Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00234456DOJ Data Set 9Other

Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00234456
Pages
5
Persons
6
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2008 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80804-CIV-MARRA/JOIINSON JANE DOE, a/k/a, JANE DOE NO. I, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, S SN1 and Defendants. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE AND EXPEDITE CERTAIN DISCOVERY Plaintiff Jane Doe moves, pursuant to Rules 26 and 34 to Preserve Evidence and Expedite the Discovery of this Evidence and states: 1. Defendants removed this action to federal court on July 21, 2008. (DE 1). 2. Plaintiff has filed a motion to remand on August 18, 2008. (D.E. 11). 3. It has come to the attention of Plaintiff's counsel that on July 21, 2008, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN filed a Motion with the Florida State Court to return the evidence seized at his home in conjunction with his criminal prosecution. (Ex. 1). 4. This evidence is relevant and critical to the prosecution of not only the instant claim, but for six (6) other

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2008 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80804-CIV-MARRA/JOIINSON JANE DOE, a/k/a, JANE DOE NO. I, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, S SN1 and Defendants. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE AND EXPEDITE CERTAIN DISCOVERY Plaintiff Jane Doe moves, pursuant to Rules 26 and 34 to Preserve Evidence and Expedite the Discovery of this Evidence and states: 1. Defendants removed this action to federal court on July 21, 2008. (DE 1). 2. Plaintiff has filed a motion to remand on August 18, 2008. (D.E. 11). 3. It has come to the attention of Plaintiff's counsel that on July 21, 2008, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN filed a Motion with the Florida State Court to return the evidence seized at his home in conjunction with his criminal prosecution. (Ex. 1). 4. This evidence is relevant and critical to the prosecution of not only the instant claim, but for six (6) other claims filed against Defendant EPSTEIN, including but not limited to the Florida RICO claims filed in State Court. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully request the Court grant her Motion to Preserve of all of the seized Evidence identified in Ex. A, to Exhibit 1 of this Motion (Palm Beach Police Department Property Receipt) should it be Returned to EPSTEIN by the State Court, and EFTA00234456 Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2008 Page 2 of 5 expedite the duplication of this evidence immediately upon its return, in advance of any Rule 26 conference. MEMORANDUM OF LAW Pursuant to Rules 26, 30 and 34, of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this court has the authority to modify the normal time limitations under the Rules. See AT&T Mobility LLC v. Dynamic Cellular Corp., 2008 WL 2139518 (S.D. Fla. 2008); see also Tracfone Wireless, Inc. v. King Trading, Inc., 2008 WL 918243 (N.D. Tex. 2008). Additionally, when there is a good faith belief that evidence may be lost the Court has the authority to enter an Order preserving such evidence. Id. at 1. An injunction is not required, nor are the elements of an injunction necessary before entering an Order preserving such evidence. Id. at 2. Given that Defendant EPSTEIN has plead guilty and is currently serving a year in jail based on the charges which form the foundation of Plaintiffs (and many other Plaintiffs') claims, it is reasonable to assume the State's seized evidence is extremely harmful to Defendant EPSTEIN. As a result, without a Protective Order Defendant EPSTEIN has no reason to keep or maintain this negative evidence. Plaintiff has put Defendant EPSTEIN on notice that this evidence is relevant to the instant action and any destruction could potentially constitute spoliation. If this evidence were destroyed Plaintiff would be severely prejudiced. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7.1.A.3 On August 21, 2008, undersigned counsel conferred with counsel for the Defendants in a good faith effort to resolve the issues raised in this motion, and Defendants' counsel advised that Defendants oppose this motion. 5/ Spencer T. Kuvin Spencer T. Kuvin (Florida Bar Number 089737) 2 of 4 EFTA00234457 Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 08:2112008 Page 3 of 5 Certificate of Services I hereby certify that on August 13, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record or pro se parties identified on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing. s/ Spencer 7'. Kuvin Spencer T. Kuvin (Florida Bar Number 089737) Attorney E-Mail Address: RICCI—LEOPOLD, P.A. 2925 PGA Blvd. Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Telephone: (561) 684-6500 Facsimile: (561) 697-2383 Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe 3 of 4 EFTA00234458 Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2008 Page 4 of 5 SERVICE LIST Doe v. Epstein, et. al. CASE NO: 08-80804-Civ-MARRAMOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Robert Critton, Esq. Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 842-2820 Fax: (561) 515-3148 Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein Served via U.S. Mail, postage prepaid Guy Alan Lewis, Esq. Email: [email protected] Lewis Tein 3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340 Coconut Grove, FL 33133 Phone: (305) 442-1101 Pax: (305) 442-6744 Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein Served via CM/ECF Bruce E. Reinhart, Esq. Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 202-6360 Fax: (561) 828-0983 Counsel for Sarah Kellen Served via U.S. Mail, postage prepaid Michael R. Tein, Esq. Email: tein©Iewistein.com Lewis Tein 3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340 Coconut Grove, FL 33133 Phone: (305)442-1101 Fax: (305) 442-6744 Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein Served via CM/ECF 4 of 4 EFTA00234459 Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2008 Page 5 of 5 Douglas M. McIntosh, Esq. Jason A. McGrath, Esq. McIntosh, Sawran, Peltz & Cartaya, P.A. Centurion Tower, Suite 1110 1601 Forum Place West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 682-3202 Fax: (561) 682-3206 Counsel for Haley Robson Served via U.S. Mail, postage prepaid 5 of 4 EFTA00234460

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs I UNITED STATES, Defendants JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO THE GOVERNMENT REGARDING INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THEIR PENDING ACTION CONCERN THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and request the defendant United States (hereinafter "the Government") to produce the original or best copy of the items listed herein below for inspection and/or copying, pursuant to the Court's Order (DE #99) directing discovery in this case. BACKGROUND As the Government will recall, the victims have asked the Government to stipulate to undisputed facts in this case. The Government has declined. Accordingly, the victims filed their Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies (DE 48

13p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject:

rom: Sent: To: Subject: RE: Epstein Thanks. ants you and Si in on the conference call, too, which means that we can't do the call until August 20th -- after the deadline we have already set. I don't know if I should say something or just wait patiently. What do you think? The agents and I were planning to go to New York on the 20th to track down the assistants and talk to other folks. Tracking: 10 EFTA00179797 Recipient Read Lour*. Andrew (USAFLS) Read: 817/2007 4:06 PM 11 EFTA00179798 From: A. Salter [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 2:33 PM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Possible Retainer for a Federal Criminal Investigation/Prosecution Hi, I just faxed over a signed contract. However, I'm not sure what kind of consultation you are looking for, but generally if there are a lot of records, it takes more than 6 hours to read and report on them. In any case, I'm happy to set up a phone conference to get started. Is there a

194p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 65 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/25/2009 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion To Stay And Or Continue Action For Time Certain Based On Parallel Civil And Criminal Proceedings With Incorporated Memorandum Of Law Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN") by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby moves this Court for the entry of an order staying or continuing this action for a time certain (i.e., until late 2010 when the NPA expires), pursuant to the application of the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and the fact that a parallel proceeding is ongoing and being investigated. In support of his motion, EPSTEIN states: I. Introduction At the outset, EPSTEIN notes this Court's prior Order, (DE 33), in which this Court denied a motion for stay brought by Def

56p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs I UNITED STATES, Defendants JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO THE GOVERNMENT REGARDING INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THEIR PENDING ACTION CONCERN THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and request the defendant United States (hereinafter "the Government") to produce the original or best copy of the items listed herein below for inspection and/or copying, pursuant to the Court's Order (DE #99) directing discovery in this case. BACKGROUND As the Government will recall, the victims have asked the Government to stipulate to undisputed facts in this case. The Government has declined. Accordingly, the victims filed their Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies (DE 48

13p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 48-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/21/2011 Page 1 of 15

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 48-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/21/2011 Page 1 of 15 JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR FINDING OF VIOLATIONS OF THE CRIME VHTIMS' RIGHTS ACT AND REQUEST FOR A HEARING ON APPROPRIATE REMEDIES CASE NO: 08.80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson EXHIBIT E EFTA_00016369 EFTA00167121 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 48-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/21/2011 Page 2 of 15 CV RE: INVESTIGATION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT IT APPEARING that the City of Palm Beach Police Department and the State Attorney's Office for the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County (hereinafter, the "State Attorney's Office") have conducted an investigation into the conduct of Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"); IT APPEARING that the State Attorney's Office has charged Epstein by indictment with solicitation of prostitution, in violation of Florida Statutes Section 796.07; IT APPEARING that the United States Attorney's Office and the Federal Bureau

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Flietit0A ()MO D.C. ELECT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 08-80804-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: JANE DOE, a/k/a JANE DOE #1, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, HALEY ROBSON, and SARAH KELLEN, Defendants. NOTICE OF REMOVAL July 18, 2008 STEVEN M. LARIMORF CLERK D.S. DIST. CT. S.O. OF FLA. • MIAMI In accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441, 1446, and 1332(a)(1), the defendants, Jeffrey Epstein, hereby remove this action' from Palm Beach County Circuit Court to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, and respectfully state as follows: Introduction Six months ago, this plaintiff filed virtually the identical lawsuit in this Court. See Jane Doe #1 v. Epstein, Case No. 08-cv-80069-KAM (S.D. Fla. filed Doe v. Epstein et at, Case No. 50 2008 CA 006596 XXXX MB (Fla. 15th Cir. Ct. filed Mar. 6, 2008). Lewis "Fein 1059 044.444vEleuf Skim 340, E0coRuT Go

100p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.