Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00593003DOJ Data Set 9Other

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 347 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/28/2015 Page 1 of 4

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00593003
Pages
4
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 347 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/28/2015 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:08.80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE NO. 1 AND JANE DOE NO. 2'S MOTION TO TEMPORARILY SEAL THEIR MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO SUPPLEMENTAL REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION COME NOW Jane Doe No. I and Jane Doe No. 2 (the "victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to file this motion to temporarily seal their Motion to Compel Answers to Supplemental Requests for Admission and Requests for Production (hereinafter referred to as the "Motion to Compel"). As indicated in their Motion to Compel, see page 2 at n. 1, the victims have attempted to secure the documents in question through voluntary production, by requests to both the Government and an identified non-party. Those efforts have been unsuccessful, prompting the need for a motion to the court. The victims are aware that a non-party to this litigation may attempt to intervene and argue that their motion is not proper should not be a part of the public court file. The victims, of course, take the view that their Motion to Compel is proper and is the appropriate procedural method for obtaining this information that clearly meets the threshold of being reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. In light of local rule 5.4(a) which indicates that Court filings are generally a matter of public record, the victims understand that this motion would not typically be sealed. However, in order to give the identified non-party EFTA00593003 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 347 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/28/2015 Page 2 of 4 an opportunity to try to raise any arguments he might wish to present to the Court on this issue, the victims request that their motion be placed under a temporary seal. WHEREFORE, the victims request that their Motion to Compel be placed under seal for ten days or until the Court has ruled on any motion by any non-party to seal the motion, whichever is longer. DATED: December 28, 2015 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. Fort Lauderdale Florida 33301 Telephone Facsimile E-mail: And Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah' Salt Lake Cit UT 84112 Telephone: Facsimile: E-Mai Attorneys for Jane Does No. 1, 2, 3 and 4 'This daytime business address is provided for identification and correspondence purposes only and is not intended to imply institutional endorsement by the University of Utah 2 EFTA00593004 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 347 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/28/2015 Page 3 of 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that the foregoing document was served on December 28, 2015, on the following using the Court's CM/ECF system or, for non-parties, by separate email service: West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Fax: E-mail: E-mail: Attorneys for the Government Roy Eric Black Jacqueline Perczek Black Srebnick Kornspan & Stumpf Miami FL 33131 Fax: Email: Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Kendall Coffe Fla. Bar No. Gabriel Groisman Fla. Bar No. Beniamin H. Brodsky, Fla. Bar No. COFFEY BURLINGTON, P.L. Miami, Florida 33133 Telephone; Facsimile: Thomas E. Scott , Jr. Cole Scott & Kissane 3 EFTA00593005 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 347 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/28/2015 Page 4 of 4 Miami FL 33156 Fax: Email: Attorneys for Alan Dershowitz /s/ Bradley J. Edwards 4 EFTA00593006

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:08-CV-80736-KAM

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedJan 26, 2015

Dershowitz Supplement to Motion for Limited Intervention

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 285 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/12/2015 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOES #2 Plaintiffs, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ________________________________/ ALAN DERSHOWITZ’S SUPPLEMENT TO HIS MOTION FOR LIMITED INTERVENTION (DE 282) Alan M. Dershowitz, a nonparty to this litigation, respectfully supplements his previously filed Motion for Limited Intervention (

6p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

5(19/22, 3:52 PM SEA At. "250SC. fktmct

5(19/22, 3:52 PM SEA At. "250SC. fktmct JcereY Epsteh - Wildpedla Epstein a massage". She claims she was taken to his mansion, where he exposed himself and had sexual intercourse with her, and paid her $200 immediately afterward.1io61 A similar $50-million suit was filed in March 2008, by a different woman, who was represented by the same lawyer.E•g-91 These and several similar lawsuits were dismissed.1139-) All other lawsuits have been settled by Epstein out of court' ll Epstein made many art-pl-atirt r s_ettlements with alleged victims.W23 - - - _ E_XCAt "-Vet 5sE RItACt PnOi- CiOR °NICER • - 40L'aritfrieerPROS1 1701-i0.Ni o> SIE•us) i1/44".,e036( C ; Perversion of Justice, Miami Herald, November 30, 2018. Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States (2014)*SC7ck%A L. ne,OSC Rt p Rom N)Eiszci poS IT c"),3 A December 3o, 2014, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe 1 ([REDACTED - Survivor]) and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Vi

32p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

STATEMENT BY ALAN DERSHOWITZ

3p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

balk.co:lizonieR - eto

balk.co:lizonieR - eto pfzcs-irro-noN 5/1 9/22. 3:52 PM Jeffrey Epstein - VVIldpeclits Epstein a massage". She claims she was taken to his mansion, , Perversion of Justice, Miami Herald, where he exposed hinviplf and had sexual intercourse with j November 30, 2018. her, and paid her $200 immediately afterward. °fl 16 A similar $50 -million suit was filed in March 2008, by a different woman, who was represented by the same lawyer.EL29-1 These and several similar lawsuits were dismissed.M All other lawsuits have been settled by Epstein out of court.(13.1 Epstein made many out-of-court settlement with alleged victims.(13°1 0 Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States (2 014) . \150ct) HBOSC " Ant P Rom% tveiCn Pas rrichi A December 3o, 2014, -federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe 1 ([REDACTED - Survivor]) and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act by the U.S. Department of Justice's NPA with Epstein and his limited 2008

29p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

AFFIDAVIT OF BRADLEY JAMES EDWARDS

19p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.