Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00234060DOJ Data Set 9Other

Case 9:08-cv-80811-WJZ

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00234060
Pages
8
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Case 9:08-cv-80811-WJZ Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 08'18'2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80811-CIV-bLOCH/SNOW C.M.A.. Plaintiff. vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN/SCHEDULING REPORT Pursuant to the Court's Order of Instructions (DE 2), Rules 16(b) and 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 16.1(B) of the Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, the parties submit the following Joint Discovery Plan and Scheduling Report. A. The Parties Have Conferred. On August 11, 2008, counsel for the plaintiff, C.M.A., and for defendants Jeffrey Epstein and conferred by telephone for the purposes prescribed by Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Although defendant ms not been served, her counsel participated in this conference as directed in the Court's Order of Instructions. The plaintiff agrees thaM partici

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:08-cv-80811-WJZ Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 08'18'2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80811-CIV-bLOCH/SNOW C.M.A.. Plaintiff. vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN/SCHEDULING REPORT Pursuant to the Court's Order of Instructions (DE 2), Rules 16(b) and 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 16.1(B) of the Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, the parties submit the following Joint Discovery Plan and Scheduling Report. A. The Parties Have Conferred. On August 11, 2008, counsel for the plaintiff, C.M.A., and for defendants Jeffrey Epstein and conferred by telephone for the purposes prescribed by Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Although defendant ms not been served, her counsel participated in this conference as directed in the Court's Order of Instructions. The plaintiff agrees thaM participation in this conference does not waive any objections to service or jurisdiction. EFTA00234060 Case 9:08-cv-80811-WJZ Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 08:1812008 Page 2 of 8 B. Statement of Claim 1. The Plaintiff's Claims The plaintiff alleges that she was assaulted by defendant Epstein while she was a minor. Plaintiff further alleges that defendantMibetted Epstein's acts of assault. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants' conduct caused her to suffer mental anguish, mental pain and suffering, psychic trauma and a loss of the capacity for the enjoyment of life. The plaintiff is seeking to recover damages in excess of $15,000, plus costs. 2. Defendants' Defenses As of the date of this Joint Scheduling Report, the defendants have not filed an answer or asserted defenses. Defendan•s not yet been served with process. C. Summary of Uncontested Facts None. D. Discovery The parties anticipate that discovery will include written discovery requests, third-party subpoenas, and depositions of individuals and government officials. E. Proposed Dates and Deadlines The parties agree that this case is appropriate for the standard track, pursuant to Local Rule 16.1(A)(2)(b), with trial estimated at 10 days and 269 days to complete discovery. The parties note that these dates may need to be adjusted depending on the resolution of issues involving service of process on defendan 2 EFTA00234061 Case 9:08-cv-80811-WJZ Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 08:182008 Page 3 of 8 Event Date Join other parties December 1, 2008 Amend pleadings in accordance with the Federal Rules December 1, 2008 Complete mediation June 30, 2009 Exchange Rule 26(a)(3) disclosures October 1, 2008 Exchange of Expert Reports February 27, 2009 Exchange of Trial Witness List April 30, 2009 Completion of all discovery May 28, 2009 (269 days from 9/1/08) Deadline for filing dispositive motions. July 30, 2009 File joint pretrial stipulation (including proposed jury instructions and joint summary of motions in limine) August 31, 2009 Pretrial conference September 15, 2009 Trial October 1, 2009 F. Estimated Length of Trial; Jury or Non-Jury The parties estimate that the trial will take approximately 10 trial days. Plaintiff has demanded a jury trial. G. Anticipated Motions The plaintiff anticipates that she will be filing a motion to add a claim for punitive damages, as soon as the pending motions (see Pam. H, infra.) are resolved. H. Pending Motions On July 25, 2008, the defendants filed a sealed Motion to Stay this action during the pendency of a parallel federal criminal action involving the same subject matter and same 3 EFTA00234062 Case 9:08-cv-80811-WJZ Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/18/2008 Page 4 of 8 parties. It is anticipated that the motion will be fully briefed and ripe for review by August 18, 2008. I. Legal or Factual Aspects Requiring Court's Special Consideration 1. Defendants' motion to stay pending conclusion of parallel federal criminal action. 2. Defendants' constitutional privileges arising from a pending criminal action. .1. Statement of Need or Agreement to Refer Matters to Magistrate Judge The parties consent to the referral of all discovery issues to the Magistrate Judge. K. Status and Likelihood of Settlement The parties have briefly discussed the possibility of settlement and will continue to explore the possibility of settlement as the case proceeds. L. Other Matters Required by Local Rule 16.1B 1. The likelihood of appearance in the action of additional parties. At this time, the parties do not anticipate the joinder of additional parties. However, counsel for the plaintiff wishes to reserve the right to join any additional defendants identified in discovery and has asked to have until December I, 2008 to do so. 2. Proposed Limits on the Time to File and Hear Dispositive Motions. The parties agree that pretrial motions should be filed no later than July 30, 2009 and request that they be heard and decided by the Pre-Trial Conference. 3. Proposals for the formulation and simplification of issues, including the elimination of frivolous claims or defenses. The parties agree to work together to formulate and simplify the issues in this case. 4 EFTA00234063 Case 9:08-cv-80811-WJZ Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/18/2008 Page 5 of 8 4. The possibility of obtaining admissions of fact and of documents, electronically stored information, or things which will avoid unnecessary proof, stipulations regarding authenticity of documents, electronically stored information or things, and the need for advance rulings from the Court on admissibility of evidence. The parties agree to work together to stipulate to the authenticity of documents produced and obtained during discovery. 5. Sueeestions for the avoidance of unnecessary proof and of cumulative evidence. The parties agree to work together to enter into stipulations to avoid unnecessary proof and cumulative evidence. 6. Any other information that might be helpful to the Court in setting the case for status or pretrial conference. At this time, the parties are unaware of any other information that might be helpful to the Court. M. Certification Regardirm Disclosures Required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) and (21 The parties certify that disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)-(2) will be served by October I, 2008. In the event that the motion for stay remains pending at that time, the defendants may seek to extend this date. The Parties agree to supplement their disclosures as necessary. N. Names, Addresses, and Phone Numbers of Counsel a. Plaintiff Richard H. Willits Richard H. Willits, P.A. 2290 10th Avenue North, Suite 404 Lake Worth, Florida 33461 5 EFTA00234064 Case 9:08-cv-80811-WJZ Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 08:1812008 Page 6 of 8 B. Defendants Guy A. Lewis Michael R. Tein Lewis Tein, P.L. 3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340 Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Bruce E. Reinhart Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A. 250 South Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Attorneys for Defendani 6 EFTA00234065 Case 9:08-cv-80811-WJZ Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 08:18'2008 Page 7 of 8 Respectfully submitted, RICHARD H. WILLITS, P.A. 2290 10th Avenue North, Suite 404 Lake Worth, Florida 33461 LEWIS TEIN, P.L. 3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340 Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 By: /s/ Richard H. Willits By: /s/ Michael R. Tein Richard H. Willits GUY A. LEWIS Fla. Bar No. 139888 Fla. Bar No. 623740 MICHAEL R. TEIN Attorneys for Plaintiff C.M.A. Fla. Bar No. 993522 BRUCE E. REINHART, P.A. & ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER 250 South Australian Avenue WEISS, P.A. Suite 1400 250 Australian Avenue South West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 By: By: /s/ Bruce E. Reinhart Jack A. Goldberger Bruce E. Reinhart Fla. Bar No. 262013 Fla. Bar No. 10762 Attorneys for Defendan Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein 7 EFTA00234066 Case 9:08-cv-80811-WJZ Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/18/2008 Page 8 of 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on August 18, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified above via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF. Is/ Michael R. Tein Michael R. Tein 8 EFTA00234067

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80993-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80993-KAM Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/02/2009 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80993-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 7 Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S ANSWER & AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files his Answer to the Second Amended Complaint and states: 1. Without knowledge and deny. 2. As to the allegations in paragraphs 2, Defendant asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "[i]t would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege bas

7p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 214

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 214 Entered on F LSD Docket 09/02/2010 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FT. LAUDERDALE DIVISION Case No. 08-CIV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND OBJECTION TO DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS WITH INTEGRATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to a Joint Stipulation Regarding Certain Documentation files this his Motion for Protective Order and Objection to Disclosure of Certain Correspondence and Discovery for the reasons set forth below: I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT During the underlying litigation, Epstein vigorously sought protection from the Court that these and other documents produced would be used for purposes other than those contemplated by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for discovery; i.e., dissemination in the

10p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Rol Slack lir „kite'

Rol Slack lir „kite' 2/949 Arcrwite a." 2434 7 Antai, Liu) 3 cut, , 4,/e EFTA00183732 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP AND AfilL/ArtO PART/H.3We; ' Cntercup Cantor 163 East 53'd Street New York, New York 10022-4611 WNW rwerA.COM September 2, 2008 VIA FACSIMILE (56D 820-8777 United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re:Jeffrey Bpstein Dear • Facsimile: In response to your letter dated August 26, 2008, I am confirming that Mr. Goldberger should continue to be listed as the contact pawn in the' mended victim notification letters and should receive the carbon copies of thoso letters as they are sent. • Also, we plan on speaking to Mr. Josofsberg this week to discuss a procedure for paying his fees. We intend to comply fully with the agreement and Mr. Epstein will pay Mr. Josfsberg's usual and customary hourly rates for his work pursuant to the agreement facilitating settlements unde

136p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

CLAIM ID: 26H9-2VPP

CLAIM ID: 26H9-2VPP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRAMOHNSON Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. / PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF SERVING VERIFIED ANSWERS TO SECOND INTERROGATORIES COMES NOW the Plaintiff, , by and through the undersigned counsel, and hereby gives notice that that Verified Answers to Second Interrogatories propounded by the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, on August 28, 2009, have been furnished to the attorney for the Defendant. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been furnished by e-mail this trday of November, 2009 to alt counsel ob the attached service list. Attorney tor minim 3505-038 Page I of 5 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00005262 EFTA00157825 CLAIM ID: 26H9-2VPP VS. EPSTEIN, et al Case No.: 08-CV-80811-Marra/Johnson Plaintiffs Verified Answers to Second Interrogatories SERVICE LIST Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldb

5p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

VIA FACSIMILE AND ELECTRONIC MAIL

VIA FACSIMILE AND ELECTRONIC MAIL Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Roy Black, Esq. Black Srebnick Kornspan & Stumpf P.A. Re: Jeffrey Epstein U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida June 27, 2008 Dear Messrs. Goldberger and Black: Thank you for providing me with the proposed plea agreement between Mr. Epstein and the State Attorney's Office. The U.S. Attorney's Office hereby provides Notice that the proposed sentencing provision does not comply with the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. The second sentencing paragraph of the proposed plea agreement reads: On 08CF00938 1 AMB, the Defendant is sentenced to 18 months Community Control I (one). As a special condition of this Community Control the Defendant must serve the first 6 months in the Palm Beach County Detention Facility ... The Non-Prosecution Agreement specifically provides: Epstein shall be sentenced to consecutive terms of twelve (12) mo

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Condensed Transcript

• ,I • • L.M., Condensed Transcript IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Case No. 502008CA028051 XXXXMB AD DEPOSITION OF LARRY EUGENE MORRISON TAKEN ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF VOLUME I Pages 1 to 200 October 6, 2009 10:55 a.m. 515 N. Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401-4321 court reporter 0 ESQUIRE Toll Free: Facsimile: I MMIIM www.esquIresolutionS.com EFTA00181380 • • • EFTA00181381 Larry Eugene Morrison - Volume I October 6, 2009 • • 1 IN /NS CIRCUIT COURT Of TAR 15Th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND PM PAIN BRACH COUNTY. FLORIDA VOLONE I Pages 1 to 200 2 3 3 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL On behalf of the Defendant ATTEFOURY. GOLDBERGER A WEISS BY: JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER. ESO.. 4 250 Australian Avenue Suite 1400 5 act. FL 33401 Plaintiff. I 6 /Case No. 5020006020051 On behalf of the Defendant by telephone: IX/WM AD JRFPRRY DITHER. e BURMAN. CR

92p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.