Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00260429DOJ Data Set 9Other

Alan Dershowitz

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00260429
Pages
3
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Alan Dershowitz Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 617-939-6001 • Detective Palm Beach Police Department 345 S. County Road Palm Beach, FL 33480 Re: Epstein matter Dear Detectives: I am sending you this letter in response to the serious concern you raised at our meeting regarding an alleged claim that one of our investigators had misrepresented himself as a police officer and in fact had actually attempted to impersonate you. As I told you neither I nor my client would ever tolerate any such conduct on the part of our investigators. With that in mind, I immediately began an inquiry of our staff, and believe that the contemporaneous notes taken by our investigator, while attempting to interview will provide the necessary explanation for your thoroughly justified consternation.. It will also, I believe, provide a more troublesome and telling illustration of her character. At our meeting, you may recall, .I -also advised you that our investigation had discovered at least o

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Alan Dershowitz Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 617-939-6001 Detective Palm Beach Police Department 345 S. County Road Palm Beach, FL 33480 Re: Epstein matter Dear Detectives: I am sending you this letter in response to the serious concern you raised at our meeting regarding an alleged claim that one of our investigators had misrepresented himself as a police officer and in fact had actually attempted to impersonate you. As I told you neither I nor my client would ever tolerate any such conduct on the part of our investigators. With that in mind, I immediately began an inquiry of our staff, and believe that the contemporaneous notes taken by our investigator, while attempting to interview will provide the necessary explanation for your thoroughly justified consternation.. It will also, I believe, provide a more troublesome and telling illustration of her character. At our meeting, you may recall, .I -also advised you that our investigation had discovered at least one of her web sites and I am enclosing some examples. You will note that she, herself, has chosen to go by the nickname of "pimp juice" and the site goes on to detail, including photos, her apparent fascination with marijuana. This will come as no surprise to you as I'm sure you are already aware of her recent Palm Beach arrest for both possession of marijuana and drug paraphernalia. The following raw notes were taken by investigators (one who suffers from a quite distinct speech impediment, making, therefore, a truly innocent claim of impersonation virtually impossible). Both of them have many years experience in conducting defense investigations and debriefing witnesses. They are both well versed in the law and extremely sensitive to any potential allegations of wrongdoing especially from witnesses who may have their own agendas. In this instance, they were instructed to take statement verbatim because we feared that she, an accomplished drama student, might try to mislead them as successfully as she had misled others. They were instructed to ask detailed questions to further elucidate her previous pronouncements regarding the extreme lengths she would go to as she put it "to be rich, no, I mean really, really rich". But as you will read, they never got a chance to ask even a single question, and could not for a moment be thought of, as attempting to misrepresent themselves as police officers. In fact even though, they are both well prepared and seasoned investigators, they were quite shocked at the overwhelming, non-stop barrage of profanity being hurled at them at a furious pace and volume from what initially appeared EFTA00260429 only to be a young woman of slight build and soft demeanor. The following is an excerpt from the investigator's report detailing her extremely short but none the less pungent statements; "11.21.2005, my partner, and I traveled to Orange Park (Jacksonville), Florida, in order to attempt to interviewer The purpose of having two people present was to act as witnesses as to whatever might have been said by during the course of our interview. ives with hei year old boyfriend, and his mother and boyfriend at Orange Park, FL. At approximately 6:30pm arrived home. We waited about 10 minutes a the residence. I knocked on the door and a woman, who I now know as answered the door. I told her that we would like to speak with She said there was no there. I said there must be because a.. was parked out front. She then said, "I'm sorry, you mean ' and I said yes. then came to the door. The following conversation took place. name is MIN(aS I handed her my business card) and this is my partner We are investigators from Miami working on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. I don't talk to fucking cops and I'm not talking to you. we're not cops. You need to leave. Get the fuck off my property, leave now. there is no need to be hostile. We are not cops. We are just trying to learn the truth. et the fuck off my property. What, you're still standing here? We're leaving but we don't understand why you're so hostile. You have no right to be here. I moved. All that shit is behind me in another wor so get the fuck out of here. oes back inside the house and came outside on the porch 11,4 a'am we're not being hostile. We're here just to learn the truth. Look, is a good girl and she left down there. We're trying to sort things out now and hire her an attorney. I understand but we're not the bad guys and we're not cops. Okay, but she doesn't want to talk with you and you really have no right being sere on my property this time of night. I'm sorry we're here at 6:45pm but your son, old us we could come back. He doesn't own this property. came back outside You're still here, get the fuck out. I'm calling the cops if you do not leave. we're talking withilliand yes, we're leaving, but all we wanted was to learn the truth from you about what wledge you may or may not have." As you can gather from this, we believe her to be the source of your concern. Our other, but we believe, less likely a tive source for the potential misunderstanding could be a close friend of Miss iamed who sloes ', more outlandish self chosen moniker and complete web name of ' whose web page I also enclose. EFTA00260430 In the event that the source of the allegation is neither of the two women mentioned above, if you would provide me with the name of the person, or persons, making the claim , I will check with the relevant investigators and follow through until we are satisfied that we have gotten to the bottom of this matter. I trust the information provided in this letter is helpful to you as we all try to bring this difficult period to a close. Sincerely, abAt ‘Dph)ao Alan Dershowitz Enclosures cc: EFTA00260431

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedJan 7, 2015

Alan Dershowitz letter

Naanhowitz - 'WmMmachuwtsogle. -- losethecarey - Detech'ife Palm Beach Police Department 4 7 325 5. County Road PalmBeach. FL 33480 Re: Epstein matter Dear Detective Recarey: I am sending you this letter in response to the serious concemyou raised at our meeting regarding an alleged claim that one of our investigators had misrepresented himself as u'pulice offioerand mam had actually attempted to impersonate you. As I told you neither 1 nor my client would ever tolerate any su'elt wuduet on

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

12/11/2007 11:37 FAX

12/11/2007 11:37 FAX a 002/099 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP NO ma MI IN It% Kenneth W Sten I o CAN NOW Ootelty Hiccintakc wcwouniMilacOrn Ikcember I I. 2007 O051 530-6444 I lonomble R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney United States Attorney's Unice Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Alex: As we discussed during our telephone conversations on both Friday and Monday (yesterday), we arc submitting two separate letters that address our broad areas of deep concern in this matter: First, the cluster of fundamental policy issues surrounding the use and implementation of 2255. a richly policy-laden but uncharted area of federttl law: and second. our profound concerns as to the background and conduct of the investigation. Consistent with our conversations, we submit these letters with the assurance and understanding that our doing so in no manner constitutes a breach of the Non-Prosecution Agreement or unwinds that Agreement. We arc grateful for your courtesy in agreeing to receive

47p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Document alleges extensive financial, academic, and sexual ties between Jeffrey Epstein, Alan Dershowitz, and high‑profile figures including Leslie...

The passage provides numerous specific allegations – dates, dollar amounts, meetings, and alleged quid‑pro quo arrangements – that could be pursued for evidence of financial flows, abuse of influence, 1996 meeting on Epstein’s jet linking Dershowitz to Leslie Wexner’s birthday party. Epstein’s claim that Wexner sold a Manhattan mansion to him for $1. 1997 $30 M investment in Boston Provident alleg

10p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

'0450,V Q+ t-Pc4IA

'0450,V Q+ t-Pc4IA T ) --t el.! "'o'f j P l ' a .,1_4,a-IS 4Q/ Il l'21 EFTA00176111 12/11/2007 11:37 FAX la 002/099 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP WO. WM I I IMkIuI OM. MN Konnulh W. Slam to Coll WMOr ChrOdy. (213) 6111)-U4-10 leilautektrklond.com V lajtAOSIMILF: (30a.530-6444 I lonorable R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4th Street Miami, FL 33132 Re: Jeffrey Epstein INair Alex: 777 South Finumon Sunni tun Attuuluu, et-tidying, 900'7 (213) 080-8400 www.lorNItuul.com December I I. 2007 HICSul Wu: (213) 600.8500 As we discussed during our telephone conversations un both Friday and Monday (yesterday). we arc submitting two separate letters that address our broad areas of deep concern in this matter: Finn, the cluster of limdamemal policy issues surrounding the use and implementation of 2255. n richly policy-luden but uncharted area of federal law: and second. our profound concerns as to th

36p
House OversightUnknown

Alleged criminal extortion plot discussed during Alan Dershowitz's 2015 Broward County deposition

Alleged criminal extortion plot discussed during Alan Dershowitz's 2015 Broward County deposition The passage references a claim that Alan Dershowitz disclosed a criminal extortion scheme involving unnamed clients during a deposition, and mentions related defamation lawsuits. While the details are vague and unverified, the involvement of a high‑profile attorney and a federal courtroom provides a concrete lead (date, location, parties) that could be pursued. The claim is moderately controversial and potentially sensitive, but it lacks clear novelty and specific financial details, limiting its score. Key insights: Dershowitz allegedly told lawyers Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell that "your clients were involved" in a criminal extortion plot.; The statement was made on October 15, 2015, during a deposition in Broward County, Florida.; Bradley and Cassell had sued Dershowitz for defamation, and Dershowitz had filed a countersuit.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Discovery Dispute Over Alan Dershowitz's Document Control in Defamation Suit

Discovery Dispute Over Alan Dershowitz's Document Control in Defamation Suit The passage outlines a procedural battle over production of documents and metadata in a defamation case involving Alan Dershowitz. While it flags potential evidence that could expose communications or internal materials, it lacks concrete details about the content, dates, or parties beyond the litigants, limiting immediate investigative value. However, the mention of “control” and alleged refusal to produce metadata could merit follow‑up to determine what information is being withheld and whether it relates to broader controversies surrounding Dershowitz. Key insights: Plaintiffs allege Dershowitz is withholding documents and metadata under the claim of ‘control’.; The objection is framed as ‘word play’ and gamesmanship, suggesting possible intentional concealment.; Discovery objections focus on timeframe limits, implying plaintiffs seek records spanning an undefined period.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.