Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00598957DOJ Data Set 9Other

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 423 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/15/2017 Page 1 of 4

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00598957
Pages
4
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 423 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/15/2017 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE REPLY TO PETITIONERS' RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Respondent, United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Reply to Petitioners' Response to Respondent's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, and states: I. Respondent's reply to petitioners' response to respondent's cross-motion for summary judgment is due on Friday, September 15, 2017. 2. The U.S. Attorney's Office closed on September 7-8, 2017, to prepare for the approach of Hurricane Irma. The Office was closed on September 11-13, 2017, due to the impact of the storm. The Office reopened on September 14, 2017, with many employees still absent due to the effects of the storm. 3. Due to the disruption caused by the storm, respondent respectfully requests an enlargement of time of three weeks, up to and including October 6, 2017, to file its reply to petitioners' response to respondent's cross-motion for summary judgment. On September 14, 2017, the undersigned counsel contacted petitioners' counsel, Brad Edwards, Esq., regarding 1 EFTA00598957 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 423 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/15/2017 Page 2 of 4 petitioners' position on the instant motion. Mr. Edwards graciously did not oppose respondent's motion. WHEREFORE, respondent respectfully requests an enlargement of time, up to and including October 6, 2017, to file its reply to petitioners' response to respondent's cross-motion for summary judgment. DATED: September 15, 2017 Respectfully submitted, BENJAMIN G. GREENBERG ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: Assistant Ha. Bar No Miami. Florida 33132 E-mail: ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on September 15, 2017, the foregoing was filed with the Clerk of the Court and served on counsel on the attached service list using CM/ECF. 2 Assistant United States Attorney EFTA00598958 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 423 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/15/2017 Page 3 of 4 SERVICE LIST Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, ENISSISS . Fort Lauderdale Florida E-mail: Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of Law at the MOM Salt Lake City. Utah 84112 Tel: E-mail: Attorneys for Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 Jacqueline Perczek Mi ' Tel: Email: PF Roy E. Black BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN & STUMPF Miami FL 33131 Tel: Email: Attorneys for Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein 3 EFTA00598959 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 423 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/15/2017 Page 4 of 4 Dexter A. Lee Assistant United States Attorney Mi Tel: E-mail: Assistant United States Attorney West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Tel: E- Assistant United States Attorney Miami, Florida 33132 Tel: Em. Attorneys for the United States 4 EFTA00598960

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:08-CV-80736-KAM

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01660111

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Nlatthewman JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota and Florida, the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. My bar admission status in California and Minnesota is currently inactive. I am currently employed as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida and was so employed during all of the events described herein. 2. I am the Assistant United States Attorne

5p
Court UnsealedJun 16, 2023

Deutsche Bank Epstein victim questionnaire

EXHIBIT A-1 Case 1:22-cv-10018-JSR Document 90-2 Filed 06/16/23 Page 1 of 12 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case No. 1:22-CV-10018 (JSR) NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION TO: ALL VICTIMS OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN’S SEX TRAFFICKING VENTURE DURING THE TIME PERIOD AUGUST 19, 2013 TO AUGUST 10, 2019 (THE “CLASS PERIOD”). IN ORDER TO QUALIFY FOR A SETTLEMENT PAYMENT, YOU (OR CLASS COUNSEL ON YOUR BEHALF) MUST TIMELY SUBMIT A TIER ONE FORM BY ___________, 20

12p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372112011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02335898

51p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.