From: "
Summary
From: " )" c/O=USA/OUrFLS/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN. To: ' Cc: " Bcc: Subject: Letter from counsel for Jane Does Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:13:26 +0000 Importance: Normal >, "Acosta, Alex (USAFLS)" Hi — I just received a letter from Brad Edwards. counsel for the two Jane Does. It is extremely problematic, and I thought we should discuss with Eir and Alex. Do you want me to scan it in, or have you received it (you are listed as a cc)? He mentions that he now has co-counsel — Jay Howell in Jacksonville (I think this person called Alex or the Justice Department a few weeks ago) and Professor Paul Cassell in Salt Lake City. Let me know how you want to proceed. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone EFTA00215420
Persons Referenced (4)
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
Virginia Roberts v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation
The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded
Subject: FW: Pending Discovery Requests - narrowing request to 4 RFPs - further request to meet
J CR Subject: FW: Pending Discovery Requests - narrowing request to 4 RFPs - further request to meet Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 20:37:44 +0000 Importance: Normal Embedded: RE:_Pending_Discovery_Requests_-_narrowed,_amended_discovery_request In light of the government's withdrawal of the Wellcare argument, petitioners withdrew the December 2 and December 29, 2015 requests for admissions. As to the two requests for production served on those same dates, petitioners withdrew the RFP's, and consolidated them into a single amended supplemental request for production, which seeks four (4) categories of documents. This is the email where Cassell withdrew the requests for admissions. I am attaching the previous email, which contains the amended supplemental request. From: Paul Cassell (mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, January 29, 20161:11 PM Subject: RE: Pending Discovery Requests - narrowing request to 4 RFPs - further request to meet Thank you for working on these discov
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res
Alfredo Rodriguez’s stolen “golden nugget” – a bound book linking Jeffrey Epstein to dozens of world leaders and billionaires
The passage describes a former Epstein employee, Alfredo Rodriguez, who allegedly stole a bound book containing the names, addresses and phone numbers of high‑profile individuals (e.g., Henry Kissinge Rodriguez claims the book lists names, addresses and phone numbers of dozens of influential individu He tried to sell the book to an undercover FBI agent for $50,000, indicating awareness of its valu
Subjec
Fr • < > Subjec :Deliberative t Process ec aratton rom am Justice - equest or wo ee xtension Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 17:59:47 +0000 Importance: Normal We have no objection, provided we get the following accommodation, which you already anticipated. We would request that your motion for extension of time give us an extension on our reply document, such that our reply would be due 10 days after the main Justice Department declaration that will be coming in two weeks. If you would include such language as well in any proposed order, saving us (and the court) drafting time, that would be very much appreciated. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G Cassell CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message along with any/all attachments is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message
From: '
From: ' (USAFLS)" To: (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: CVRA case Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 20:49:04 +0000 Importance: Normal I agree with your statement. I thought that you had framed our initial response to their complaint in terms of "mootness," but your response has reminded me that you didn't say it was moot, just that the Court had no authority to set aside the non-prosecution agreement. I will watch CM/ECF while you are at the NAC. Assistant U.S. Attorne Fax From: (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 4:46 PM To: . (USAFLS) Subject: RE: CVRA case A moot case is one where there is no longer any dispute for which the court can grant relief. If their previous conduct is any indication, plaintiffs will probably assert that the CVRA obligated the government to consult with them prior to entering into the non-prosecution agreement. They seem to be resigned to the fact that the court cannot or will not set aside the non-prosecution agreement, since the relief plaintiffs
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.