PodhurstOrseck
Summary
PodhurstOrseck TRIAL & APPELLATE LAWYERS Aaron S. Podhurst Robert C Josefsberg Joel D. Eaton Steven C Marks Victor M. Din, Jr. Katherine W. Ezell Stephen F. Rosenthal Ricardo M. Martinez ad Ramona Rasco Alexander T. Rundle' John Gravante, CONFIDENTIAL' Ethics Counsel The Florida Bar September 22, 2008 VIA U.S. MAIL AND VIA E-MAIL Tallahassee, FL 32399-2300 Re: Request for Written Staff Opinion Dear Sir or Madam: Robert Orseck (1934-1978) Walter E. Beacham, Jr. Karen Podhurst Dern Of Counsel Attached as Exhibit "A" is a copy of a letter we recently received from Jeffre Hermann. Apparently he sent a similar letter to Assistant United States Attorney Attached as Exhibit "B" is a copy of AUSA letter to you. Her request, and your opinion, will effect how we proceed with this matter. Rather than repeating, or paraphrasing AUSA letter, we are writing to advise you that we agree with her summary of the relevant facts, and we too request your guidance. If ou need
Persons Referenced (9)
“...tive defendant to plead guilty to state criminal offenses that would result in the defendant's designation as a sex offender. The Agreement also sought to place the victim...”
Jane Does“...epresent you, that attorney can review the Court's order in the matter of In re Jane Does 1 and 2, United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Cou...”
The victim“... defendant's designation as a sex offender. The Agreement also sought to place the victims in the same position where they would have been if the defendant had been convicted of the federal offenses...”
United StatesUnited States AttorneyRoy Black“...t Enclosures cc: , AUSA AUSA and Professional Responsibility Officer AUSA Roy Black, Esq., Counsel to the Putative Defendant Michael Tein, Esq., Counsel to the Putative Defendant In addition t...”
U.S. Attorney“... winv.hermar.law.com receipt of letters dated September 2, 2008 from Assistant U.S. Attorney A. that were sent to sexual assault victims of Jeffrey Epstein. That letter advises victims that you wil...”
Alexander Acosta“...tion, and thank you for your kind assistance with this matter. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney By: Assistant United States Attorney cc: ni SA and Professional Responsibilit...”
Jeffrey Epstein“...a Fax and Regular Mail Robert Josefsberg, Esq. Miami, Florida 331301720 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Josefsberg: Afire M. Herman , I-Ida 33160 winv.hermar.law.com receipt of letters dated Se...”
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLEA AGREEMENT The United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida ("the United States"), and Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") enter into the following agreement: 1. The defendant agrees to plead guilty to the Information which charges the defendant with two counts of knowingly and intentionally violating the privacy protection accorded to child victims by 18 U.S.C. § 3509; in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 403. 2. The defendant is aware that the sentence will be imposed by the Court after considering the Federal Sentencing Guidelines and Policy Statements (hereinafter "Sentencing Guidelines"). The defendant acknowledges and understands that the Court will compute an advisory sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines and that the applicable guidelines will be determined by the Court re
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 312-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/23/2015 Page 1 of 25
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 312-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/23/2015 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S OPPOSITION TO JANE DOE NO. 1 AND JANE DOE NO. 2's PROTECTIVE MOTION PURSUANT TO RULE 15 TO AMEND THEIR PETITION TO CONFORM TO EXISTING EVIDENCE AND TO ADD JANE DOE NO. 3 AND JANE DOE NO. 4 AS PETITIONERS Respondent United States, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Opposition to Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2's Motion pursuant to Rule 15 to Amend their Petition to Conform to Existing Evidence and to Add Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4 as Petitioners, and states: I. THE CAREFUL BALANCE THAT CONGRESS STRUCK WITH THE CVRA COUNSELS AGAINST THE EXPANSION OF THESE CVRA PROCEEDINGS TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL CLAIMS OR PARTIES. Petitioners have filed their "protective" motion to amend their petit
09/18/2007 02:53
09/18/2007 02:53 PM To 'Jay Lefkowite < cc bec Subject Factual proffer Hi Jay — I didn't want us to get sidetracked during the conference call. I want to make sure that we have a factual basis for "harassment" Forcibly flying omewhere else is a different 1512 offense with a 10 year cap. 1 is is the factual proffer that I drafted up earlier this afternoon, to give you an idea of what it would look like. When I include a factual proffer in a plea agreement, I usually use prefatory language like: The parties agree that, had this case proceeded to trial, the United States would have proven the following facts beyond a reasonable doubt, and that the following facts are true and correct and are sufficient to support a plea of guilty . <Cpstein Plea Proffer.doc>> Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone Fax «< Attachment 'Epstein Plea Proffer.doc' has been archived by user 'CommonStorellT/Klrkland•Ellls' on '11/26/2007
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. UNITDATES OF AMERICA vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLEA AGREEMENT The United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida ("the United States"), and Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter referred to as th `defendant") enter into the following agreement: 1. The defendant agrees to plead guilty to the Information which charges the defendant as follows: Count 1 charges that the defendant intentionally harassed another person, F that is, Jane Doe #1, in an attempt to delay, prevent, and dissuade Jo oe #1 from reporting to a law enforcement officer of the United States the commission of a federal offense; in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1512(d)(2) and 2; and Count 2 charges that the defendant, while in an airplane over the high seas, did knowingly commit a simple assault on a person who was T over the age of 16 years, that is, S.K.; in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sec
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 AND #2, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO INTERVENE OF ROY BLACK, MARTIN WEINBERG, AND JAY LEFKOWITZ ]DE94] The United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Response to the Supplemental Briefing of Attorneys Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz (DE94). The Court asked the United States to address the Intervenor Attorneys' argument that special concerns or rules should apply to the disclosure and use of documents prepared and exchanged during plea negotiations between the Intervenors (on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein) and the U.S. Attorney's Office. The Intervenor Attorneys seek to preclude the unsealing of certain documents already filed with the Court as well as the use of their contents, and the disc
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. / PLEA AGREEMENT The United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida ("the United States"), and Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") enter into the following agreement: 1. The defendant agrees to plead guilty to a two-count Information which charges that the defendant intentionally harassed two other persons, that is, S.K. and N.M., in an attempt to delay, prevent, and dissuade those persons from reporting to a law enforcement officer of the United States the commission of a federal offense; in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1512(d)(2) and 2. 2. The defendant agrees and understands that the above charges involve his conduct, and the criminal conduct of others, between in and around early 2001 through in and around September 2007. This agreement resolves the federal criminal liability of th
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.