Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00222947DOJ Data Set 9Other

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FGJ 07-103(WPB) IN RE: GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS SEALED MOTION The United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby moves the Court for permission to disclose the Court's Sealed Order of April 16, 2007 and a grand jury subpoena related to that sealed order. In support thereof, the Government states: 1. In April 2007, the United States filed a Sealed Motion for an Order compelling the testimony of 2. On April 16, 2007, the Court granted the Sealed Motion in a Sealed Order, which is attached hereto. 3. The matter relates to issues occurring before the grand jury and, accordingly, is governed by Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e). Under that Rule, the "court may authorize disclosure — at a time, in a manner, and subject to any other conditions that it directs — of a grand-jury matter: (i) preliminarily to or in connection with a judicial proceeding." 4. The Order itself 1 EF

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00222947
Pages
4
Persons
4
Integrity

Summary

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FGJ 07-103(WPB) IN RE: GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS SEALED MOTION The United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby moves the Court for permission to disclose the Court's Sealed Order of April 16, 2007 and a grand jury subpoena related to that sealed order. In support thereof, the Government states: 1. In April 2007, the United States filed a Sealed Motion for an Order compelling the testimony of 2. On April 16, 2007, the Court granted the Sealed Motion in a Sealed Order, which is attached hereto. 3. The matter relates to issues occurring before the grand jury and, accordingly, is governed by Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e). Under that Rule, the "court may authorize disclosure — at a time, in a manner, and subject to any other conditions that it directs — of a grand-jury matter: (i) preliminarily to or in connection with a judicial proceeding." 4. The Order itself 1 EF

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FGJ 07-103(WPB) IN RE: GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS SEALED MOTION The United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby moves the Court for permission to disclose the Court's Sealed Order of April 16, 2007 and a grand jury subpoena related to that sealed order. In support thereof, the Government states: 1. In April 2007, the United States filed a Sealed Motion for an Order compelling the testimony of 2. On April 16, 2007, the Court granted the Sealed Motion in a Sealed Order, which is attached hereto. 3. The matter relates to issues occurring before the grand jury and, accordingly, is governed by Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e). Under that Rule, the "court may authorize disclosure — at a time, in a manner, and subject to any other conditions that it directs — of a grand-jury matter: (i) preliminarily to or in connection with a judicial proceeding." 4. The Order itself 1 EFTA00222947 5. The Sealed Order and subpoena are relevant to a judicial proceeding, that is, Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 v. United States, 08-80736-CV-MARRA. is one of the Petitioners in that case, and she has alleged, inter alia, that she was not treated fairly in connection with the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. 6. The United States respectfully requests permission to disclose redacted versions of the subpoena and Order. in the pub this Motion, the United States' Surreply to the Replies of William Riley and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein on Motion to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas, and Supplement to Ex Parte Declaration Number One in Support of United States' Response to Motion to Quash Subpoenas, for the following reasons: 1. The attached documents contain information relating to an ongoing grand jury investigation; thus, pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(6), all records and orders related to the grand-jury proceedings must be kept under seal to the extent and as long as necessary to prevent the unauthorized disclosure of a matter occurring before the grand jury 2. Public disclosure of this matter would jeopardize the criminal investigation, notify potential subjects and/or targets and undermine the public interest and the function of the grand jury. WHEREFORE, the United States respectfully requests that the aforementioned documents be sealed. Respectfully submitted, 2 EFTA00222948 R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: Assistant United States Attorne 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Telephone: Facsimile: CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on August , 2007, the foregoing document was served via Federal Express on Attorneys William Richey and Roy Black. This document was not filed using CM/ECF because it is being filed under seal. Assistant U.S. Attorney 3 EFTA00222949 SERVICE LIST In re Federal Grand Jury Subpoenas No. OLY-63 and OLY-64 United States District Court, Southern District of Florida William L. Richey, Esq. Assistant U.S. Attorne William L. Richey P.A. U.S. Attorney's Office 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Telephone: Facsimile: Attorney for United States 4 Telephone: Facsimile: Attorney for Subpoenaed Parties Riley Kiraly and William Riley 11 Black, Black, Srebnick, Kornspan & Stumpf, P.A. Telephone: Facsimile: Attorney for Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein EFTA00222950

Related Documents (6)

House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Attorney‑Generated Oversight Memo Accuses DOJ Prosecutors of Misconduct, Conflict of Interest, and Political Motives in Jeffrey Epstein Federal Case

The document provides a detailed, contemporaneous account of alleged DOJ misconduct—including unauthorized subpoenas, misrepresentations to the court, undisclosed financial incentives to witnesses, ex Alleged illegal re‑issuance of a grand‑jury subpoena after a Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) was sig Claims that AUSA Villafana disclosed confidential case details to the New York Times and leaked in

85p
House OversightUnknown

Attorney‑Generated Oversight Memo Accuses DOJ Prosecutors of Misconduct, Conflict of Interest, and Political Motives in Jeffrey Epstein Federal Case

Attorney‑Generated Oversight Memo Accuses DOJ Prosecutors of Misconduct, Conflict of Interest, and Political Motives in Jeffrey Epstein Federal Case The document provides a detailed, contemporaneous account of alleged DOJ misconduct—including unauthorized subpoenas, misrepresentations to the court, undisclosed financial incentives to witnesses, ex‑parte communications, and leaks to the press—while naming senior DOJ officials (Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip, Assistant U.S. Attorneys Marie Villafana and Jeffrey Sloman) and linking the case to former President Bill Clinton’s notoriety. These allegations, if substantiated, could expose abuse of prosecutorial discretion, potential violations of DOJ ethics rules, and political influence, making it a strong investigative lead. However, much of the material is defensive in nature and repeats known procedural complaints, limiting its novelty and concrete evidentiary hooks. Key insights: Alleged illegal re‑issuance of a grand‑jury subpoena after a Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) was signed (July 1 2008 subpoena).; Claims that AUSA Villafana disclosed confidential case details to the New York Times and leaked information to reporter Landon Thomas.; Accusations that Villafana attempted to appoint a personal friend of her live‑in boyfriend as attorney‑representative for victims, suggesting a conflict of interest.

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S INITIAL DISCLOSURES Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, makes its Initial Disclosures, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1)(A), and state: Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1)(A)fil: 1. R. Alexander Acosta Dean, School of Law Florida International University Rafael Diaz-Balart Hall 11200 S.W. 8'h Street Miami, Florida 33199 (305) 348-1118 Dean Acosta was the United States Attorney, Southern District of Florida, during the time when the criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein was opened in the U.S. Attorney's Office, and the non-prosecution agreement was negotiated. 2. was the First Assistant U.S. Attorney in the U.S. Attorney's Office, during the time when the criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein was opened, and the non-prosecution agreement was negot

10p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p
OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 329 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2015 Page 1 of 2

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01325031

20p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS FGJ 07-103(WPB) DUCES TECUM NUMBERS OLY-63 and OLY-64 UNITED STATES' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE OVERSIZED RESPONSE TO MOTION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN TO INTERVENE AND TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS AND CROSS-MOTION TO COMPEL UNDER SEAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS FGJ 07-103(WPB) DUCES TECUM NUMBERS OLY-63 and OLY-64 UNDER SEAL UNITED STATES' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE OVERSIZED RESPONSE TO MOTION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN TO INTERVENE AND TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS AND CROSS-MOTION TO COMPEL The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Motion for Permission to File an Oversized Response, and, in support thereof, states: 1. Movant Jeffrey Epstein, by and through counsel, filed a Motion to Intervene and to Quash two grand jury subpoenas duces tecum on July

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.