Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00267852DOJ Data Set 9Other

STEVEN MARSHALL MP

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00267852
Pages
6
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

STEVEN MARSHALL MP Member for Dunstan DOCov"-"I itE ci eve ov. 7"TI'iQS 00c51 addr-es-sed 10 S42van fACAK1,0O) , J 7/f/202-0 Address Unit 2, 90.94 The Parade, Norwood SA 5067 61 __LoWITH COMPLIMENTS Tel Web EFTA00267852 31st December 2019 Jacqueline Pearce Dear Steven Marshall, Premier of Australia, As informed by email contact to your official email I am contacting you to inform you of a criminal matter involving SA health and members of Port Pirie, South Australia in relation to Intellectual Property Theft of two business developments within the medical industry that I had developed between the years. of 2007 - 2011, under the guidance and aid of The Regional Development Board, Port Pine, South Australia as a registered client and applied funding - As supplied in the Timeline of Events and evidence to support and verify this claim in documented form. I am requesting your urgent attention and assistance in this matter to investigate this further and to reso

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
STEVEN MARSHALL MP Member for Dunstan DOCov"-"I itE ci eve ov. 7"TI'iQS 00c51 addr-es-sed 10 S42van fACAK1,0O) , J 7/f/202-0 Address Unit 2, 90.94 The Parade, Norwood SA 5067 61 __LoWITH COMPLIMENTS Tel Web EFTA00267852 31st December 2019 Jacqueline Pearce Dear Steven Marshall, Premier of Australia, As informed by email contact to your official email I am contacting you to inform you of a criminal matter involving SA health and members of Port Pirie, South Australia in relation to Intellectual Property Theft of two business developments within the medical industry that I had developed between the years. of 2007 - 2011, under the guidance and aid of The Regional Development Board, Port Pine, South Australia as a registered client and applied funding - As supplied in the Timeline of Events and evidence to support and verify this claim in documented form. I am requesting your urgent attention and assistance in this matter to investigate this further and to resolve this matter. I have collected and recorded this event in detail for the duration of 11 years in recording details, names, sources, phone numbers, reports, events and official documentation of each event and illegal conduct. This information was submitted and supplied to I.C.A.0 in 2016. I have also supplied this information to Vicki Chapman, Deputy, Attorney General, South Australia, Austin Macauley Publishers, London who I am currently under contract with and Kathleen T Zellner, US attorney in a collaboration of bringing this matter to justice. The Intellectual Property Theft occurred between the years of the business plans development and occurred in Port Pirie and the SA Medical Association and is now owned and operated by SA Health, and escalated into a vicious damaging timeline of events that has impacted upon my life destructively creating hardship in every area of my life , emotionally, mentally, physically and financially and has affected any people connected to me - as outlined in the Timeline of Events. I am requesting a full investigation and assistance in this matter and am seeking that these crimes committed against me and the individuals involved be brought to justice, to be recognised as the developer of the medical developments, financial gain, financial inclusion for the duration of the business, justice and compensation for the crimes and damages that occurred thereafter - targeting to cover up the event. As my telecommunication systems have been compromised and affected by this crime including mail interception, tampering, hacking of email and phone services, blocked and altered, blocked services within Australian Postal systems I ask for all correspondence to be conducted through the Kadina Council Chambers, Kadina by certified mail or personal contact as a precautionary measure and security. I urgently require your assistance and appreciate your time and consideration concerning this matter. Yours Sincerely Jacqueline Pearce EFTA00267853 PekSa•)ALLY DELI ERE° e2oao . et U is moi /lit Office of the Premier of South Australia B467300 Ms Jacqueline Pearce Dear Ms Pearce, Thank you for your letter of 31 December 2019 to the Hon Steven Marshall MP, Premier of South Australia. The Premier's office received your message on 10 January 2020 and it is currently being reviewed. Should a formal response be required, we will be in touch again shortly. Once again, thank you for taking the time to write to the Premier. Yours sincerely, Correspondence Unit OFFICE OF THE PREMIER 10 January 2020 Office of the Premier State Administration Centre 200 VictoriaSquare Adelaide South Australia 5000 GPO Box 2343 Adelaide SA 5001 Telephone Email: vainv.premier.sa.gov.au EFTA00267854 Office of the Premier of South Australia GPO Box 2343 Adelaide SA 5001 Ms Jacqueline Pearce ,A114C SA520 1 POSTAGE 34elingA EFTA00267855 nu. The Hon Steven Marshall MP Premier of South Australia B467300 Ms Jacqueline Pearce Dear Ms Pearce, I write in response to your recent letter concerning the alleged theft of your business development proposals by employees of SA Health. Investigating these matters falls outside of my portfolio responsibility. I recommend you consider raising this matter directly the Hon Stephen Wade MLC, Minister for Health and Wellbeing. You can write to the Minister at GPO Box 2555, Adelaide SA 5001. Please be advised I am unable to refer your correspondence for action, given your reference to your complaint to the Office of Public Integrity. Section 54(3) of the Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2012 prohibits the disclosure of information that is connected to a matter that forms or is the subject of a complaint under the Act, except in very limited circumstances. You may also wish to seek advice from the Legal Services Commission of South Australia (LSC), which provides legal aid to the public and offers a free advisory service on most legal matters. You can reach the LSC Legal Helpline on I trust this information is of assistance. Yours sincerely, Hon Steven Marshall MP PREMIER OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA e.c=> / I / 2020 Office of the Premier State Administration Centre 200 Victoria Square Adelaide South Australia 5000 GPO Box 2303 Adelaide SA 5001 T ♦81 8 8429 3232 Epremieress.gov.au www.premiticsa.gov.eu EFTA00267856 The Hon Steven Marshall MP Premier of South Australia GPO Box 2343 Adelaide SA 5001 Ms Jacqueline Pearce AMC SA 520 POSTAGE PAID AUSTRALIA EFTA00267857

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: Epstein Evidence status

From: To: , ' Subject: Epstein Evidence status Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 02:16:47 +0000 Importance: Normal Thank you for putting this together I counted 72 items total. 32 from NYC and 40 from USVI. According to your spreadsheet there are only 9 items outstanding: 24331 SSD from DVR being processed by HQ 24362 and 24364 Both Macs from USVI that need blacklight run 24376 - 24380, 24395 are all RAID that need rebuilding. Everything else is complete. Is that accurate, did I miss anything? Also, on the relativity file dump are you still anticipating it being complete in 1 to 1 and a 1/2 weeks? SSA- FBI New York On Jul 6, 2020 8:21 Pm, "a> wrote: Greetings, Attached you will find an Excel spreadsheet with the status of all the digital evidence I have for the Epstein case. You will note that there were several non-evidentiary items included to try to close the discrepancy that the US Attorney's Office is concerned about. Keep in mind, my status of the other day was only the

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: '

From: ' To:' 1111 Cc: ' >, Subject: Re: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 19:13:54 +0000 Importance: Normal and I just spoke. We are going to down and take a look at all digital evidence and get this squared away. I'm going to work on getting a large enough hard drive to dump the evidence on to get it to SDNY. From: Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 2:39 PM To: Cc: Subject: Fwd: RE: Epstein search warrant documents I know you already got this, just wanted to confer with you as to what is going on with all this. Feel like you, me, and need to chat and see what is what. I'm thinking that this started before the case took a turn yet is still moving in the same direction. In other words, do we really need to be doing this? Seems to me that I should be taking all my marching orders from and M. NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner cell desk From: (USANYS)" Forwarded message Date: Jun 17, 2020 2:28 PM Subject: RE: Epstein search war

14p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

(USANYS)'

From: (USANYS)' To: " CRM" II II Cc: " (CRM)" Subject: R -: n epee ent: Prince n rew: e sa to to to Epstein investigators 'straining relations between UK and America' Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 12:58:39 +0000 lane-Images: image001.png Thanks, The below looks good to us. On the penalties: Title 18, United States Code, Section 2423 (transportation of minors) — maximum penalty is 10 years' imprisonment Title 18, United States Code, Section 2422 (coercion and enticement) — maximum penalty is 5 years' imprisonment Title 18, United States Code, Section 1591 (sex trafficking) — maximum penalty is 40 years' imprisonment From: (CRM) Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2021 5:49 AM (USANYS) C (CRM) Subject: RE: Independent: Prince Andrew: Refusal to talk to Epstein investigators 'straining relations between UK and America' We also just got the following questions on the new MLA request. I have given preliminary responses (as noted), but want to confirm with you. I. Has the witne

4p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: RE: Epstein

Subject: RE: Epstein Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 22:26:56 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: Signed_Plea_Agreement.pdf; Final_Addendum.pdf Here is the signed agreement and an addendum. Please note that it has a confidentiality clause. Thanks. SEMI Subject: Re: Epstein Ok thx. Would you send me your last proposed nonpros with them with the 2255 language? Sent: Wed Nov 28 16:48:48 2007 Subject: FW: Epstein This is the first that I have heard about another attempt to meet with someone in Washington. I thought I would give you a heads up. Hope all is well, Andy. EFTA00214817 Subject: Fw: Epstein Can u send Jay the proposed letter and redact the names? Thx, Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld Original Message From: Jay Lefkowitz <[email protected]> Sent: Wed Nov 28 16:29:09 2007 Subject: Re: Epstein I received your email yesterday and was a little surprised at the tone of your letter, given the fact that we spoke last week and had what I thought was a prod

4p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: "Bulletin Intelligence" <[email protected]>

From: "Bulletin Intelligence" <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - FBI Public Affairs News Briefing Monday, April 26, 2021 Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 10:27:35 +0000 c Importan e: Normal Mobile version and searchable archives available at fbi.bulletinintelligence.com. 'L; 1 B1 News Briefing TO: THE DIRECTOR AND SENIOR STAFF DATE: MONDAY, APRIL 26, 2021 6:30 AM EDT TODAY'S TABLE OF CONTENTS LEADING THE NEWS • Garland Signals More Investigations Into Local Police Departments Will Be Forthcoming. CAPITOL VIOLENCE NEWS • FBI Using Facial Recognition, Undercover Operations To Arrest Capitol Rioters. • Growing Number Of Those Arrested In Capitol Siege Probe Have Military, Law Enforcement, Or Government Ties. • Two Kansas Women Charged In Capitol Riot Probe. • FBI Arrests Man Who Boasted On Dating App Of Storming Capitol. • Texas Couple Charged With Assaulting Officers During Capitol Siege.

40p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The US Attorney's office filed a response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for reconsideration regardin...

The US Attorney's office filed a response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for reconsideration regarding the disclosure of juror names, arguing that the defendant's request for early disclosure is not justified and that the court's current plan for juror name disclosure is sufficient. The government contends that the defendant is seeking extra time to conduct research on prospective jurors without a valid reason. The government's response cites relevant case law and the court's previous orders to support its position.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.