Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00221222DOJ Data Set 9Other

Case 9:08-cv-80993-KAM

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00221222
Pages
5
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Case 9:08-cv-80993-KAM Document 52-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/07/2009 Pitt 5-7f UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80993-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 7, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF JANE, DOE 7'S ANSWERS TO DEFENDANTS FIRST INTERROGATORIES Plaintiff, JANE DOE 7, by and through their undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 33, hereby responds to Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S First Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff as follows: General Objections 1. Plaintiff objects to Defendant's Interrogatories to the extent that the Interrogatories call for the disclosure of information protected by the attorney-client privilege, attorney work-product doctrine, or other applicable privilege or immunity, whether created by statute or common law. Plaintiff claims such privileges and protections to the extent implicated by each Interrogatory, and excludes privileged and protected inf

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:08-cv-80993-KAM Document 52-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/07/2009 Pitt 5-7f UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80993-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 7, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF JANE, DOE 7'S ANSWERS TO DEFENDANTS FIRST INTERROGATORIES Plaintiff, JANE DOE 7, by and through their undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 33, hereby responds to Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S First Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff as follows: General Objections 1. Plaintiff objects to Defendant's Interrogatories to the extent that the Interrogatories call for the disclosure of information protected by the attorney-client privilege, attorney work-product doctrine, or other applicable privilege or immunity, whether created by statute or common law. Plaintiff claims such privileges and protections to the extent implicated by each Interrogatory, and excludes privileged and protected information from any responses to Defendant's discovery. Any disclosure is inadvertent and is not intended to waive those privileges or protections, which are specifically reserved. 2. Plaintiff objects to Defendant's Interrogatories to the extent that same are vague, ambiguous, incomprehensible and/or overly broad. A EFTA00221222 Case 9:08-cv-80993-KAM Document 52-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/07/2009 Page 2 of 5 Doe No. 7 v. Epstein Page 6 Jane Doe 1 (who is not represented by the undersigned attorneys) ain s c assmate who brought Plaintiff to Defendant's estate on 2 occasions ai Pf" ti s classmate who accompanied Plaintiff to Defendant's estate on at lest one occasion accompanied Plaintiff to Defendant's estate on at least one occasion, but Plaintiff is unable to recall which sister it was. Discovery is ongoing and may be supplemented in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 6. Please state the specific nature and substance of the knowledge that you believe the person(s) identified in your response to interrogatory no. 5 may have. Answer: See Plaintiffs Answer to Interrogatory No. 5. 7. Were you suffering from physical infirmity, disability, disease, sickness, or psychiatric/psychological condition at the time of the incident(s) described in the complaint? If so, what was the nature of the infirmity, disability, or sickness? Answer: No. 8. Did you consume any alcoholic beverages or take any drugs or medications within 12 hours before the time of each incident(s) described in the complaint? If so, state the type and amount of alcoholic beverages, drugs, or medication which were consumed, and when and where you consumed them. Answer: No. 9. Describe each injury (physical, emotional, mental) for which you are claiming damages in this case, specifying the part of your body that was injured, the EFTA00221223 Case 9:08-cv-80993-KAM Document 52-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/07/2009 Page 3 of 5 Doe No. 7 v. Epstein Page 13 Plaintiff received a letter dated Sept. 15, 2008, in care of her undersigned attorneys, titled "Amended Notification of Indentified Victim". No statements regarding benefits from cooperation with law enforcement were made to Plaintiff at any time. January 2(, 2009 Respectfully submitted: HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN PA 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 www.hermanlaw.com Tel: 305-931-2200 Fax: i -08 7 By Jeffrey M. Herman jhermanahermanlaw.com Florida Bar No. 521647 Stuart S. Merrnelstein smermelsteinAhermanlaw.com Florida Bar No. 947245 Adam D. Horowitz ahorowitzahermanlaw.com Florida Bar No. 376980 EFTA00221224 Case 9:08-cv-80993-KAM Document 52-2 Entered on FLSD Doc, 05/07/2009 poiisig 4ifif 5 01/23/2009 28:20 FENX KINKOS Jane Doe No. 7 v. Epstein Page15 against Mr. Epstein end regarding whether there would b@ any benefit from your voluntary cooperation with law enforcement. VERIFICATION being duly sworn, deposes and says that the forego' wers o interrogate are true and correct t trsst of her knowledge, information and belief. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PALM BEACH ) ss WOR Tn anrn cr iBSCRIBED before me this at aday of ca.n. 2008 by who is personally known to me or has p uced the which is curront or has been issued within the past five years an ears a sen o er identifying nJmber. -3—va. Ft vv..e. past Signatu NOTARY PUBLIC - STATE OF FLORIDA Commission Number. Diu)" o My commission cOmmission expires: Clikei a-0 It JUAN FERNAN012 s Expires 9/18/2011 °r''.,, Commit 0D07115002 Florid, Nolan' Aspn.,Int nnimpont EFTA00221225 Case 9:08-cv-80993-KAM Document 52-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/07/2009 Page 5 of 5 Doe No. 7 v. Epstein Page 15 Certificate of Service WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been sent via U.S. Mail and facsimile to the following addressees this 7G day of January, 2009. Robert D. Critton, Jr, Esq. Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/842-2820 Phone 561/515-3148 Fax rcrit beiclaw•will Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. AtterburyGoldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 Fax: 561-835-8691 jaqesoAbellsouth.net Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Michael R. Tein, Esq. Lewis Tein, P.L. 3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340 Coconut Grove, FL 33133 305-442-1101 Fax 305 442 6744 ' Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein teinAlewistein.com EFTA00221226

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Express

Fed Express 8668 3188 6107 Dt"-ziti-411.3 =etc= pszteA-A4.e ComPINUSIMJAIR ATTY OrCiSn DE FLA AMMSS 500 S AUSTRAI TAN AVP P1 s Packaging raWEST PALM FIFACH silts Pi ZIP "4.34101-4,nn3 Fedex P. Fide' K Err/elope namniase baba Fed& Sox MIN Lira a mot Istaaanas Your Internal Billing Reference Run ratan Nel WW1,' coa T. N.R•tara goo aws),(DS goateturAFF0 Lum_iscarsi_ r *23 N. ANINZENS Avg- Ws ant nano Mau Pafla DoNladanats 1 A %- 1.585 - 7 0215 4a Express Package Service -- O itegu... P."4:74tr XV,EKSI•••,rdeventiem kusanDanCyn, S▪ o WPM/ ?limn 4 Wad Phone TS Cei I 2 00 °11 , 047 K ufsitt.L.: .=zr K rldetiet:21San, Mat Waal Nis, Sea agars' Ma lam Papa —I 46 bprens Freight Seriice K fri et teeliLagLeig K Leititi0n s„, restiltatVg= •CiIIINOmaaca laalealainsi• SOR12 hasp* oP to f5Oft't — Eaai . r deFro Overnight oc tateana — ann. damn N O um n ran ma nt n • Cs nom nanny ;Nick:gnaw, I St 7 gis 30. Freight Plan( Addeess

384p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/3012008 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF FILING DEPOSITION In support of his motion to stay this action [DE 12], defendant Jeffrey Epstein hereby files the redacted deposition of Jane Doe #1 (Case No. 08-80069-Civ-Marra/Johnson), taken in State of Florida Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 2006 CF 09454 AXX (Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County). The redacted deposition is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Respectfully submitted, ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Tel: 561 659 8300 Fax: 561 835 8691 By: /s/ Jack A. Goldberger Jack A. Goldberger Fla. Bar No. 262013 [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein EFTA00222289 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 15 En

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 31 Entered on FLSD Docket 07 29 '2008 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. I JANE DOE NO. 3, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. JANE DOE NO. 4, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. JANE DOE NO. 5, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. CASE NO.: 08-80119-CIV-ICAM-LRJ CASE NO.: 08-80232-CIV-KAM-LRJ CASE NO.: 08-80380-CIV-KAM-LRJ CASE NO.: 08-80381-CIV-KAM-LRJ DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF FILING EXHIBITS Defendant Jeffrey Epstein hereby files the following two exhibits to his Reply in Support of Motion to Stay, filed under seal on July 28, 2008: A. Exhibit "A" is the July 9, 2008 Declaration of Assistant United States Attorney , M previously filed by the United States in In re: Jane Doe, Case No. 08- 80736-CIV-Marra/Johnson (S.D. Fla.) (DE 14). LeaTsinri 3059 GRAND Avavue. Surn 340.COCONtri GROvE. FLORIDA 33133 EFTA00221651 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 31 Entered on FLSD Docket 07'29'2008 Page 2 of 3

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. VICTIM'S MOTION TO UNSEAL NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT COMES NOW the Petitioners, Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2, by and through their undersigned attorneys, pursuant to the Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771 ("CVRA"), and file this motion to unseal the non-prosecution agreement that has been provided to their attorneys under seal in this case. The agreement should be unsealed because no good cause exists for sealing it. Moreover, the Government has inaccurately described the agreement in its publicly-filed pleadings, creating a false impression that the agreement protects the victims. Finally, the agreement should be unsealed to facilitate consultation by victims' counsel with others involved who have

8p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/20/2008 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY Defendant Jeffrey Epstein respectfully moves for a mandatory stay of this action under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3509(k). As discussed below, this action is subject to a mandatory stay based on the existence of two pending parallel criminal actions. Introduction This civil action is a private counterpart to two ongoing criminal actions, one in Palm Beach state court, the other in Miami federal court. Both cases purport to arise from the same occurrence: the alleged sexual assault of a minor, Jane Doe No. 2. A federal statute directly on point provides that when an alleged sexual assault involving a child victim results in a "criminal proceeding," a commonly EFTA00221641 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

6p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01387839

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.