 3 cut, , 4,/e EFTA00183732 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP AND AfilL/ArtO PART/H.3We; ' Cntercup Cantor 163 East 53'd Street New York, New York 10022-4611 WNW rwerA.COM September 2, 2008 VIA FACSIMILE (56D 820-8777 United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re:Jeffrey Bpstein Dear • Facsimile: In response to your letter dated August 26, 2008, I am confirming that Mr. Goldberger should continue to be listed as the contact pawn in the' mended victim notification letters and should receive the carbon copies of thoso letters as they are sent. • Also, we plan on speaking to Mr. Josofsberg this week to discuss a procedure for paying his fees. We intend to comply fully with the agreement and Mr. Epstein will pay Mr. Josfsberg's usual and customary hourly rates for his work pursuant to the agreement facilitating settlements unde

136p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01812018

3p
OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01814412

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.