(USAFLS)

(USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: hursda ua ' To: N.: Subject: ist o names From: (USAFLS) t Ser riii.1:43111 . To: N.; Subject: List of names Here are the names of people I am intending to keep in the indictment: eyewitness info only) - initials only. not' listed Jane Doe Not all will be in substantive counts, but they will be mentioned in the oven acts. Assistant U.S. Attorney 1668 08-80736-CV-MARRA F014604 EFTA00223748 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: h r February 14 2 8 2. P To: N.: Subject: I now you hate d when I o this,but. . . I always seem to notice something new when I go through these records. In notes, he shows 'payment to Golden Cab on 6/17/05. Can you call and see if they have any reco s or any trips tcrEl Brillo Way? Or a Dennis working there? And that long string of unknown numbers on cell phone. Could those be 'group of lines for Yellow Cab? Thanks. I am almost finished with the changes to the girls we are keeping. I will send that to you and then when I finish the new girls, I will send that portion. Assistant U.S. Attorney 1670 08-80736-CV-MARRA F014605 EFTA00223749 (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Subject: Here are the names of people I am intending to keep in the indictment: eyewitness info only) — initials only, not 'listed Jane Doe II Not all will be in substantive counts, but they will be mentioned in the overt acts. I Assistant U.S. Attorney 1672 08-80736-CV-MARRA •014606 EFTA00223750 . (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: To: Subject: RE DOBs Hi guys - sorry to bother you. On some of the new girls I don't have dobs. Martell Dicenso (the 302 says her dob is 84 5/2007) and do we have 'phone number?) Have you guys ever talked to or Should I include them? Assistant U.S. Attorney 1674 08-80736-CV-MARRA ♦014607 EFTA00223751 M, Ann Marie I. (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: hursda February 14. 2008 1:21 PM To: Subject: Epstein Indictment I In - I didn't send the indictment yet. I was just asking tor input on who to include and who to exclude. How old was w hen she went Vl jilt From: Sen 14, 2008 1:00 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Epstein Indictment Hey Marie, There was no indictment attached to your email. Can you send it again. %I In addition to the two calls from to on her cell /04 at 1:35 pm and 5/2/04 at 10:32 am, we have two telephone calls from to Shawn Haught's (boyfriend) telephone on 03/04/2004 at 9:46 am and 2:30 pm. Message pads reflect 10 Inning 03/11/2003 ending 03/01/2006. Individuals identified as taking the messages are and Alfredo Rodriguez. From: (USAFLS) [Ann.Marie. j.gov] Sen 1 AM To: N.; Subject: RE: Epstein Indictment F Y I jell me what you think. Also. can you pu i u essages from what the dates are and ‘s.ho took the messages? at we has only two phone calls with ' 4/23/04 and 5/2/04 561 rue> From: (USAFLS) Sen ruary 14, 2008 11:22 AM To: Subject: Epstein Indictment 1678 and see if you can tell 08-80736-CV-MARRA I-014608 EFTA00223752 Hi Myesha — Our server was down for 'few hours this morning. so I am very behind on my revisions. I wanted to talk about which iris we should drop. and I. are the girls who have filed lawsuits. I have excluded them. With respect to the other girls brought by . here are my thoughts. We c and S. very easily. Both only gave I or 2 massages and did not disclose their ages. ill S. is good witness because she shows that, if you aren't willing to do more sexual activity, Epstein stops the massage and doesn't want to see you anymore. She seems like someone whom we could get in as 404(b) because the probative nature outweighs its plie s I think we should drop I because I don't believe she will ever be completely zuthful about the amount of sexual activity that occurred. (She is the girl that one of the witnesses described as 'I virgin on graduation day.") That only leaves . the soccer player who cried for the entire interview. I think that she may be worth keepisWe have such good documents evidence related to her - message bads, car rental records. 156 calls with . and 2 calls with (we have very few phone calls with =, so this is M). What do vou think? Assistant U.S. Attorney 1679 08-80736-CV-MARRA F014609 EFTA00223753 . (USAFLS) From: Sent: hursda Febru r 14. 2008 1 00 PM To: ■ (USAFLS) Subject: pstein Indictment Hey Marie, There was no indictment attached to your email. Can you send it again. In addition to the two calls from on her cell 10/04 at 1:35 pm and 5/2/04 at 10:32 am, we have two telephone calls from to Shawn Haught's ( boyfnend) telephone on 03/04/2004 at 9:46 am and 2:30 pm. Message pads reflect 10 messa es from beginning 03/11/2003 ending 03/01/2006. Individuals identified as taking the messages are and Alfredo Rodriguez. From: (USAFLS) [Ann. 1 Sen • ru • 1 AM To: N.; Su act: RE: Epstein Indictment FYI -fell me ■ you think. Also. can you pull the messages from what the dates arc and who took the messages? Thanks. And • ) • at we have only two phone calls with MP 4/23/04 and 5/2/04 and see if you can tell From: (USAFLS) Ton ruary 14, 2008 11:22 AM To: Subject: Epstein Indictment Hi Myesha — Our server was down for' few hours this morning. so I am very behind on my revisions. I wanted to talk about which we should drop. and I. are the girls who have filed lawsuits. I have excluded them. With respect to the other girls brought by M. here are my thoughts. We c and S. very easily. Both only gave I or 2 massages and did not disclose their ages. S. is good witness because she shows that, if you aren't willing to do more sexual activity, Epstein stops the massage and doesn't want to see you anymore. She seems like someone whom we could get in as 404(b) because the probative nature outweighs its pie I think we should drop I because I don't believe she will ever be completely zuthful about the amount of sexual activity that occurred. (She is the girl that one of the witnesses described as virgin on graduation day.") That only leaves . the soccer player who cried for the entire interview. I think that she may be worth keeping. We have such good documentary evidence related to her — message pads. car rental records, 156 calls 1686 08-80736-CV-MARRA I-014610 EFTA00223754 with and 2 calls with (we have very few phone calls with M, so this is key). I hat do ou think? Assistant U.S. Attorney 561 1687 08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014611 EFTA00223755 (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Subject: Thur F 14, 2008 12:37 PM (USAFLS) Epstein Indictment I'm not supposed to be involved in n tantive decisions until I get word from on h h'. However, my gener thoughts are that you are correct 5 of th Vence and will be I good witness, although reluctant one. Am I correct to assume that and I. are still in? Their past history of commitment will have to be dealt with and it won't be easy. but I agree that they should be lite fact that their commitments were post-Epstein is good but his going to try to destroy them. Is in as well? I thought that she was truthful. What about M '7 From: (USAFLS) [mailto Sen 2008 11:22 AM To: Su • ect: Epstein Indictment I Hi Myesha — Our server was down for few hours this morning, so I am very behind on my revisions. I wanted to talk about which girls we should dro . and I. are the girls who have filed lawsuits. I have excluded them. With respect to the other girls brought by . here arc my thoughts. We can dm and S. very easily. Both only gave I or 2 massages and did not disclose their ages. good witness because she shows that, if you aren't willing to do more sexual activity. Epstein stops the massage and doesn't want to see you anymore. She seems like someone whom we could get in as 404(b) because the probative nature outweighs its prejudice. I think we should drop I because 1 don't believe she will ever be completely truthful about the amount of sexual activity that occurred. (She is the girl that one of the witnesses described as'i virgin on graduation day:') That only leaves the soccer player who cried for the entire interview. I think that she may be worth keep' such good documentary evidence related to her — message pads, car rental records, 156 calls with . and 2 calls with (we have very few phone calls with . so this is key). What do you think? Assistant U.S. Attorney 1690 08-80736-CV-MARRA F014612 EFTA00223756 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thur d Februa 14 20 81 41 M To: N , Subject: RE. EpsteinIndictment FYI - len me you think. Also. can you pull the messages from dates are and 11. oak the messages? Thanks. And am I correct that we have only two phone calls with M.' 4/23104 and 5/2/U4 ssistant .S, 56I 209-1047 From: .IICSAFLS) ruary 14, 2008 11:22 AM To: Subject: Epstein Indictment and see ilyou can tell what the Hi Myesha — Our server was down for' few hours this morning, so I am very behind on my revisions. I wanted to talk about which girls we should drop. M and I are the girls who have filed lawsuits. I have excluded them. Both only gave 1 or 2 massages and did not disclose their ages. With respect to the other girls brought by . here are my th S. is good witness ause s e shows that, if e cal drop I.T eld MI S. very easily. you aren't willing to do more sexual activity. Epstein stops the massage and doesn't want to see you anymore. She seems like someone whom we could get in as 404(b) because the probative nature outweighs its prejudice. I think we should drop I because I don't believe she will ever be completely truthful about the amount of sexual activity that occurred. (She is the girl that one of the witnesses described as 'i virgin on graduation day.") That only leaves Il.. the soccer player who cried for the entire interview. I think that she may be wort in . We have such g document evidence related to her — message pads, car rental records. 156 calls with. and 2 calls with (we have very few phone calls with • so this is key). What do you think? SLY 1702 08-80736-CV-MARRA •014613 EFTA00223757 From: Sent: To: Subject: FYI — Tell me what >nu think. Also. cairtill the messages from il and see if you can tell what the dates are and who took the messages? And am I correct that we have only two phone calls with 4/23/04 and 5/2/04 I. Mark VAIN& Assistant U.S. Attorney 561 209-1047 From: (USAFI.S) Sen • February 14, 2008 11:22 AM To: Subject: Epstein Indictment Hi Myesha - Our server was down for' few hours this morning, so I am very behind on my revisions. 1 wanted to talk about which girls we should drop. and I. are the girls who have filed lawsuits. I have excluded them. With respect to the other girls brought by , here are my th e c drop and S. very easily. Both only gave I or 2 massages and did not disclose their ages. S. is I good witness because she shows that, if you aren't willing to do more sexual activity, Epstein stops the massage and doesn't want to see you anymore. She seems like someone whom we could get in as 404(b) because the probative nature outweighs its prejudice. etely truthful about the amount of sexual activity that occurred. !Ps the girl that one of the witnesses described as' virgin on graduation day.") I think we should drop I because I don't believe she will ever be cornui That only leaves oo the soccer player who cried for the entire interview. I think that she may be wo We have such g documentary evidence related to her — message palmnal records, 156 calls with and 2 calls with (we have very few phone calls with so this is key). What do you think? Assistant U.S. Attorney 1794 08-80736-CV-MARRA II-014614 EFTA00223758 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: illhursc ruary . 2008 11:22 AM To: Subject: Epstein Indictment Hi Myesha — Our server was down for' few hours this morning. so I am very behind on my revisions. I wanted to talk about which girls we should drop. and are the girls who have filed lawsuits. I have excluded them. With respect to the other girls brought by M . here are my th e cal drop and S. very easily. Both only gave 1 or 2 massages and did not disclose their ages. S. is I good witness because she shows that, if you aren't willing to do more sexual activity, Epstein stops the massage and doesn't want to see you anymore. She seems like someone whom we could get in as 404(b) because the probative nature outweighs its prejudice. I think we should drop I because I don't believe she will ever be completely truthful about the amount of sexual activity that occurred. (She is the girl that one of the witnesses described as 1 virgin on graduation day.") That only leaves the soccer player who cried for the entire interview. I think that she may be worth pin . We have such good document evidence related to her - message pads. car rental records, 156 calls with and 2 calls with (we have very few phone calls with so this is key). What do you think? I Marie Villafatia Assistant U.S. Attorney 1706 08-80736-CV-MARRA I-014615 EFTA00223759 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: February 12, 2008 4:33 PM To: N. Subject: Te ne numbers Can you 'mail me your summary chart, too? The Excel spreadsheet. Thanks. Assistant U.S. Attorney 561 209-1047 1713 08-80736-CV-MARRA F014616 EFTA00223760 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday February 12. 2008 4 33 PM To: N Subject: elephone numbers Can you e-mail me your summary chart, too? The Excel spreadsheet. Thanks. Assistant U.S. Attorney 1714 08-80736-CV-MARRA F014617 EFTA00223761 . (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: U M. ri l iary -i 2008 3 19 PM To: Subject: Telephone charts and phone records the Hi 11- Im im i get thiament package finalized. C's d . and Also, do you have all o f to me the final telephone charts for all of records electronically? Maybe we can search for phone numbers for some of the new girls, even though we don't have their phone records yet. Also, can you check on the lead to New York? Ideally. I would like to turn the package in on Thursday, so I need to know if we can include any of those girls. When you have I chance. please give me I call. I am in the U.S. Attorney's Office Assistant U.S. Attorney 561 sai 1717 08-80736-CV-MARRA ♦014618 EFTA00223762 .(USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Subject: r 08208 PM (USAFLS) e. hone call info Ill fax it in 5 min(what fax U?) Fro (USAFLS) < To: N. Sent: Fri Feb 22 14:07:06 2008 Subject: Phone call info Hi - Can you "nail or air the dates of the calls? I can add them to the ni dictment today. I think is going to try to finish her review over the weekend. Thanks. II Marie Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone 561 209-1047 Fax 156n 08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014619 EFTA00223763 USAFLS From: (USAFLS) Sent: lila eb rt i.wi ,t082. 10 PM To: N Subject: : hone ca info Thanks y 500 S. Austra Ian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm h FL 33401 Phone 5 Original Messa From: Kuyrkendall, IN. Sent. • Fliiiiiiiiiii2008 2:08 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Ph!!!M!!!!Millo I11 fax it in 5 min(what fax II) From: To: Kuyrkendall, N. Sent: Fri Feb 22 14:07:06 2008 Subject: Phone call info Hi - Can you l[mail or the in is ment today. I think the weekend. (USAFLS) < Illr the dates of the calls? I can add them to is going to try to finish her review over Thanks. II Marie Villafana Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone 561 209-1047 Fax 1562 08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014620 EFTA00223764 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: n ry , 2:07 PM To: N. Subject: one ca m o Hi Nesbitt — Can you Imail or fax me the dates of the calls? I can add them to the indictment today. I think is going to try to finish her review over the weekend. Thanks. I Marie Villafatla Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach. FL 33401 Phone Fax 1564 08-80736-CV-MARRA F014621 EFTA00223765 From: Sent: To: Subject: of the FedEx records last name is or and her phone number is (this may be an office number, not ce phone number). They also show another corporate name: "Max Hotel Services Corp." They show' phone number for Epstein and Eric Gany as They have an Imail address for as: and show her phone number as The notes show that the Max Hotel Services Corp credit card was declined and then they shos n a with company name "NYSG LLC" They want us to be more specific about individual shipment records. so we will have to comb through what they gave us to identify specific shipments. lam running to lunch but will be back this afternoon. Thanks. I Marie VillafaAa Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400 West Palm Beach. FL 33401 Phone Fax 1567 08-80736-CV-MARRA F014622 EFTA00223766 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: n aiiiiriary 25. 2008 11 24 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: uestion regarding use of Grand Jury Thank you. &reline. It is most appreciated. I Mark' rub:law Assistantli.S. Atturne) 500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400 West Palm Beach. FL 33401 Phone 561 209-1047 Fax From: M, (USAFLS) Sett : nd F 5, 2008 11:23 AM To: (USAFLS) Sub ect: RE: Question regarding use of Grand Jury Marie: I see no need to change grand juries. Indeed, changing grand juries might suggest that something untoward occurred, which is not the case. Nor do I see' requirement to give 1404(b) tape instruction. Let's not forget dig the role of the grand is to investigate, and it is wholly apEropriate that I grand jury in good faith pursued I line of investigation that does not lead to indictment. That is very different matter from presenting information pursuant to 404(b), to prove motive, lack of accident, etc. I share your instinct that just dropping six victims, and the draft proposed indictment, might call for some explanation, or at least acknowledgement, to the grand jury. It's always dicey, and not really desirable, to explain and share legal strategies with the grand jury. Perhaps you can simply tell them that the old draft II proposed indictment is being withdrawn, and ifferent set of facts is being pursued, and ask them if they can set aside what they heard previously, and base determination of probable cause solely on the new evidence. If any of them indicat inability to do so, perha they should li excused from consideration of this case; if that leaves you without I quorum, then you have I basis to go to I new grand jury. I hope this helps; I'm available by phone as well. Cctralitie, 1546 08-80736-CV-MARRA I-014623 EFTA00223767 From: (USAFLS) Sonbli ruary 25, 2008 9:59 AM To: (USAFLS) Su Question regarding use of Grand Jury Hi — I have received two conflicting points of view regarding this question, so I thought I should ask the exp ..Here is my situation: 1 have been involved in' long-term investigation of I ild exploitation case. Throughout the investigation, I have prese ed evidence and testimony to Grand Jury I Some of that evidence and testimony related to six victims (of I total of 19 victims), including the live testimony of one of those victims. I also began presenting evidence related to what I called '"draft proposed indictment." For various reasons, the indictment has been r delayed about 9 months. And, r other strategic reasons, we have decided to drop the six victims referenced above, and replaced them with different six victims. The question is now raised as to whether I should continue presenting to Grand Jury', with' 404(b)-type instruction related to the evidence of the six dropped victims and some sort of instruction regarding the initial i "draft proposed indictment", or whether I should present Grand Jury B, excluding any testimony regarding those six victims. One other consideration — Grand Jury is due to expire in August, and I anticipate that the investigation will continue for quite some time after indi ant. It is possible that the 6 dropped victims will be re-added in 'superseding indictment. Thank you. I Marie Villafafia Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone Fax Tracking: 1547 08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014624 EFTA00223768 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: Monde Februa 25 2008 11 23 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: uestion regarding use of Grand Jury Marie: I see no need to change grand juries. Indeed, changing grand juries might suggest that something untoward occurred. which is not the case. Nor do I see 'requirement to give' 404(6) 'Ape instruction. Let's not forget thil the role of the grand is to investigate, and it is wholly aprpriate that 'grand jury in good faith pursued I line of investigation that does not lead to indictment. That is very different matter from presenting information pursuant to 404(b), to prove motive, lack of accident, etc. I share your instinct that just dropping six victims, and the draft proposed indictment, might call for some explanation, or at least acknowledgement. to the grand jury. It's always dicey, and not really desirable, to explain and share legal strategies with the grand jury. Perhaps you can simply tell them that the old draft proposed indictment is being withdrawn, and iffe lil rent set of facts is being pursued, and ask them if they can set aside what they heard previously, and base determination of probable cause solely on the new evidence. If any of them indicatt inability to do so. perhags they should lif excused from consideration of this case; if that leaves you without I quorum, then you have I basis to go to I new grand jury. I hope this helps: I'm available by phone as well. Cc:wait/4e. From: (USAFLS) jilt Son • February 25, 2008 9:59 AM To: (USAFLS) Su : Question regarding use of Grand Jury Hi - I have received two conflicting points of view regarding this question. so I thought I should ask the . Here is my situation: i ir I have been involved in' long-term investigation of I ild exploitation case. Throughout the investigation. I have presc d evidence and testimony to Grand Jury Some of that evidence and testimony related to six victims (of total of 19 victims), including the live testimony of one of those victims. I also began presenting evidence re ated to what I called '"draft proposed indictment." For various reasons, the indictment has been delayed about 9 months. And, for other strategic reasons. we have decided to drop the six victims referenced above, and replaced them with' different six victims. 1552 08-80736-CV-MARRA F014625 EFTA00223769 The question is now raised as to whether I should continue presenting to Grand Jury'. with' 404(b)-type instruction related to the evidence of the six dropped victims and some sort of instruction regarding the initial i "draft proposed indictment", or whether I should present Grand Jury B. excluding any testimony regarding those six victims. One other consideration — Grand Jury is due to expire in August, and I anticipate that the investigation will continue for quite some time after indi ment. It is possible4hat the 6 dropped victims will be re-added in 'superseding indictment. Thank you. I Marie Villafana Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone Fax 1553 08-80736-CV-MARRA F014626 EFTA00223770 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: n a ary 25. 2008 9 59 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Question regarding use of Grand Jury Ili — I have received two conflicting points of view regarding this question, so I thought I should ask the . Here is my situation: I have been involved in 'long-term investigation of I ild exploitation case. 'Throughout the investigation. I 1 have preseled evidence and testimony to Grand Jury Some of that evidence and testimony related to six victims (of 'total of 19 victims), including the live testimony of one of those victims. I also began presenting evidence related to what I called tdraft proposed indictment." For various reasons, the indictment has been delayed about 9 months. And, for other strategic reasons, we have decided to drop the six victims referenced above, and replaced them with 'different six victims. The question is now raised as to whether I should continue presenting to Grand Jury', with' 404(b)-type instruction related to the evidence of the six dropped victims and some sort ofinstruction regarding the initial IL "draft proposed indictment", or whether I should present Grand Jury B, excluding any testimony regarding those six victims. One other consideration — Grand Jury is due to expire in August. and I anticipate that the investigation will continue for quite some time after indi ent. It is possible that the 6 dropped victims will be re-added in, superseding indictment. Thank you. I Marie Villajafia Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone Fax Tracking: 1556 08-80736-CV-MARRA F014627 EFTA00223771 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: lionc ary , 25, 2008 12:00 PM To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS). Garcia. Rolando (USAFLS), Mi. Karen (USAFLS) Cc: Braden, Myesha Subject: Epstein Hi all —I wanted to raise an issue with you regarding the presentation of the Epstein indictment. 1 have been Il e West Palm Beach Tuesday grand jury in the past. which has included presentation of testimony from and agent testimony regarding girls who will no longer be referenced in the indictment. I have conferred %ith and Heck regarding whether to stay with the same grand jury or present to Id), gran jury. They agree that I should present to the same grand jury with some sort of instruction regarding not relying on evidence/testimony regarding those girls. That is my intention. I would like to present on March I l a'. Epstein will be in town on March 10'h foliate court hearing and hopefully we will be able to keep track of his whereabou until the following day. is p reviewing the package now, so it should be in Miami by Monday, March 3" Also. I invited Myesha to be present for the grand jury proceedings, but she is waitin a. about her level of involvement in the case. She is available on that date, so, if decide this, she will be able to attend. Thank you. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone Fax Tracking: 1542 08-80736-CV-MARRA I-014628 EFTA00223772 (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Subject: paten' (USAFLS) ry 26, 2008 10 05 AM Hi Myesha — I won't even tell you about how today is starting off badly on this case (politics, of course, not facts). But, in any event, the word is that CEOS is going to undertake an "independent review" of the case and I meet with Epstein's attorneys some time next week. My supervisor is finishing t review of the indictment package and I know she caught some typos. Wls.i I finish those revisions, I will mail to you the entire indictment package, and you can find out what = wants to look at. I have one real concern, however. As you know, there are several girls that are still unknown to the defense. I want to avoid trait possibility that those names might be disclosed. Should 1 redact the names of all of the girls from the pros memos that I send to you? Thank you. Myesha. I Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone Fax t520 08-80736-CV-MARRA .014629 EFTA00223773 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: gr ay, xuary 2 . 2008 9:41 AM To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Cc: Senior, Robert (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Confidential Why would we possibly let him keep the same deal after all he has put us through? And after we have discovered 6 new girls. plus another 3 probable victims in New York? UFO* Pala& Assistant U.S. 500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400 w est Palm Beach. Fl. 33401 l'h, me 561 209-1047 I :IN 561 From: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, February 26, • To: Senior, Robert (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: Confidential FYI From: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 7:43 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Oosterbaan, Andrew Subject: Epstein Jay, The Section Chief of DOJ's Child Exploitation Obscenity Section (CEOS) notified me today that he will review the matter involving your client Jeffrey Epstein. The Section Chief has indicated that he is ready to proceed immediately, and I understand you are in the process of providing him this week with' summary of issues to be reviewed, and expect to meet with him next week. The Section Chief also indicated that you would be calling this Office regarding the upcoming March 3, 2008 court date in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County. As you know, the Agreement entered into by your client originally provided that the United States 1522 08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014630 EFTA00223774 Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (this Office) would defer prosecution if your client pled guilty to enumerated state charges by October 26, 2007. Since then, that date has been postponed for' number of reasons. At this juncture, it would not be reasonable to keep the current March 3ldate as I deadline for compliance with the Agreement. That said, this Office is very concerned about additional delays. Despite this concern, I want to assure you that if counsel for Mr. Epstein meets with CEOS next week (the week of March 3$, this Office will extend the time for compliance with the Agreement to provide CEOS time to engage in' thorough review. It goes without saying that in the event that CEOS decides that' federal prosecution should not be undertaken against Mr. Epstein, this Office will close its investigation. However, should CEOS disagree with Mr. Epstein's position, Mr. Epstein shall have one week to abide by the terms and conditions of the September 24, 2007 Agreement as amended by letter from United States Attorney Acosta to Jay Lefkowitz. Jeffrey,. Sloman First Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida Tracking: 1523 08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014631 EFTA00223775 (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: (USAFLS) 008 428 PM (U AFL ) To the Civil Rights Chief That is fine. Just please send licopy to me for my file. II Marie Villafaha Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone 561 209-1047 Fax 561 820-8777 Original Message From: Weinstein, David (USAFLS) Sent. 7, 2008 4:22 PM To: (USAFLS) Cc: enior, obert USAFLS Subject: Re: To the Civil Rights Chief IMP and I discussed this yesterday. Jeff made some edits to your If a wants to send it out under Bob's signature. Bob have you had chance to review Jeff's email? From: (USAFLS) To: Weinstein, David USAFLS Cc: Senior, Robert (USAFLS) Sent: Wed Feb 27 16:16:36 2008 Subject: RE: To the Civil Rights Chief It Hi David -- Have you had chance to talk to Bob about this? I think my window is close to "opening" and don't want the bad guys to come up with another reason for delay. Thank you. II Marie Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phon 47 Fax 1499 08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014632 EFTA00223776 Sent To: Cc: enior, Subject: Re: Original Message From: Weinstein, David (USAFLS) 2008 5:03 PM USAFL ; To the Civil Rights Chief (USAFLS); Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS) Timing is everything. Right now I am at the NAC attending the Criminal Civil Rights Seminar. Your letter seems to cover everything, but I want to chat with Bob about it before we send it out. It should probably be addressed to Stephan Curran, who is the Deputy assigned to cover our District. Bob an talk Monday when I get back and w can send out the letter. Since shop is involved and has been for while, they will hopefully agree il with our your conclusion. DSW From: (USAFLS) To: Weins ein, USAFLS Cc: Senior, Rober SAFLS); Sent: Thu Feb 21 15:56:01 2008 Subject: To the Civil Rights Chief (USAFLS); Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS) Hi David - I was just perusing the U.S. Attorney's Manual looking for an answer on another case and I noticed that Section 9-75.030 (regarding Coordination of Child Sex Abuse cases) says that cases involving violations of 18 USC 1591 (related to child sex trafficking) are supposed to be coordinated with CEOS and the Civil Rights Division. According to Section 8-3.120, prior to presentation to the grand jury, the U.S. Attorney is supposed to advise the Civil Rights Division in writing of the following: Identity of the targets of the investigation; The factual allegations to be investigated; The statutes which may have been violated; The United States Attorney's assessment of the significance of the case and w ther the case is one of "national interest," and The U.S. Attorney's proposed staffing of the matter (including whether C it Rights Division attorney should be assigned to work directly on the matter). ( Here is my proposal for such 'written notification: Dear : Pursuant o USAM Section 8-3.120, I write to inform you of an ongoing investigation child exploitation matter that may result in charges of violat' f 18 U.S. Large stein, Marcinkova, and W eir * I PO Ili t Mg The investigation has revea ed a effrey pstein would use his • :500 08-80736-CV-MARRA I-014633 EFTA00223777 assistants (Kellen, Marcinkova, and to arrange appointments with minors to engage in commercial sexual activity. ommunications were made via telephones. Once appointments were made, stein would travel to the Southern District of Florida, where he maintained residence, and the minors would travel to his home in Palm Beach where the sexua activity would occur. The Office anticipates lr charges of violations of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 371, 2422, 2423, and 1591. The investigation of the case by the City of Palm Beach Police Department has resulted in press coverage because of the titillating nature of the facts, but we see t s case as similar to other "sex tourism" cases charged by our office, and not matter of "national interest" as' defined by the U.S. Ir Attorney's Manual. Wit respect to staffing, the Office has consulted with the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, and we anticipate that the case will be staffed by at least one Assistant United States Attorney from our West Palm Beach office and at least one CEOS Attorney. If we determine that the case should be presented for an indictment, I copy will be provided to you. David - If you need any more info, please let me know. Also, the indictment is currently being reviewed by my supervisor. If you want to send the draft to Civil Rights now, please let me know. Thank you. ll Marie Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone 561 209-1047 Fax 561 820-8777 Tracking: 1501 08-80736-CV-MARRA FO14634 EFTA00223778 (USAFLS) From: Weinstein. David (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesda Februa 27, 2008 422 PM To: (USAFLS) Cc: enior. o e ( S) Subject: Re: To the Civil Rights Chief If Bob, Jeff, Alex and I discussed this yesterday. Jeff made som edits to your proposed letter a wants to send it out under Bob's signaturI . Bob have you had chance to review Jeff's email? From: (USAFLS) To: WeIns ein, Cc: Senior, Robert (USAFLS) Sent: Wed Feb 27 16:16:36 2008 Subject: RE: To the Civil Rights Chief II Hi David -- Have you had chance to talk to Bob about this? I think my window is close to "opening" and don't want the bad guys to come up with another reason for delay. Thank you. l lMarie Villafaha ssistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phon - 47 Fax Original Message From: Weinstein, David (USAFLS) Sent , 2008 5:03 PM To: Cc: !Ttl,,Tobert USAFLS ; Subject: Re: To the Civil Rig is ie (USAFLS); Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS) Timing is everything. Right now I am at the NAC attending the Criminal Civil Rights Seminar. Your letter seems to cover everything, but I want to chat with Bob about it before we send it out. It should probably be addressed to Stephan Curran, who is the Deputy assigned to cover our District. Bob an Since with o DSW I talk Monday when I get back and w can send out the letter. shop is involved and has been for while, they will hopefully agree conclusion. 1509 08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014635 EFTA00223779 From: (USAFLS) To: Weinstein, David USAFLS) Cc: Senior, Robert (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Sent: Thu Feb 21 15:56:01 2008 Subject: To the Civil Rights Chief Hi David - I was just perusing the U.S. Attorney's Manual looking for an answer on another case and I noticed that Section 9-75.030 (regarding Coordination of Child Sex Abuse cases) says that cases involving violations of 18 USC 1591 (related to child sex trafficking) are supposed to be coordinated with CEOS and the Civil Rights Division. According to Section 8-3.120, prior to presentation to the grand jury, the U.S. Attorney is supposed to advise the Civil Rights Division in writing of the following: Identity of the targets of the investigation; The factual allegations to be investigated; The statutes which may have been violated; The United States Attorney's assessment of the significance of the case and w ther the case is one of "national interest," and The U.S. Attorney's proposed staffing of the matter (including whether I C it Rights Division attorney should be assigned to work directly on the matter) Here is my proposal for such 'written notification: Dear : Pursuant o USAM Section 8-3.120, I write to inform you of an ongoing investigat child exploitation matter that may result in charges of violat' 1591 targe Win. illipplistein, The in g as rev Sarah a Jeffrey ps ein woul use is and k/ (Kellen, Marcinkova, and to arrange appointments with minors to engage in commercial sexual activity. ommunications were made via telephones. Once appointments were made, stein would travel to the Southern District of II Florida, where he maintained residence, and the minors would travel to his home in Palm Beach where the sexua activity would occur. The Office anticipates charges of violations of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 371, 2422, 2423, and 1591. The investigation of the case by the City of Palm Beach Police Department has resulted in press coverage because of the titillating nature of the facts, but we see t 's case as similar to other "sex tourism" cases charged 1r by our office, and not matter of "national interest" as defined by the U.S. Attorney's Manual. wit respect to staffing, the Office has consulted with the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, and we anticipate that the case will be staffed by at least one Assistant United States Attorney from our West Palm Beach office and at least one CEOS Attorney. If we determine that the case be provided to you. be presented for an indictment, I copy will 1505 08-80736-CV-MARRA II-014636 EFTA00223780 David - If you need any more info, please let me know. Also, the indictment is currently being reviewed by my supervisor. If you want to send the draft to Civil Rights now, please let me know. Thank you. II Marie Villafaha Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone 561 209-1047 Fax 561 820-8777 1506 08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014637 EFTA00223781 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: 11. 27. 2008 4:17 PM To: Weinstein, David (USAFLS) Cc: Senior, Robert (USAFLS) Subject: RE: To the Civil Rights Chief II Hi David -- Have you had chance to talk to Bob about this? I think my window is close to "opening" and don't want the bad guys to come up with another reason for delay. Thank you. Fax 561 820-8777 Original Message From: Weinstein, David (USAFLS) Sent. 2008 5:03 PM To: Cc: Subject: Re: To the Civil Rights Chia (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Timing is everything. Right now I am at the NAC attending the Criminal Civil Rights Seminar. Your letter seems to cover everything, but I want to chat with Bob about it before we send it out. It should probably be addressed to Stephan Curran, who is the Deputy assigned to cover our District. Bob and I can talk Monday when I get back and w send out the letter. Since Drew's shop is involved and has been for while, they will hopefully agree with our/your conclusion. DSW e From: (USAFLS) To: Weins Da vi USAFLS Cc: Senior, Robert (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Sent: Thu Feb 21 15:56:01 2008 Subject: To the Civil Rights Chief Hi David - I was just perusing the U.S. Attorney's Manual looking for an answer on another case and I noticed that Section 9-75.030 (regarding Coordination of Child Sex Abuse cases) says that cases involving violations of 18 USC 1591 1512 08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014638 EFTA00223782 (related to child sex trafficking) are supposed to be coordinated with CEOS and the Civil Rights Division. According to Section 8-3.120, prior to presentation to tile grand jury, the U.S. Attorney is supposed to advise the Civil Rights Division in writing of the following: Identity of the targets of the investigation; The factual allegations to be investigated; The statutes which may have been violated; The United States Attorney's assessment of the ther the case is one of "national interest," and The U.S. Attorney's proposed staffing of the matter (including whether Civil Rights Division attorney should be assigned to work directly on the matter). Here is my proposal for such I written notification: Dear : Pursuant you of an ongoing investigatio charges of violat' stein, The inves iga ion 1as rev assis an s (Kellen, Marcinkova, and engage in commercial sexual activity. significance of the case and I o USAM Section 8-3.120, I write to inform child exploitation matter that may result in targe IIIIIell and k/ t at Jeffrey Epstein would use his l l llIIIIII igifillilli to arrange appointments with minors to ommunications were made via telephones. Once appointments were made, stein would travel to the Southern District of Florida, where he maintained residence, and the minors would travel to his home in Palm Beach where the sexua activity would occur. The Office anticipates charges of violations of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 371, 2422, 2423, and 1591. The investigation of the case by the City of Palm Beach Police Department has resulted in press coverage because of the titillating nature of the facts, but we see t•'s case as similar to other "sex tourism" cases charged Attorney's Manual. Wit respect to staffing, the Office has consulted with the II by our office, and not matter of "national interest" as defined by the U.S. Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, and we anticipate that the case will be staffed by at least one Assistant United States Attorney from our West Palm Beach office and at least one CEOS Attorney. If we determine that the case should be presented for an indictment, I copy will be provided to you. David - If you need any more info, please let me know. Also, the indictment is currently being reviewed by my supervisor. If you want to send the draft to Civil Rights now, please let me know. Thank you. II Marie Villafana Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 1513 08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014639 EFTA00223783 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone 561 209-1047 Fax 561 820-8777 Tracking: 1514 08-80736-CV-MARRA I-014640 EFTA00223784 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: ursday, 2008 5:05 PM To: Weinstein, David (USAFLS) Subject: RE. To the Civil Rights Chief Sounds good. Enjoy the cheese grits! II Marie Villafaha Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phon - 47 Fax From: Weinstein, Day (USAFLS) Original Messagill--- Sent , 2008 5:03 PM To: Cc: enior, Robert USAFLS ; Subject: Re: To the Civil Rig s ie (USAFLS); Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS) Timing is everything. Right now I am at the NAC attending the Criminal Civil Rights Seminar. Your letter seems to cover everything, but I want to chat with Bob about it before we send it out. It should probably be addressed to Stephan Curran, who is the Deputy assigned to cover our District. Bob and I can talk Monday when I get back and w can send out the letter. Since Drew's shop is involved and has been for while, they will hopefully agree with our/your conclusion. DSW From: (USAFLS) To: Weinstein, (USAFLS) Cc: Senior, Rober USAFLS); Sent: Thu Feb 21 15:56:01 2008 Subject: To the Civil Rights Chief (USAFLS); Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS) Hi David - I was just perusing the U.S. Attorney's Manual looking for an answer on another case and I noticed that Section 9-75.030 (regarding Coordination of Child Sex Abuse cases) says that cases involving violations of 18 USC 1591 (related to child sex trafficking) are supposed to be coordinated with CEOS and the Civil Rights Division. According to Section 8-3.120, prior to presentation to the grand jury, the U.S. Attorney is supposed to advise the Civil Rights Division in writing of the following: 1568 08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014641 EFTA00223785 ( Identity of the targets of the investigation; Ill ( The factual allegations to be investigated; ( The statutes which may have been violated; ( The United States Attorney's assessment of the significance of the case and w ther the case is one of "national interest," and ( The U.S. Attorney's proposed staffing of the matter (including whether I C vil Rights Division attorney should be assigned to work directly on the matter). Here is my proposal for such "written notification: Dear : Pursuant o USAM Section 8-3.120, I write to inform you of an ongoing investigatio child exploitation matter that may result in charges of violatiso 1591 targe stein, Sarah and eligitsi k/ T ' s s rev t at Jeffrey Epstein would use his assis an s ( and to arrange appointments with minors to engage in commercial sexua ac ivity. ommunications were made via telephones. Once appointments were made, stein would travel to the Southern District of If Florida, where he maintained residence, and the minors would travel to his home in Palm Beach where the sexua activity would occur. The Office anticipates charges of violations of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 371, 2422, 2423, and 1591. The investigation of the case by the City of Palm Beach Police Department has resulted in press coverage because of the titillating nature of the facts, but we see t II 's case as similar to other "sex tourism" cases charged by our office, and not matter of "national interest" as defined by the U.S. Attorney's Manual. Wit respect to staffing, the Office has consulted with the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, and we anticipate that the case will be staffed by at least one Assistant United States Attorney from our West Palm Beach office and at least one CEOS Attorney. If we determine that the case should be presented for an indictment, I copy will be provided to you. David - If you need any more info, please let me know. Also, the indictment is currently being reviewed by my supervisor. If you want to send the draft to Civil Rights now, please let me know. Thank you. II Marie Villafaha Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phon - 47 Fax Tracking: 1569 08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014642 EFTA00223786 (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Weinstein. David (USAFLS) Thursday. February 21. 2008 5.03 PM (U nior. o rt S), (USAFLS); Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS) Re. To the Civil Rights Chie Timing is everything. Right now I am at the NAC attending the Criminal Civil Rights Seminar. Your letter seems to cover everything, but I want to chat with Bob about it before we send it out. It should probably be addressed to Stephan Curran, who is the Deputy assigned to cover our District. Off Bob an talk Monday when I get back and wilcan send out the letter. Since shop is involved and has been for while, they will hopefully agree with our your conclusion. DSW IIIIIIIII[essage - From: Ann Marie (USAFLS) To: Weins ein, avid (USAFLS Cc: Senior, Robert (USAFLS); (USAFLS); Rolando (USAFLS) Sent: Thu Feb 21 15:56:01 2008 Subject: To the Civil Rights Chief Hi David - I was just perusing the U.S. Attorney's Manual looking for an answer on another case and I noticed that Section 9-75.030 (regarding Coordination of Child Sex Abuse cases) says that cases involving violations of 18 USC 1591 (related to child sex trafficking) are supposed to be coordinated with CEOS and the Civil Rights Division. According to Section 8-3.120, prior to presentation to the grand jury, the U.S. Attorney is supposed to advise the Civil Rights Division in writing of the following: Identity of the targets of the investigation; The factual allegations to be investigated; The statutes which may have been violated; The United States Attorney's assessment of the significance of the case and w ther the case is one of "national interest," and The U.S. Attorney's proposed staffing of the matter (including whether Civil Rights Division attorney should be assigned to work directly on the matter) Here is my proposal for such I written notification: Dear Pursuant you of an ongoing investigat' charges of vein Jeffrey Epstein, I o USAM Section 8-3.120, I write to inform child exploitation matter that may result in tand 1574 08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014643 EFTA00223787 T • • • as rev that Jeffrey Epstein would use his assis an s ( , and to arrange appointments with minors to engage in commercia sexua activity. ommunications were made via telephones. Once appointments were made, stein would travel to the Southern District of Florida, where he maintained residence, and the minors would travel to his home in Palm Beach where the sexua activity would occur. The Office anticipates Ir charges of violations of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 371, 2422, 2423, and 1591. The investigation of the case by the City of Palm Beach Police Department has resulted in press coverage because of the titillating nature of the facts, but we see t 's case as similar to other "sex tourism" cases charged by our office, and not matter of "national interest" as defined by the U.S. Attorney's Manual. Wit respect to staffing, the Office has consulted with the Ir Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, and we anticipate that the case will be staffed by at least one Assistant United States Attorney from our West Palm Beach office and at least one CEOS Attorney. If we determine that the case should be presented for an indictment, 'copy will be provided to you. David - If you need any more info, please let me know. Also, the indictment is currently being reviewed by my supervisor. If you want to send the draft to Civil Rights now, please let me know. Thank you. II Marie Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phon - 47 Fax 1575 08-80736-CV-MARRA •014644 EFTA00223788 (USAF LS) Sent: Thurst M !•• • • aruary , .2i 3:56 PM From: (USAFLS) To: Weinstein. David (USAFL Cc: Senior. Robert (USAFLS): Subject: To the Civil Rights Chief (USAFLS). Garcia. Rolando (USAFLS) Hi David — I was just perusing the U.S. Attorney's Manual looking for an answer on another case and I noticed that Section 9-75.030 (regarding Coordination of Child Sex Abuse cases) says that cases involving violations of 18 USC 1591 (related to child sex trafficking) are supposed to be coordinated with CEOS and the Civil Rights Division. According to Section 8-3.120, prior to presentation to the grand jury. the U.S. Attorney is supposed to advise the Civil Rights Division in writing of the following: (I Identity of the targets of the investigation; ( The factual allegations to be investigated; ( The statutes which may have been violated; ( I The United States Attorney's assessment of the significance of the case and whether the case is one of "national interest," and (I The U.S. Attorney's proposed staffing of the matter (including whether 'Civil Rights Division attorney should be assigned to work directly on the matter). Here is my proposal for such 'written notification: Dear : Pursuant o (ISA M Section 8-%.120. I Iv rite to inform you of an ongoing result in charges of v inlatioisaiot 18 l'.S.C.591. the targets of the investigation are Jeffrey Epstein. Pareinkova. . i id a/kia Adriana Mucinska. The investigation has revealed that kffiey Epstein would use his assistants (Kellen, Mareinkova. and In to arrange appointments with minors to engage in commercial sexual aci i% it). Communications were made via telephones. Once appointments were made. Epstein would travel to the Southern District of I lorida. where he maintained I residence. and the minors %sould travel to his home in Palm Beach w here the sexual actin i ty would occur. The Office anticipates charges of violations of Title I8. United States Code. Sections 371. 2422. 2423. and 1591. The investigation of the case by the City, of Palm Beach Police Department has resulted in preisaierage because of the titillating &mtore of the facts. but we see this case as similar to other - sex tourism" = charged by our office, and not matter of "national interest- as defined by the U.S. Manual. th respect to staffing. the Office has consulted with the Child Exploitation and . Section. and . anticipate that the case will be staffed by at least one Assistant United States Attorney from our West Palm Beach office and at least one CEOS Attorney. II' we determine that the case should he presented limy on indictment. a copy will be provided to )ou. David - If you need any more info, please let me know. Also, the indictment is currently being reviewed by my supervisor. If you want to send the draft to Civil Rights now, please let me know. Thank you. I Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400 1578 08-80736-CV-MARRA I-014645 EFTA00223789 West Palm Beach. FL 33401 Phone Fax Tracking: 1579 08-80736-CV-MARRA F014646 EFTA00223790 Villafana, Ann Marie I. (USAFLS) From: Roe. Susan (USAWA1N) Sent: . 2008 6:51 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: and Hi Marie, What? CEOS conducting its own independent review? Independent of what? Do they not understand who they are and what their job is? Why are they letting themselves be manipulated like that? And how can defense lawirs "demand" a meeting II/main Justice? I am so sorry for you. At least they should wall off few people to help you later with motions. It's good for me to see my future, I guess, We know about the John Melk lawsuit and have 'fair amount of info on it. It is odd that JE fed ex'd him something — I wonder if JE was part of the straw man action. I wonder if DC used fed ex — not that we know but it's worth checking. We're moving ahead w/our investigation at this time. We are pretty sure we can charge DC and his assistants with 'conspiracy of 1201 (kidnapping), citing the new-ish part of 1201 which prohibits the use of interstate facilities in furtherance of the crime. Here we see international travel brought about by inveigle or decoy, use of emails and phones to trick her to travel, and her arrival at the isolated island with no way off and no passport (DC took hers the first night and held it until they were on the plane out), holding her for ransom, reward or other (here for sexual activity & whether it's "consensual" or not sho I 1 be decisive). We think it works, our local FBI ASAC is on board and emailed with David Karp in DC -- opines that the statute fits this crime. Have you had any contact with Karp on your case? thinking he's I good guy. We had' conf call with OIA and the FBI guy in Bahamas today. We really need to search DC's place to find out about security and surveillance systems, phone s ems, locks on the i doors, etc - We're still going through the seized computers, including bunch of Macs, and iphones. The Bureau doesn't have many Mac examiners but I never knew that before. It's taking forever. Bruce Lyon called again to ask questions about DC . He again talked about JE rot. When I asked him if he was' lawyer in the JE case, he said he was one of JE's attorneys. Pretty weird for 'lawyer for' witness. I haven't mentioned that I know about it or know you. Let's keep in touch. Susie Fro9.111=1. (USAFLS) Sent: urs ay, February 28, 2008 1:22 PM 1478 08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014647 EFTA00223791 To: Roe, Susan (USAWAW) Subject: DC and JE Hi Susan — What is the word with you? My word is growing ever more bizarre. JE's lawyers have demanded' meeting with the head of CEOS with the understanding that CEOS will do an "independent review" of the case and then will play no role in the litigation thereafter (so when I am swamped with silly motions I will not be able to reach out to them for help). This meeting is supposed to happen next week. In the meantime, we keep finding more and more girls. On the DC/JE front. I have found 'somewhat shady business connection. I am reviewing JE's Federal Express records from the past 5 years (I treasure trove of info) and found 'package sent by JE to "John Melk/Musha Cay." I googled those two names and came up with this article. htto://www.foxnews.com/story/0.2933.304900.00.htm I I like the obscure reference to "rumors" about Copperfield's personal life. Maybe Melk is someone to talk to? I hope all is well. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone Fax 1479 08-80736-CV-MARRA ♦014648 EFTA00223792 (USAFLS) From: ipi rsc Hary (USAFLS) Sent: 2008 4:22 PM To: Roe. Susan (USAWAW) Subject: OC and JE Hi Susan — What is the word with you? My word is growing ever more bizarre. JE's lawyers have demanded' meeting with the head of CEOS with the understanding that CEOS will do an "independent review" of the case and then will play no role in the litigation thereafter (so when I am swamped with silly motions I will not be able to reach out to them for help). This meeting is supposed to happen next week. In the meantime, we keep finding more and more girls. On the DC/JE front, I have found 'somewhat shady business connection. I am reviewing JE's Federal Express records from the past 5 years (I treasure trove of info) and found 'package sent by JE to "John Melk/Musha Cay." I googled those two names and came up with this article. htto://www.foxnew . s.com/storv/0.2933,304900,00.html I like the obscure reference to "rumors" about Copperfield's personal life. Maybe Melk is someone to talk to? I hope all is well. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone Fax Tracking: 1488 08-80736-CV-MARRA F014649 EFTA00223793 (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Subject: W un hiN. . 2008 4:34 PM (USAFLS) e: tas we made contact I ny girl. Ny agent to set up interview for next week. Sorry haven't made it over there yet, I'm hoping to finish up on the GJSs soon. From To: Sent: u e• 6:07:12 2008 Subject: Hi guys - I am still wading through these FedEx records. There are I lot of li shipments from "The Art of Women" n Haleiwa, Hawaii. I was able to access their MySpace page and he claims to be photographer for "aspiring models." He invites aspiring models to visit s website, www.artofwomen.com <http://www.artofwomen.com> , but I cannot access it because DOJ blocks me. Can you try? fun task (USAFLS) ; Ric ards, Jason R. .gov> Also, someone from ]E's office sent ll package to Chiko Hoge, U.S. Secret Service, in Honolulu. It looks like t was around the me that JE took Clinton to Africa. IL Dave Rogers also sent package to "Inspector Lewis, U.S. Customs Service, 1210 Corbin Street, Elizabe , NJ 07201" There were 'lot of packages to Karin Models/MC-squared. Helen Kim's name appears as the person sendi e packages 'lot, do we know if she still works for JE? What about Cecilia Any word from FBI New York? Thanks. II Marie Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone 561 209-1047 Fax 1484 08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014650 EFTA00223794 . (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: h rua To: N , Subject: un to Hi guys —I am still wading through these FedEx records. There are' lot of shipments from "The Art of Women" in Haleiwa. Hawaii. I was able to access their MySpace page and he claims to be' photographer for "aspiring models." He invites aspiring models to visit his website www.artofwomen.com, but I cannot access it because DOJ blocks me. Can you try? Also, someone from JE's office sent too Clinton to Chiko M. Hoge, U.S. Secret Service, in Honolulu. It looks like it was around the time that JE too Clinton to Africa. Dave Rogers also sent 'package to "Inspector Lewis, U.S. Customs Service, 1210 Corbin Street, Elizabeth. NJ 07201" there were 1 lot of packages to Karin Models/MC-squared. Helen Kim's name ears as the person sending the packages' lot, do we know if she still works for JE? What about Cecilia =? Any word from FBI New York? Thanks. I. Marie Villajafia Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone Fax 1492 08-80736-CV-MARRA F014651 EFTA00223795 (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Subject: RE Do you know (USAFLS) ary 27, 20084:29 PM Bummer! Haven't found anything to yet. Marie Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm aonrti FL 33401 Phon Fax Original Message From: Richards, Jason R. Sent To: Subject: Re: Do you know 7, 2008 4:24 PM (USAFLS) Too old... From: (USAFLS) < To: Kuyrkendall, N.; Richards, Jason R. Sent: Wed Feb 27 16:21:41 2008 Subject: Do you know 's dob? He was sending packages to her in 2001. II Marie Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone 561 209-1047 Fax 1498 08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014652 EFTA00223796 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: nesc ii.M IP a x u 7 PM To: N . Subject: o you know 's dob? He was sending packages to her in 2001. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone Fax Isle 08-80736-CV-MARRA F014653 EFTA00223797 (USAFLS) From: Sloman. Jeff (USAFLS) Sent: Fr' F r 2008 7:36 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: e: ore gao evidence sen it heduled mtg for March 12. I leave it to CEOS to determine whether to info. I d read about Sage. Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld From: (USAFLS) To: Senior, Robert USAFLS ; Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Weinstein, David (USAFLS) Sent: Fri Feb 29 16:09:05 2008 Subject: More good evidence Hi guys other New York girl has been identif d and will be interviewed next week. so have FedEx records corroborating girl who saw Epstein (and receive gift from him) when she was 15. II I have mailed CEOS about additional information in preparation for their meeting ut have received no response. I don't know whether I should send them info about the additional girls (to show how this case continues to grow, and has become multi-state) or not send the info to avoid an unintentional leak to Epstein's lawyers. I also wasn't sure whether you guys heard that parents have voluntarily dismissed their case against Epstein. Accordin p ers here no money changed hands, but it seems unlikely. I will be issuing subpoena for her li deposition transcript. Can someone give me an update? Thank you. II Marie Villafaha Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone 561 209-1047 Fax 561 820-8777 1472 08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014654 EFTA00223798 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: IIIPMffuary , 008 4:09 PM To: Senior, Robert (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS): Weinstein. David (USAFLS) Subject: More good evidence Hi guys — Another New York girl has been identified and will be interviewed next week. We also have FedEx records corroborating' girl who saw Epstein (and received' gift from him) when she was 15. I have imailed CEOS about additional information in preparation for their meeting but have received no response. I don't know whether I should send them info about the additional girls (to show how this case continues to grow. and has become multi-state) or not send the info to avoid an unintentional leak to Epstein's lawyers. I also wasn't sure whether you guys heard that parents have voluntarily dismissed their case agai st Epstein. According to the papers here no money changed hands, but it seems unlikely. I will be issuing subpoena for her deposition transcript. Can someone give me an update? Thank you. I Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone Fax Tracking: 1474 08-80736-CV-MARRA I-014655 EFTA00223799 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: e arc . 2008 5:58 PM To: N. Subject: pstein update I don't think we have an issue with staleness because the memory cards are fixed (they haven't changed since the original search warrant). II Marie Villafana Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phon - 47 Fax Original Messa From: Kuyrkendall, IN. Sent' 2008 5:55 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Epstein up ate I like your style! Unsure what communication btw Jeff and )ay is about?? Also do we have staleness issues with SW? To: Acosta, A ex USA ; S oman, Jeff (USA ; Ooster aan, An rew From MS (USAFLS) AMMER.> ; Senior, Robe Cc: Sent: Wed Mar 05 16:54:35 2008 Subject: Epstein update (USA); (USA) Hi all - I wanted to update you on couple of ew developments in the Epstein case. First, ff Herman is supposed to give rpress conference today a ouncing the filing of third lawsuit against Epstein. That case also involves victim whom we are no onger referring to in the indictment [Drew - tell that to the defense.] Herman seems to have latched onto the group which, as discussed in my third addendum to the pros memo, we ave a rea y decided to forego for the most part. Since I am not certain of the scope of your meeting, I do not know how cal it is for you to see the new facts developed in the supplemental pros memos (you reviewed the initial pros memo from May of last year). If you would like the supplements, please let me know. The legal theories have remained the same. 1455 08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014656 EFTA00223800 I also wanted to call to everyone's attention the three-year statute of Ir il limitations in Florida for the state solicitation offenses. The st ute will run for all e victims this summer. Once it runs we cannot insist on state court plea to new charge. It also means that the state cannot charge t e crimes related o the victims discovered after the initial investigation. We have asked the Palm Beach Police Department to forego presenting thdse charges for state prosecution in deference to our prosecution. If we do not intend to go forward, it is imperative that we communicate that to the Police Department as soon as possible so they can present those victims for state prosecution. I have reserved time with the grand jury on the 18th. I had hoped to present the indictment at that time, but in light of Jeff's communication with Jay, I will push it off until the 25th. I would still like to start the presentation on the 18th so we aren't accused of rushing the grand jury. So; I hope that the final indictment packet will be approved by that date. Thank you. II Marie Villafaha Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone 561 209-1047 Fax 1456 08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014657 EFTA00223801 (USAFLS) From: N. Sent: oa March . 2008 5:55 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: e: pstein u me I like your style! Unsure what communication btw Jeff and Jay is about?? Also do we have staleness issues with SW? 1 1 - 1 1 1 " I From: (USAFLS) < v> To: Acosta, A ex USA ; S oman, Jeff (USA ; Ooster aan, An rew CRM ; Senior, Robert (USA) Cc: Garcia, Rolando (USA); (USA) Sent: Wed Mar 05 16:54:35 2008 Subject: Epstein update Hi all - I wanted to update you on i couple of ew developments in the Epstein case. First, ff Herman is supposed to give rpress conference today a ouncing the filing of third lawsuit against Epstein. That case also involves yict'm whom we are no onger eferring to in the indictment [Drew - tel that to the defense.] I Herman seems to have latched onto the grou which, as discussed in my third addendum to the pros memo, we have a rea y decided to forego for the most part. critical it is for you to see the new facts developed in the supplemental pros memos (you reviewed the initial pros memo from May of last year). If you would like the supplements, please let me know. The legal theories have remained the same. I also wanted to call to everyone's attention the three-year statute of Ir li limitations in Florida for the state solicitation offenses. The st ute will run for all e victims this summer. Once it runs we cannot insist on state court plea to new charge. It also means that the state cannot charge t e crimes related o the victims discovered after the initial investigation. We have asked the Palm Beach Police Department to forego presenting those charges for state prosecution in deference to our prosecution. If we do not intend to go forward, it is imperative that we communicate that to the Police Department as soon as possible so they can present those victims for state prosecution. I have reserved time with the grand jury on the 18th. I had hoped to present the indictment at that time, but in light of Jeff's communication with Jay, I will push it off until the 25th. I would still like to start the presentation on the 18th so we aren't accused of rushing the grand jury. So, I hope that the final indictment packet will be approved by that date. Thank you. 1457 08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014658 EFTA00223802 II Marie Villafana Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone 561 209-1047 Fax 561 820-8777 1458 08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014659 EFTA00223803 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: n arch 05. 2008 10 39 AM To: N. Subject: RE: Epstein Sounds good. I think it is worth doing the search warrant. Can Jason get the cards out of evidence when he is down there? Do you have cop) of >our Aida% its that 'submitted on the computer I think those are' good start for the search warrant Aida% it. Thanks. .4. Mark, Assistant U.S. Attome) 500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400 West Palm Beach. H. 33401 Phone 561 209-1047 Fax From: N. Sen 5, 2008 10:35 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Epstein Marie, Still no word from Mr. Herman. Just to clarify about the memory cards - Joe Jason have both reviewed the evidence some time ago. There is no significant photographs on the cards. However, forensic analysis was not done which would show any deleted photos. Jason has to go tomorrow to Miami. I have askeditim to pick up the copies of L documents, obtain the copyright da for the "Massage for Dummies" book and get 'description of the memory cards - should we decide to go ahead with search warrant. We're still working on obtaining of the girls' phone records. I have pti Hauge on standby to put ether the travel/phone charts once we have and Jennifers' records. I'll give you call once I have spoken with Herman. From: (USAFLS) [Ann.Marie. Sen 8 12:15 PM To: Subject: RE: Epstein N. Thank you Ihr the update. On the statute of limitations. it doesn't matter for the pending charges because they were indicted in time. it just matters to adding new charges. Can you call Mr. Herman and see if he will give us the following items without I subpoena? Copy of deposition transcript • y vt co and/or audiorecording of that deposition any other depositions taken in that suit 4. Copies o #mails and correspondence sent to or received from Epstein or his lawyers 5. Copies of any agreements - formal or informal - entered into between Epstein/his lawyers and Saige/Saige's dad/their las%) ers. 1463 08-80736-CV-MARRA F014660 EFTA00223804 And maybe you can ask him why there will be 'press conference? Thank you. I Mane Ilatana Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400 West Palm Beach. FL 33401 Phone Fax 561 820-8777 From: N. Son • 2008 11:24 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein Hey Marie, I just heard from Joe that Mr. Herman is holding another press conference tomorrow at Palm Beach Town Mat 1:00pm. He called the Town of Palm Beach to see if he could hold It at EPSTEIN's residence. They told him "NO". Also FYI, there Is' three year statute of limitations on the State charges of Solicitation. Joe feels like that State or Epstein's Counsel may be waiting for those dates to pass. September/October 2005 is when most of the other victims reported so that means in Sept/Oct 2008 the statute of limitations applies. 1469 08-80736-CV-MARRA ♦014661 EFTA00223805 Ann Marie C. tUSAFLS) From: N Sent: W do M r h 2008 10 35 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE Epstein Marie, Still no word from Mr. Herman. Just to clarify about the memory cards • Joe Ja‘on have both reviewed the evidence some time ago. There is no significant photographs on the cards. However, forensic analysis was not done which would show any deleted photos. Jason has to go tomorrow to Miami. I have askedliim to pick up the copies of documents, obtain the copyright dal for the "Massage for Dummies" book and get I description of the memory cards - should we decide to go ahead with search warrant. We're still working on obtaini of the girls' phone records. I have pus Hauge on standby to put together the travel/phone charts once we have and )ennifers' records. I'll give you call once I have spoken with Herman. From: (USAFLS) Sen • , 8 12:15 P To: N. Subject: RE: Epstein v] Thank you for the update. On the statute of limitations. it doesn't matter for the pending charges because they were indicted in time. it just matters to adding new charges. Can you call Mr. Herman and see if he will give us the following items without I subpoena? I. Copy of deposition transcript 2. Copy of any vi eo and/or audiorecording of that deposition cil 3. Transcripts) any other depositions taken in that suit 4. Copies of any mails and correspondence sent to or received from Epstein or his lawyers 5. Co ies of anv agreements — formal or informal — entered into between Epstein/his lawyers and dad/their lawyers. And maybe you can ask him why there will be 'press conference? AM you. I Marie Wail Assistant U.S. A ttorne) 500 S. Australian Me. suite 400 West Palm Beach. H. 3340 I Phone Fax' From: Sen • 2008 11:24 AM To: (USAFLS) Sub : Epstein Hey Marie, 1465 08-80736-CV-MARRA I-014662 EFTA00223806 I just heard from Joe that Mr. Herman is holding another press conference tomorrow at Palm Beach Town ■ at 1:00pm. He called the Town of Palm Beach to see if he could hold it at EPSTEIN's residence. They told him "NO". Also FYI, there is' three year statute of limitations on the State charges of Solicitation. Joe feels like that State or Epsteln's Counsel may be waiting for those dates to pass. September/October 2005 is when most of the other victims reported so that means in Sept/Oct 2008 the statute of limitations applies. 1466 08-80736-CV-MARRA ♦014663 EFTA00223807 (USAFLS) From: i USAFLS) Sent: h 04, 08 12:16 PM To: N. Subject: RE Epstein MIyou for the update. On the statute of limitations. it doesn't matter for the pending charges because they were indicted in time. it just matters to adding new charges. Can you call Mr. Herman and see if he will give us the following items without I subpoena? I. Copy of deposition transcript ' of e ndfor audiorecording of that deposition 3. another depositions taken in that suit 4. :-mails and correspondence sent to or received from Epstein or his lawyers 5. Co ies of any agreements - formal or inforinal - entered into between Epsteinfhis lawyers and daditheir lawyers. And maybe you can ask him why there ■ he I press conference? Thank you. 1 Made Villulana Assistant U.S. 500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 40(1 West Palm Beach. f 1 33401 Phone 561 209-1047 Fax From: N. Sen • T r 2008 11:24 AM To: (USAFLS) Sub ect: Epstein Hey Mane, I just heard from Joe that Mr. Herman is holding another press conference tomorrow at Palm Beach Town Mat 1:00pm. He called the Town of Palm Beach to see if he could hold it at EPSTEIN's residence. They told him "NO". Also FYI, there is' three year statute of limitations on the State charges of Solicitation. Joe feels like that State or Epstein's Counsel may be waiting for those dates to pass. September/October 2005 is when most of the other victims reported so that means in Sept/Oct 2008 the statute of limitations applies. 1469 08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014664 EFTA00223808 Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) From: N. Sent: u M r h 08 1124 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein Hey Marie, I just heard from Joe that Mr. Herman is holding another press conference tomorrow at Palm Beach Town. at 1:00pm. He called the Town of Palm Beach to see if he could hold it at EPSTEIN's residence. They told him "NO". Also FYI, there is' three year statute of limitations on the State charges of Solicitation. Joe feels like that State or Epstein's Counsel may be waiting for those dates to pass. September/October 2005 is when most of the other victims reported so that means in Sept/Oct 2008 the statute of limitations applies. 1470 08-80736-CV-MARRA •014665 EFTA00223809 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: 06, 008 1:24 PM To: Subject: : pstein update Good for him!!!! What is it about •ur gender that makes us sell out so easily? ( You remember that Lill) Ann used to be the alleged head of child exploitation here) Mahe 111/41itha Assistant Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400 West Palm Beach. Ft. 33401 Phone Fax 561 From: Sent: Th r M r h 2008 1:23 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Epstein update Rumor has it that would not even allow Stephanie into our building to say hello. From: Sen To: Subject: RE: Epstein update (USAFLS) [mailto 8 1:21 PM Thanks. Myesha. We actually keep finding more and more evidence (FedEx records are fabulous!). And we may have fitund pictures!!! We need a search warrant for the disk before we will know for sure. I keep telling myself that I am not allowed w get excited about the case because I will only be shot down again. I also wonder - what hap tI tind pictures? Are they suddenly going to agree that I CAN prosecute? Or will it just be more of the actually seems interested and focused now. He wants to read the memos and agreed that I should redact all identifying info so I Imailed those to him today. So. I am still tentatively keeping ml fingers crossed. I will keep you posted. As far as bringing Stephanie Thacker. I just think they have decided that the ONLY way to make this go away is through using -influence- user the decision-makers. I hope she is getting a lot of money for this. to to soon. 01 Phone 561 209-1047 1406 08-80736-CV-MARRA F014666 EFTA00223810 l a\ From: Sett • Th 2008 1:13 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Epstein update Mane How are things goings 'been prett out of the loop since I found out that I was not longer partnering on the case. !M mentioned that there was meeting and that Stephanie Thacker (our former deputy) would buttending with e I don t know when it happened or what happened. Regardless, keep your chin up. This is I good prosecution Myesha From: jwi. (USAFLS) [mailto Sent: n ay, arc , 2008 4:55 PM To: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman Jeff USAFLS); Oosterbaan, Andrew; Senior, Robert (USAFLS) Cc: Garaa, Rolando (USAFLS); EMIS (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein update Hi all — I wanted to update you on couple of new developments in the Epstein case. First. Jeff Herman is I supposed to give I press conferenc today announcing the filing of I third la • against Epstein. That case also involves victim whom we are no longer referrinia the indictment t — please do not tell that to the defense.] erman seems to have latched onto the group w . as discussed in my third addendum to the pros memo, we have already decided to forego for the most pan. Ill _ Since I am not certain of the scope of your meeting. I do not know how critical it is for you to see the acts developed in the supplemental pros memos (you reviewed the initial pros memo from May of last year). If you would like the supplements. please let me know. The legal theories have remained the same. I also wanted to call to everyone's attention the three-year statute of limitations in Florida for the state solicitation offenses. The statute will run for all the victims this summer. Once it runs we cannot insist on' state court plea to' new charge. It also means that the state cannot charge the crimes related to the victims discovered after the initial investigation. We have asked the Palm Beach Police Department to forego presenting those charges for state prosecution in deference to our prosecution. If we do not intend to go forward, it is imperative that we communicate that to the Police Department as soon as possible so they can present those victims for state prosecution. I have reserved time with the grand jury on the 18Th. I had hoped to present the indictment at that time, but in light of Jeffs communication with Jay, I will push it off until the 25*. I would still like to start the presentation on the 18* so we aren't accused of rushing the grand jury. So,1 hope that the final indictment packet will be approved by that date. Thank you. I Marie Villafarla Assistant U.S. Attorney 1407 08-80736-CV-MARRA II-014667 EFTA00223811 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone Fax 1408 08-80736-CV-MARRA ♦014668 EFTA00223812 Villafana, Ann Marie,. (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Subject: th r Mar h 06 008 1:23 PM (USAFLS) RE Epstein update Rumor has it that. would not even allow Stephanie into our building to say hello. From: (USAFLS) (mailto Sen rc 08 1:21 PM To: Subject: RE: Epstein update [hanks. Myesha. We actually keep fipcling more and more evidence (FedEx records are fabulous!). And we may have found pictures!!! We need 'search warrant for the disk before we will know for sure. I keep telling myself th d to get excited about the case because I will only be shot down again. I also wonder - find pictures? Are they suddenly going to agree that I CAN prosecute? Or will it just be more of the same? Drew actual') seems interested and focused now. lie wants to read the memos and agreed that I should redact all identifying info so I Imailed those to him today. So. I am still tentatively keeping fingers crossed. I will keep you posted. As Far as bringing Stephanie Thacker. I just think they have decided that the ONLY way to make this go away is through using "influence- over the decision-makers. I hope she is getting a lot of money for this. 'Falk to fu soon. .4. Marie - Assistant U.S. Attorne) 500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400 West Palm Beach. Fl. 33401 Phone 561 209-1047 fax From: Sen • r 2008 1:13 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Epstein u to Marie, ill things going'? mentioned that there was meeting and that tep hacker (ourformer deputy) would b ttending with the de ense y I don't know when it happened or what happened Regardless. keep your chin up This is good prosecution. Myesha 1409 08-80736-CV-MARRA F014669 EFTA00223813 From: (USAFLS) (mailto:Ann Sent: UMW 2008 4:55 PM To: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman Jeff (USAFLS); Oosterbaan, Andrew; Senior, Robert (USAFLS) Cc: Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein update Hi all — I wanted to update you on I couple of new developments in the Epstein case. First. Jeff Herman is supposed to give 'press conference today announcing the filing of third law uit against Epstein. That case also involves I victim whom we are no longer referriniiii the indictment — please do not tell that to the defense .I lerman seems to have latched onto the group w . as discussed in my third addendum to the pros memo, we have already decided to forego for the most part. IR — Since I am not certain of the scope of your meeting. I do not know how critical it is for you to see the acts developed in the supplemental pros memos (you reviewed the initial pros memo from May of last year). If you would like the supplements, please let me know. The legal theories have remained the same. I also wanted to call to everyone's attention the three-year statute of limitations in Florida for the state solicitation offenses. The statute will run for all the victims this summer. Once it runs we cannot insist on' state court plea to' new charge. It also means that the state cannot charge the crimes related to the victims discovered after the initial investigation. We have asked the Palm Beach Police Department to forego presenting those charges for state prosecution in deference to our prosecution. If we do not intend to go forward, it is imperative that we communicate that to the Police Department as soon as possible so they can present those victims for state prosecution. I have reserved time with the grand jury on the It. I had hoped to present the indictment at that time, but in light of Jeffs communication with Jay. I will push it off until the 25i11. I would still like to start the presentation on the 8th so we aren't accused of rushing the grand jury. So. I hope that the final indictment packet will be approved by that date. Thank you. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400 West Palm Beach. Fl. 33401 Phone Fax 1410 08-80736-CV-MARRA •014670 EFTA00223814 Villafana, Ann Marie,. (USAFLS) From: Sent: 008 1:13 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: : pstein update Marie. How are things going? been prei out of the loop since I found out that I was not longer partnering on the case. mentioned tha ere was meeting and that Stephanie Thacker (our former deputy) would b ttending with e e ense I don't know when it happened or what happened. Regardless. keep your chin up. This is I good prosecution Myesha From: ppm (USAFLS) [maiito.Antai v) Sent: ne ay, arc , 2008 4:55 PM To: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman Jeff MS); Oosterbaan, Andrew; Senior, Robert (USAFLS) Cc: Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS), (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein update Hi all - I wanted to update you on 'couple of new developments i the Epstein case. First, Jeff Herman is supposed to give 'press conference today announcing the filing of I third la ' against Epstein. That case also involves ' ,victim whom we are no longer referrinsiti the indictment [ - please do not tell that to the defense.] erman seems to have latched onto the group w , as discussed in my third addendum to the pros memo, we have already decided to forego for the most pan. II II_ Since I am not certain of the scope of your meeting, I do not know how critical it is for you to see the acts developed in the supplemental pros memos (you reviewed the initial pros memo from May of last year). If you would like the supplements. please let me know. The legal theories have remained the same. I also wanted to call to everyone's attention the three-year statute of limitations in Florida for the state solicitation offenses. The statute will run for all the victims this summer. Once it runs we cannot insist on' state court plea to' new charge. It also means that the state cannot charge the crimes related to the victims discovered after the initial investigation. We have asked the Palm Beach Police Department to forego presenting those charges for state prosecution in deference to our prosecution. If we do not intend to go forward, it is imperative that we communicate that to the Police Department as soon as possible so they can present those victims for state prosecution. I have reserved time with the grand jury on the 18'". I had hoped to present the indictment at that time, but in light of Jeffs communication with Jay. I will push it off until the 25m. I would still like to start the presentation on the 18'h so we aren't accused of rushing the grand jury. So. I hope that the final indictment packet will be approved by that date. Thank you. I Marie Mafia& Assistant U.S. Attorney 1415 08-80736-CV-MARRA I-014671 EFTA00223815 500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone Fax 1916 08-80736-CV-MARRA ♦014672 EFTA00223816 (USAFLS) From: Oosterbaan. Andrew Sent: Th r M r h 008 12:04 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: pstein update Thanks, Marie I don't think money is ever an issue. From: M=M (USAFLS) [mallto Sent: T btirOW, Marthfl0a 11:18 AM To: Oosterbaan, Andrew Subject: RE: Epstein update Hi Drew - Here you go. Please let me knoll if you need anything else. Thanks. II As . and Jeff can tell you, the defense can always come up with another mason to have another meeting. surprised that Mr. Epstein hasn't started complaining about legal fees. lii .1 Marie Vithiafia Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400 West Palm Beach. Fl. 33401 Phone 561 209-1047 Fax From: Oosterbaan, Andrew Senti 2008 8:46 AM To: ZlagaysliiaLth.gk, (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Epstein update That's not' bad idea. I don I need the names or any identifying information. Thanks, Marie. From: (USAFLS) [mailto:Ann Sent: urs ay, arc , 08 8:19 AM To: Oosterbaan, Andrew Subject: RE: Epstein update Ili Drew - I am running off to court but should he hack by 10:30. Do you want me to redact the names or an) thine to prevent any unintentional leaks to the defense? They are very good at extracting information. they even got me by around the 6' .1. Mark Villafaria Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400 West palm Beach. Fl 33401 Phone Fax 1419 08-80736-CV-MARRA F014673 EFTA00223817 From: Oosterbaan, Andrew Sent: Wednesday, March 05, To: Senior, Robert (USAFLS); (USAFLS); Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Cc: Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Epstein update Thanks for the information. Marie. We have I March te meeting scheduled with Epstein's lawyers. I plan to conduct the review as expeditiously as I possibly can It is difficult to be more definitive than that. however, because the defense has yet to provide me with an outline of the matters they wish me to review and they have also suggested that more than one meeting may be necessary I can't imagine there will be any need for more than one meeting I think your updated prosecution memorandum should be part of my review, so, unless someone down there disagrees. please send it. Thanks again. From: Senior, Robert (USAFLS) [mailto:[email protected]) Sere' 05, 2008 6:10 PM To: (USAalosta Alex (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Oosterbaan, Andrew rc Cc: °a a, o an o U FLS); S USAFLS) Subject: RE: Epstein update Let's finish the review of the package. Where is it at in the process ? From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 4:55 PM To: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman Jeff USAFLS); Oosterbaan, Andrew; Senior, Robert (USAFLS) Cc: Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein update Hi all - I wanted to update you on I couple of new developments in the Epstein case. First. JOT Ilerman is supposed to give 'press conference today announcing the tiling of I third laws i' against Epstein. That case I also involves % ictim whom we are no longer referrinia the indictment I - please do not tell that to the defense. J lerman seems to have latched onto the group w is 1. as discussed in my third addendum to the pros memo, we have already decided to forego for the most part. Pw_Since I am not certain of the scope of your meeting, I do not know how critical it is for you to see the n acts developed in the supplemental pros memos (you reviewed the initial pros memo from May of last year). If you would like the supplements. please let me know. The legal theories have remained the same. I also wanted to call to everyone's attention the three-year statute of limitations in Florida for the state solicitation offenses. The statute will run for all the victims this summer. Once it runs we cannot insist on' state court plea to 'new charge. It also means that the state cannot charge the crimes related to the victims discovered after the initial investigation. We have asked the Palm Beach Police Department to forego presenting those charges for state prosecution in deference to our prosecution. II' we do not intend to go forward, it is imperative that we communicate that to the Police Department as soon as possible so they can present those victims for state prosecution. 1420 08-80736-CV-MARRA 1-014674 EFTA00223818 I have reserved time with the grand jury on the 18n. I had hoped to present the indictment at that time. but in light of Jeffs communication with Jay.1 will push it off until the 25n. I would still like to stan the presentation on the le so we aren't accused of rushing the grand jury. So. I hope that the final indictment packet will be approved by that date. Thank you. I Marie Malan° Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone Fax 1421 08-80736-CV-MARRA F014675 EFTA00223819 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: llayRIP$008 11:18 AM To: Oosterbaan, Andrew Subject: RE Epstein update Attachments: Indictment.pdf. 2nd Add Pros Memo003 pdf. 3rd Addendum Pros Memo pdf. Epstein Pros Memo pdf Iii prev‘ - Here you go. Please let me know if you need anything else. ■ As Alex and Jelican tell you. the defense can always come up with anothst• reason to have another meeting. I'm surprised that Mr. Epstein hasn't started complaining about legal lees. I Marie kaiak: Assistant U.S. Attorne' 500 S. Australian e. suite 401) West Palm Reach. I I 33-101 Phone Iax From: Oosterbaan, Andrew Sen • 2008 8:46 AM To: (USAFLS) Sub ect: RE: Epstein update That's not 'bad idea I don't need the names or any identifying information Thanks. Marie From: (USAFLS) Sent: y, a , 8 8:19 AM To: Oosterbaan, Andrew Subject: RE: Epstein update () Hi rew — I am running off to court but should be back by 10:30. Do you want me to redact the names or any hing to prevent any unintentional leaks to the defense? They arc very good at extracting information, they even gut me by around the eh meeting. I Marie l'illatistia Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400 West Palm Beach. FL 33401 Phone Fax From: Oosterbaan, Andrew Sent: Wednesday, March 05, To: Senior, Robert (USAFLS); Cc: Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS); Subject: RE: Epstein update (USAFLS); Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) FLS) 1425 08-80736-CV-MARRA I-014676 EFTA00223820 Thanks for the information, Marie We have I March le meeting scheduled with Epstein's lawyers I plan to conduct the review as expeditiously as I possibly can. It is difficult to be more definitive than that, however, because the defense has yet to provide me with an outline of the matters they wish me to review and they have also suggested that more than one meeting may be necessary. I can't imagine there will be any need for more than one meeting. I think your updated prosecution memorandum should be part of my review, so. unless someone down there disagrees. please send it Thanks again From: Senior, Robert (USAFLS) [mailto:Robert.Senior@usdolgov] Sent. 5, 2008 6:10 PM To: (USAgicoitex (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Oosterbaan, Andrew Cc: araa, oan o LS); (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Epstein update Let's finish the review of the package. Where is it at in the process ? From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 4:55 PM To: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Oosterbaan, Andrew; Senior, Robert (USAFLS) Cc: Garaa, Rolando (USAFLS); S (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein update Hi all — I wanted to update you on a couple of new developments i he Epstein case. First. Jeff Herman is supposed to give 'press conference today announcing the filing of 'third la • gainst Epstein. That case also involves !victim whom we are no longer referrin ' indictment [ - please do not tell that to the defense.] lerman seems to have latched onto the group w P1tcn, as discussed in my third addendum to the pros memo, we have already decided toforego for the most pan. Since I am not certain of the scope of your meeting, I do not know how critical it is for you to see the acts developed in the supplemental pros memos (you reviewed the initial pros memo from May of last year). If you would like the supplements. please let me know. The legal theories have remained the same. I also wanted to call to everyone's attention the three-year statute of limitations in Florida for the state solicitation offenses. The statute will run for all the victims this summer. Once it runs we cannot insist on' state court plea to' new charge. It also means that the state cannot charge the crimes related to the victims discovered after the initial investigation. We have asked the Palm Beach Police Department to forego presenting those charges for state prosecution in deference to our prosecution. If we do not intend to go forward, it is imperative that we communicate that to the Police Department as soon as possible so they can present those victims for state prosecution. I have reserved time with the grand jury on the I8'". I had hoped to sesent the indictment at that time. but in light of Jeff's communication with Jay, I will push it off until the 251 I would still like to start the presentation on the It so we aren't accused of rushing the grand jury. So. I hope that the final indictment packet will be approved by that date. Thank you. 1426 08-80736-CV-MARRA .014677 EFTA00223821 Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone Fax Tracking: 1427 08-80736-CV-MARRA •014678 EFTA00223822 (USAFLS) From: Oosterbaan, Andrew Sent: r 008 8:46 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: pstein update That's not' bad idea I don't need the names or any identifying information. Thanks, Marie. From: j.....(USAFL.5) [mallto Sent: ur ay, arc , 08 8:19 AM To: Oosterbaan, Andrew Subject: RE: Epstein update ln Ili - I am running otito court but should he hack l” 10:30. Do you scant me to redact the names or aamt sing to pre‘cm any unintentional leaks to the dclense? They arc %ery good at extracting inlormation. the) o en got me by around the 6th meeting. A. Marie I'd/44/ana Assistant Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400 West Palm Beach. PI. 33401 Phone Fax From: Oosterbaan, Andrew Sent: Wednesday, March 05, To: Senior, Robert (USAFLS); (USAFLS); Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Cc: Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS); FLS) Subject: RE: Epstein update Thanks for the information, Mari