Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00216265DOJ Data Set 9Other

Subject: RE: Question regarding Placement in a Halfway House

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00216265
Pages
2
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: Subject: RE: Question regarding Placement in a Halfway House Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:17:29 +0000 Importance: Normal Thank you so much. This is exactly the info that I needed. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone 561 209-1047 Fax 561 820-8777 Messke Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 11:02 AM Subject: Re: Question regarding Placement in a Halfway House No problem at all. As you probably already know, the recently enacted Second Chance Act (Pub. L. No. 110- 199), as well as some recent Circuit decisions, made some changes to the Bureau of Prisons' statutory authority and processes regarding RRC (Residential Re-entry Center, aka halfway house) placement. Whereas prior to the Second Chance Act the BOP was limited to RRC transfers for the last 10 percent of an inmate's sentence (not to exceed six months), under amended 18 U.S.C. 3624(c)(1) the BOP can place an inmate in a re-entry transitional placement for up to 12 m

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Subject: RE: Question regarding Placement in a Halfway House Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:17:29 +0000 Importance: Normal Thank you so much. This is exactly the info that I needed. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone 561 209-1047 Fax 561 820-8777 Messke Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 11:02 AM Subject: Re: Question regarding Placement in a Halfway House No problem at all. As you probably already know, the recently enacted Second Chance Act (Pub. L. No. 110- 199), as well as some recent Circuit decisions, made some changes to the Bureau of Prisons' statutory authority and processes regarding RRC (Residential Re-entry Center, aka halfway house) placement. Whereas prior to the Second Chance Act the BOP was limited to RRC transfers for the last 10 percent of an inmate's sentence (not to exceed six months), under amended 18 U.S.C. 3624(c)(1) the BOP can place an inmate in a re-entry transitional placement for up to 12 months. Further, the BOP can consider RRC placement at any time during an inmate's sentence, and will make an individual determination as to the propriety of such placement upon request. However, given the transitional goals of RRC placement and the limited RRC resources available, it is unlikely that many inmates would be designated to an RRC prior to their final year of incarceration. The bottom line is that for your defendant with an 18-month sentence, RRC placement, if deemed appropriate, would most likely be deemed appropriate for some period of the final year of incarceration. The most relevant regulations on that issue are found at 28 U.S.C. 570.20 to 570.22. Regarding good time, the inmate's RRC review is based on his projected release date, which is computed with consideration of good time credit. So if the inmate's full term sentence expiration is 1/1/2005, but with good time credit he is projected to release on 1/1/2004, he would be in the 12-month window from 1/1/2003 to 1/1/2004. If he loses good time, the projected release date would change, and so would the window. Regarding your question on work limitations, the restrictions or factors used in determining suitable employment for RRC residents are in the Statement of Work negotiated with the contractor, Community Corrections Management (CCM)Manual, and the center rules. Ordinarily, residents are allowed to work 40 hours a week. Anything above that, requires CCM approval. They are allowed to work part time, if that's the only thing available at that time. Residents can also work more than one job if it does not keep them out of the center in excess of 12 hours. Anything above that, requires CCM approval. Generally, the CCM does not allow residents EFTA00216265 to work for family or be self-employed because of accountability issues. Their work hours and pay have to be verifiable and documented. I am attaching the existing policy statement on CCC (the former acronym for RRC) placement and utilization. However, please note that as the Second Chance Act and caselaw have change the manner in which the BOP considers and uses RRC placement, the "six month or 10%" language in the policy statement should be considered outdated. The statement should be revised in the near future. The regulations cited above (28 U.S.C. 570.20 - 570.22) are current and accurate. I hope this helps! Senior CLC Attorney / Special Assistant United States Attorney United States Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons / FCC Coleman P.O. Box 1029 / 846 N.E. 54th Terrace Coleman, FL 33521 Direct - -1 Fax - 352.689.7387 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED/PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION The information contained in this electronic message and any and all accompanying documents constitutes sensitive information. This information is the property of the U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons. If you are not the intended recipient of this information, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on this information is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please notify us immediately at the above number to make arrangements for its return to us. Your name was provided to me by another AUSA in our office as someone with knowledge regarding halfway house placement. I am sorry to bother you, but I was hoping that you could answer the following questions: I. If someone is sentenced to 18 months' imprisonment, when would he become eligible for placement in a halfway house/CCC? If, for example, it is the last 6 months of his imprisonment term, do you count back from his release date assuming that he receives full credit for "good time," or would it be 6 months from the end of his imprisonment term not considering good time credit? 2. While at the halfway house/CCC, are there rules regarding the number of hours per day the inmate can work, days of the week, and type of job that the inmate can accept? (For example, could someone work 12 hours per day, seven days per week, in what is essentially a self-employment type of situation?) 3. If there are any regulations or policy statements related to these issues, could you point me in the right direction? Thank you so much for your assistance. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone 561 209-1047 Fax 561 820-8777 EFTA00216266

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

2023R00074 - 001

2023R00074 - 001 AO 110 (Rev. 06/09) Subpoena to Testify Before a Grand Jury UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of Virgin Islands SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY BEFORE A GRAND JURY To: Estate of Jeffrey Epstein C/O Daniel Ruzumna, Esq., Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler, LLP YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear in this United States district court at the time, date, and place shown below to testify before the court's grand jury. When you arrive, you must remain at the court until the judge or a court officer allows you to leave. Place: St. Thomas Grand Jury Ron de Lugo Federal Building & Courthouse 5500 Veteran's Drive, 3rd Floor, St. Thomas, VI 00802 Date and Time: August 15, 2023 You must also bring with you the following documents, electronically stored information, or objects (blank if not applicable): All records, information and materials turned over to the law firm of WilmerHale in the case of Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 2

4p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS FGJ 07-103(WPB) DUCES TECUM NUMBERS OLY-63 and OLY-64 UNITED STATES' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE OVERSIZED RESPONSE TO MOTION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN TO INTERVENE AND TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS AND CROSS-MOTION TO COMPEL UNDER SEAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS FGJ 07-103(WPB) DUCES TECUM NUMBERS OLY-63 and OLY-64 UNDER SEAL UNITED STATES' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE OVERSIZED RESPONSE TO MOTION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN TO INTERVENE AND TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS AND CROSS-MOTION TO COMPEL The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Motion for Permission to File an Oversized Response, and, in support thereof, states: 1. Movant Jeffrey Epstein, by and through counsel, filed a Motion to Intervene and to Quash two grand jury subpoenas duces tecum on July

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

United States District Court

United States District Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TO: Custodian of Records JEGE, Inc. SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY BEFORE GRAND JURY FGJ 07-103(WPB)-Tues./No. OLY-47 SUBPOENA FOR: ri PERSON DOCUMENTS OR OBJECTISI YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to appear and testify before the Grand Jury of the United States District Court at the place, date and time specified below. PLACE: United States District Courthouse 701 Clematis Street West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 ROOM: Grand Jury Room DATE AND TIME: May 8, 2007 1:00 pm* YOU ARE ALSO COMMANDED to bring with you the following document(s) or object(s): All income tax returns, balance sheets, regulatory filings, minutes of board of directors meetings, and documents required by or filed with the Internal Revenue Service and/or the State of Delaware referring or relating to the period of 1/1/2003 to 12/31/2005. For the period 1/1/2003 to the present, the names of all employees, copies of all W-2s for all employees, and the names

4p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Nlatthewman JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota and Florida, the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. My bar admission status in California and Minnesota is currently inactive. I am currently employed as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida and was so employed during all of the events described herein. 2. I am the Assistant United States Attorne

5p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject:

From: To: Subject: - u is airs ews ne Ing e nes ay, u y 29, 2020 Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:25:50 +0000 c Importan e: Normal Mobile version and searchable archives available at fbi.bulletinintelligence.com. 1B1 News Briefing TO: THE DIRECTOR AND SENIOR STAFF DATE: WEDNESDAY, JULY 29, 2020 6:30 AM EDT TODAY'S TABLE OF CONTENTS LEADING THE NEWS • Barr Spars With Democrats At Contentious House Hearing. • Barr Says Democrats Have Tried To "Discredit" Him. • Barr Says Bash Investigating "High Number Of Unmaskings" During Obama Administration. PROTESTS • Memo Reveals Federal Agents Sought Role In Suppressing Protests Since Start. • New Mexico Governor Addresses Concerns About Federal Agents In Albuquerque. • Report: US, Oregon In Talks About Pulling Agents From Portland. • Portland Fines Federal Government For Unpermitted Fence Outside Courthouse. • US Park Police Head: Decision To Clear Protesters Not Linked To Trump "Photo Op." • Hundreds Of Cases Involving LAPD Off

47p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subjec

Fr • < > Subjec :Deliberative t Process ec aratton rom am Justice - equest or wo ee xtension Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 17:59:47 +0000 Importance: Normal We have no objection, provided we get the following accommodation, which you already anticipated. We would request that your motion for extension of time give us an extension on our reply document, such that our reply would be due 10 days after the main Justice Department declaration that will be coming in two weeks. If you would include such language as well in any proposed order, saving us (and the court) drafting time, that would be very much appreciated. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G Cassell CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message along with any/all attachments is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.