Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00259523DOJ Data Set 9Other

O1 (FBI)

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00259523
Pages
2
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: al O1 (FBI) To: rrlY1 (FBI) Subject: Fyr:"I lLT" - Date: Monday, August 19, 01. 03 AM Please find below a comprehensive report received from the Metropolitan Police in response to your inquiry to interview . As you will read, has changed her mind and is no longer willing to be interviewed. Please let me know if you have any further requests regarding Please serialize the response to your file and also serialize it to the London file: Thank you. Kind regards, From: Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 2:55 PM To: (LO) (FBI) Subject: **RESULT** - Hi M, As per our telephone conversation earlier, I can confirm that I made contact with via her mobile on Friday 16th August 2019. At that time, she confirmed that she was willing to cooperate in the capacity as a witness but she wanted to know if a lawyer could be provided and if a list of questions could be made available in advance. I then received two emails from on Friday 16th August 2019; in the first email she

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: al O1 (FBI) To: rrlY1 (FBI) Subject: Fyr:"I lLT" - Date: Monday, August 19, 01. 03 AM Please find below a comprehensive report received from the Metropolitan Police in response to your inquiry to interview . As you will read, has changed her mind and is no longer willing to be interviewed. Please let me know if you have any further requests regarding Please serialize the response to your file and also serialize it to the London file: Thank you. Kind regards, From: Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 2:55 PM To: (LO) (FBI) Subject: **RESULT** - Hi M, As per our telephone conversation earlier, I can confirm that I made contact with via her mobile on Friday 16th August 2019. At that time, she confirmed that she was willing to cooperate in the capacity as a witness but she wanted to know if a lawyer could be provided and if a list of questions could be made available in advance. I then received two emails from on Friday 16th August 2019; in the first email she asked if it would be possible for her to have a senior community support officer with her at the proposed meeting with the FBI. In the second email stated that she did not need a lawyer. She explained that she got very uncomfortable as she has never been part of an investigation before and this case has been very ugly. She just wants to assist to the best of her abilities. If there would be a lawyer in the room, then that would be great and if not, then she was fine with that too. Today, Monday 19th August 2019 I received a telephone call from via her mobile. She advised me that she was no longer willing to assist the FBI for a number of reasons; Jeffrey Epstein is dead, she has to think about her own safety, there is no added value for the FBI speaking to her and she has concerns over confidentiality, fearing that her name will land up on Twitter, like others involved. Checks conducted on , date of birth. reveal as follows:- Police National Computer — no trace Police National Computer Driving Licence — no trace Metropolitan Police databases — a report in whereby circumstances (scant details available on the database). Experian check:- reported to police suspicious EFTA00259523 Alias name - -) (source - Ex-directory residential landline in the name of linked to the above address 2 active accounts in the name of ) and Dissolved current Directorships — (opened Voters Check — shown at the above address since OCTOBER'. bank current account (opened. Cecilia provided the following contact details:- I hope this assists you and your colleagues further. The information contained within this message and any attachments may not be used in judicial proceedings without the consent of the originator CCC — International Crime Coordination Centre NPCC - International Criminality Portfolio - Brexit EFTA00259524

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.