Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00597298DOJ Data Set 9Other

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00597298
Pages
4
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION -AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. I ORDER GRANTING COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGM I NT THIS CAUSE came before the court on Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S, Motion for Summary Judgment regarding the Fourth Amended Counterclaim filed herein by Counter- Plaintiff and the court having reviewed the file and applicable precedent, having heard argument of counsel and being otherwise advised in the premises, it is hereupon ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. Mr. EPSTEIN filed suit against Mr. EDWARDS and Mr. EDWARDS thereafter filed a Counterclaim against Mr. EPSTEIN. Mr. EPSTEIN later dismissed his Complaint without prejudice. The Counterclaim proceeded and went through several amendments. The Fourth Amended Counterclaim at issue here contains two causes of action. Those causes of action are abuse of process and malicious prosecution. 2. The issue before the court is whether the absolute litigation privilege applies to causes DRAFT EFTA00597298 CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB of action for both abuse of process and malicious prosecution. 3. The court has reviewed Levin, Middlebrooks. Moves & Mitchell. v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co., 639 So.2d 606, 608 (Fla. 1994), Bchevarria, McCalla. Ravmer, Barrett & Frappier v. Cole, 950 Sold 380 (Fla. 2007) and Wolfe v. Foreman 38 Fla. L. Weekly D1540 (July 17, 2013). The court finds these cases to be not only persuasive but binding. The court is bound by the holding of Levin. that all actions occurring during the course of a judicial proceeding, so long as the act has some relation to the proceeding, are absolutely privileged. This proposition was reaffirmed in Bchevarria. The Third District Court of Appeal in Wolfe, quoting in large part from Bchevarria found specifically that the litigation privilege applies to malicious prosecution claims and acts occurring during the course of a judicial proceeding, if those acts bear some relation to the proceeding. 4. During the hearing on this matter, it was conceded by counsel for Counter-Plaintiff that all of the allegations made in both the abuse of process claim and the malicious prosecution claim are acts occurring during the course of a judicial proceeding and bear some relation to the proceeding. 5. The court therefore finds that the absolute privilege applies to both the abuse of process claim and malicious prosecution claims made herein. 6. The Counter-Plaintiff urged the court that Olson v. Johnson, 961 So.2d 356 (FIa. 2d DCA 2007), is in conflict with Wolfe and that this conflict would allow this court to "peruse" other issues. However, the court finds Olson inapplicable because that case dealt with extra judicial false statements that were made to a police officer. The statements were not made during the course of a ILLL:-A DRAFT EFTA00597299 CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMII judicial proceeding and were therefore not privileged. For the reasons stated above, the Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this day of , 2014. &DRAFT CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE Copies furnished to those on the attached service list. E DRAFT EFTA00597300 SERVICE LIST CASE NO. 502009CA040800)0C0CMB-AG W. Chester Brewer, Jr., Esquire wcblaw wcbc W. Chester Brewer, Jr., 250 S. Australian Avenue Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Jack ScarAttal Searcy Denney Scarola et al 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldberger, E.tatre igoldberiterOaevm= Atterbury, Goldberger & 250 S. Australian Avenue Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Marc Hunk, Esquire 1 East Broward Blvd. Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Bradl J. Edwards uire Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N. Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Fred Haddad, Esquire a freclht rw.com 1 Financial Plaza Suite 2612 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Tonja Haddad Colema Esquire dill Law Offices of Tonja Haddad, 315 SE 7iA Street, Suite 301 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 ono EFTA00597301

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainrw.com

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-23 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 1 of 6

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-23 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 1 of 6 EXHIBIT 24 EFTA00081220 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-23 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 2 of 6 Page 1 Page 3 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT 1 - - - IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE No.502009CA040800XXXXMBAG 2 EXHIBITS 3 - - - JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff , vs 4 5 NUMBER DESCRIPTION PAGE 6 Exhibit number 1 Eyeglasses 133 SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS. individually, and 7 L.M., individually, 8 9 Defendants. 10 VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN 11 Wednesday. March 17. 2010 12 10:17 a.m.- 1:27 p.m. 13 14 303 Banyan Boulevard suite 400 15 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 16 17 Reported By: 18 Sandra W. Townsend, FPR 19 Notary Public, State of Florida 20 West Palm Beach Office Job #1358 21 22 23 24 25 Page 2 Page 4 1 APPEARANCES: 1 PROCEEDINGS 2 3 On behalf of the Plaintiff

6p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Rothstein Deposition Reveals Use of Jeffrey Epstein Case to Fuel Ponzi Scheme and Possible High‑Profile Name Manipulation

The transcript provides multiple concrete leads: (1) Rothstein admits the firm used the Epstein case to attract investors for a Ponzi scheme; (2) mentions specific high‑profile individuals (Bill Clint Rothstein confirms the Epstein case was leveraged to lure investors into a Ponzi scheme. Reference to a flight manifest allegedly listing Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew, used as a sales too Russell A

71p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Epstein Investigation Files Reveal Potential High‑Level Collusion, Suppressed Evidence, and Questionable Plea Deal

The document contains multiple concrete leads that, if verified, tie a roster of powerful individuals—including Prince Andrew, Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Henry Kissinger, Ted Kennedy, and others—to J Alfredo Rodriguez possessed a bound notebook containing names, addresses, and phone numbers of dozen Rodriguez attempted to sell this notebook to an undercover FBI operative for $50,000, indicating p

63p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Epstein paid three women $5.5 million to settle underage‑sex lawsuits, documents reveal

The passage provides concrete figures, names (initials) and settlement amounts, and links the payments to a broader pattern of alleged hush‑money deals. It mentions high‑profile figures (Donald Trump, Epstein settled three cases for $1 M, $2 M and $2.5 M respectively. Settlements were disclosed in court filings for a malicious‑prosecution lawsuit. Attorney Bradley Edwards negotiated the deals; his

4p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Witness Scott Rothstein Testifies on Alleged 2005‑2006 Scheme at His Firm in Federal Oversight Hearing

The transcript reveals a federal‑level hearing where Rothstein, a convicted fraudster, is questioned about a “scheme” that began in 2005‑06, with attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein, the Department of Justi Rothstein acknowledges a scheme at his firm starting in 2005‑06. Jeffrey Epstein’s in‑house counsel and a DOJ attorney are present at the hearing. Multiple attorneys representing plaintiffs and defen

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

9p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.