Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00591687DOJ Data Set 9Other

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 409 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/20/2017 Page 1 of 4

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00591687
Pages
4
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 409 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/20/2017 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:08-cv-S0736-KAM JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES, Respondent. JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY TO GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO VICTIMS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND RESPONSE TO GOVERNMENT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, now file this unopposed motion for an extension of time to file a reply/response to the Government's Response and Opposition to the Victims' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and the Government's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 401-2). As the Court is aware, this is a complex case. Following the filing of the Victims' Statement of Undisputed Materials Facts and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361), the Government obtained several extension of time and then, on June 2, 2017, the Government filed a 33-page response to the victims' motion for partial summary judgment and its own cross- motion for summary judgment (DE 401-2). The cross-motion raises nine separate arguments as to why the Government believes it is entitled to summary judgment in this case. In conjunction 1 EFTA00591687 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 409 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/20/2017 Page 2 of 4 with these motions, the Government also filed a 22-page response to the victims' statement of undisputed materials facts (DE 407). The victims' response is currently due on July 21, 2017. Victims' counsel has been working diligently to prepare the victims' response. In researching and working on the response to the Government's motion, the victims have encountered several new issues that were more complicated than initially anticipated. Some of these issues pertain to legislative history associated with the Crime Victims' Rights Act and related subjects that require extensive research. Counsel for the victims also have several other cases that have recently required their attention. As a result of these facts, victims' counsel are not able to complete a fully adequate response under the current deadline. Accordingly, the victims seek an extension until August 11, 2017, to fully research and brief the important issues raised in the Government's response and motion. This request is not interposed for purposes of delay, but rather to allow full and careful briefing on this potentially dispositive motions. The Government does not oppose the motion and requests that the Court set a date September 15, 2017, for its reply in support of its motion for summary judgment. For the foregoing reasons, the victims respectfully request that the Court grant a twenty- one day extension to August 11, 2017, to respond to the Government's brief and to reply in support of their motion for summary judgment. DATED: July 20, 2017 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ natal f. Edoeva4 Bradley J. Edwards 1 EFTA00591688 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 409 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/20/2017 Page 3 of 4 FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telepho Facsimil , E-mail: [email protected] And Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah' 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone Facsimile: [email protected] Attorneys for Jane Does 1 and 2 This daytime business address is provided for identification and correspondence purposes only and is not intended to imply institutional endorsement by the University of Utah. 3 EFTA00591689 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 409 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/20/2017 Page 4 of 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that the foregoing document was served on July 20, 2017, on the following using the Court's CM/ECF system: Dexter Lee A. Marie Villainla 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 401 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Attorneys for the Government Roy Eric Black Jacqueline Perczek Black Srebnick Komspan & Stumpf 201 S Biscayne Boulevard Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33131 Email: pleadingeroyblack.com Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Is/ Sway/ p. Seitualua 4 EFTA00591690

Technical Artifacts (6)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:08-CV-80736-KAM
Domainpleadingeroyblack.com

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02726140

4p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 I UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. I. I, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. Along with co-counsel, I have represented Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in civil suits against Jeffrey Epstein for sexually abusing them. I have also represented other girls who were sexually abused by Epstein. As a result of that representation, I have become familiar with many aspects of the criminal investigation against Epstein and have reviewed discovery and correspondence connected with the criminal investigation. I have also spoken to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 at length about the criminal investigation and their involvement in it, as well enforcement (or lack their of) of their rights as crime victims in the investigation. I also represent Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in the pen

12p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Nlatthewman JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota and Florida, the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. My bar admission status in California and Minnesota is currently inactive. I am currently employed as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida and was so employed during all of the events described herein. 2. I am the Assistant United States Attorne

5p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

STATEMENT BY ALAN DERSHOWITZ

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372112011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01735410

0p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.