Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00222348DOJ Data Set 9Other

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00222348
Pages
3
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/25:2008 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA NO. 08-80119-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, 1. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL CLERK TO ENTER DEFAULT THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Clerk to Enter Default Against Defendant (DE 9), filed June 11, 2008. The motion is now fully briefed and is ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the motion and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. On July 16, 2008, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause' why default should not be entered against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein (DE 22), arguing that Defendant had let more than twenty days elapse after service of process before attempting to respond to the Complaint. As the Court explained, under New York law, personal service may be made on an individual by delivering the summons within the state to a perso

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/25:2008 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA NO. 08-80119-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, 1. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL CLERK TO ENTER DEFAULT THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Clerk to Enter Default Against Defendant (DE 9), filed June 11, 2008. The motion is now fully briefed and is ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the motion and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. On July 16, 2008, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause' why default should not be entered against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein (DE 22), arguing that Defendant had let more than twenty days elapse after service of process before attempting to respond to the Complaint. As the Court explained, under New York law, personal service may be made on an individual by delivering the summons within the state to a person of suitable age and discretion at the actual place of business, dwelling place or usual place of abode of the person to be served and by either mailing the summons to the person to be served at his or her last known residence or by mailing the summons by first class mail to the person to be served at his or her actual place of business in an envelope bearing the legend "personal and confidential" and not indicating on the outside thereof, by return address 'The Court presumes familiarity with the contents of this Order. 1 EFTA00222348 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/25/2008 Page 2 of 3 or otherwise, that the communication is from an attorney or concerns an action against the person to be served, such delivery and mailing to be effected within twenty days of each other. N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 308(2) (McKinney 2008) (emphasis added). Based on the Court's reading of the Affidavit of Service (DE 4), it appeared that Plaintiff's process server had mailed a copy of the Summons and Complaint to Defendant on May 5, 2008. What appeared to be a distortion in the document due to its electronic upload into the Court's CM/ECF system, however, was apparently a line striking the language from the affidavit regarding the mailing of the Summons and Complaint. (See DE 26.) Plaintiff brought this error to the Court's attention after the Court issued its Order to Show Cause. Because the Summons and Complaint were not mailed to Defendant, service was not accomplished under New York law.' See N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 308(2). Further, as the Court has already explained, service was not effective under either the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Florida law.' Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Clerk to Enter Default Against Defendant (DE 9) is DENIED. Plaintiff shall have forty-five (45) days from the date of entry of this Order to serve a copy of the Summons and Complaint on Defendant. Failure to serve Defendant within forty-five days shall result in dismissal of the above-styled action pursuant to 'Interestingly, Plaintiff did not bring this issue to the Court's attention in its Reply brief. Defendant's Response to the Motion (DE I I) made clear that he assumed all the steps were taken to serve Defendant in accordance with New York law, including that copies were sent through the mail. 'The Court again declines to allow discovery on whether Richard Barnett resides at Defendant's New York home. Mr. Barnett submitted an affidavit sworn under penalty of perjury that he does not reside at that address. (See Barnett Aff.) Plaintiff has not submitted any evidence to suggest that Mr. Barnett is not credible, so allowing discovery on this point would simply be a waste of resources. 2 EFTA00222349 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/25/2008 Page 3 of 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). It is further ORDERED that Defendant is relieved of responsibility from responding to the Court's Order to Show Cause (DE 22) issued on July 16, 2008. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 25ih day of July, 2008. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge Copies furnished to: all counsel of record 3 EFTA00222350

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

11/28/07 WED 09:18 FAX 1 213 680 8500

11/28/07 WED 09:18 FAX 1 213 680 8500 KIRALAND&ELLIS LLP 11002 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP AND A/MIMED PARINUSHIPS Kenneth W: Start To Call Wrier Directly. (213) 680-8440 kstarrekirklend.com VIA FACSIMILE Honorable Alice S. Fisher Assistant Attorney General Department of Justice Criminal Division 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Room 2107 Washington, DC 20530 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms. Fisher: 777 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, California 90017 (213) 680-8400 www.kirkland.com November 28, 2007 Facsimile: (213) 680-8600 I represent Jeffrey Epstein, who, as you may be aware, was the target of a dual investigation by both state and federal authorities in Florida for acts relating to his interactions with numerous young women. As you may also be aware, Mr. Epstein has entered into a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (the "Agreement") with the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (the "USAO") to resolve its criminal investigation of him

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: Jeffrey Epstein

From: To: Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 20:51:45 +0000 Importance: Normal Mr. Lefkowitz, The United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida was recently notified that the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, at your request, intends to review certain aspects of the investigation involving Mr. Epstein's sexual conduct involving minor victims. Naturally, until the DAG's Office has completed its review, this Office has postponed the current June 2, 2008 deadline requiring compliance by your client with the terms and conditions of the September 24, 2007 global resolution of state and federal liabilities, as modified by the United States Attorney's December 19, 2007 letter to Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Sincerely, EFTA00214435

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

CLAIM ID: 26H9-2VPP

CLAIM ID: 26H9-2VPP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRAMOHNSON Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. / PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF SERVING VERIFIED ANSWERS TO SECOND INTERROGATORIES COMES NOW the Plaintiff, , by and through the undersigned counsel, and hereby gives notice that that Verified Answers to Second Interrogatories propounded by the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, on August 28, 2009, have been furnished to the attorney for the Defendant. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been furnished by e-mail this trday of November, 2009 to alt counsel ob the attached service list. Attorney tor minim 3505-038 Page I of 5 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00005262 EFTA00157825 CLAIM ID: 26H9-2VPP VS. EPSTEIN, et al Case No.: 08-CV-80811-Marra/Johnson Plaintiffs Verified Answers to Second Interrogatories SERVICE LIST Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldb

5p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

EXHIBIT M

EXHIBIT M EFTA00039806 From: U Subject: Date: Fwd: Next week - meet re: Jeffrey Epstein Sunday. February 24, 2019 8:18:01 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Dat • March 3 ?016 at 5:09.55 PM EST To: Subject: RE: Next week - meet re: Jeffrey Epstein Cool. Talk to you then. From: Sent: I hursday, March 03, 20th 5:05 PM To:I 2 Subject: HE: Next week - meet re: Jeffrey Epstein Tuesday at 4 is good. Thanks. From: Sent: hursday, March 03, 2011 10:24 AM To: Subject: HE: Next week - meet re: Jeffrey Epstein Sure. Sounds both intriguing and complicated. I uesday is better for me than Wednesday. How's Tuesday at 4 pm? From: Sent: I hursday. March 03, 201b k:08 AM To: ■ Subject: Next week - meet re: Jeffrey Epstein Earlier this week Pete Skinner and two other lawyers came in to pitch a sex trafficking case against Jeffrey Epstein, a financier with homes abroad, in FL, and in Manhattan. They represent vho claims to have been prostituted by and f

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

IN RE:

IN RE: INVESTIGATION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN Non-Prosecution Agreement IT APPEARING that the City of Palm Beach Police Department and the State Attorney's Office for the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County (hereinafter, the "State Attorney's Office") have conducted an investigation into the conduct of Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"); IT APPEARING that the State Attorney's Office has charged Epstein with one count of solicitation of prostitution, in violation of Florida Statutes Section 796.07; IT APPEARING that the interest of the United States pursuant to the Petite policy will be served by the following procedure expressed in this Agreement; IT APPEARING that the United States Attorney's Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation have conducted their own investigation of Epstein's background and offenses including; knowingly and willfully conspiring with others known and unknown to commit an offense against the United States, in violation of Titl

6p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.