Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

Express

Fed Express 8668 3188 6107 Dt"-ziti-411.3 =etc= pszteA-A4.e ComPINUSIMJAIR ATTY OrCiSn DE FLA AMMSS 500 S AUSTRAI TAN AVP P1 s Packaging raWEST PALM FIFACH silts Pi ZIP "4.34101-4,nn3 Fedex P. Fide' K Err/elope namniase baba Fed& Sox MIN Lira a mot Istaaanas Your Internal Billing Reference Run ratan Nel WW1,' coa T. N.R•tara goo aws),(DS goateturAFF0 Lum_iscarsi_ r *23 N. ANINZENS Avg- Ws ant nano Mau Pafla DoNladanats 1 A %- 1.585 - 7 0215 4a Express Package Service -- O itegu... P."4:74tr XV,EKSI•••,rdeventiem kusanDanCyn, S▪ o WPM/ ?limn 4 Wad Phone TS Cei I 2 00 °11 , 047 K ufsitt.L.: .=zr K rldetiet:21San, Mat Waal Nis, Sea agars' Ma lam Papa —I 46 bprens Freight Seriice K fri et teeliLagLeig K Leititi0n s„, restiltatVg= •CiIIINOmaaca laalealainsi• SOR12 hasp* oP to f5Oft't — Eaai . r deFro Overnight oc tateana — ann. damn N O um n ran ma nt n • Cs nom nanny ;Nick:gnaw, I St 7 gis 30. Freight Plan( Addeess

Case 9:08-cv-80993-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80993-KAM Document 52-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/07/2009 Pitt 5-7f UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80993-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 7, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF JANE, DOE 7'S ANSWERS TO DEFENDANTS FIRST INTERROGATORIES Plaintiff, JANE DOE 7, by and through their undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 33, hereby responds to Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S First Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff as follows: General Objections 1. Plaintiff objects to Defendant's Interrogatories to the extent that the Interrogatories call for the disclosure of information protected by the attorney-client privilege, attorney work-product doctrine, or other applicable privilege or immunity, whether created by statute or common law. Plaintiff claims such privileges and protections to the extent implicated by each Interrogatory, and excludes privileged and protected inf

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 31 Entered on FLSD Docket 07 29 '2008 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. I JANE DOE NO. 3, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. JANE DOE NO. 4, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. JANE DOE NO. 5, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. CASE NO.: 08-80119-CIV-ICAM-LRJ CASE NO.: 08-80232-CIV-KAM-LRJ CASE NO.: 08-80380-CIV-KAM-LRJ CASE NO.: 08-80381-CIV-KAM-LRJ DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF FILING EXHIBITS Defendant Jeffrey Epstein hereby files the following two exhibits to his Reply in Support of Motion to Stay, filed under seal on July 28, 2008: A. Exhibit "A" is the July 9, 2008 Declaration of Assistant United States Attorney , M previously filed by the United States in In re: Jane Doe, Case No. 08- 80736-CIV-Marra/Johnson (S.D. Fla.) (DE 14). LeaTsinri 3059 GRAND Avavue. Surn 340.COCONtri GROvE. FLORIDA 33133 EFTA00221651 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 31 Entered on FLSD Docket 07'29'2008 Page 2 of 3

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. VICTIM'S MOTION TO UNSEAL NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT COMES NOW the Petitioners, Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2, by and through their undersigned attorneys, pursuant to the Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771 ("CVRA"), and file this motion to unseal the non-prosecution agreement that has been provided to their attorneys under seal in this case. The agreement should be unsealed because no good cause exists for sealing it. Moreover, the Government has inaccurately described the agreement in its publicly-filed pleadings, creating a false impression that the agreement protects the victims. Finally, the agreement should be unsealed to facilitate consultation by victims' counsel with others involved who have

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/20/2008 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY Defendant Jeffrey Epstein respectfully moves for a mandatory stay of this action under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3509(k). As discussed below, this action is subject to a mandatory stay based on the existence of two pending parallel criminal actions. Introduction This civil action is a private counterpart to two ongoing criminal actions, one in Palm Beach state court, the other in Miami federal court. Both cases purport to arise from the same occurrence: the alleged sexual assault of a minor, Jane Doe No. 2. A federal statute directly on point provides that when an alleged sexual assault involving a child victim results in a "criminal proceeding," a commonly EFTA00221641 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

EFTA01387839