Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00593364DOJ Data Set 9Other

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00593364
Pages
9
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. X 15-cv-07433-RWS Defendant's Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Omnibus Motion in Lirnine Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver CO 80203 EFTA00593364 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 I. FED. R. EVID. 405(8) REQUIRES ADMISSION OF ALL SPECIFIC INCIDENTS OF PLAINTIFF LYING OR ENGAGING IN DECEITFUL OR FRAUDULENT CONDUCT 1 A. All allegations or comments made by Plaintiff are "connected to" the alleged defamatory statement 4 B. Responses to Enumerated Motions In Limine 6 1. Stories and allegations concerning Dershowitz, foreign presidents, and world leaders are highly relevant and admissible (Motion in Limine 1) 6 2. Meeting Bill Clinton at Jeffrey Epstein's private island twice (Motion in Limine 2) 8 3. FOIA responses and related materials are admissible (Motion in Limine 3) 8 4. Louis Freeh's testimony and report are admissible evidence (Motion in Limine 4) 9 5. Prince Andrew and Buckingham Palace's denials of Plaintiff's claims are not offered for the truth of the matter asserted (Motion in Limine 5) 11 6. Evidence Regarding Plaintiff's Sexual History and Reputation is Admissible (Motion in Limine 6) 14 7. Plaintiff cannot prohibit use of words such as "prostitute," which she used to describe herself, or any other "derogatory" terms that describe her reputation (Motion in [Amine 7) 14 8. Plaintiff's drug use is relevant to her memory and lack of damages (Motion in Limine 8) 16 9. Information regarding Plaintiff's criminal history is relevant and admissible evidence when character is an essential element of the claim (Motion in Limine 9) 18 10. Evidence concerning school attendance is relevant to Plaintiff's allegations of how she spent her time in 1999 to 2002 (Motion in Limine 10) 19 11. Plaintiff put her full childhood history and character at issue (Motion in Limine 11) 20 12. Victims Refuse Silence is a sham not-for-profit established to create a claim for defamation per se (Motion in Limine 12) 20 i EFTA00593365 13. Plaintiff's failure to pay her personal tax obligations is relevant to her character for truthfulness (Motion in Limine 13) 22 14. Plaintiff's husband's domestic violence against her in March 2015 is probative of other intervening causes of emotional distress and related damages (Motion in Limine 14) 23 15. Plaintiff's lies about her age and the year she met Mr. Epstein must be exposed to the jury (Motion in Limine 15) 24 16. All of Plaintiff's medical records are relevant to Plaintiff's damages claims (Motion in Limine 16) 25 17. The Parties agree to preclusion of all documents and discussion of the Jane Doe 102 case, including the settlement of those claims (Motion in Limine 17) 26 18. The Cassell/Edwards v. Dershowitz litigation is relevant and admissible (Motion in Limine 18) 26 19. Judge Mama's ruling is relevant and admissible (Motion in Limine 19) 29 20. The transcript of the tape recording of Mr. Dershowitz's conversation with Rebecca Boylan is admissible (Motion in [Amine 20) 31 C. Plaintiff's Remaining Motions In Limine Are Premature and Request an Unnecessary Advisory Opinion (Motions in Limine 21-29) 32 1. "Bad Acts" by Plaintiffs counsel 34 2. Discussion of missing witnesses and absence of evidence is appropriate, and missing witness instruction may be requested 35 CONCLUSION 36 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 38 ii EFTA00593366 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Brady v. Chemical Construction Corp., 740 F.2d 195 (2d Cir. 1984) 10 Cannistraci v. Kirsopp, No. 1:10-CV-980 MAD/DRH, 2012 WL 2089687, at *1-2 (N.D.N.Y June 8, 2012) 11 Cardillo v. Doubleday & Co., Inc., 518 F.2d 638, 639-40 (2d Cir.1975) 13 Chamblee v. Harris & Harris, Inc., 154 F. Supp. 2d 670, 681 (S.D.N.Y. 2001) 22 Chnapkova v. Koh, 985 F.2d 79, 82 (2d Cir. 1993) 22 Daniels by Glass v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 634 So.2d 88, 93 (Miss. 1993) 4 DeVaul v Carvigo Inc., 526 N.Y.S.2d 483 (2d Dept. 1988) 35 Doddy v. Oxy USA, Inc., 101 F.3d 448, 459-60 (5th Cir. 1996) 10 Donnelly v. DeChristoforo, 416 U.S. 637, 646-47, 94 &Ct. 1868, 40 L.Ed.2d 431 (1974). 33 Edwards v. City of N.Y., No. 08-2199 TLM, 2011 WL 2748665, at *4 (E.D.N.Y. July 13, 2011) 22 EEOC v. Grief Brothers Corp., 218 F.R.D. 59, 61-62 (W.D.N.Y. 2003) 25 Equal Employment Opportunity Comm'n v. Reed Pierce's Sportsman's Grille, LLC, No. 3:10- CV-541-WHB-LRA, 2013 WL 12123370, at *1 (S.D. Miss. Jan. 11, 2013) 24 Gaillard v. Jim's Water Service, Inc., 535 F.3d 771, 778-779 (8th Cir. 2008) 22 Gallo v. Ricci, 814 N.Y.S.2d 422, 423 (2006) 36 Geraty v. Vill. of Antioch, No. 09 C 6992, 2015 WL 127917, at *7 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 8, 2015) 9 Gordy Co. v. Mary Jane Girls, Inc., No. 86 CIV. 6814 (RWS), 1989 WL 28477, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 24, 1989) 17 Gov't of Virgin Islands v. Grant, 775 F.2d 508, 511 & n. 4 (3d Cir. 1985) 3 Grasso v. Mathew, 564 N.Y.S.2d 576, 578 (3d Dep't 1991) 30 Guccione v. Hustler Magazine, Inc., 800 F.2d 298, 303 (2d Cir. 1986) 13 iii EFTA00593367 Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1, 116 S.Ct. 1923, 135 L.Ed.2d 337 (1996) 22 Kadant Johnson Inc. v. D'Amico, No. CIV.A. 10-2869, 2012 WL 2190897, at *1 (E.D. La. June 14, 2012) 3 Kevorkian v. Am. Med. Assn, 237 Mich. App. 1, 12, 602 N.W.2d 233, 239 (1999) 13 Longmire v. Ala. State Univ., 151 F.R.D. 414, 419 (M.D.AIa. 1992) 3 Minemyer v. R-Boc Representatives, Inc., No. 07 C 1763, 2012 WL 379904, at *4 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 6, 2012) 12 O'Brien v. Alexander, 898 F.Supp. 162, 171 (S.D.N.Y. 1995) 30 Palmieri v. Defaria, 88 F.3d 136, 141 (2d Cir. 1996) 33 People v Thomas, 21 N.Y.3d 226 (2013) 35 People v. Williams, 5 N.Y.3d 732, 734 (2005) 35 Preferred Properties, Inc. v. Indian River Estates, Inc., 276 F.3d 790, 799 n.5 (6th Cir. 2002) 13 Rowe v. DPI Specialty Foods, Inc., No. 2:13-CV-00708-DN, 2015 WL 3533844, at *5 (D. Utah June 4, 2015) 13, 28 S.E.C. v. Collins & Ailanan Corp., 256 F.R.D. 403, 412 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) 19 Schafer v. Time, Inc., 142 F.3d 1361, 1364-75 (11th Cir. 1998) 3 Seligson, Morris & Neuburger v Fairbanks Whitney Corp., 257 N.Y.S.2d 706 (1st Dept. 1965)35 Sidor v. Reno, 95 CIV. 9588 (KMW), 1998 WL 164823, *2 (S.D.N.Y. April 7, 1998) 25 United States v. Dukes, 727 F.2d 34, 37 (2d Cir. 1984) 17 United States v. Hatchet:, 918 F.2d 631, 641 (6th Cir. 1990) 22 United States v. Lujan, No. 05—CR-924 (RB) (D.N.M. Mar. 25, 2011) 32 United States v. Fiche, 981 F.2d 706, 713 (4th Cir. 1992) 3 United States v. Rabbani, 382 F. App'x 39, 42 (2d Cir. 2010) 35 United States v. Robinson, 583 F.3d 1265, 1272 (10th Cir. 2009) 17 United States v. Van Meerbeke, 548 F.2d 415, 417-18 (2d Cir. 1976) 17 iv EFTA00593368 United States v. West, 58 F.3d 133, 141 (5th Cir. 1995) 22 United States v. Wexler, 79 F.2d 526, 529-30 (2d Cir. 1935) 33 United States v. Wilson, No. 04-CR-1016 NGG, 2013 WL 2948034, at *4-6 (E.D.N.Y. June 14, 2013) 32 World Wide Ass'n of Specialty Programs v. Pure, Inc., 450 F.3d 1132, 1138 (10th Cir. 2006).... 3 Zamora v. CC Servs., L.P., 647 F. App'x 330 (5th Cir. 2016) 9 Rules Fed. R. Evid. 403 7 Fed. R. Evid. 405 and 608 4, 6, 15, 20 Fed. R. Evid. 405(6) passim Fed. R. Evid. 801 12 Fed. R. Evid. 801 (d)(2)(D) 29, 31 Fed. R. Evid. 803(6) 19 Fed. R. Evid. 803(8) 8 Fed. R. Evid. 902(4) and 902(11) 19 V EFTA00593369 PAGES 1-36 REDACTED EFTA00593370 Dated: March 17, 2017 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Laura A. Menninger Laura A. Menninger (LM-1374) Jeffrey S. Pagliuca (pro hac vice) Ty Gee (pro hac vice) HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver,CO 020 Phone: Fax: Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell 37 EFTA00593371 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on March 17, 2017, I electronically served this Defendant's Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Omnibus Motion In Limine via ECF on the following: Sigrid S. McCawley Meredith Schultz BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER, LLP 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Ste. 1200 Ft. Lauderdale. FL 33301 Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Ave., Ste. 2 Ft. Lauderdale. FL 33301 Paul G. Cassell 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City. UT 84112 J. Stanley Pottinger 49 Twin Lakes Rd. South Salem NY 105 0 Is/ Nicole Simmons Nicole Simmons 38 EFTA00593372

Technical Artifacts (7)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #1:10-CV-980 MAD
Case #2:13-CV-00708-DN
Phone12123370
Phone2190897
Phone2748665
Phone2948034
Phone3533844

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell’s Motion cites alleged meetings with Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Dershowitz and foreign leaders as admissible evidence

The filing references specific alleged contacts between Maxwell and high‑profile figures (Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, and unnamed foreign presidents) that could link powerful actors Motion in Limine 2 asserts Maxwell met Bill Clinton twice on Jeffrey Epstein’s private island. Motion in Limine 1 references stories involving Alan Dershowitz, foreign presidents and world leader Mot

6p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Defendant’s Opposition cites alleged meetings with Bill Clinton on Jeffrey Epstein’s island and references to Dershowitz, foreign presidents, and P...

The filing lists specific alleged contacts between Ghislaine Maxwell and high‑profile figures (Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, foreign heads of state). If substantiated, these connection Motion 2 alleges Maxwell met Bill Clinton twice on Epstein’s private island. Motion 1 references stories involving Alan Dershowitz and foreign presidents. Motion 5 addresses Prince Andrew and Bucking

7p
Court UnsealedDepositionOct 22, 2020

Maxwell lawyer response to Giuffre deposition

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------X VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. 15-cv-07433-RWS --------------------------------------------------X DEFENDANT’S COMBINED MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO EXTENDING DEADLINE TO COMPLETE DEPOSITIONS AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR VIOLATION OF RULE 45 ......................................... Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca HADDON, MORGAN, AND FO

32p
Court UnsealedAug 9, 2019

Maxwell Brief

Case 18-2868, Document 279, 08/09/2019, 2628231, Page1 of 37 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------X Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. ............................................. VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, 15-cv-07433-RWS --------------------------------------------------X Reply Brief in Support of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN,

37p
Court UnsealedAug 9, 2019

Epstein Docs

Case 18-2868, Document 271, 08/09/2019, 2628203, Page1 of 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT _____________________________________________ At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 9th day of August, two thousand nineteen. ________________________________________ Julie Brown, Miami Herald Media Company, Intervenors - Appellants. v.

2024p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Court Transcript Reveals Potential Undisclosed Evidence and High‑Profile Connections in Giuffre v. Maxwell Defamation Case

The transcript contains several concrete references that could be pursued for investigative value: attempts to depose former President Bill Clinton; FOIA requests and alleged FBI involvement (Louie Fr Plaintiff’s counsel sought to depose Bill Clinton to establish his relationship with Epstein. Reference to former FBI Director Louis Freeh as an expert witness without a Rule 26 disclosure. Discussio

138p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.