Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Summary
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 26 Entered on FLSD Docket 07 21 '2008 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DECLARATION OF JEFFREY M. HERMAN REGARDING SERVICE OF PROCESS AND THIS COURT'S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Jeffrey M. Herman, deposes and states as follows: I. I am counsel for Plaintiff in this action. After the parties' briefed the issue of service of process on Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, this Court found valid service under New York law and entered an Order to Show Cause Why Default Should Not be Entered Against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, dated July 16, 2008. 2. I submit this Declaration to correct what appears to be a factual error in the Court's Order to Show Cause. I do so even though this error is in Plaintiff's favor. 3. In the Order to Show Cause, this Court finds that "[Ole process server also mailed a copy of the summons and co
Persons Referenced (4)
“...rocess server in this case did not mail a copy of the Summons and Complaint to the Defendant's New York address. In none of the papers Plaintiff filed in this matter is it...”
United StatesJeffrey M. Herman“... JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DECLARATION OF JEFFREY M. HERMAN REGARDING SERVICE OF PROCESS AND THIS COURT'S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Jeffrey M. Herman, deposes and sta...”
Jeffrey Epstein“...FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DECLARATION OF JEFFREY M. HERMAN REGARDING SERVICE OF PROCESS AND THIS COURT'S ORDER TO S...”
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd
CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Page 1 of 17 U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:08-cv-80380-KAM Doe No. 4'. Epstein Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra Referred to: Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson Lead case: 9:08-ev-80111-.KAM Member case• (View Member Case) Case: 9:09-0-80802-KAM Cause: 28:1332 Diversity Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 4 Date Filed: 04/14/2008 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 360 P.I.: Other Jurisdiction: Diversity represented by Adam D. Horowitz Mermelstein & Horowitz PA 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami FL 33160 Fax: Email: LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Jeffrey Marc Herman Herman & Mermelstein 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami FL 33160 Fax: 931-0877 Email: LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Stuart S. Mermelstein Mermelstein & Horowitz PA 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami FL 33160 MOM Fax: 931-0877 Email: LRJ https://ecIfIsd.uscourts.g
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 49 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/31/2008 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARR)VJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARR)VJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARR)VJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARR)VJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. EFTA00222466 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 49 Entered on FLSD Docket 10;31.2008 Page 2 of 11 JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08- 80994-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: 08- 80993-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS Plaintiffs, Jane Does 2-7, by and through undersigned counsel, file this Mem
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 0718/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 2, by and through her undersigned counsel, submits this Memorandum of Law in Response to Motion for Stay, as follows: INTRODUCTION Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay this action is based on the incorrect premise that there are criminal actions pending against him in Palm Beach Circuit Court, State of Florida. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 2006 CF 09454 AXXMB (Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County), and in the Southern District of Florida, In re Grand Jury, No. FGJ 07-103 (WPB) (S.D. Fla.). The Motion to Stay as to the state court criminal action was rendered moot on June 30, 2008 when Jeffrey Epstein entered a plea of guilty to
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF SERVING SECOND AMENDED ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES COMES NOW the Plaintiff, , by and through undersigned counsel, and hereby files this Notice with the Court that Second Amended Answers to Interrogatories propounded by the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, on January 16, 2009, have been furnished to the attorney for the Defendant I HEREBY CERTIFY that a tru copy of th egoing has been furnished by e- mail this 1.-S racof October, 2009 list of counsel. Attorney for PlaIntiff(s) 3505-045 Page I of 17 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00005456 EFTA00157905 vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-86811-CIV-MARFtAkIOHNSON Plaintiffs Second Amended Answers to Defendant's Fkst Interrogatories PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF SERVING SECOND AMENDED ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES 3. List all fo
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 41 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/22/2008 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM IN RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 2, ("Jane" or "Jane Doe"), by and through her undersigned counsel, files this Memorandum in Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, and states as follows: 1. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein is alleged to have sexually abused Jane Doe when she was a minor. The Complaint is in two Counts: Count I is labeled "Sexual Assault", and alleges an intentional tort based on the actions of Jeffrey Epstein; Count II alleges the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress based on the same factual allegations. Defendant Epstein has moved to dismiss only Count I of the Complaint, contending that Plaintiff has failed to state a claim. Simultaneously her
Case 9:08-cv-80069-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80069-KAM Document 7-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02,112008 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80069-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. I, by and through JANE DOE's FATHER as parent and natural guardian, and JANE DOE's FATHER, and JANE DOE's STEPMOTHER, individually, Plaintiffs, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING JANE DOE NO. 1 REACHING AGE OF MAJORITY Plaintiffs, Jane Doe No. 1, by and through Jane Doe's Father as parent and natural guardian, and Jane Doe's Father and Jane Doe's Stepmother, individually, submit this Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Jane Doe No. 1 Reaching Age of Majority, as follows: I. Introduction This action alleges the sexual assault of Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 1 ("Jane Doe") by the Defendant when she was 14 years old. The Motion to Stay Proceedings filed by Jane Doe's Mother
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.