Richard H. Willits, P.A.
Summary
Richard H. Willits, P.A. Civil Trial Law r Office: Facsimile: September 12, 2008 U.S. Department of Justice 500 S. Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Attention: , Assistant U.S. Attorney Re: Our Client: Defendant: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms. Villafana: Please provide us a copy of the settlement agreement that you refer to between the United States and Mr. Epstein. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Michael Danchuk Legal Administrator/Paralegal MD/amy cc: Richard H. Willits, Esq. EFTA00223633 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 April 9, 2008 VIA FACSIMILE Richard H. Willets, Esq. Mr. Michael Danchuk Re: Dear Messrs. Willits and Danchuk: Thank you for your letter of March 28, 2008, regarding . Pursuant to the strict rules of grand jury secrecy, I am not able to provide you with the information that you have requested. I b
Persons Referenced (5)
“...ustralian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Attention: , Assistant U.S. Attorney Re: Our Client: Defendant: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms. Villafana: Please provide us a copy of the settl...”
Alexander Acosta“...ep me updated on the course of the civil litigation. cc: FBI Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta By EFTA00223634 04/09/2008 14:19 FAX 5618021787 USAO WPB FL Oooi TRANSMISSION OK ***************...”
Jeffrey Epstein“... FL 33401 Attention: , Assistant U.S. Attorney Re: Our Client: Defendant: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms. Villafana: Please provide us a copy of the settlement agreement that you refer to between the...”
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
IN RE:
IN RE: INVESTIGATION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN ADDENDUM TO THE NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT IT APPEARING that the panics seek to clarify certain provisions of page 4, paragraph 7 of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (hereinafter "paragraph 7"), that agreement is modified as fol lows: 7A. The United States has the right to assign to an independent third-party the responsibility fur consulting with and, subject to the good faith approval of Epstein's counsel, selecting the attorney representative for the individuals identified under the Agreement. If the United States elects to assign this responsibility to an independent third-patty, both the United States and Epstein retain the right to make good faith objections to the attorney representative suggested by the independent third-party prior to the final designation of the attorney representative. 7II. The parties will jointly prepare a short written submission to the independent third-party regarding the role of the attorney represen
From: "ExecSec 1(DO1)1(FBII)"
From: "ExecSec 1(DO1)1(FBII)" To: Subject: DOJ EXECSEC / TRIM DOCUMENT : 19/DO/2652 : (Rec'd from OLA via email) writing to follow-up on earlier communications with DOJ/OPR, regarding the ongoing investigation to determine whether federal prosecutors in the U.S. Attorney's Office for the S.D. of Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 12:43:16 +0000 Importance: Normal Priority: normal Attachments: (Recninvestigation_to_determine_whether federal_prosecutors_in_the_U.S._Attorney_s_ Office_for the_S.D._of Florida,_including_current_Secretaty_olpdf Classification: UNCLASSIFIED (U) C, OPA, VSD, CID, SAC (U) Instructions: EFTA00175190 (U) Attached is correspondence referred to the FBI by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Executive Secretariat, FOR INFORMATION ONLY. IT DOES NOT REQUIRE ANY FBI ACTION; however, it is being referred to you for your information in the event you may be contacted by the DOJ entity tasked with handling the response. (U) IMPORTANT NOTE: If you represent an FBI
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS FGJ 07-103(WPB) DUCES TECUM NUMBERS OLY-63 and OLY-64 UNITED STATES' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE OVERSIZED RESPONSE TO MOTION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN TO INTERVENE AND TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS AND CROSS-MOTION TO COMPEL UNDER SEAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS FGJ 07-103(WPB) DUCES TECUM NUMBERS OLY-63 and OLY-64 UNDER SEAL UNITED STATES' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE OVERSIZED RESPONSE TO MOTION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN TO INTERVENE AND TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS AND CROSS-MOTION TO COMPEL The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Motion for Permission to File an Oversized Response, and, in support thereof, states: 1. Movant Jeffrey Epstein, by and through counsel, filed a Motion to Intervene and to Quash two grand jury subpoenas duces tecum on July
U.S. Department of Justice
U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 99 N. E. 4 gh Street Miami. FL 33132-2111 cto er DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE The Hon. Edward B. Davis (Ret.) rnrut ' mut rtitt Miami, Florida 33131 Re: Service as a Special Master Dear Judge Davis: Thank you for agreeing to serve as a Special Master and for assisting the United States Attorney's Office in the selection of an attorney representative to represent a group of identified victims. This letter is meant to assist you in performing your duties by providing you with background information regarding the agreement between the United States and Jeffrey Epstein and the duties that the attorney representative will have to perform. The Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office conducted an investigation of Mr. Epstein. As a result of that investigation, the U.S. Attorney's Office and Mr. Epstein entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement and an Addendum that contains, inter a
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant
U.S. Department of Justice
U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida VIA FACSIMILE Michael R. Tein, Esq. Lewis Tein, P.L. 3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340 Coconut Grove, FL 33133 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Tein: 500 South Australian Ave.. Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (56!) 820-8711 Facsimile: (561) 820-8777 July 17, 2008 The Office has reviewed your "Notice of Continued Pendency of Federal Criminal Action," and we feel that it misrepresents the posture of the federal investigation. For example, you cite to In re Grand Jury, No. FGJ 07-103 (WPB), as evidence that the federal criminal action remains pending. That is a citation to Mr. Epstein's Motion to Quash a subpoena for computer equipment removed from Mr. Epstein's home after he and his attorneys were aware of the existence of the state investigation. Pursuant to the Non- Prosecution Agreement, that motion was supposed to have been withdrawn several months ago, and, therefore, is not "pending" in
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.