Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00221127DOJ Data Set 9Other

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00221127
Pages
3
Persons
6
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY FLORIDA Case No.: Division: IN RE: GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS MOTION FOR PRODUCTION OF GRAND JURY TRANSCRIPTS AND TO SEAL ALL PROCEEDINGS FILED UNDER SEAL IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY FLORIDA Case No.: Division: IN RE: GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS MOTION FOR PRODUCTION OF GRAND JURY TRANSCRIPTS AND TO SEAL ALL PROCEEDINGS Comes now the United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, and moves this Court, on behalf of the federal grand jury, for the production of transcripts of any and all proceedings before the State Grand Jury on Wednesday, July 19, 2006, referring or relating to Jeffrey Epstein and/or including but not limited to witness testimony, statements made by any member of the State Attorney's Office, and instructions given by any member of the State Attorney's Office. In support of thi

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY FLORIDA Case No.: Division: IN RE: GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS MOTION FOR PRODUCTION OF GRAND JURY TRANSCRIPTS AND TO SEAL ALL PROCEEDINGS FILED UNDER SEAL IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY FLORIDA Case No.: Division: IN RE: GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS MOTION FOR PRODUCTION OF GRAND JURY TRANSCRIPTS AND TO SEAL ALL PROCEEDINGS Comes now the United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, and moves this Court, on behalf of the federal grand jury, for the production of transcripts of any and all proceedings before the State Grand Jury on Wednesday, July 19, 2006, referring or relating to Jeffrey Epstein and/or including but not limited to witness testimony, statements made by any member of the State Attorney's Office, and instructions given by any member of the State Attorney's Office. In support of this Motion, the United States states: I. Pursuant to Fl. Stat. § 905.17(1), all "stenographic records, notes, and transcriptions made by the court reporter or stenographer shall be filed with the clerk who shall keep them in a sealed container not subject to public inspection. The notes, records, and transcriptions . . . shall be released by the clerk only . . . on order of the court pursuant to s. 905.27." 2. After consultation with the Office of the Clerk of Court, Fifteenth Judicial District, it was determined that the Grand Jury Coordinator from the State Attorney's Office maintains physical control of the tapes and records of the State Grand Jury for the Fifteen Judicial District. 3. Attached hereto is a grand jury subpoena addressed to the State Attorney's Office and issued on behalf of Federal Grand Jury 05-02 (West Palm Beach) seeking the production of transcripts of any and all proceedings before the State Grand Jury on Wednesday, July 19, 2006, referring or relating to Jeffrey Epstein and/or including but not limited to witness testimony, statements made by any member of the State Attorney's Office, and instructions given by any member of the State Attorney's Office. 4. Pursuant to Fl. Stat. § 905.27, no one may "disclose the testimony of a witness examined before the grand jury or other evidence received by it except when required by a court to disclose the testimony for the EFTA00221127 purpose of: ... (c) Furthering justice." 5. If the Court orders the disclosure of the transcripts for use in the federal grand jury proceedings and any criminal case derived from those grand jury proceedings, then the transcripts "may be disclosed to the prosecuting attorney of the court in which such criminal case is pending, and by the prosecuting attorney to his or her assistants, legal associates, and employees, and to the defendant and the defendant's attorney, and by the latter to his or her legal associates and employees. . . [T]he grand jury testimony afforded such persons by the court can only be used in the defense or prosecution of the civil or criminal case and for no other purpose whatsoever." Fl. Stat. § 905.27(2). 6. Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, an attorney for the United States may only disclose a matter occurring before the grand jury to "any government personnel — including those of a state [or] state subdivision . . . that an attorney for the government considers necessary to assist in performing that attorney's duty to enforce federal criminal law." Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(3)(A)(ii). In accordance with that Rule, the United States informs the Court that the transcripts of the State's grand jury proceedings relate to the substance of a federal grand jury investigation. See In m Grand Jury Proceedings , 832 F.2d 554 (11th Cir. 1987). 7. Further in accordance with the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States informs the Court that it has an obligation to keep secret and not to disclose any matter occurring before the grand jury except in accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(3). Notification of this disclosure has been provided to the United States District Court who empaneled the federal grand July in accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(3) (B). n 8. The United States respectfully requests that this Motion and all other pleadings and orders filed in relation to this matter be kept under seal, in accordance with Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.051(7), 2.051(9)(A)(iii), 2.051(9)(A)(iv), and 2.051(9)(A)(vii), and in accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(6). 9. If the Court requires further information regarding the basis for the motion, the United States respectfully requests the opportunity to present such information in camera in accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(5). For the foregoing reasons, the United States respectfully requests that the Court order the State Attorney's Office to produce transcripts of any and all proceedings before the State Grand July on Wednesday, July 19, 2006, referring or relating to Jeffrey Epstein and/or including but not limited to witness testimony, statements made by any member of the State Attorney's Office, EFTA00221128 and instructions given by any member of the State Attorney's Office, and order that this Motion, the Court's Order, and all further proceedings in this matter be sealed. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY BY: 111.11.1 ATESATTORNEY Florida Bar No. 0018255 500 South Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 TEL FA CERTI CE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of this Motion for Production of Grand Jury Transcripts was delivered by hand, this 23rd day of August, 2006, to Lanna L. Belohlavek, State Attorney's Office, 15th Judicial Circuit West Palm Beach, FL 33401-4209. Assistant United States Attorney Fi1f the Court discloses this information to any other Court employee, the United States respectfully requests that the Court notify the undersigned so that the United States can provide the United States District Court with the requisite notification. EFTA00221129

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. / PLEA AGREEMENT The United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida ("the United States"), and Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") enter into the following agreement: 1. The defendant agrees to plead guilty to a two-count Information which charges that the defendant intentionally harassed two other persons, that is, S.K. and N.M., in an attempt to delay, prevent, and dissuade those persons from reporting to a law enforcement officer of the United States the commission of a federal offense; in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1512(d)(2) and 2. 2. The defendant agrees and understands that the above charges involve his conduct, and the criminal conduct of others, between in and around early 2001 through in and around September 2007. This agreement resolves the federal criminal liability of th

5p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLEA AGREEMENT The United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida ("the United States"), and Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") enter into the following agreement: 1. The defendant agrees to plead guilty to a two-count Information which charges the defendant as follows. Count 1 charges that the defendant intentionally harassed another person, that is in an attempt to delay, prevent, and dissuade Efrom attending or testifying in an official proceeding, that is a Federal Grand Jury appearance in the Southern District of Florida, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1512(d)(2) and 2; and Count 2 charges that the defendant intentionally harassed another person, that is,=, in an attempt to delay, prevent, and dissuadafrom reporting to a law enforcement officer of the United States the commission

5p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLEA AGREEMENT The United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida ("the United States"), and Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") enter into the following agreement: 1. The defendant agrees to plead guilty to the Information which charges the defendant with two counts of knowingly and intentionally violating the privacy protection accorded to child victims by 18 U.S.C. § 3509; in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 403. 2. The defendant is aware that the sentence will be imposed by the Court after considering the Federal Sentencing Guidelines and Policy Statements (hereinafter "Sentencing Guidelines"). The defendant acknowledges and understands that the Court will compute an advisory sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines and that the applicable guidelines will be determined by the Court re

82p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

09/18/2007 02:53

09/18/2007 02:53 PM To 'Jay Lefkowite < cc bec Subject Factual proffer Hi Jay — I didn't want us to get sidetracked during the conference call. I want to make sure that we have a factual basis for "harassment" Forcibly flying omewhere else is a different 1512 offense with a 10 year cap. 1 is is the factual proffer that I drafted up earlier this afternoon, to give you an idea of what it would look like. When I include a factual proffer in a plea agreement, I usually use prefatory language like: The parties agree that, had this case proceeded to trial, the United States would have proven the following facts beyond a reasonable doubt, and that the following facts are true and correct and are sufficient to support a plea of guilty . <Cpstein Plea Proffer.doc>> Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone Fax «< Attachment 'Epstein Plea Proffer.doc' has been archived by user 'CommonStorellT/Klrkland•Ellls' on '11/26/2007

85p
OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. X 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT FOR BREACH OF NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT Mark S. Cohen Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00065989 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 STATEMENT OF FACTS 7 A. The Structure of the NPA 8 B. The Negotiation of the NPA 11 ARGUMENT 12 I. The Indictment Should Be Dismissed for Breach of the NPA. 14 A. Ms. Maxwell Has Standing to Enforce the NPA. 15 B. The NPA's Prohibition on Prosecution of Potential Co-Conspirators Is Not Limited to the SDFL. 18 1. The NPA is binding on the USAO in this District 18 2. United States v. Annabi does not alter the an

38p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. X 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT FOR BREACH OF NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00099352 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 STATEMENT OF FACTS 7 U The Structure of the NPA 8 B. The Negotiation of the NPA 11 ARGUMENT 12 I. The Indictment Should Be Dismissed for Breach of the NPA. 14 a Ms. Maxwell Has Standing to Enforce the NPA. 15 B. The NPA's Prohibition on Prosecution of Potential Co-Conspirators Is Not Limited to the SDFL. 18 1. The NPA is binding on the USAO in this District 18 2. United States v. Annabi does not alter the analysis. 19 1. There is an "affirmative appearance" that the co-conspirator immunity provision was intended to apply outside the SDFL 20 b. The Second Circuit's subsequent applic

38p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.