Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00367580DOJ Data Set 9Other

DS9 Document EFTA00367580

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00367580
Pages
4
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: Subject: Fwd: Bedford GIV crash update Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 01:48:47 +0000 lane-Images: image00 1 jpg; image001(1)jpg FYI Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Larry Visoski Date: June 18, 2014, 7:27:30 PM CDT To: , Darren Indyke >, Rich Kahn Subject: Fwd: Bedford GIV crash update JE told me to order Paris charts, sounds like a definite maybe to Paris Saturday night Thx Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> Date: June 18, 2014 at 8:05:15 PM AST To: Larry Visoski Subject: Re: Bedford GIV crash update order the paris charts On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Larry Visoski c wrote: Preliminary GIN' Crash Report Focuses on Flaps and Gust Lock EFTA00367580 Piiftp://c.o0bg.com/rf/image_960w/Boston/201 1- 2020/2014/06/17/BostonGlobe.cotn/Metro/Imag es/crash-big-13313.jpg The NTSB's preliminary report into the crash of a Gulfstream IV during takeoff roll at Bedford Hanscom Field near Boston on May 31 revealed a number of inconsistencies. On June 13, investigators reported that while the flap handle on the jet was set to the "flaps 10" position, the flight data recorder indicated the flaps were set to the "flaps 20" position. Speculation also focused on the position of the aircraft's gust lock before takeoff. On that subject, the report said, "The flight data recorder (FDR) data revealed the elevator control surface position during the taxi and takeoff was consistent with its position if the gust lock was engaged." The GIV's control lock will not normally allow the thrust levers to be advanced beyond six-percent thrust with the lock engaged. "The gust lock handle, located on the right side of the control pedestal, was however found in the forward (OFF) position and the elevator gust lock latch was disengaged," concluded investigators. The Gulfstream's FDR did not record any movement of the flight controls by the crew before takeoff. AIN spoke with a GIV pilot based in the northeast U.S. who did not wish to be identified but offered some insights on the aircraft. "The position of the controls recorded by the FDR was pretty consistent with where the flight controls normally rest during taxiing," he said. On this basis, the gust lock theory would seem less plausible. "You normally don't even start the engines with the control lock in place," the pilot added. He explained that part of the Gulfstream takeoff procedure includes feeling the controls lighten as air moves across the tail surfaces early in the takeoff roll. "If we don't feel that by 60 knots or so, it's an automatic abort," he added, while also questioning the takeoff speeds mentioned in the report. "At a light [takeoff] weight, the VI speed of the GIV should have been about 118 knots," he said, "with rotation at about 124." This prompted him to question why the aircraft reached a speed of 165 knots before the crew aborted the takeoff http://www.ainonline.com/comment/10536 Back to Top Timoth Boland Senior Vice President - Western Zone Manager I Global Aerospace Inc. EFTA00367581 -aero.com> Date: Jun 18, 2014 10:28 AM Subject: GIV Prelim To: "Neal Young Cc: Preliminary GIV Crash Report Focuses on Flaps and Gust Lock Rliftp://c.o0bg.com/rf/image_960w/Boston/201 1- 2020/2014/06/17/BostonGlobe.corn/Metro/Imag es/crash-big-13313.jpg The NTSB's preliminary report into the crash of a Gulfstream IV during takeoff roll at Bedford Hanscom Field near Boston on May 31 revealed a number of inconsistencies. On June 13, investigators reported that while the flap handle on the jet was set to the "flaps 10" position, the flight data recorder indicated the flaps were set to the "flaps 20" position. Speculation also focused on the position of the aircraft's gust lock before takeoff. On that subject, the report said, "The flight data recorder (FDR) data revealed the elevator control surface position during the taxi and takeoff was consistent with its position if the gust lock was engaged." The GIV's control lock will not normally allow the thrust levers to be advanced beyond six-percent thrust with the lock engaged. "The gust lock handle, located on the right side of the control pedestal, was however found in the forward (OFF) position and the elevator gust lock latch was disengaged," concluded investigators. The Gulfstream's FDR did not record any movement of the flight controls by the crew before takeoff. AIN spoke with a GIV pilot based in the northeast U.S. who did not wish to be identified but offered some insights on the aircraft. "The position of the controls recorded by the FDR was pretty consistent with where the flight controls normally rest during taxiing," he said. On this basis, the gust lock theory would seem less plausible. "You normally don't even start the engines with the control lock in place," the pilot added. He explained that part of the Gulfstream takeoff procedure includes feeling the controls lighten as air moves across the tail surfaces early in the takeoff roll. "If we don't feel that by 60 knots or so, it's an automatic abort," he added, while also questioning the takeoff speeds mentioned in the report. "At a light [takeoff] weight, the VI speed of the GIV should have been about 118 knots," he said, "with rotation at about 124." This prompted him to question why the aircraft reached a speed of 165 knots before the crew aborted the takeoff. EFTA00367582 http://www.ainonl ine.comicomment/ I 0536 Back to Top Timothy Boland I Senior Vice President - Western Zone Manager I Global Aerospace Inc. Sent from my inone please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA00367583

Technical Artifacts (5)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainaero.com
Domainc.o0bg.com
URLhttp://www.ainonl
URLhttp://www.ainonline.com/comment/10536

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

July 30, 2021 David Rodgers prep VTC

July 30, 2021 David Rodgers prep VTC Attorney Quigley Prepared for trial testimony. • Currently retired, formerly worked as a pilot. • Employer from 1991 through 2019 was Jeffrey Epstein, though was paid by NES corp o First 13 years, was chief pilot o Remainder was the captain and flight engineer • First hired in approximately July 1991 by JE o DR was flying for a real estate developer in Columbus, Ohio, and aviation manager next door worked for Les Wexner and suggested DR might be interested in flying for Jeffrey because he was getting same airplane DR was flying. o DR said he was interested, the aviation manager set up interview, DR met with Jeffrey, and was hired • Job responsibilities as chief pilot: o Flying the plane o Budgeting to paying bills so we would know how much money we would need for the planes, bills for maintenance o Scheduling maintenance o Recording flight logs • Responsibilities as captain and flight engineer: o Flying the plane o Captain

7p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: Daphne Wallace <

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: Larry Visoski

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: NY Friday

1p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: Lesley Groff

8p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.