Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00215570DOJ Data Set 9Other

July 9, 2008

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00215570
Pages
2
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

July 9, 2008 Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorn 's Office SENT VIA E-MAIL & FACSIMILE 'JOSEPH R.ATTERBURY t JACK A GOLDBERGER JASON S.WEISS "Board Certified Criminal Trial Attorney I. Member of New Jersey & Florida Bars Re: Jeffrey E. Epstein Dear Ms. 1=: Thank you for your letter to me dated July 8, 2008 and the draft document dated, e-mailed and faxed to me at my office on June 30, 2008, styled "Notification of Identified Victims." I would like to address a few related issues. First, please note that we have several requests concerning any such notification. Specifically, we request that: (a) Any notification be sent to any individual by mail (or served upon their attorney, to the extent known), and we respectfully object to any service by hand, a method of service which carries the concomitant risk of conversations regarding the notification that potentially would place the federal authorities in a position of being advocates for civil litigat

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
July 9, 2008 Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorn 's Office SENT VIA E-MAIL & FACSIMILE 'JOSEPH R.ATTERBURY t JACK A GOLDBERGER JASON S.WEISS "Board Certified Criminal Trial Attorney I. Member of New Jersey & Florida Bars Re: Jeffrey E. Epstein Dear Ms. 1=: Thank you for your letter to me dated July 8, 2008 and the draft document dated, e-mailed and faxed to me at my office on June 30, 2008, styled "Notification of Identified Victims." I would like to address a few related issues. First, please note that we have several requests concerning any such notification. Specifically, we request that: (a) Any notification be sent to any individual by mail (or served upon their attorney, to the extent known), and we respectfully object to any service by hand, a method of service which carries the concomitant risk of conversations regarding the notification that potentially would place the federal authorities in a position of being advocates for civil litigation; (b) Any notification be effectuated by a separate mailing to each individual without the inclusion of any language that appeared on the second page of your June 30, 2008 memorandum; i.e. rather than including in each notification a large section listing "identified individuals" with redactions other than the name of the recipient (which we contend would be a clear and impermissible signal to any individual that the notification is a broad notification to numerous other alleged victims). Rather, a simple one page notification directed only to the recipient, and limited to the information currently on the first page of your draft memorandum would suffice. EFTA00215570 (c) You eliminate from any notification any language that is currently contained in the "acknowledgment" section of the June 30, 2008 memorandum; and (d) You supplement the notification with the Government's previously made representation that it is not vouching for the veracity of any claim by any identified individual. See Letter from o E. Davis (10/25/07). Second, please note also that we do not understand your request that Mr. Epstein and his attorneys execute the rider / acknowledgment contained within your June 30 hand-delivered draft. Specifically, we do not believe that the Non-Prosecution Agreement requires Mr. Epstein's execution of any such additional stipulation. Because we want to ensure that Mr. Epstein continues to strictly comply with the letter of the parties' agreement, we respectfully ask that you explain why you believe that the Non-Prosecution Agreement requires execution of your stipulation. Our understanding of the Non-Prosecution Agreement is that it does not require Mr. Epstein to "acknowledge" anything not already contained within the four corners of the written agreement. The agreement certainly contains no written term obligating that he "waive any evidentiary challenge to the introduction of a copy" of any "Notification of Identified Victims" in "any judicial proceeding between any identified individual" and Mr. Epstein, as your memorandum currently requests. Further, please note that your June 30 stipulation, as drafted, is not limited to Section 2255 proceedings. Rather, your June 30 draft requires Mr. Epstein to waive evidentiary challenges in "any judicial proceeding" - - which clearly exceeds the bounds of the parties' written agreement. Third, I would respectfully request that you provide me with the names of the "pro bono lawyers" who, you indicated to me at our June 30 meeting at my office, were intending to represent certain persons identified on your June 30 draft notification, as well as any knowledge that the Government has as to how they were selected, and what communications the Government has had with them to date. Finally, please know that it is Mr. Epstein's firm intent to fulfill strictly each term and condition of his Non-Prosecution Agreement with the Government. Nothing in this letter should be construed, however, as waiving any defense that may be available to Mr. Epstein under the parties' written agreement. I look forward to your response. Until then, I remain, V trul yours, Jai. A. Goldberger cc: Jeffrey Epstein EFTA00215571

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

VIA FACSIMILE AND ELECTRONIC MAIL

VIA FACSIMILE AND ELECTRONIC MAIL Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Roy Black, Esq. Black Srebnick Kornspan & Stumpf P.A. Re: Jeffrey Epstein U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida June 27, 2008 Dear Messrs. Goldberger and Black: Thank you for providing me with the proposed plea agreement between Mr. Epstein and the State Attorney's Office. The U.S. Attorney's Office hereby provides Notice that the proposed sentencing provision does not comply with the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. The second sentencing paragraph of the proposed plea agreement reads: On 08CF00938 1 AMB, the Defendant is sentenced to 18 months Community Control I (one). As a special condition of this Community Control the Defendant must serve the first 6 months in the Palm Beach County Detention Facility ... The Non-Prosecution Agreement specifically provides: Epstein shall be sentenced to consecutive terms of twelve (12) mo

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 iVest Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 820-8711 Facsimile: (561) 820.8777 June 27, 2008 VIA FACSIMILE Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. One Clearlake Centre, Suite 1400 250 Australian Ave S. West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5015 Roy Black, Esq. Black Srebnick Kornspan & Stumpf P.A. 201 S. Biscayne Blvd, Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33131 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Messrs. Goldberger and Black: I write to follow up on my e-mail correspondence of June 24 and June 26, and my message this morning. As of 3:15 p.m., Friday, June 27, 2008, the Office still has not received a copy of a proposed plea agreement between Mr. Epstein and the State Attorney's Office, nor has the Office received notice of a date and time for a change of plea. As you know, the Non-Prosecution Agreement between Mr. Epstein and the Office called for Mr. Epstein to plead, be se

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Rol Slack lir „kite'

Rol Slack lir „kite' 2/949 Arcrwite a." 2434 7 Antai, Liu) 3 cut, , 4,/e EFTA00183732 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP AND AfilL/ArtO PART/H.3We; ' Cntercup Cantor 163 East 53'd Street New York, New York 10022-4611 WNW rwerA.COM September 2, 2008 VIA FACSIMILE (56D 820-8777 United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re:Jeffrey Bpstein Dear • Facsimile: In response to your letter dated August 26, 2008, I am confirming that Mr. Goldberger should continue to be listed as the contact pawn in the' mended victim notification letters and should receive the carbon copies of thoso letters as they are sent. • Also, we plan on speaking to Mr. Josofsberg this week to discuss a procedure for paying his fees. We intend to comply fully with the agreement and Mr. Epstein will pay Mr. Josfsberg's usual and customary hourly rates for his work pursuant to the agreement facilitating settlements unde

136p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida West Palm Beach, FL 33401 July 10, 2008 VIA FACSIMIIJi Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Attcrbu Goldber er & Weiss P.A. Re: IsfratEasigin Dear Mr. Goldberger: In response to your letter of today's date, copies of the victim notifications arc being mailed to you on a rolling basis. For those victims who have counsel, the attorneys' contact information will be included. As you will see, the letter makes clear that neither the U.S. Attorney's Office nor the Federal Bureau of Investigation can take part in or otherwise assist in civil litigation. The Office feels that is a sufficient statement of its position and we will not include the language that you have requested. Also, a final list of victims has been sent to you today via Certified Mail. That list is identical to the draft provided to you on June 30th, except that it also includes the full name of the minor victim. cc: AUSA Sincerely, R.

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 214

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 214 Entered on F LSD Docket 09/02/2010 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FT. LAUDERDALE DIVISION Case No. 08-CIV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND OBJECTION TO DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS WITH INTEGRATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to a Joint Stipulation Regarding Certain Documentation files this his Motion for Protective Order and Objection to Disclosure of Certain Correspondence and Discovery for the reasons set forth below: I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT During the underlying litigation, Epstein vigorously sought protection from the Court that these and other documents produced would be used for purposes other than those contemplated by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for discovery; i.e., dissemination in the

10p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

MARTIN G. WEINBERG, P.C.

MARTIN G. WEINBERG, P.C. ATTORNEY AT MW 20 PARK PLAZA, SUITE 1000 ROSTON, MASSACUUSEITS 02116 FAX NIGHT EAIERGRNCV: Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms. July 22, 2011 Roy Black forwarded to me your letter to him dated July 21, 2011, from the District Attorney of the County of New York. We thank you for providing notice of the intended disclosure but we do object to any disclosure of the Non-Prosecution Agreement and the related list of witness/victims on the basis of the confidentiality provisions of paragraph 13. Absent an enforceable subpoena - which we would have the right to move to quash in the Court from which it was issued - there exists no right or duty to disclose the confidential Non-Prosecution Agreement or the non-public witness/victim list which was referenced in paragraph 7 of the NPA. Further, given th

68p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.