Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS
From:
Jay lefkowitz [
[email protected]]
Sent:
Thursday, September 13, 2007 7:35 PM
To:
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
Subject:
Re:
Sounds good. I will be at home. Let's talk at 9 am. '111877 3944.
Already thinking about
the same statutes.
Look forward to speaking in the morning.
Best, Jay
Original Message
Hi Jay -- Yes, I am. I have been spending some quality time with Title 18 looking for
misdemeanors. Do you want to take a look at 18 USC 403, 18 USC 1512(d), and 47 USC
223(a)(1)(B) and we can talk about them tomorrow? I know that someone mentioned there being
activity on an airplane, I just want to make sure that there is factual basis for the plea
that the agents can confirm.
I'm not sure exactly where I will be tomorrow morning, so is it alright if I call you?
Have a good evening.
A. Marie Villafaila
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Original Message
Subject:
Marie - Are you free to speak at 9 am tomorrow?
Thanks.
Jay
**4,
***** ****** ***** ses*********** ************ ***********.:
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
15
EFTA00226107
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
Sent:
Thursday, September 13, 2007 7:27 PM
To:
'Jay Lefkowitz'
Subject:
RE:
Hi Day -- Yes, I am. I have been spending some quality time with Title 18 looking for
misdemeanors. Do you want to take a look at 18 USC 403, 18 USC 1512(d), and 47 USC
223(a)(1)(8) and we can talk about them tomorrow? I know that someone mentioned there being
activity on an airplane, I just want to make sure that there is factual basis for the plea
that the agents can confirm.
I'm not sure exactly where I will be tomorrow morning, so is it alright if I call you?
Have a good evening.
A. Marie Villafaha
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Original Message
Subject:
Marie - Are you free to speak at 9 am tomorrow?
Thanks.
Jay
**4.:***********************40****************************ry.
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP.
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to postmasterBkirkland.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments.
It*********S#4
, 4******************4ciiikt*********************
37
EFTA00226108
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Jay Lefkowitz
[email protected]
Sent:
Wednesday, September 12, 2007 5:55 PM
To:
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
Cc:
Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS)
Subject:
Re: Jeffrey Epstein
Andy - meant to copy you on my first attempt to respond to Marie.
We appreciate the courtesy of today's meeting and your agreement and Alex's. We understand the concerns you are raising and will
work over the next few days to come up with a mutually acceptable solution. I will speak with you no later than Monday, and in the
interim, if we come up with a solution, we will be in touch with you.
Best, Jay
Original Message
Cc: "I.ouric, Andrew 4USAFLS\)" <Andrew.LourieQusdoi.cov>
Jay - It was nice seeing you again. Andy and I talked with Alex and Jeff. We are all satisfied in principle with
the agreement, but the Office is uncomfortable with the recommended federal charge. Specifically, we are
concerned about the effect of taking the position that Mr. Epstein's house is in the special maritime and
territorial jurisdiction of the United States, and we have no evidence of any assaults occurring either on Mr.
Epstein's plane or offshore from his residence.
We are hoping that you can find an alternative federal statute that can be used. I also will wait to hear from
Jack Goldberger to discuss logistics.
Thank you.
A. Marie Villafatia
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
19
EFTA00226109
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Villafana, Mn Marie C. (USAFLS)
Sent:
Wednesday, September 12. 2007 3:44 PM
To:
lefkowitzrakirkland.com'
Cc:
Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS)
Subject:
Jeffrey Epstein
Jay - It was nice seeing you again. Andy and I talked with Alex and Jeff. We are all satisfied in principle with
the agreement, but the Office is uncomfortable with the recommended federal charge. Specifically, we are
concerned about the effect of taking the position that Mr. Epstein's house is in the special maritime and
territorial jurisdiction of the United States, and we have no evidence of any assaults occurring either on Mr.
Epstein's plane or offshore from his residence.
We are hoping that you can find an alternative federal statute that can be used. I also will wait to hear from
Jack Goldberger to discuss logistics.
Thank you.
A. Marie Villafaiia
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Tracking:
Exhibit 49
EFTA00226110
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
Sent:
Thursday, September 13, 2007 8:10 PM
To:
Oosterbaan, Andrew
Subject:
RE: Epstein
Iii Drew -- I tracked down the AUSA in Alaska and he is sending the trust agreement out to me. I will let you
know how things go in the morning.
Thanks.
A. Marie Villafana
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Thanks for the information, Marie. I'll get the details on the Boehm arrangements from the prosecutors and get back to
you tomorrow. I believe the girls agreed to the arrangement, but I'll confirm that. I should have the indictment reviewed
by then as well.
Hi Drew — Sorry to bother you, but the plea negotiations are getting fast and furious. Epstein's lawyers are
fixated on this idea of a "victim's fund" rather than having the girls file separate 2255 actions. I know that the
reason they want to do it is not out of the goodness of their hearts but to keep this stuff out of the public Court
files, but in some ways it will help the girls, too. Do you know anything about how the fund in Alaska was
worked out? Did all the victims consent or did the Court just do it?
Thank you for your help. I also turned in the indictment package to my immediate supervisor today, so I expect
some edits back from her before it goes higher up the chain. If you had any thoughts, please let me know.
A. Marie Villafalia
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
28
EFTA00226111
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Oosterbaan, Andrew
Sent:
Thursday, September 13, 2007 7:54 PM
To:
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
Subject:
RE: Epstein
Thanks for the information, Marie. I'll get the details on the Boehm arrangements from the prosecutors and get back to
you tomorrow. I believe the girls agreed to the arrangement, but I'll confirm that. I should have the indictment reviewed
by then as well.
Hi Drew - Sorry to bother you, but the plea negotiations are getting fast and furious. Epstein's lawyers are
fixated on this idea of a "victim's fund" rather than having the girls file separate 2255 actions. I know that the
reason they want to do it is not out of the goodness of their hearts but to keep this stuff out of the public Court
files, but in some ways it will help the girls, too. Do you know anything about how the fund in Alaska was
worked out? Did all the victims consent or did the Court just do it?
'thank you for your help. I also turned in the indictment package to my immediate supervisor today, so I expect
some edits back from her before it goes higher up the chain. If you had any thoughts, please let me know.
A. Marie Viltafaria
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
14
EFTA00226112
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
Sent:
Thursday, September 13,2007 7:37 PM
To:
Oosterbaan, Andrew
Subject:
Epstein
Hi Drew — Sorry to bother you, but the plea negotiations are getting fast and furious. Epstein's lawyers are
fixated on this idea of a "victim's fund" rather than having the girls file separate 2255 actions. I know that the
reason they want to do it is not out of the goodness of their hearts but to keep this stuff out of the public Court
files, but in some ways it will help the girls, too. Do you know anything about how the fund in Alaska was
worked out? Did all the victims consent or did the Court just do it?
Thank you for your help. I also turned in the indictment package to my immediate supervisor today, so I expect
some edits back from her before it goes higher up the chain. If you had any thoughts, please let me know.
A. Marie Villafaria
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
30
EFTA00226113
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Oosterbaan, Andrew
Sent:
Tuesday, September 11, 2007 11:53 AM
To:
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
Subject:
RE: Revised Epstein Indictment
I had not heard. The counter-offering is unfortunate, but I suppose it's understandable. Let me know how it goes.
Thanks, Marie.
Probably some time tomorrow, just to Karen Atkinson to get a first read, then it will go to Rolando and then up
to Jeff. I am still shooting for 9/25 for an indictment date, assuming they don't take our counter-counter-offer.
In case you haven't heard, yesterday one of Epstein's lawyers countered with 15 months jail followed by 15
months "community confinement" (a/k/a home confinement), and we counter-countered with 20 months jail
followed by 10 months community confinement.
Here is the agreement that was sent out
Thanks, Drew.
Marie Villajaiia
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Cc:
[email protected]; Richards, Jason R.
Will do. When do you plan to submit it?
Cc:
[email protected]; Richards, Jason R.
Hi all - Here is the revised version of the indictment. We are still doing some proofreading, but I wanted to get
sonic feedback before I start sending it through the chain of command. Can you let me know what you think?
32
EFTA00226114
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
Tuesday, September 11, 2007 11:48 AM
Oosterbaan, Andrew
RE: Revised Epstein Indictment
070910 Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement.pdf
Probably some time tomorrow, just to Karen Atkinson to get a first read, then
to Jeff. 1 am still shooting for 9/25 for an indictment date, assuming they don
In ease you haven't heard, yesterday one of Epstein's lawyers countered with
months "community confinement" (a/k/a home confinement), and we counter
followed by 10 months community confinement.
Here is the agreement that was sent out
Thanks, Drew.
A. Marie Villafaila
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Cc:
[email protected]; Richards, Jason R.
Will do. When do you plan to submit it?
it will go to Rolando and then up
't take our counter-counter-offer.
15 months jail followed by 15
-countered with 20 months jail
Cc:
[email protected]; Richards, Jason R.
Hi all — Here is the revised version of the indictment. We are still doing some proofreading, but I wanted to get
some feedback before I start sending it through the chain of command. Can you let me know what you think?
«070911 revised indictment.wpd»
A. Marie Villafaila
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
Exhibit 48
63
EFTA00226115
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
Sent:
Tuesday, September 11, 2007 2:15 PM
To:
Gerald Lefcourt
Cc:
Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS)
Subject:
Revised Agreement re Epstein
Dear Gerry: I have attached a revised version, as per Mr. Acosta's request. The operative terms have not
changed. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Also, please confirm your receipt of this e-
mail.
Thank you.
07091 Epstein
Jon-Prosecution..
A. Marie Villafana
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Tracking:
54
EFTA00226116
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
Sent:
Monday, September 10, 2007 5:23 PM
To:
Gerald Lefcourt
Cc:
Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS)
Subject:
Jeffrey Epstein
Gerry:
As per your discussion with U.S. Attorney Acosta, I have attached the Office's written counterproposal. If you
have any questions regarding its terms, please do not hesitate to call.
070910 Epstein
Jon-Prosecution..
A. Marie Villafaiia
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Tracking:
72
Exhibit 47
EFTA00226117
"Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS)" <
[email protected]>
11/27/2007 01:55 PM
To
"Jay Lefkowitz" <
[email protected]> cc
"Acosta, Alex (USAFLS)" <
[email protected]> Subject
Epstein
Jay,
Please accept my apologies for not getting back to you sooner but I was a little under the
weather yesterday. I hope that you enjoyed your Thanksgiving.
Regarding the issue of due diligence concerning Judge
selection
like to make a
few observations. First, Guy Lewis has known for some ime hat Judge
was making
reasonable efforts to sec
n Podhurst and Bob Josephsberg for this assignment. In fact,
when I told you of Judge
selection during our meeting last Wednesday, November 21st,
you and Professor Dershowi z se med very comfortable, and certainly not surprised, with the
selection. Podhurst and Josephsberg are no strangers to nearly the entire Epstein defense
team including Guy Lewis, Lili Ann Sanchez, Roy Black, and, apparently, Professor Dershowitz
who said he knew Mr. Josephsberg from law school. Second, Podhurst and Josephsberg have long-
standing stellar reputations for their legal acumen and ethics. It's hard for me to imagine
how much more vetting needs to be done.
The United States has a statutory obligation (Justice for All Act of 2004) to notify the
victims of the anticipated upcoming events and their rights associated with the agreement
entered into by the United States and Mr. Epstein in a timely fashion. Tomorrow will make one
full week since you were formally notified of the selection. I must insist that the vetting
proces
o an end. Therefore, unless you provide me with a good faith objection to
M
Judge
selection by COB tomorrow, November 28, 2007, I will authorize the notification
of the victims. Should you give me the go-ahead on Podhurst and Josephsberg selection by COB
tomorrow, I will simultaneously send you a draft of the letter. I intend to notify the
victims by letter after COB Thursday, November 29th. Thanks,
Jeff
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP.
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to
[email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments.
**** ******* 4**.ps ***** 40************* ****** *****************
3
EFTA00226118
back to work after the Thanksgiving Holiday, and yet your demands regarding timing suggest
that I have been sitting on my hands for days.
You should know that the first time I learned about Judge
selection of
Podhurst and Josephsberg, and indeed the first time I ever heard t eir names, was in our
meeting with you on Wednesday of last week. Nevertheless, I have now been able to confer
with my client, and we have determined that the selection of Podhurst and Josephsberg are
acceptable to us, reserving, of course, our previously stated objections to the manner in
which you have interpreted the section 2255 portions of the Agreement.
We do, however, strongly and emphatically object to your sending a letter to the
alleged victims. Without a fair opportunity to review and the ability to make objections to
this letter, it is completely unacceptable that you would send it without our consideration.
Additionally, given that the US Attorney's office has made clear it cannot vouch for the
claims of the victims, it would be incendiary and inappropriate for your Office to send such
a letter. Indeed, because it is a certainty that any such letter would immediately be leaked
to the press, your actions will only have the effect of injuring Mr. Epstein and promoting
spurious civil litigation directed at him. We believe it is entirely unprecedented, and in
any event, inappropriate for the Government to be the instigator of such lawsuits.
Finally, we disagree with your view that you are required to notify the alleged
victims pursuant to the Justice for All Act of 2004. First, 18 USC section 2255, the
relevant statute under the Non-Prosecution Agreement for the settlement of civil remedies,
does not have any connection to the Justice for All Act. Section 2255 was enacted as part of
a different statute. Second, the Justice for All Act refers to restitution, and section 2255
is not a restitution statute. It is a civil remedy. As you know, we had offered to provide
a restitution fund for the alleged victims in this matter; however that option was rejected
by your Office. Had that option been chosen, we would not object to your notifying the
alleged victims at this point. At this juncture, however, we do not accept your contention
that there is a requirement that the government notify the alleged victims of a potential
civil remedy in this case.
Accordingly, for all the reasons we have stated above, we respectfully -- and firmly
-- object to your sending any letter whatsoever to the alleged victims in this matter.
Furthermore, if a letter is to be sent to these individuals, we believe we should have a
right to review and make objections to that submission prior to it being sent to any alleged
victims. We also request that if your Office believes that it must send a letter to go to
the alleged victims, who still have not been identified to us, it should happen only after
Mr. Epstein has entered his plea. This letter should then come from the attorney
representative, and not from the Government, to avoid any bias.
As you know, Judge Starr has requested a meeting with Assistant Attorney General
Fisher to address what we believe is the unprecedented nature of the section 2255 component
of the Agreement. We are hopeful that this meeting will take place as early as next week.
Accordingly, we respectfully request that we postpone our discussion of sending a letter to
the alleged victims until after that meeting. We strongly believe that rushing to send any
letter out this week is not the wisest manner in which to proceed. Given that Mr. Epstein
will not even enter his plea for another few weeks, time is clearly not of the essence
regarding any notification to the identified individuals.
Thanks very much,
Jay
2
EFTA00226119
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Lourie, Andrew
Sent:
Wednesday, November 28, 2007 5:02 PM
To:
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Oosterbaan, Andrew
Cc:
Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS)
Subject:
Re: Epstein
Ok thx. Would you send me your last proposed nonpros with them with the 2255 language?
Original Message
Cc: Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS) <RGarcialusa.doj.gov>
Hi Andy and Drew -- This is the first that I have heard about another attempt to meet with
someone in Washington. I thought I would give you a heads up.
Hope all is well, Andy.
A. Marie Villafaha
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Original Message
Marie,
Can u send Jay the proposed letter and redact the names? Thx, Jeff
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
Original Message
Cc: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS)
Dear Jeff:
I received your email yesterday and was a little surprised at the tone of your
letter, given the fact that we spoke last week and had what I thought was a productive
meeting. I was especially surprised given that your letter arrived on only the second day
EFTA00226120
The United States has a statutory obligation (Justice for All Act of 2004) to notify the
victims of the anticipated upcoming events and their rights associated with the agreement
entered into by the United States and Mr. Epstein in a timely fashion. Tomorrow will make one
full week since you were formally notified of the selection. I must insist that the vetting
proces
o an end. Therefore, unless you provide me with a good faith objection to
Judge
selection by COB tomorrow, November 28, 2007, I will authorize the notification
of the
. Should you give me the go-ahead on Podhurst and Josephsberg selection by COB
tomorrow, I will simultaneously send you a draft of the letter. I intend to notify the
victims by letter after COB Thursday, November 29th. Thanks,
Jeff
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP.
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to
[email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments.
3
EFTA00226121
that there'is a requirement that the government notify the alleged victims of a potential
civil remedy in this case.
Accordingly, for all the reasons we have stated above, we respectfully -- and firmly
-- object to your sending any letter whatsoever to the alleged victims in this matter.
Furthermore, if a letter is to be sent to these individuals, we believe we should have a
right to review and make objections to that submission prior to it being sent to any alleged
victims. We also request that if your office believes that it must send a letter to go to
the alleged victims, who still have not been identified to us, it should happen only after
Mr. Epstein has entered his plea. This letter should then come from the attorney
representative, and not from the Government, to avoid any bias.
As you know, Judge Starr has requested a meeting with Assistant Attorney General
Fisher to address what we believe is the unprecedented nature of the section 2255 component
of the Agreement. We are hopeful that this meeting will take place as early as next week.
Accordingly, we respectfully request that we postpone our discussion of sending a letter to
the alleged victims until after that meeting. We strongly believe that rushing to send any
letter out this week is not the wisest manner in which to proceed. Given that Mr. Epstein
will not even enter his plea for another few weeks, time is clearly not of the essence
regarding any notification to the identified individuals.
Thanks very much,
Jay
"51oman, Jeff (USAFLS)" <
[email protected]>
11/27/2007 01:55 PM
To
"Jay Lefkowitz" (JLefkowitzfikirkland.com> cc
"Acosta, Alex (USAFLS)" <
[email protected]> Subject
Epstein
Jay,
Please accept my apologies for not getting back to you sooner but I was a little under the
weather yesterday. I hope that you enjoyed your Thanksgiving.
Regarding the issue of due diligence concerning Judge Davis' selection
like to make a
few observations. First, Guy Lewis has known for some time that Judge
was making
reasonable efforts to sec
n Podhurst and Bob Josephsberg for this assignment. In fact,
when I told you of Judge
selection during our meeting last Wednesday, November 21st,
you and Professor Dershowi z seemed very comfortable, and certainly not surprised, with the
selection. Podhurst and Josephsberg are no strangers to nearly the entire Epstein defense
team including Guy Lewis, Lili Ann Sanchez, Roy Black, and, apparently, Professor Dershowitz
who said he knew Mr. Josephsberg from law school. Second, Podhurst and Josephsberg have long-
standing stellar reputations for their legal acumen and ethics. It's hard for me to imagine
how much more vetting needs to be done.
2
EFTA00226122
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS)
Wednesday, November 28, 2007 4:35 PM
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
Fw: Epstein
Marie,
Can u send Jay the proposed letter and redact the names? Thx, Jeff
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
Original Message
Cc: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS)
Dear Jeff:
I received your email yesterday and was a little surprised at the tone of your
letter, given the fact that we spoke last week and had what I thought was a productive
meeting. I was especially surprised given that your letter arrived on only the second day
back to work after the Thanksgiving Holiday, and yet your demands regarding timing suggest
that I have been sitting on my hands for days.
You should know that the first time I learned about Judge
's selection of
Podhurst and Josephsberg, and indeed the first time I ever heard t eir names, was in our
meeting with you on Wednesday of last week. Nevertheless, I have now been able to confer
with my client, and we have determined that the selection of Podhurst and Josephsberg are
acceptable to us, reserving, of course, our previously stated objections to the manner in
which you have interpreted the section 2255 portions of the Agreement.
We do, however, strongly and emphatically object to your sending a letter to the
alleged victims. Without a fair opportunity to review and the ability to make objections to
this letter, it is completely unacceptable that you would send it without our consideration.
Additionally, given that the US Attorney's office has made clear it cannot vouch for the
claims of the victims, it would be incendiary and inappropriate for your Office to send such
a letter. Indeed, because it is a certainty that any such letter would immediately be leaked
to the press, your actions will only have the effect of injuring Mr. Epstein and promoting
spurious civil litigation directed at him. We believe it is entirely unprecedented, and in
any event, inappropriate for the Government to be the instigator of such lawsuits.
Finally, we disagree with your view that you are required to notify the alleged
victims pursuant to the Justice for All Act of 2004. First, 18 USC section 2255, the
relevant statute under the Non-Prosecution Agreement for the settlement of civil remedies,
does not have any connection to the Justice for All Act. Section 2255 was enacted as part of
a different statute. Second, the Justice for All Act refers to restitution, and section 2255
is not a restitution statute. It is a civil remedy. As you know, we had offered to provide
a restitution fund for the alleged victims in this matter; however that option was rejected
by your Office. Had that option been chosen, we would not object to your notifying the
alleged victims at this point. At this juncture, however, we do not accept your contention
EFTA00226123
Recipient
AndreW
Garda, Rolando (USAFLS)
Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS)
Read
Road. 9/19/2007 5:10 PM
Road: 9/19/2007 4:36 PM
3
EFTA00226124
Jay
Original Message
(See attached file: 9.19.07 Draft Plea Agreement
(Clean).doc)
(See attached file: 9.19.07 Draft Plea Agreement
(Redlined).doc)
The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside
information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis
International LLP.
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to
postatastertairldand.corn, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments.
Tracking:
2
EFTA00226125
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Vilialana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
Sent:
Wednesday. September 19. 2007 4:33 PM
To:
'Lourie, Andrew'; Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS)
Cc:
Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS)
Subject:
RE: Draft Plea Agreement
Importance:
High
Andy and Rolando -- This is my proposed response (below). I know that you keep saying he is going to plead, and he will
plead if we cave on everything, but I really do not think that Mr. Epstein is going to engage in serious negotiations until he sees
the Indictment and shows up in mag court (preferably in flip-flops). In reviewing the indictment package, if you would like to
maintain flexibility for the future, we could indict Mr. Epstein just on Count I (the conspiracy charge), and, if he won't plead to
5 years at that time, supersede with the remaining counts and just go to trial. But we gave them an initial deadline of early
August with the 24-month sentence. We are now seven weeks later and we are just spinning our wheels.
Jay -- The same problems that I e-mailed you about on Sunday and discussed yesterday with you and Rolando and that you
discussed with Andy are still in here. Paragraphs 4, 7, 8,9, and 11 have specifically been discussed and rejected. Paragraphs
17 through 19 have been addressed in paragraph 2 and will not be repeated. You have removed our paragraphs 4 (regarding the
application of the Sentencing Guidelines) and 18 (appeal waiver) both of which are specifically required by the Office's
Appellate Division. You have replaced Mr. Epstein's plea to a registrable offense, to one that does not require registration, and
you have again delayed the plea until after Mr. Epstein completes his federal prison sentence. Rolando and I specifically told
you that was unacceptable, and Barry Krischer also has informed us that he will not keep his case open for that period. You
also have inserted that this is a Rule 11(cX1)(C) plea, which binds the judge, which you know we have specifically rejected.
There are other, smaller, changes that the Office probably cannot agree to, but the bigger issues are these. If you or your client
insists on these, there can be no plea agreement.
A. Marie Villafafia
Assistant U.S. Attorney
561 209-1047
Original Message
Confidential
For settlement purposes only
Marie - I wanted to get this to you before I took off for nyc. I am landing at 7 and would like to speak shortly thereafter.
I am still considering which of the options you suggested Sunday. In this email, lam sending you a redline of your federal
resolution. I am also working on a deferred prosecution agreement because it may well be that we cannot reach agreement here.
I don't think there are that many issues left open, although clearly we still need to have further discussions. I also like your
suggestion from Sunday that we consider a C plea.
I know that Alex would have to sign off on it and that he has not done so as of now.
Regarding my schedule, I am available tonight to speak, all afternoon tomorrow (I ant in fed court in nyc on another criminal
matter tomorrow am), and then all day Friday.
I will plan on seeing you Monday. I am confident that one of the approaches we have discussed will work out.
1
EFTA00226126
Confidential
For settlement purposes only
Marie - I wanted to get this to you before I took off for nyc. I am landing at 7
and would like to speak shortly thereafter.
I am still considering which of the options you suggested Sunday. In this email,
I am sending you a redline of your federal resolution. I am also working on a
deferred prosecution agreement because it may well be that we cannot reach
agreement here. I don't think there are that many issues left open, although
clearly we still need to have further discussions. I also like your suggestion
from Sunday that we consider a C plea.
I know that Alex would have to sign off on it and that he has not done so as of
now.
Regarding my schedule, I am available tonight to speak, all afternoon tomorrow (I
am in fed court in nyc on another criminal matter tomorrow am), and then all day
Friday.
I will plan on seeing you Monday. I am confident that one of the approaches we
have discussed will work out.
Jay
Original Message
(See attached file: 9.19.07 Draft Plea Agreement
(Clean).doc)
(See attached file: 9.19.07 Draft Plea Agreement
(Redlined).doc)
**********4#4####t***#4
, 4#4###****************************20#
The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-
client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland
& Ellis International LLP.
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof
is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-
mail to postmasterPkirkland.com, and destroy this communication and all copies
thereof, including all attachments.
t*.****ii####i***********
70#4************3444flIci*************
Tracking:
3042
EFTA00226127
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Villafana, Ann Marie C (USAFLS)
Sent:
Wednesday, September 19, 2007 4:33 PM
To:
Lourie, Andrew; Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS)
Cc:
Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS)
Subject:
RE: Draft Plea Agreement
Importance:
High
Andy and Rolando -- This is my proposed response (below). I know that you keep
saying he is going to plead, and he will plead if we cave on everything, but I
really do not think that Mr. Epstein is going to engage in serious negotiations
until he sees the Indictment and shows up in mag court (preferably in flip-
flops). In reviewing the indictment package, if you would like to maintain
flexibility for the future, we could indict Mr. Epstein just on Count 1 (the
conspiracy charge), and, if he won't plead to 5 years at that time, supersede
with the remaining counts and just go to trial. But we gave them an initial
deadline of early August with the 24-month sentence. We are now seven weeks
later and we are just spinning our wheels.
Jay -- The same problems that I e-mailed you about on Sunday and discussed
yesterday with you and Rolando and that you discussed with Andy are still in
here. Paragraphs 4, 7, 8, 9, and 11 have specifically been discussed and
rejected. Paragraphs 17 through 19 have been addressed in paragraph 2 and will
not be repeated. You have removed our paragraphs 4 (regarding the application of
the Sentencing Guidelines) and 18 (appeal waiver) both of which are specifically
required by the Office's Appellate Division. You have replaced Mr. Epstein's
plea to a registrable offense, to one that does not require registration, and you
have again delayed the plea until after Mr. Epstein completes his federal prison
sentence. Rolando and-I specifically told you that was unacceptable, and Barry
Krischer also has informed us that he will not keep his case open for that
period. You also have inserted that this is a Rule 11(c)(1)(C) plea, which binds
the judge, which you know we have specifically rejected.
There are other, smaller, changes that the Office probably cannot agree to, but
the bigger issues are these. If you or your client insists on these, there can
be no plea agreement.
A. Marie Villafaha
Assistant U.S. Attorney
561 209-1047
Original Message
304:
EFTA00226128
Good job. A few thoughts:
I would eliminate the first sentence of para 2. Is there another way to deal with the issue in para 3 without this in the plea
agreement 7 Do we need para 10? Isn't para 11 sufficient without 10? Is it our place to include para 13 in this
agreement? I think it belongs in the state agreement and it looks out of place here.
I think you should include Roy or another member of the FL Bar on the plea agreement so we are not slowed down at the
last minute by Pro Flac stuff.
FYI - The Palm Beach Post reported the whole deal in today's paper and claimed to have a "federal source" and a "spy"
in Epstein's camp.
.4 Marie rilloranti
Assistant L.S. Attornti
56I 209.1047
Can you send me copy of the last thing you sent them? Thanks.
We arc still waiting for a **redline" of the agreement That they' seemed happy with yesteId4. BarrTind Litirria and
Epstein's attorneys are coining to our office on Monday to finalize even thing with the plan of getting him at least
arraigned on Monday afternoon. They tried to drag it into Tuesday and I said no.
.4. Marie VilWaria
Assistant U.S. Attorney
561 209-1047
What is the latest?
3045
EFTA00226129
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Lourie, Andrew (
[email protected]]
Sent:
Wednesday, September 19, 2007 4:21 PM
To:
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
Subject:
RE: epstein
twill reach out to Alex to discuss.
Cc: Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS)
Oh. and ■
took out the appeal waiver.
A. Marie
lafana
Assistant U.S. Attorney
561 209-1047
Cc: Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS)
I just got their "red-lined- version. I will forward it to you. Here are the issues that Rolando and I specifically discussed
with them arid rejected. that they have re-inserted into the agreement.
1.
We aeree to recommend that no PSI be prepared.
ev_have converted it into an ABA plea — as though_we wouldn't notice?
3.
want us to agree to the incorrect calculation of the guidelines
4. Instead of agreeing that the girls can sue Epstein. they cannot sue him and instead are bound to apply to a trust
administered by the State Court (Jay and I have addresSed this at least three times and it keeps appearing in his
versions)
5. They changed the stale charge that he has to plead guilty to to a non-registrable offense and he doesn't have to
plead to that charge until after he has finished serving his federal sentence.
6. They want us not to oppose a request for a prison camp designation.
7. They have re-added paragraphs 17 through 19, all of which are addressed by paragraph 2.
There are other problems too, but these are the highlights. This is NOT good faith negotiations.
.4. Marie l'illafiala
Assistant U.S. Attorney
561209-1047
Cc: Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS)
3044
EFTA00226130
Hi Jay — 1 was hoping there would be things for me to read this morning, but 1 will try to remain patient.
I believe there are only two types of agreements that would apply to this case: (I) a plea agreement to a federal
charge or charges; and (2) a non-prosecution agreement (which is really a deferred prosecution agreement
because the defendant agrees that if he violates the agreement, the U.S. can prosecute him).
A plea agreement is part of the court file. It is not accessible on-line via PACER, but someone can go to the
Clerk's Office to obtain a copy.
A non-prosecution agreement would not be made public or filed with the Court, but it would remain part of our
case file. It probably would be subject to a FOIA request, but it is not something that we would distribute
without compulsory process.
On the obstruction charges, many of the facts I included in that first proffer were hypothesized based upon our
discussions and the agents' observations of Ms. Groff. We will need to interview her to confirm the accuracy of
those fac
a second count, we could rely on the incident where Mr. Epstein's private investigators
followed
s father, forcing him off the road. Or, if there is something more recent related to any grand
jury subpoenas, we could consider that.
Hope that helps.
A. Marie Villajafia
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Tracking:
3114
EFTA00226131
this with a state plea as well so he serves the additional time there. I need to see your language for proffers on the two
charges - (taking Nadia and Sarah out of the jurisdiction to avoid process.)
Alternatively. at this stage. we could have just one count for 12 months and then 6 months incarceration under the state,
followed by community control and probabtion. I am not sure which is more practicable.
Pease let me know when you are free to speak.
Thanks -- Jay
"Villafana, Ann Marie C. VUSAFL51)"
eAnn-Matie.C.VillafanaeuscloLgoe>
09115/2007 09 14 AM
To -Jay Lelltoontz"<JLelltcnvitzakirkland corn*.
cc
SuCteCt RE Draft Agreement*,
Hi Jay — I know that the U.S. Attorney %sill not go belos 18 months of prison/jail time (and I would strongly
oppose the suggestion).
A. Marie rillafatia
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. .Australian Ave. Suite 400
West Palm Beach. FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
an alternative to what we discussed just now might be to plead to one count of 1512, serve 12 months plus supervised
release which would be one year of home detention Of we can make that work). followed by two years of probation in the
state on the state charges with the first 6 months being community control.
"Villain, Ann Marie C. MUSAFLS1)" <
[email protected]>
OMB/2007 05 £4 AM
To 'Jay Letkowea- <JLelkoweatalurkieno corn,
cc
SuOject Drat: Agreements/
3113
EFTA00226132
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
Sent:
Tuesday, September 18, 2007 11:43 AM
To:
tourie, Andrew.; Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS)
Co:
Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS)
Subject:
RE: Draft Agreements?
He also removed any promise to plead to a registrable offense and the promise related to the girls' damages
claims.
A. Marie I'ilafafa
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400
West Palm Beach. FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS)
i
Andy and Rolando: Please
e below so you understand my frustration. This document is
diffe
a
t
from what Jay just told An
they would agree to. He has it written as 16 months' impriso
wed b 8
months federal supervised re ease. He wants us to recommend an improper calculation of the guidelines. an
e
wants to waive the PSI so he can keep all of his information confidential. I have already told Jay that the PSI
language and other language in this agreement was unacceptable to our office. I will send back a plea
agreement that reads consistent with what Jay represented to Andy but I don't believe that this will be resolved
by Tuesday unless they come down here and we have a group contract writing session with the state attorney's
_
___
office and the decision-makers.
_
_
_
-.1.-Marie Villa7ana
_"
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Confidential — For Settlement purposes only.
Marie — Please look this over and let's see if we can identify any issues that we need to discuss in greater detail. Since
you can't go to only one count of obstruction, but 18 would become about 15 with gain time, I have made a proposal of a
total 24 month sentence based on two informations. This would include a period of home detention. We can then follow
3112
EFTA00226133
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
Sent:
Tuesday, September 18, 2007 9:31 AM
To:
Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Loud'', Andrew (USAFLS); Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS)
Cc:
Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS); McMillan, John (USAFLS)
Subject:
Epstein Negotiations
Importance:
High
Hi all — I think that we may be near the end of our negotiations with Mr. Epstein, and not because we have
reached a resolution. As I mentioned yesterday, I spent about 12 hours over the weekend drafting Informations,
changing plea agreements, and writing factual proffers. I was supposed to receive a draft agreement from them
yesterday, which never arrived. At that time, they were leaning towards pleading only to state charges and
doing all of the time in state custody.
Late last night I talked to Jay Lefkowitz who asked about Epstein pleading to two twelve-month federal charges
with half of his jail time being spent in home confinement pursuant to the guidelines. I told him that I had no
objection to that approach but, in the interest of full disclosure, I did not believe that Mr. Epstein would be
eligible because he will not be in Zone A or B. This morning Jay called and said that I was correct but, if we
could get Mr. Epstein down to 14 months, then he thought he would be eligible.
My response: have him plead to two separate Informations. On the first one he gets 12 months' imprisonment
and on the second he gets twelve months, with six served in home confinement, to run consecutively.
I just received an e-mail asking if Mr. Epstein could just do 12 months imprisonment instead.
As you can see, Mr. Epstein is having second thoughts about doing jail time. I would like to send Jay an e-mail
stating that if we do not have a signed agreement by tomorrow at 5:00, negotiations will end. I have selected
tomorrow at 5:00 because it gives them enough time to really negotiate an agreement if they are serious about it,
and, if not, it gives me one day before the Jewish holiday to get witnesses lined up for Tuesday's grand jury
appearance, when I plan to present the indictment, and it gives the office sufficient time to review the
indictment package.
Do you concur?
A. Marie Villafaiia
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Tracking:
EFTA00226134
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
Sent:
Monday, September 17, 2007 11:44 AM
To:
Acosta, Alex (USAFLS)
Subject:
RE: Latest update
Absolutely.
There were a lot of problems with their last attempt.
They tried to re-open all
the loopholes that I had sewn shut.
Tracking:
8
EFTA00226135
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Acosta, Alex (USAFLS)
Sent:
Monday, September 17. 2007 11:43 AM
To:
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Garcia. Rolando (USAFLS): Lourie. Andrew (USAFLS)
Cc:
Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS); McMillan, John (USAFLS)
Subject:
Re: Latest update
Pls make sure they know its only a draft, and that we still need to approve final. The form
and language may need polishing.
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
Original Message
<
[email protected]>; Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS) <
[email protected]>
[email protected]>
Hi all - Just spoke with Jay Lefkowitz, he reports that, as of now, they are leaning back
towards pleading only to state charges with a Non-Prosecution agreement. They are doing some
legal research and talking with the state, and Jay thinks that they should have a proposed
agreement by late tonight or early tomorrow morning. I am going to send him our last version
of the Non-Prosecution Agreement so that he has a template to work from. Jay has my numbers
in case I need to go home early and any questions come up.
As soon as I know something, I will pass it along.
A. Marie Villafaha
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
6
EFTA00226136
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
Sent:
Monday, September 17, 2007 11:33 AM
To:
Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS); Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS)
Cc:
Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS); McMillan, John (USAFLS)
Subject:
Latest update
Hi all -- Just spoke with Jay Lefkowitz, he reports that, as of now, they are leaning back towards pleading only
to state charges with a Non-Prosecution agreement. They arc doing some legal research and talking with the
state, and Jay thinks that they should have a proposed agreement by late tonight or early tomorrow morning. I
am going to send him our last version of the Non-Prosecution Agreement so that he has a template to work
from. Jay has my numbers in case I need to go home early and any questions come up.
As soon as I know something, I will pass it along.
A. Marie Villafana
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Tracking:
10
EFTA00226137
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
Sent:
Tuesday, September 18, 2007 9:31 AM
To:
Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS); Garcia. Rolando (USAFLS)
Cc:
Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS); McMillan, John (USAFLS)
Subject:
Epstein Negotiations
Importance:
High
Hi all — I think that we may be near the end of our negotiations with Mr. Epstein, and not because we have
reached a resolution. As I mentioned yesterday, I spent about 12 hours over the weekend drafting Informations,
changing plea agreements, and writing factual proffers. I was supposed to receive a draft agreement from them
yesterday, which never arrived. At that time, they were leaning towards pleading only to state charges and
doing all of the time in state custody.
Late last night I talked to Jay Lefkowitz who asked about Epstein pleading to two twelve-month federal charges
with half of his jail time being spent in home confinement pursuant to the guidelines. I told him that I had no
objection to that approach but, in the interest of full disclosure, I did not believe that Mr. Epstein would be
eligible because he will not be in Zone A or B. This morning Jay called and said that I was correct but, if we
could get Mr. Epstein down to 14 months, then he thought he would be eligible.
Mi response: have him plead to two separate Informations. On the first one he gets 12 months' imprisonment
and on the second he gets twelve months, with six served in home confinement, to run consecutively.
I just received an e-mail asking if Mr. Epstein could just do 12 months imprisonment instead.
As you can see, Mr. Epstein is having second thoughts about doing jail time. I would like to send Jay an e-mail
stating that if we do not have a signed agreement by tomorrow at 5:00, negotiations will end. I have selected
tomorrow at 5:00 because it gives them enough time to really negotiate an agreement if they are serious about it,
and, if not, it ives me one day before the Jewish holiday to get witnesses lined up for Tuesday's grand jury
appearance, hen I plati_to_present the indictment, and it gives the office sufficient time to review the __
indictment package.
Do you concur?
A. Marie Villafana
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Tracking:
3123
EFTA00226138
Marie,
Where are we at in the plea negotiations?
Tracking:
3142
EFTA00226139
prosecution agreement, the ones I have sent you recently are plea agreements that get filed with the
court. Please see if the appeal waiver language in those versions is alright.
Re your paragraph 7: As I mentioned, we will not waive the presentence investigation I know that
this will delay Mr. Epstein's sentencing by 70 days, but that will allow him to get all of his affairs in
order. As to bail, it will be set at the time of arraignment. and we can work out a joint recommendation
regarding the amount and its limitations. I have no objection to making a joint recommendation that
Mr. Epstein remain out on bond pending his sentencing, but I'm not sure that it belongs in a plea
agreement, especially since I can't bind the court on that issue. However, I can assure you, and we
can put it on the record during the plea colloquy, that I will join in your recommendation that he remain
out on bond pending sentencing. The same goes for the prison camp issue. As I mentioned, I have
opposed a designation only once in a very particular case. I can assure you. and we can put it on the
record at the plea colloquy that I will not oppose your recommendation for Mr. Epstein's designation.
Re your paragraph 8: As I mentioned over the telephone. I cannot bind the girls to the Trust
Agreement. and I don't think it is appropriate that a state court would administer a trust that seeks to
pay for federal civil claims. We both want to avoid unscrupulous attorneys and/or litigants from
coming forward, and I know that your client wants to keep these matters outside of public court filings,
but I just don't have the power to do what you ask. Here is my recommendation. During the period
between Mr. Epstein's plea and sentencing. I make a motion for appointment of the Guardian Ad
Litem. The three of us sit down and discuss things, and I will facilitate as much as I can getting the
girls' approval of this procedure because. as I mentioned. I think it is probably in their best interests.
In terms of plea agreement language, let me suggest the following:
The United States agrees to make a motion seeking the appointment of a Guardian ad Litem to
represent the identified victims. Following the appointment of such Guardian, the parties agree to
work together in good faith to develop a Trust Agreement, subject to the Court's approval, that would
provide for any damages owed to the identified victims pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 2255. Then
include the last two sentences of your paragraph 8.
Re the two paragraphs following your paragraph 8: I will include our standard language regarding
resolving all criminal liability and I will mention "co-conspirators." but I would prefer not to highlight for
the judge all of the other crimes and all of the other persons that we could charge. Also. we do not
have the power to bind Immigration and we make it a policy not to try to. however. I can tell you that.
as far as I know, there is no plan to try to proceed on any immigration charges against either Ms.
Ross or Ms. Marcinkova.
Also, on the grand jury subpoenas. I can prepare letters withdrawing them as of the signing of the
plea agreement, but I would prefer to take out that language. In my eyes, once we have a plea
agreement, the grand jury's investigation has ended and there can be no more use of the grand jury's
subpoena power.
I had hoped that we were far closer to resolving this than it appears that we are. Can I suggest that
tomorrow we either meet live or via teleconference. either with your client or having him within a quick
phone call, to hash out these items? I was hoping to work only a half day tomorrow to save my voice
for Tuesday's hearing and grand jury. if necessary, but maybe we can set a time to meet. If you want
to meet "off campus" somewhere. that is fine. I will make sure that I have all the necessary decision
makers present or "on call," as well.
If we can resolve some of these issues today, lets try to. and then save only the difficult issues for
tomorrow.
Sorry for the long e-mail. and for ruining your date with your daughter.
A. Marie Villafaha
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach. FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
3141
EFTA00226140
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Villafana, Ann Mahe C. (USAFLS)
Sent:
Monday, September 17. 2007 10:35 AM
To:
Garcia. Rolando (USAFLS): Laurie. Andrew (USAFLS)
Subject:
RE: Epstein
i
Iii Rolando — Here is the last e-mail that I sent to Jay last night. Ja talked with his client about it and reports
that they arc leaning towards options 1 or 4. They are going to try
make that decision today (there seems to
be some dissension in the ranks because Jack Goldberger gave some incorrect information), and draft a
proposed either Non-Prosecution Agreement or Plea Agreement. As you can see from my list below. there are a
number of things in their last draft that were unacceptable. All of the loopholes that I sewed up they tried to
open. So. Jay is supposed to be consulting with Roy Black regarding the correct state information and then will
give me a call.
I agreed to ask the Judge to take the hearing off calendar tomorrow and to postpone the grand jury appearances
that were scheduled from tomorrow. but I told him in no uncertain terms that I am indicting on the 2.5th so this
needs to be resolved early this week. Andy and I talked about all of this as well. Long answer to a short
question. sorry.
Hi Jay — This can wait until after the show, but my voice is going so I thought I would type it up. I
talked to Andy and he still doesn't like the factual basis. In his opinion, the plea should only address
the crimes that we were addressing, and we were not investigating Mr. Epstein abusing his girlfriend.
So, these are the only options that he recommended:
1. We go back to the original agreement where Mr. Epstein pleads only to state charges and serves
his time in the state, except that we can agree to only 18 months imprisonment.
2. Mr. Epstein pleads guilty to the state charges and also pleads to either two obstruction counts or to
one count of violating 47 USC 223(a)(1)(8). with a joint non-binding recommendation of 18 months,
so that Mr. Epstein can serve his time federally.
3. (My suggestion only, not Andy's): I go back to the U.S. Attorney and ask him to agree to an ABA-
plea to a 371 count (conspiracy toviolate 2422(b)) with a binding 20-month recommendation so that
Mr. Epstein can serve all of his time in a federal fadlity.
Or 4. Mr. Epstein pleads to one obstruction count, and serves part of his time federally and part state.
On your other proposed changes, some are fine and some are problematic.
Re your paragraph 2: As to timing, it is my understanding that Mr. Epstein needs to be sentenced in
the state after he is sentenced in the federal case, but not that he needs to plead guilty and be
sentenced after serving his federal time. Andy recommended that some of the timing issues be
addressed only in the state agreement, so that it isn't obvious to the judge that we are trying to create
federal jurisdiction for prison purposes. My understanding is that Mr. Epstein should sign a state plea
agreement. plead guilty to the federal offenses, plead guilty to the state offenses, be sentenced on the
federal offenses, and then be sentenced on the state offenses, and then start serving the federal
sentence.
Re your paragraph 3: As to the reservation of Mr. Epstein's right to withdraw his state plea or to
appeal his state plea or sentence, that is fine, but we need the caveat that, if he were to do so, the
United States could proceed on our charges.
Re your paragraph 6: With respect to the waiver of the right to appeal the federal sentence, given the
way we have drafted the information, it is possible that getting to the 18 month sentence will require
an upward departure The version of the agreement that you were working from is a federal non-
3140
EFTA00226141
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS)
Sent:
Friday, September 14, 2007 1:04 PM
To:
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS);
Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS)
Cc:
Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS); Ball, Shawn (USAFLS)
Subject:
RE: Epstein Documents
Andy has agreed to help finalize this. I will be out of town beginning tomorrow.
Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS); Ball, Shawn (USAFLS)
Here are the proposed plea agreement and information. If any changes need to be made, please contact Shawn
via e-mail or at 561 209-1037. I will be out the rest of the day, but you can get me at 561 601-2301, and I will
be able to access e-mail over the weekend.
Thank you!
<< File: Information charging 1512 and 113.wpd >>
<< File: OLY Plea Agreement v4 1512 and 113 violations.wpd >>
A. Marie Villafatia
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
11
EFTA00226142
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS)
Sent:
Friday, September 14.2007 11:09 AM
To:
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
Subject:
Re: Epstein update
The assault sounds like a stretch and factually sort of silly
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
Original Message
Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS) <
[email protected]>; Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS) <
[email protected]>
<
[email protected]>; Ball, Shawn (USAFLS) <
[email protected]>
Hi all - Jay and I talked through the main issue, which was the charges that Epstein would
plead guilty to. He put in a pitch for only 12 months, I put in a pitch that he plead to 24
with a 20-month recommendation, and we decided that we would be stuck with the 18 months. So
he will plead to one count of obstructing a witness from reporting a crime based upon Sarah
Kellen's call to one of the girls subtly pressuring her not to participate in the
investigation and one count of simple assault on an airplane based upon an incident where
Epstein "put great pressure" [Jay's words) on Kellen to call the girls to set up
appointments.
I will revise the plea agreement accordingly and draft an information for your review. I
will be out the rest of the day, but I will be accessible over the weekend. I will give all
of the electronic files to Karen and Shawn in case you need to make changes. Jay thinks we
will have a signed agreement by Monday and I am hoping that we can convince Judge Marra to
use the time on Tuesday that he set aside for the hearing to take the plea instead.
Documents to follow soon.
A. Marie Villafana
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
12
EFTA00226143
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
Sent:
Friday, September 14, 2007 9:52 AM
To:
Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS); Lourie, Andrew
(USAFLS)
Cc:
Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS); Ball, Shawn (USAFLS)
Subject:
Epstein Documents
Here are the proposed plea agreement and information. If any changes need to be made, please contact Shawn
via e-mail or at 561 209-1037. 1 will be out the rest of the day, but you can get me at 561 601-2301, and I will
be able to access e-mail over the weekend.
Thank you!
Information
arging 1512 and
MX Plea
ement v4 1512 a
A. Marie Villafana
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
23
EFTA00226144
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
Sent:
Friday, September 14, 2007 9:25 AM
To:
Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS); Garcia, Rolando
(USAFLS)
Cc:
Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS); McMillan, John (USAFLS); Ball, Shawn (USAFLS)
Subject:
Epstein update
Hi all - Jay and I talked through the main issue, which was the charges that Epstein would plead guilty to. He
put in a pitch for only 12 months, I put in a pitch that he plead to 24 with a 20-month recommendation, and we
decided that we would be stuck with the 18 months. So he will plead to one count of obstructing a witness from
reporting a crime based upon
call to one of the girls subtly pressuring her not to participate in the
investigation and one count of simple assault on an airplane based upon an incident where Epstein "put great
pressure" [Jay's words] on Kellen to call the girls to set up appointments.
I will revise the plea agreement accordingly and draft an information for your review. 1 will be out the rest of
the day, but I will be accessible over the weekend. I will give all of the electronic files to Karen and Shawn in
case you need to make changes. Jay thinks we will have a signed agreement by Monday and I am hoping that
we can convince Judge Marra to use the time on Tuesday that he set aside for the hearing to take the plea
instead.
Documents to follow soon.
A. Marie Villafaiia
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Tracking:
24
EFTA00226145
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
Sent:
Thursday. September 13, 2007 8:12 PM
To:
Atkinson. Karen (USAFLS); Ball, Shawn (USAFLS)
Cc:
McMillan, John (USAFLS)
Subject:
Epstein Indictment Package
In case Karen has any changes to the indictment package and wants to send it on to Rolando, here are the
indictment and pros memo. Shawn has the forms.
070913 revised
Pros Memo
2nd Addendum
indictment.wpd 1-07 REVISED.wp Pros Memo.wpt
A. Marie Villafaila
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Tracking:
26
EFTA00226146
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
Sent:
Thursday, September 13, 2007 7:29 PM
To:
Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS)
Subject:
Telephone Conference with Jay Lefkowitz tomorrow morning
Hi all — 1 just received an e-mail from Jay Lefkowitz wanting to do a call tomorrow morning. Andy will be on
the road, but will be on the conference call. Does anyone else want to join in?
A. Marie :finale&
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Tracking:
31
EFTA00226147
I then paged through Title 18, and came up with two possibilities. 18 U.S.C. § 403 is a
misdemeanor with a one year statutory maximum for violation of the privacy rights of a child
victim. We would have to show an intentional disclosure of documents or information
concerning a child victim to someone other than a participant in the legal proceedings. When
the state prosecution first hit the press, Epstein's attorneys (especially Roy Black) made
statements about the "credibility" of some of the child victims, with specific identifying
information, and I would base two charges on information disclosed about two of the victims.
18 U.S.C. § 1512(d) is also a misdemeanor with a one year statutory maximum. We would have
to show that Epstein (or someone on his behalf) intentionally harassed another person to
hinder, delay, prevent, or dissuade the person from reporting to a law enforcement officer
the commission or possible commission of a federal offense, or to dissuade the person from
causing a criminal prosecution to be sought or instituted. Three girls have mentioned
exertions of pressure to keep them from reporting the offenses or talking to law enforcement.
My guess is that he will object to these charges because he would have to plead to two
counts, which would expose him to the potential of a 24-month sentence. If he does so, I
recommend that we reconsider the Rule 11 plea rather than try to create violations out of
whole cloth.
I also determined that a defendant who receives a prison sentence on a misdemeanor offense is
also eligible for one year of supervised release.
Another option is a plea to 47 U.S.C. § 223(a)(1)(0), which prohibits someone "in interstate
or foreign communications, by means of a telecommunications device knowingly -- . . . (ii)
initiates the transmission of any . . . . request, suggestion, proposal, . . . or other
communication which is obscene . . . knowing that the recipient of the communication is under
18 years of age, regardless of whether the maker of such communication placed the call or
initiated the communication." This is a felony offense, with a two-year statutory maximum.
To move things along, I have put together an information package assuming a plea to two
counts of violating section 403. I will leave that info with Karen as well, in case you want
to make any changes tomorrow.
Thank you.
A. Marie Villafaha
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
18
EFTA00226148
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS)
Sent:
Thursday, September 13, 2007 7:28 PM
To:
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
Subject:
Re: Epstein plea
U can give him my cell. If he calls me early I will be in car
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
Original Message
Hi Andy -- It would still have to be a conspiracy to commit an assault on a plane. I just
want to make sure that we have something that is factually accurate. Just trying to plan
ahead.
I just got an e-mail from Jay Lefkowitz asking if I am free to talk tomorrow at 9:00. Will
you be in then? I have to report to the hospital at 10:15.
A. Marie Villafana
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Original Message
He is going to give us an assault on the plane or we can do conspiracy
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
Original Message
Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS) <
[email protected]>
<
[email protected]>
Hi all - I have not heard back from any of Mr. Epstein's attorneys today about the plea, but
I know that they are out for the holiday. I will be out tomorrow, so today I finished the
indictment package if we decide to go forward. It currently is with Karen Atkinson.
17
EFTA00226149
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
Original Message
Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS) <
[email protected]>
<
[email protected]>
Hi all - I have not heard back from any of Mr. Epstein's attorneys today about the plea, but
I know that they are out for the holiday. I will be out tomorrow, so today I finished the
indictment package if we decide to go forward. It currently is with Karen Atkinson.
I then paged through Title 18, and came up with two possibilities. 18 U.S.C. § 403 is a
misdemeanor with a one year statutory maximum for violation of the privacy rights of a child
victim. We would have to show an intentional disclosure of documents or information
concerning a child victim to someone other than a participant in the legal proceedings. When
the state prosecution first hit the press, Epstein's attorneys (especially Roy Black) made
statements about the "credibility" of some of the child victims, with specific identifying
information, and I would base two charges on information disclosed about two of the victims.
18 U.S.C. § 1512(d) is also a misdemeanor with a one year statutory maximum. We would have
to show that Epstein (or someone on his behalf) intentionally harassed another person to
hinder, delay, prevent, or dissuade the person from reporting to a law enforcement officer
the commission or possible commission of a federal offense, or to dissuade the person from
causing a criminal prosecution to be sought or instituted. Three girls have mentioned
exertions of pressure to keep them from reporting the offenses or talking to law enforcement.
My guess is that he will object to these charges because he would have to plead to two
counts, which would expose him to the potential of a 24-month sentence. If he does so, I
recommend that we reconsider the Rule 11 plea rather than try to create violations out of
whole cloth.
I also determined that a defendant who receives a prison sentence on a misdemeanor offense is
also eligible for one year of supervised release.
Another option is a plea to 47 U.S.C. § 223(a)(1)(0), which prohibits someone "in interstate
or foreign communications, by means of a telecommunications device knowingly --
. . (ii)
initiates the transmission of any . . . . request, suggestion, proposal, . . . or other
communication which is obscene . . . knowing that the recipient of the communication is under
18 years of age, regardless of whether the maker of such communication placed the call or
initiated the communication." This is a felony offense, with a two-year statutory maximum.
To move things along, I have put together an information package assuming a plea to two
counts of violating section 403. I will leave that info with Karen as well, in case you want
to make any changes tomorrow.
Thank you.
A. Marie Villafana
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
34
EFTA00226150
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
Sent:
Thursday, September 13, 2007 7:27 PM
To:
Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS)
Subject:
RE: Epstein plea
Alright. I will get Rolando and/or Jeff on with me.
A. Marie Villafana
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Original Message
I have a 930 hearing in miami.
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
Original Message
Hi Andy -- It would still have to be a conspiracy to commit an assault on a plane. I just
want to make sure that we have something that is factually accurate. Just trying to plan
ahead.
I just got an e-mail from lay Lefkowitz asking if I am free to talk tomorrow at 9:00. Will
you be in then? I have to report to the hospital at 10:15.
A. Marie Villafaha
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Original Message
He is going to give us an assault on the plane or we can do conspiracy
33
EFTA00226151
hinder, delay, prevent, or dissuade the person from reporting to a law enforcement officer
the commission or possible commission of a federal offense, or to dissuade the person from
causing a criminal prosecution to be sought or instituted. Three girls have mentioned
exertions of pressure to keep them from reporting the offenses or talking to law enforcement.
My guess is that he will object to these charges because he would have to plead to two
counts, which would expose him to the potential of a 24-month sentence. If he does so, I
recommend that we reconsider the Rule 11 plea rather than try to create violations out of
whole cloth.
I also determined that a defendant who receives a prison sentence on a misdemeanor offense is
also eligible for one year of supervised release.
Another option is a plea to 47 U.S.C. § 223(a)(1)(8), which prohibits someone "in interstate
or foreign communications, by means of a telecommunications device knowingly -- . . . (ii)
initiates the transmission of any . . . . request, suggestion, proposal, . . . or other
communication which is obscene . . . knowing that the recipient of the communication is under
18 years of age, regardless of whether the maker of such communication placed the call or
initiated the communication." This is a felony offense, with a two-year statutory maximum.
To move things along, I have put together an information package assuming a plea to two
counts of violating section 403. I will leave that info with Karen as well, in case you want
to make any changes tomorrow.
Thank you.
A. Marie Villafaha
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Tracking:
39
EFTA00226152
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
Thursday, September 13, 2007 7:24 PM
Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS)
RE: Epstein plea
Hi Andy -- It would still have to be a conspiracy to commit an assault on a plane. I just
want to make sure that we have something that is factually accurate. Just trying to plan
ahead.
I just got an e-mail from Jay Lefkowitz asking if I am free to talk tomorrow at 9:00. Will
you be in then? I have to report to the hospital at 10:15.
A. Marie Villafana
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Original Message
He is going to give us an assault on the plane or we can do conspiracy
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
Original Message
Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS) <
[email protected]>
<
[email protected]>
Hi all - I have not heard back from any of Mr. Epstein's attorneys today about the plea, but
I know that they are out for the holiday. I will be out tomorrow, so today I finished the
indictment package if we decide to go forward. It currently is with Karen Atkinson.
I then paged through Title 18, and came up with two possibilities. 18 U.S.C. § 403 is a
misdemeanor with a one year statutory maximum for violation of the privacy rights of a child
victim. We would have to show an intentional disclosure of documents or information
concerning a child victim to someone other than a participant in the legal proceedings. When
the state prosecution first hit the press, Epstein's attorneys (especially Roy Black) made
statements about the "credibility" of some of the child victims, with specific identifying
information, and I would base two charges on information disclosed about two of the victims.
18 U.S.C. § 1512(d) is also a misdemeanor with a one year statutory maximum. We would have
to show that Epstein (or someone on his behalf) intentionally harassed another person to
38
EFTA00226153
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
Sent:
Thursday, September 13, 2007 7:10 PM
To:
Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS); Ball, Shawn (USAFLS)
Cc:
McMillan, John (USAFLS)
Subject:
Epstein Information Package
Hi all - Here is the Information and Plea Agreement for the Information Package. Shawn has all of the other
forms on her computer.
Thank you!
Information
OLY Plea
:barging 403.wpement v3 misden
A. Marie Villafasia
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
%Vest Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Tracking:
91
EFTA00226154
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
Sent:
Thursday, September 13, 2007 6:58 PM
To:
Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS)
Cc:
Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS); Laurie, Andrew (USAFLS)
Subject:
Epstein plea
Hi all - I have not heard back from any of Mr. Epstein's attorneys today about the plea, but I know that they are
out for the holiday. I will be out tomorrow, so today I finished the indictment package if we decide to go
forward. It currently is with Karen Atkinson.
I then paged through Title 18, and came up with two possibilities. 18 U.S.C. § 403 is a misdemeanor with a one
year statutory maximum for violation of the privacy rights of a child victim. We would have to show an
intentional disclosure of documents or information concerning a child victim to someone other than a
participant in the legal proceedings. When the state prosecution first hit the press, Epstein's attorneys
(especially Roy Black) made statements about the "credibility" of some of the child victims, with specific
identifying information, and I would base two charges on information disclosed about two of the victims.
18 U.S.C. § I512(d) is also a misdemeanor with a one year statutory maximum. We would have to show that
Epstein (or someone on his behalf) intentionally harassed another person to hinder, delay, prevent, or dissuade
the person from reporting to a law enforcement officer the commission or possible commission of a federal
offense, or to dissuade the person from causing a criminal prosecution to be sought or instituted. Three girls
have mentioned exertions of pressure to keep them from reporting the offenses or talking to law enforcement.
My guess is that he will object to these charges because he would have to plead to two counts, which would
expose him to the potential of a 24-month sentence. If he does so, I recommend that we reconsider the Rule 11
plea rather than try to create violations out of whole cloth.
I also determined that a defendant who receives a prison sentence on a misdemeanor offense is also eligible for
one year of supervised release.
Another option is a plea to 47 U.S.C. § 223(a)(1)(B), which prohibits someone "in interstate or foreign
communications, by means of a telecommunications device knowingly --
(ii) initiates the transmission of
any . . . . request, suggestion, proposal, . . . or other communication which is obscene . . . knowing that the
recipient of the communication is under 18 years of age, regardless of whether the maker of such
communication placed the call or initiated the communication." This is a felony offense, with a two-year
statutory maximum.
To move things along, I have put together an information package assuming a plea to two counts of violating
section 403. I will leave that info with Karen as well, in case you want to make any changes tomorrow.
Thank you.
A. Marie Villajatia
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
43
EFTA00226155
Original Message
Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS) <
[email protected]>
Dear Gerry: I have attached a revised version, as per Mr. Acosta's request. The operative
terms have not changed. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Also,
please confirm your receipt of this e-mail.
Thank you.
«070911 Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement.pdf»
A. Marie Villafaha
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Tracking:
so
EFTA00226156
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
Sent:
Tuesday, September 11, 2007 5:01 PM
To:
Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS)
Subject:
RE: Revised Agreement re Epstein
Hi Andy -- I will try to get back as soon as possible. I just don't know how long I will be
at the hospital. Is it just us three or is Gerry Lefcourt also attending? What should 1 be
prepared to discuss?
A. Marie Villafaila
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Original Message
Good. Barry leaves early for Jewish holidays any chance u can make 130
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
Original Message
Plead to the three specified charges, a 30 month sentence, split 20 in jail and 10 in
"community control," and agree that the girls are victims for purposes of damages. We also
put in deadlines for a plea and sentencing date.
A. Marie Villafana
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Original Message
What is our latest offer?
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
49
EFTA00226157
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS)
Sent:
Tuesday, September 11, 2007 4:54 PM
To:
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
Subject:
Re: Revised Agreement re Epstein
Good. Barry leaves early for Jewish holidays any chance u can make 130
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
Original Message
Plead to the three specified charges, a 30 month sentence, split 20 in jail and 10 in
"community control," and agree that the girls are victims for purposes of damages. We also
put in deadlines for a plea and sentencing date.
A. Marie Villafana
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Original Message
What is our latest offer?
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
Original Message
Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS) <ALourieflusa.doj.gov>
Dear Gerry: I have attached a revised version, as per Mr. Acosta's request. The operative
terms have not changed. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Also,
please confirm your receipt of this e-mail.
Thank you.
«070911 Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement.pdf»
21
EFTA00226158
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
From:
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)
Sent:
Tuesday, September 11, 2007 4:52 PM
To:
Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS)
Subject:
RE: Revised Agreement re Epstein
Plead to the three specified charges, a 30 month sentence, split 20 in jail and 10 in
"community control," and agree that the girls are victims for purposes of damages. We also
put in deadlines for a plea and sentencing date.
A. Marie Villafafia
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Original Message
What is our latest offer?
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
Original Message
Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS) <
[email protected]>
Dear Gerry: I have attached a revised version, as per Mr. Acosta's request. The operative
terms have not changed. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Also,
please confirm your receipt of this e-mail.
Thank you.
«070911 Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement.pdf»
A. Marie Villafana
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
Tracking:
52
EFTA00226159
« File: OLY Non-Prosecution Agreement v3.wpd »
A. Marie Villafana
Assistant U.S. Attorney
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone 561 209-1047
Fax 561 820-8777
27
EFTA00226160
any one of these conditions allows the United States to elect to terminate the agreement and
to investigate and prosecute Epstein for any and all federal offenses.
By signing this agreement, Epstein asserts and certifies that he is aware of the fact
that the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States provides that in all
criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial.
Epstein further is aware that Rule 48(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure provides
that the Court may dismiss an indictment, information, or complaint for unnecessary delay in
presenting a charge to the Grand Jury, filing an information, or in bringing a defendant to
trial. Epstein hereby requests that the United States Attorney for the Southern District of
Florida defer such prosecution. Epstein agrees and consents that any delay from the date of
this Agreement to the date of initiation of prosecution, as provided for in the terms
expressed herein, shall be deemed to be a necessary delay at his own request, and he hereby
waives any defense to such prosecution on the ground that such delay operated to deny him
rights under Rule 48(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and the Sixth Amendment to
the Constitution of the United States to a speedy trial or to bar the prosecution by reason
of the running of the statute of limitations for a period of months equal to the period
between the signing of this agreement and the breach of this agreement. Epstein further
asserts and certifies that he understands that the Fifth Amendment and Rule 7(a) of the
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure provide that all felonies must be charged in an
indictment presented to a grand jury. Epstein hereby agrees and consents that, if a
prosecution against him is instituted, it may be by way of an Information signed and filed by
the United States Attorney, and hereby waives his right to be indicted by a grand jury.
By signing this agreement, Epstein asserts and certifies that the above has been read
and explained to him. Epstein hereby states that he understands the conditions of this Non-
Prosecution Agreement and agrees to comply with them.
Cc: McMillan, John (USAFLS); Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS); Lourie,
Andrew (USAFLS)
Here is my proposed Non-Prosecution Agreement. Since Gerry Lefcourt is the attorney who
contacted Andy Lourie with the counter-offer, I have used his name as attorney for Mr.
Epstein. If another attorney will be in that role, I can change the signature block. Please
let me know if you have any questions or changes.
26
EFTA00226161
(hereinafter, the "State Attorney's Office") charging violations of the following Florida
Statutes:
(a)
lewd and lascivious battery on a child, in violation of Fl. Stat.
800.04(4);
(b)
solicitation of minors to engage in prostitution, in violation of
Fl. Stat. 796.03; and
(c)
engaging in sexual activity with minors at least sixteen years of
age, in violation of Fl. Stat. 794.05.
2.
Epstein and the State Attorney's Office shall make a joint, binding
recommendation that the Court impose a thirty (30) month sentence to be divided as follows:
(a)
Epstein shall begin by serving at least twenty (20) months in
prison, without any opportunity for withholding adjudication or sentencing, and without
probation or community control in lieu of imprisonment; and
(b)
following the term of imprisonment, Epstein shall serve ten (10)
months of community control.
3.
Epstein shall waive all challenges to the Information filed by the State
Attorney's Office and shall waive the right to appeal his conviction and sentence.
4.
Epstein shall provide to the U.S. Attorney's Office copies of all proposed
agreements with the State Attorney's Office prior to entering into those agreements.
5.
Epstein agrees that, if any of the victims identified in the federal
investigation file suit pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255, Epstein will not contest the
jurisdiction of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida over his person
and/or the subject matter, and Epstein will not contest that the identified victims are
persons who, while minors, were victims of violations of Title 18, United States Code,
Sections(s) 2422 and/or 2423.
6.
The United States shall provide Epstein's attorneys with a list of the
identified