Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00601677DOJ Data Set 9Other

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00601677
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendant(s). AMENDED MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING COMPLETION OF ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY (AMENDMENTS TO PARAGRAPHS 3 AND 41 Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS. moves this Honorable Court for entry of an order staying further proceedings with respect to JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S Motion for Attorney's Fees and Costs, and in support thereof would show: I. EPSTEIN seeks to recover fees and costs against BRADLEY EDWARDS pursuant to a Proposal for Settlement that offered a payment of $300,000 to BRADLEY EDWARDS in exchange for a dismissal and release of EDWARDS' claims for compensatory and punitive damages against EPSTEIN and EDWARDS' acceptance of a prohibition on EDWARDS, his attorneys, and agents "that they shall not in any method or manner discuss, publish, or disseminate any information concerning the settlement..." The confidentiality clause sought to be imposed by EPSTEIN on EDWARDS, his attorneys and agents also broadly sought to prohibit disclosure of "the reasons for the payment." EFTA00601677

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.