Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 1:08-cv-80736-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2008 FRIT1113w1 O_to D.C.
ELECTRONIC
08-80736-Civ-MAR RA/JOHNSON
CASE NO.:
Petitioner.
JULY 7, 2008
S.D. OF FLA. • MIAMI
enc y VICTIM'S PETITION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF
CRIME VICTIM'S RIGHTS ACT, 18 U.S.0 . SECTION 3771
COMES NOW the Petitioner, JANE DOE (hereinafter "Petitioner"), by and through her
undersigned attorneys, pursuant to the Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771
("CVRA"), and files this Petition for Enforcement in the above styled action as follows:
1.
Petitioner, an adult, as a minor child was a victim of federal crimes committed by
JEFFREY EPSTEIN (hereinafter "Defendant").
These crimes included sex trafficking of
children by fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1591, use of a means of interstate commerce to
entice a minor to commit prostitution, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422, as well as wire fraud, in
violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. The Defendant committed these crimes within the jurisdiction of
the Southern District of Florida in Palm Beach County, Florida.
2.
Upon information and belief, the Defendant is the subject of a federal criminal
investigation conducted by the United States of America in the Southern District of Florida. The
Defendant has recently been prosecuted and pleaded guilty, on June 30, 2008, in the Circuit
Court for Palm Beach County to various similar state offenses including solicitation of minors
for prostitution.
3.
Upon information and belief, the Defendant is engaged in plea negotiations with
the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida concerning federal
1 o110
EFTA00215606
Case 1:08-cv-80736-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2008
Page 2 of 10
crimes which he is alleged to have committed against minor children, including the Petitioner.
Such negotiations may likely result in a disposition of the charges in the next several days.
4.
Under the CVRA, before any charges are filed against the Defendant, the
Petitioner has the rights (among others) to notice of her rights under the CVRA, to confer with
the prosecutors, and to be treated with fairness. As soon as charges are filed, the Petitioner has
the rights (among others) to timely notice of court proceedings, the right not to be excluded from
such proceedings, the right to be heard at such public proceedings regarding conditions of
release, any plea, and any sentence, the right to confer with the attorney for the government. the
right lo restitution, and the right to be treated with fairness and with respect for her dignity and
privacy.
5.
The Petitioner has been denied her rights in that she has received no consultation
with the attorney for the government regarding the possible disposition of the charges, no notice
of any public court proceedings, no information regarding her right to restitution, and no notice
of rights under the CVRA, as required under law.
6.
The Petitioner is in jeopardy of losing her rights, as described above, if the
government is able to negotiate a plea or agreement with the Defendant without her participation
:md knowledge.
WHEREFORE, for the reasons outlined above, the Petitioner respectfully requests this
Court to grant her Petition, and to order the United States Attorney to comply with the provisions
of the CVRA prior to and including any plea or other agreement with the Defendant and any
attendant proceedings.
2
20110
EFTA00215607
Case 1:08-cv-80736-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2008
Page 3 of 10
MEMORANDUM
I.
THE CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT MAKES CRIME VICTIMS
INDEPENDENT
PARTICIPANTS
THROUGHOUT
THE
In October 2004, Congress passed and the President signed into law the Crime Victims'
Rights Act, Pub. L. No. 108-405, 118 Stat. 2251 (codified at 18 U.S.C. § 3771). Because this
appears to be the first case involving the Act to come before this Court, a bit of background may
be in order.
A.
The CVRA Gives Crime Victims Rights to Participate in the Criminal Justice
Process.
Congress passed the CVRA "to give crime victims enforceable rights to participate in
federal criminal proceedings." Opinion at 14. Congress was concerned that in the federal system
crime victims were "treated as non-participants in a critical event in their lives. They were kept
in the dark by prosecutors too busy to care enough ... and by a court system that simply did not
have a place for them." 150 CONG. REC. S4262 (Apr. 22, 2004) (statement of Sen. Feinstein).
To remedy this problem, Congress gave victims "the simple right to know what is going on, to
participate in the process where the information that victims and their families can provide may
be material and relevant ... ." Id.
The CVRA gives victims of federal crimes a series of rights, including the right to notice
of court proceedings, to be heard at plea and sentencing hearings, and to reasonably "confer with
the attorney for the Government in the case." 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a). Victims also have a "right
of access to the terms of a plea agreement ... ." In re Interested Party I, 530 F.Supp. 2d 136,
2008 WL 134233 at *7 (D.D.C. 2008). The CVRA also assures victims broadly that they will
"be treated with fairness." 18 U.S.C. §3771(a)(8).
3
30110
EFTA00215608
Case 1:08-cv-80736-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2008
Page 4 of 10
Nair
Of course, these rights would be of little use to most crime victims unless they were told
about them. To ensure that victims are notified of their rights, the CVRA directs employees of
the Justice Department "and other departments and agencies of the United States engaged in the
detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime" to use their "best efforts to see that crime
victims are notified of... the rights described [in the CVRA]." 18 U.S.C. § 3771(c)(1) (emphasis
added).1
B.
The CVRA Gives Victims Rights During the Investigation of a Crime.
The CVRA gives victims rights during the investigation of a crime. The Fifth Circuit
recently reached this conclusion, holding:
The district court acknowledged that "[t]here are clearly rights
under the CVRA that apply before any prosecution is underway."
BP Prods., 2008 WL 501321 at •11, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12893,
at *36. Logically, this includes the CVRA's establishment of
victims' "reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the
Government." 18 U.S.C. & 3771(a)(5). At least in the posture of
this case (and we do not speculate on the applicability to other
situations), the government should have fashioned a reasonable
way to inform the victims of the likelihood of criminal charges and
to ascertain the victims' views on the possible details of a plea
bargain.
la re Dean, 527 F.3d 391, 394 (516 Cir. 2008).
The position that CVRA rights apply before charges have been filed is consistent with the
Justice Department regulations under the CVRA, which explain that government officials "must
advise a victim [about their rights under the CVRA] ... at the earliest opportunity at which it may
be done without interfering with an investigation." A.G. GUIDELINES FOR VICTIM AND WITNESS
I Further supporting this requirement is another statute, 42 U.S.C. § I 0607(cX3). which directs government officials
tc provide victims with "the earliest possible notice of," among other things. "the filing of charges against a
suspected offender."
4
4 of 10
EFTA00215609
Case 1:08-cv-80736-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2008
Page 5 of 10
Nat
ASSISTANCE 23 (May 2005). And the plain language of the CVRA undergirds this conclusion, as
it applies not simply to prosecutors but to government agencies "engaged in the detection [and)
investigation ... of crime ... ." 18 U.S.C. § 3771(c)(1). Indeed, if there were any doubt, the plain
language of the CVRA extends victims' right to situations "in which no prosecution is
underway." 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(3).
H.
PETITIONER IS A "VICTIM PROTECTED BY THE CVRA.
Under the CVRA the crime victim is defined as "a person directly and proximately
harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense ... ." 18 U.S.C. Section 3771(e). In
particular, Defendant called Petitioner when she was a minor over a telephone (a means of
interstate communication) requesting that she perform a massage in exchange for payment. As
Defendant well knew, that request was fraudulent, as he not only intended to receive a massage,
but also intended to have her perform sexual acts in exchange for a cash payment to Petitioner.
Only when Petitioner arrived at a Defendant's mansion as directed by Defendant, did Defendant
reveal his true purpose of obtaining sexual favors in exchange for payment. This conduct
violated 18 U.S.C. § 2422, which forbids using a means of interstate commerce to knowingly
"induce" or "entice" a minor "to engage in prostitution." In addition, this conduct was both a use
of "fraud" to obtain a commercial sex act, in violation of 18 U.S.0 § 1591, and use of wire
communications to perpetrate a "scheme and artifice to defraud," in violation of 18 U.S.C. §
1343.
It appears obvious that Petitioner was "directly and proximately" harmed by these crimes,
thereby making her a victim under the CVRA. It should be emphasized that the CVRA "was
designed to be a `broad and encompassing' statutory victims' bill of rights." United States v.
5
SOI10
EFTA00215610
Case 1 :08-cv-80736-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2008
Page 6 of 10
wisie
ye'
Degenhardt, 405 F.Supp.2d 1341, 1342 (D. Utah 2005) (quoting 150 Cong. Rec. S4261 (daily
ed. Apr. 22, 2004) (statement of Sen. Feinstein)). Congress intended the CVRA to dramatically
rework the federal criminal justice system. In the course of construing the CVRA generously, the
Ninth Circuit observed: "The criminal justice system has long functioned on the assumption that
crime victims should behave like good Victorian children -- seen but not heard. The Crime
Victims' Rights Act sought to change this by making victims independent participants in the
criminal justice process." Kenna v. U.S. Dist. Court for C.D. Cal., 435 F.3d 1011, 1013 (9th Cir.
2006). Accordingly, because the CVRA is remedial legislation, courts should interpret it
"liberally to facilitate and accomplish its purposes and intent."
Elliott Industries Ltd.
Partnership v. BP America Production Co., 407 F.3d 1091, 1118 (10th Cir. 2005) (noting
remedial legislation should be "interpreted liberally to facilitate and accomplish its purposes and
intent"). The CVRA itself suggests this conclusion by requiring that courts must treat crime
victims with "fairness." United States v. Patkar, 2008 WL 233062 at *3 (D. Haw. 2008) (citing
United States v. Turner, 367 F.Supp.2d 319, 335 (E.D.N.Y. 2005)).
Not only must the CVRA as a whole be interpreted liberally, but its definition of "crime
victim" requires a generous construction. After reciting the direct-and-proximate-harm language
at issue here, one of the Act's two co-sponsors -- Senator Kyl -- explained that "(t)his is an
intentionally broad definition because all victims of crime deserve to have their rights protected
." 150 Cong. Rec. S10912 (Oct. 9, 2004) (emphasis added). The description of the victim
definition as "intentionally broad" was in the course of floor colloquy with the other primary
sponsor of the CVRA and therefore deserves significant weight. See Kenna, 435 F.3d at 1015-16
(discussing significance of CVRA sponsors= floor statements).
6
6 Of 10
EFTA00215611
Case 1:08-cv-80736-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2008
Page 7 of 10
vow
The definition of "crime victims" must thus be construed broadly in favor of Petitioner.
She obviously qualifies as a "victim" under the CVRA.
III.
Because Petitioner is a "victim" under the CVRA, she has certain protected rights under
the Act. Most important, the Act promises that she will have an opportunity to "confer with the
attorney for the Government in the case." To date, Petitioner has not been given that right. This
raises that very real possibility that the Government may negotiate and conclude a plea agreement
with the Defendant without giving Petitioner her protected rights.2
Petitioner is entitled to have this conference with prosecutors before any final plea
agreement is reached. The Fifth Circuit reached exactly this conclusion in a very recent case. In
In re Dean, 527 F.3d 391 (5th Cir. 2008), the Government negotiated a plea agreement with the
well-heeled corporate defendant without conferring with the victims. When the Government's
fitilure was challenged in the Fifth Circuit, the Fifth Circuit concluded that the Government had
indeed violated the CVRA. The Fifth Circuit observed: "In passing the [CVRA), Congress
made the policy decision-which we are bound to enforce-that the victims have a right to inform
the plea negotiation process by conferring with prosecutors before a plea agreement is reached."
Id. at 394.
This Court is obligated to protect the rights of Petitioner. The CVRA directs that "[i]n
any court proceeding involving an offense against a crime victim, the court shall ensure that the
2 On information and belief, roughly the same crimes were committed against several other young females. These
victims, too, are in danger of losing their right to confer under the CVRA.
7
Tot 10
EFTA00215612
Case 1:08-cv-80736-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2008
Page 8 of 10
crime victim is afforded the rights described in [the CVRA]." 18 U.S.C. § 3771(bX1). The
CVRA also confers on crime victims the right to "assert the rights described in [the CVRA]." 18
U.S.C. § 3771(d)(1). Therefore, this Court has its own independent obligation to intercede and
ensure that the Government respects the rights of Petitioner under the CVRA.
CONCLUSION
The Petitioner requests the intervention of this Court to ensure that her rights are
respected and accorded, as promised in the Crime Victims' Rights Act.
DATED this 7th day of July, 2008.
Respectfully Submitted,
ASSOCIATES, LLC
Brad Edwards, Esquire
Attorney fnr Petitinnpr
Hollywood, Florida 33020
Telephone:
Facsimile:
8
Sot 10
EFTA00215613
Case 1:08-cv-80736-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2008
Page 9 of 10
Now
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing has been
provided by United States mail and via facsimile to:
United States Attorney's Office-
Florida 33401, this 7th day of July, 2008.
Brad Edwards, Esquire
Attorney for Pell.
Florida Bar No.
9
USA,
est Palm Beach,
9 of ID
EFTA00215614
° 8-892AccialW
i ticatIPP
I+ ntered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2008 Fepeyi 06th 0 D.c.
eel% 44 11:e . 1 en
"heJS 44 civ I cover sheet and the information contained burin neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pkadings or other papers a
by local rules of cowl. This form. approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974. is required for the use of the Clerk
Ise civil enacts Meet. ISLE INSTR V( TIONS ON III/ Res( RSI of 1111 fUR M 1
NOTICE: Attorneys MUST Indicate All Re-flied
I. (a) PLAINTIFFS
22;
34i/e. Poe
(b) Count) of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff
ech
,
1E X(' EPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES,
ICI ADO:Net% ,Fenn name. Addien. and Tekpbone Mambo,
7ac # .0,55'06 -tr.5
LOP
ice
53
DEFENDANTS
Avred 5-6/-es-
JULY 7, 2008
CLERK Il.S. DIST. CT.
S.D. OF FLA. • MIAMI
County of Residence of First Listed Defendant
LAND INVOLVED.
K.5
CtnyS
IIICheck County Where Action Arose
MIAMI-DADS
3 MONROE
3 EIROW MID /PALM BEACH
3 MARTIN
3 ST. LUCIE
3 INDIAN RIVER
3 OKEECHOBEE
1110111 SN1DS
derma -a- Leon Ben usio
S (yeomen,.
Ploite0
3 3
seders, Ones**,
IVES. Doserninent Soo • Pany)
, S. Lo.etneent
3 4
Diversely
Cele, day
(Indicate ('uitostop of Pones in hem III)
III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PA RTIESernee an - re.. One Ras for Plawro
If or Moray Cann OM":
and One Nos foe Oelendaitil
ITT
DEE
yrs
DEE
Cowen of The. Sale
3
I
3
I
Incorporated or Principal Place
1
4
14
of Busmen In This S me
OScv 5 013 c' mAfraik oftmso,v
Como of A noshes State
3
Incorpotoed and Pntopal Plats
1
5
1
5
of 0.1660. In Another Stale
mon or Same e of a
1
3
1
1
Foreign Naomi
Foreign Connell
6
1
r
CONTRACT
TORTS
BANKREPTC1'
OTHER ST rac TES
' II* los ram e
PERSONAL INJURY
PERSONAL INJURY
3
610 Allicuhult
1 422 Appeal 2li UST 153
3
400 Sin 4 ReaPPoliiel'aral
:
120 Mater
3 310 A robin
3
)62 hood Imury •
3
020 Other food a Deg
1 423 WohOtassl
3
410 Ammo.,
: IN, Miller Aci
3115 A oho Peodoct
Mad mogreetto
3 625 Dog Related Suture
20 ESC 157
3
430 Bo I' ad Dant ins
2 140 Negotiable Inatoteent
Lability
3
365 Personal lorry •
of Popov 21 VS(' sal
3
450 Comment
'
ISO It 06 net 010‘irPar•en.
3 120 Amaish. Libel &
Prodmi LiabiWy
3
630 LaRue, Lana
3
460 Donation
& Le foscooto ofludgmem
Standee
3
360 Abloom. Personal
3
640 R.R. a Tent
1 X20 Copyrights
3
470 RN \OW Influenced and
'
151 Monroe rest
3 3)0 Federal Employe..
'story Product
.3
650 Angle Rep.
3 100 Paint
Comp, Orgameations
'
152 Romeo of Defeo BO
bathe'
Imbibe,
3
660 Occoaliosal
1 OlITtademark
3
IMO Consumer Code,
Sondem 1 nos
3 140 Manor
SafoeNobh
3
490 Cable Sat TV
tEtt . Votive.,
3 345 Mom Product
3
370 Omer Fraud
3
690 Who
3 III0 SOlone Sersice
:
I II PI es nem co fili tom snot
Labile,'
3
171 Tenth en Lending
LABOR
SOCIALSECURITY
3 *50 Sec fides COM00/010t.
of Vorties Resells
3 350 Most Vehicle
1
WOOther Posonal
3
710 Fair Labor Standard*
3 X6I NIA II 395(11
Emtne
2,
tl
160 StoslebeMets' Sues
190 00e re C mermt
3 355 Moor Venecle
retalCILialohly
1
110060), Damage
135 Property Damage
3
Ao
720 EsboeMgmi. Rebhan
3
3
1162 Blob Lung 02/1
X63 DINT DOVW (405($3)
3
g75 Cmlama Challenge
IT ESC 3410
D
to
195 Costa Vadat I..adit)
I% km chef
1 )60 0 bet Personal
INIF,
Pada' labday
3
730 LaboeMputeperting
a Diolosure MI
1
3
X615510 Tole XVI
,165 RSI 005i011
3
3
$90 Other'
pity AMOR,
$91 Agoculitteat Aces
C
REM, PROPERTY
CIVIL RIGHT'
PRISONER PETITIONS 3
740 aaaaa y Labor Act
3
S92 tee ROOK Stalk:6000 AO
210 Leal d' ink newel,
3 441 Voliog
-I
, I 0 %I onon• to Vacate
3x 70 TARO ICS Planar
3
790 Oihtr Labor Liimation
3
093 Entwonmental Mauna
• ]ate Tofecloure
3 412 Employment
Sentence
3
791 Engl. Ito. Inc. Sono,
or Defender°
3
MO Emig, alloeman Act
1 :30 Rot Leese a f tet MOM
3 443 Moon
Hahn C
t
.co
3 XII IRS
Odd Pan)
3
095 Frodom olInfonnatoo" et
•
240 Tors to Lan!
245 Tor Priiduii Liabittiv
Accominodoons
3 444 WM..
1
1
)30 Goma,
313 Death Penally
In ES( 7609
3 000 001014 of fee Dviermioalion
r
I
115 Amer. ti. DISailitry, -
.., 462 Noterthreoon
Under I pal A (ten 10 Jana
7, 290 All la. r Rol POW)
3 Employment
3
5, 0 mandamusa Omer
'
Apploation
116 Amer. o Disabelehm •
463 lieben Corpres.Alien
3
OM"
3
ypp Cud Riots
1
Delano
)(44O Other tea Rights
3
555 Prison Condition
3
465 Other honeymoon
Amon'
m
950 Cossietuannably of State
SIAM in
V. ORIGIN
enlace a - X" en One Rea man
Original
2 Removed Porn
3 3
Re-ftled-
Proem tog
State Court
see VI below)
Transferred from
0
4 Reinstated or 0
5 another &strict
16 Multidindel
Reopened
IsPecifY)
Litigation
Appeal to District
O ,
Judge from
'
Magistrate
Judgment
(:ASE(S).
a) Re-filed Case 0 YES ONO
b) Related Cases 1 YES 1 NO
,See woodman
mond POO
JUDGE
DOCKET NUMBER
the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing and Write a Brief Statement of Cause (Do not cite Ju risd ic I on al statutes unless
dhersIty): Certgale
k/
A 9 'S 4c*
it
age.
5
7)
fe-frtlon on behalf al v1414'4,4 o$ Sex OatrinSeS
to
LC
auto. -pled
eviret
-
veldt.'"
7 tLt
CvdrQlf
LENGTH OF TRIAL via
1
days estimated (for both sides to try entire easel
REQUESTED IN
0
CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS AcnoN
DEMANDS
COMPLAINT:
UNDER F.R.C.P. 23
CHECK YES only if demanded in complaint:
JURY DEMAND:
3 Yes
3
No
1 HE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
S1GNATUR
NET OF RECORD
DATE
10 e410
3
RECEIPT r inWc/03
AMOUNT
5D
IPP
EFTA00215615