Subject: RE: Revised Draft with DOJ Edits

From: To: Subject: RE: Revised Draft with DOJ Edits Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 19:05:36 +0000 Importance: Normal I Ii — Does this mean your response is good to go? On the sealed document tracking form, is there a particular statute or rule that you think gives us the right to file under seal? Thank you. From (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesda Jul 09, 2008 3:04 PM To: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS). (USAFLS) Cc Subject: RE: Revised Draft with DOJ Edits Thanks to you= a nd for all your help. We'll let you know what happens. From: (USAEO) Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 3:02 PM To: Cc: jec u t: wised Draft with DOJ Edits (USAFLS); Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) (USAFLS) All — We have checked with OLP and they have cleared the language in your latest revision (per your e-mail below). Please let us know if you have additional questions. Thank you for your patience on this — From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 2:26 PM To: (USAFLS) (USAFLS); Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); EFTA00215649 Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: Revised Draft with DO) Edits Colleagues, Attached please find the latest revision, which includes the edits suggested by EOUSA. I have also incorporated the word "place", per s suggestion. For our Dal colleagues, there is a new Section III, which goes into detail regarding the contact had with the three victims. Also, as to whether Edwards raises the right to fairness being violated, I was referring to paragraph five of the emergency petition, which only alleges violations of the right to consultation, notice of public court proceedings, information regarding right to restitution, and notice of rights under the CVRA. A motion to seal has been prepared, seeking leave of the Court to seal the government's response,ns declaration, and the attachments to the declaration. « File: victim_resp_USArev corrected_Daledits.wpd » EFTA00215650