For the period endingCase 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 434 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/03/2009 Page 1 of 2
Case File
efta-efta00602276DOJ Data Set 9OtherROY BLACK
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00602276
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
ROY BLACK
HOWARD M. SRESNICK
SCOTT A. KORNSPAN
LARRY A. Swim?
MARIA NEYRA
JACKIE PERCZEK
MARK A.J. SHAPIRO
JARED LOPEZ
BLACK
SREBNICK
KORNSPAN
& STUMPF
-=. PA._
December 9, 2009
A. Marie Villafalia, Esq.
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney's Office
Southern District of Florida
500 South Australian Avenue
Suite 400
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
RE: Jeffrey Epstein
Dear Marie:
JESSICA FONSECA-NADER
KATHLEEN P. PHILLIPS
AARON ANTHON
MARCOS BEATON, JR.
MATTHEW P. O'BRIEN
JENIPER J. SOULIKIAS
NOAH Fox
E-Mail: RBlackeroyEllacicoorn
You emailed me a letter on November 2, asking whether Jeffrey Epstein's
place of employment remained constant. It has. I reviewed a Google map to
confirm that the distance between that place of employment and the location
where he was stopped by Palm Beach Police is less than 3 miles (and that the
location where he was walking was on a direct mute to his place of work).
It has taken us a while to respond to your letter because other matters have
consumed our time and effort. Over the past five weeks, the massive billion-dollar
conspiracy created and run by Scott Rothstein has been exposed. On Monday,
Mr. Epstein filed a state civil RICO lawsuit charging Rothstein, his partner Brad
Edwards, and others with tortuous and fraudulent abuses of process that resulted
in serious injury to Mr. Epstein. A copy of the Complaint is enclosed with this
letter.
As ou know, Rothstein's firm represents
and
three of the plaintiffs who have brought civil actions against Mr.
Epstein. The Rothstein firm was a criminal enterprise that used the litigation
against Mr. Epstein to lure investors into its billion-dollar ponzi scheme. We
believe that Rothstein and his co-conspirators used the government's criminal
investigation as a means to perpetrate and further their fraud. For example:
201 5. Biscayne Boulevard. Suite 1300 • Miami. Florida 33131. Phone: 305-371.6421 • Fax: 305-358.2006 • nw.RoyBlack.00m
EFTA00602276
A. Marie Villafazia, Esq.
December 9, 2009
Page 2
1. The Rothstein lawyers sought disclosure of the NPA to prove who the
victims were, and used the NPA to "corroborate" their false claims.
2. Rothstein and his co-conspirators abused the legal process in other
cases. They forged the signature of judges, and even forged an Eleventh Circuit
opinion.
3. Rothstein lawyers demanded phony protective orders.
4. In our case, they sought discovery of Epstein's plane logs to fish for
celebrities to extort and convince investors that huge amounts of settlement
money was available from them.
5. Rothstein lawyers litigated claims using Jane Doe names to make the
phony settlements appear plausible to investors, and also to prevent any
investigation into the claims by the investors.
6. Rothstein and others told investors that your office directed the women
to the Rothstein firm.
7. Rothstein and his co-conspirators gathered information illegally, and
shared it with the other plaintiffs' attorneys in this case.
8. Rothstein deceived investors into believing that he had the confidential
victim list you prepared, and that he had a copy of the NPA.
9.
Rothstein told investors that his investigators had sophisticated
electronic bugging equipment to gather evidence against Epstein.
10. Rothstein told investors that Epstein had offered to settle the cases for
$200 million, when there have been no such discussions about any settlement at
any price.
And it does not stop there. Rothstein his artners, and his employees
investigated and litigated the
cases with funds derived
from their criminal enterprise and their fraud and misrepresentations to investors.
But we have been stymied from debunking fraudulent claims brought by the
Rothstein criminal enterprise because you have threatened that such action on
Black Srebnick. Komspan & Stumpf, PA
EFTA00602277
A. Marie Villafaria, Esq.
December 9, 2009
Page 3
our part would constitute a breach of the NPA. So the Rothstein lawyers, once
again, are using the power of the federal government to perpetrate and further
their fraud. And the expense of litigating these cases has been extreme. For
example, Bob Josefsberg, who I do not believe was aware of the Rothstein crimes,
is now demanding over $2 million in legal fees.
As a lawsuit brought by some of the investors' claims, Rothstein and his
partner Edwards used Jeffrey Epstein as bait. The litigation strategy, media
pronouncements, and investigatory initiatives of Rothstein and Edwards were
calculated to support Rothstein's deceptions rather than to advance the position
of his clients. I bring these facts to your attention so that if you had contact with
Edwards or those associated with him in the past concerning Mr. Epstein, you
consider not continuing communications with any of them in the future.
I would like a short conference with you in person to talk about Mr.
Epstein's progress through the state criminal justice system, to discuss several
outstanding issues that I want to make sure you have accurate information about,
and, from my perspective, most importantly, so that I can provide Mr. Epstein
with proper counsel going forward. If you email me some dates when you are
available this month, we can schedule a short meeting in your office hopefully
before the year ends.
Roy Black
RB/wg
Enclosure
Black. Srebnick. Kornspan & Stumpf. P.A.
EFTA00602278
Technical Artifacts (3)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Fax
Fax: 305-358.2006Phone
305-358.2006Phone
305-371.6421Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
Fowler White Burnett
5p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
It's an absurdly vast house, among the largest in Manhattan, but the dining
19p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019
Epstein Depositions
10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps
839p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacationggmail.com>
3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
It's an absurdly vast house, among the largest in Manhattan, but the
20p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
Filing # 61724765 E-Filed 09/19/2017 03:54:34 PM
4p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.