Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00596485DOJ Data Set 9Other

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00596485
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK x IN MATTER OF APPLICATION OF BRADLEY : JAMES EDWARDS SEEKING CPLR 3102(e) ORDER FOR DAILY NEWS, L.P. TO PRODUCE : TAPE RECORDING x Index No. 112345/2010 (Justice Goodman) Motion Seq. No. 1 AFFIRMATION OF ROBERT D. BALIN IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR CPLR 3102(e) ORDER ROBERT D. BALIN, an attorney duly admitted to practice law before the courts of the State of New York, hereby affirms the following to be true under penalty of perjury: 1. I am a member of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, attorneys for Daily News, L.P. ("Daily News"). I submit this affirmation in opposition to the motion of Bradley James Edwards for an order, pursuant to CPLR 3102(e), compelling the Daily News to produce a certain audio recording. 2. The grounds for denying Edwards' motion are fully set forth in the accompanying memorandum of law. I submit this affirmation to annex exhibits relevant to the Daily News' opposition. 3. Annexed hereto as Exhibit "A" is a true and correct copy of the Complaint of Jeffrey Epstein, with Exhibits 1 and 2, that was filed December 7, 2009 in the proceeding entitled Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein. et al., Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG, in the 15th Judicial Circuit of the Florida Circuit Court (the "Ponzi Scheme Action"). 4. Annexed hereto as Exhibit "B" is a true and correct copy of the Answer and Counterclaim of Defendant, Bradley J. Edwards that was filed December 21, 2010 in the Ponzi Scheme Action. DWT 15631739v2 3970112-000042 EFTA00596485 5. Annexed hereto as Exhibit "C" is a true and correct copy of the Order on Motion of Counter-Defendant. Jeffrey Epstein, for a More Definite Statement and Motion to Dismiss, dated January 26, 2010, that was issued in the Ponzi Scheme Action. 6. Annexed hereto as Exhibit "D" is a true and correct copy of Defendant Bradley J. Edwards's Motion to Appoint Commissioner that was filed July 19, 2010 in the Ponzi Scheme Action. 7. Annexed hereto as Exhibit "E" is a true and correct copy of the Order on Defendant's Motion to Appoint Commissioner, dated August 3, 2010, that was issued in the Ponzi Scheme Action. 8. Annexed hereto as Exhibit "F" is a true and correct copy of Defendant Bradley J. Edwards' Motion for Final Summary Judgment that was filed September 22, 2010 in the Ponzi Scheme Action. 9. Annexed hereto as Exhibit -G" is a true and correct copy of Defendant Bradley J. Edwards' Statement of Undisputed Facts that was filed September 22, 2010 in the Ponzi Scheme Action. 10. Annexed hereto as Exhibit "H" is a true and correct copy of the docket in the Ponzi Scheme Action as of November 1, 2010. II . Annexed hereto as Exhibit "I" is a true and correct copy of the Non-Prosecution Agreement between the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein, executed by Epstein on September 24, 2007. 12. Annexed hereto as Exhibit "J" is a true and correct copy of the Affidavit of George Rush, sworn to April 6, 2010, that was submitted in the proceeding entitled In re 2 DWT 15631739v2 3970112-000042 EFTA00596486 Application to Quash Subpoenas to Daily News, L.P., and George Rush, No. M8-85, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (the "Jane Doe Action"). 13. Annexed hereto as Exhibit "K" is a true and correct copy of Real Party In Interest Jane Doe's Response in Opposition to Motion of Daily News, L.P. to Quash Subpoenas, with exhibits, dated April 29, 2010, that was submitted in the Jane Doe Action. 14. Annexed hereto as Exhibit "L" is a true and correct copy of the Supplementary Affidavit of George Rush, sworn to April 30, 2010, that was submitted in the Jane Doe Action. 15. Annexed hereto as Exhibit "M" is a true and correct copy of the Memorandum and Order dated May 18, 2010 that was issued in the Jane Doe Action. 16. Annexed hereto as Exhibit "N" is a true and correct copy of the Amended Order, dated July 28, 2010, that was issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in the appeal in the Jane Doe Action. 17. Annexed hereto as Exhibit "O" is a true and correct copy of the Judgment against Scott W. Rothstein that was entered June 9, 2010 in the criminal case entitled United States v. Scott W. Rothstein, Case No. 09-cr-60331, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Dated: New York, New York November 1, 2010 Robert D. Balin 3 DWT 15631739v2 3970112-000042 EFTA00596487

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone3970112

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Extensive RRA Contact List Linking Donald Trump's Attorney and Multiple Epstein‑Case Lawyers

The document provides a detailed roster of attorneys, paralegals, investigators, and staff associated with the RRA (presumably a law firm or litigation consortium) handling Jeffrey Epstein‑related mat Alan Garten is identified as "Donald Trump's attorney" within the RRA contact list. Multiple attorneys are listed as "Counsel for other Epstein Victims," indicating a broader litigatio The list inclu

2p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Attorney alleges Rothstein used Epstein lawsuits to lure investors and links high‑profile associates to alleged child‑molestation scheme

The passage provides a potentially actionable lead that a law firm partner (Scott Rothstein) may have marketed litigation against Jeffrey Epstein to attract investors for his Ponzi scheme, and it name Attorney joined Rothstein’s firm in April 2009 and brought clients with lawsuits against Epstein. Allegations that Rothstein presented those lawsuits to investors to fund his Ponzi scheme. Claims tha

1p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Bradley J. Edwards files renewed motion for summary judgment in Jeffrey Epstein civil case

The passage merely restates a routine procedural filing without revealing new evidence, financial flows, or connections to high‑level officials. It offers minimal investigative value beyond confirming Edwards seeks summary judgment, claiming no genuine issue of material fact. Alleges no evidence of fraud by Edwards against Epstein. References three alleged victims of Epstein linked to Edwards.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Counsel list filing for Jeffrey Epstein case (House Oversight document)

The document only provides attorney contact information and a case number for a filing related to Jeffrey Epstein. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to high‑lev Case number: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Multiple law firms listed as counsel for Jeffrey Epstein Filing appears to be a notice of supplement in a court proceeding

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

BuzzFeed Review Finds Little Concrete Evidence Linking Bill Clinton to Jeffrey Epstein Misconduct

The document largely recaps existing reporting and court‑record reviews, noting that no hard evidence directly ties former President Bill Clinton to criminal activity by Jeffrey Epstein. It does highl Clinton appears on 13 documented flights on Epstein's private jet, often accompanied by Epstein aide Attorney Jack Scarola warned of “extortionate threats, power, wealth or political pressure” when a

10p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.