From: "
From: " . (USAFLS)" </O=USA/OUrFLS/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN= To: " (USAFLS)" Cc: Subject: Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:21:34 +0000 Importance: Normal Hi — Brad Edwards just called me. Here is what he would like me to do: 1. Tell him the names of all of the victims. 2. Tell him the name of every witness we interviewed. 3. Turn over the statements of all of the people listed in (1) and (2). 4. Ask the Palm Beach County Jail to provide us with all of Epstein's e-mails and phone calls. 5. I stopped listening to the rest. I told him "no" to all of the above. When he complained, I reminded him that he has subpoena power and he can get most of this stuff from Epstein. I also asked him why I hadn't received any signed Protective Orders except his, and he said he hadn't shown a copy of it to anyone else yet. I sent him a letter (I am sending a copy to you via inter-office) reminding him to send me the signed Protective Orders as he receives them, and telling him that he needs to sit do
Summary
From: " . (USAFLS)" </O=USA/OUrFLS/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN= To: " (USAFLS)" Cc: Subject: Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:21:34 +0000 Importance: Normal Hi — Brad Edwards just called me. Here is what he would like me to do: 1. Tell him the names of all of the victims. 2. Tell him the name of every witness we interviewed. 3. Turn over the statements of all of the people listed in (1) and (2). 4. Ask the Palm Beach County Jail to provide us with all of Epstein's e-mails and phone calls. 5. I stopped listening to the rest. I told him "no" to all of the above. When he complained, I reminded him that he has subpoena power and he can get most of this stuff from Epstein. I also asked him why I hadn't received any signed Protective Orders except his, and he said he hadn't shown a copy of it to anyone else yet. I sent him a letter (I am sending a copy to you via inter-office) reminding him to send me the signed Protective Orders as he receives them, and telling him that he needs to sit do
Persons Referenced (1)
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Related Documents (6)
Filing # 35429605 E-Filed 12/11/2015 10:08:04 AM
Case 09-34791-RBR
Alleged Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) Shielded Jeffrey Epstein from a 53‑count indictment and kept victims uninformed
Alleged Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) Shielded Jeffrey Epstein from a 53‑count indictment and kept victims uninformed The passage cites a specific non‑prosecution agreement that allegedly prevented a 53‑count federal indictment of Jeffrey Epstein and describes victim‑exclusion tactics. It names dates, a federal prosecutor’s draft indictment, and references to legal filings, offering concrete leads for further FOIA or court‑record requests. While the claim is not novel—Epstein’s NPA has been reported—it provides actionable details (Feb 10 2016 filing, Sept 2007 signing, June 30 2008 termination) that could be pursued to verify the agreement’s terms, the officials who negotiated it, and any potential misconduct by DOJ or the U.S. Attorney’s Office. Key insights: A 53‑count indictment prepared by federal prosecutors was never filed due to an NPA.; Victims were allegedly not consulted about the NPA, violating victim‑rights statutes.; The NPA was signed in September 2007 and remained in effect until June 30, 2008.
Dershowitz seeks to seal Giuffre affidavit in Edwards‑Cassell defamation case, claims media attacks are fabricated
Dershowitz seeks to seal Giuffre affidavit in Edwards‑Cassell defamation case, claims media attacks are fabricated The passage hints at a possible concealment of evidence in a high‑profile defamation dispute involving Alan Dershowitz, a prominent attorney, and references the infamous Giuffre allegations. While it names well‑known legal figures, it provides no concrete financial transactions, dates, or new factual revelations beyond already public claims, limiting its investigative utility. However, the suggestion that a court record may be sealed to hide potentially damaging testimony offers a moderate lead for further document‑review and freedom‑of‑information requests. Key insights: Dershowitz requests the court to declare portions of Ms. Giuffre’s affidavit confidential.; He publicly denies the allegations on BBC Radio 4, framing them as a coordinated false‑story campaign.; Dershowitz threatens perjury prosecution against accusers and seeks disbarment of opposing counsel.
The Palm Beach Post
EFTA01838551
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.