Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00617379DOJ Data Set 9Other

, Esq.

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00617379
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
, Esq. Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Avenue Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Dear You emailed me a letter on November 2 asking whether Jeffrey Epstein s place of employment remained constant. It has. I reviewed a Google map to confirm that the distance between that place of employment and the location where he was stopped by Palm Beach Police is less than 3 miles (affd that the location where he was walking was on a direct route to his place of work). It has taken us a while to respond to your letter becausesther matters have consumed our time and effort. Over the past five weeks, the massive billion-dollar conspiracy created and run by Scott Rothstein has been exposed. Yesterday, Mr. Epstein filed a state civil RICO lawsuit charging Rothstein, his partner Brad Edwards, and others with tortuous and fraudulent abuses of process that resulted in serious injury to Mr. Epstein. As you know, Rothstein's firm represents and three of the plaintiffs who have brought civil actions against Mr. Epstein. The Rothstein Firm was a criminal enterprise that used the litigation against Mr. Epstein to lure investors to its billion-dollar ponzi scheme. We believe that Rothstein and his co-conspirators used your criminal investigation to perpetrate and further their fraud. They sought disclosure of the NPA to prove who the victims were, and used the NPA to "corroborate" their false claims. Rothstein and his co-conspirators abused as many legal processes as they could: They forged the signature of judges, forged an Eleventh Circuit opinion, demanded phony protective orders, sought discovery of Epstein's plane logs to £md famous people to extort, and they litigated claims under Jane Doe names to make settlement appear plausible to investors, and also to prevent any investigation into the claims of investors. We are uncovering more of this outrageous story every day. dir rhstein and the other so-called lawyers gathered information illegally, shared it with the other plaintiffs attorneys, and told investors that your office directed the women to the Rothstein Finn. We have been stymied from debunking fraudulent claims by the plaintiffs suing Mr. Epstein because you have threatened that such action on our part would constitute a breach of the NPA. EFTA00617379 Bob Josefsberg is now demanding over $2 million in legal fees. Rothstein, his partners, and his employees investigated and litigated the cases with funds derived from their criminal enterprise and their fraud and misrepresentations to investors. Rothstein deceived investors into believing that he had the confidential victim list your prepared,jhat he had a copy of the NPA, that his investigators had sophisticated elec eit'r lc bugging equipment, and that Epstein had offered to settle the cases for $200 million. This latter claim was obviously false, and there have b i no such discussions about any settlement at any price. As a lawsuit brought by some of the investors aims, Rothstein an his partner Edwards used Jeffrey Epstein as bait. The litigation strategy, media pronouncements, and investigatory initiatives of Rothstein and Edirards were calculated to support Rothstein's deceptions rather than to advance the position of his clients. I bring these facts to your attention so that %Lou had contact with Edwards or those associated with him in the past concernirig?Mr. Epstein, you consider not continuing communications with any of them in the future. I would like a short conference with you in person to talk about Mr. Epstein's progress through the state criminal justice system, to discuss several outstanding issues that I want to make sure you have accurate information about, and, from my perspective, most importantly, so that I can provide Mr. Epstein with proper counsel going foiward,4 If you email me some dates when you are available is month, we can schedule a short meeting in your office hopefully before end Sincerely, EFTA00617380

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Extensive RRA Contact List Linking Donald Trump's Attorney and Multiple Epstein‑Case Lawyers

The document provides a detailed roster of attorneys, paralegals, investigators, and staff associated with the RRA (presumably a law firm or litigation consortium) handling Jeffrey Epstein‑related mat Alan Garten is identified as "Donald Trump's attorney" within the RRA contact list. Multiple attorneys are listed as "Counsel for other Epstein Victims," indicating a broader litigatio The list inclu

2p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Attorney alleges Rothstein used Epstein lawsuits to lure investors and links high‑profile associates to alleged child‑molestation scheme

The passage provides a potentially actionable lead that a law firm partner (Scott Rothstein) may have marketed litigation against Jeffrey Epstein to attract investors for his Ponzi scheme, and it name Attorney joined Rothstein’s firm in April 2009 and brought clients with lawsuits against Epstein. Allegations that Rothstein presented those lawsuits to investors to fund his Ponzi scheme. Claims tha

1p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Bradley J. Edwards files renewed motion for summary judgment in Jeffrey Epstein civil case

The passage merely restates a routine procedural filing without revealing new evidence, financial flows, or connections to high‑level officials. It offers minimal investigative value beyond confirming Edwards seeks summary judgment, claiming no genuine issue of material fact. Alleges no evidence of fraud by Edwards against Epstein. References three alleged victims of Epstein linked to Edwards.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Counsel list filing for Jeffrey Epstein case (House Oversight document)

The document only provides attorney contact information and a case number for a filing related to Jeffrey Epstein. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to high‑lev Case number: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Multiple law firms listed as counsel for Jeffrey Epstein Filing appears to be a notice of supplement in a court proceeding

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

BuzzFeed Review Finds Little Concrete Evidence Linking Bill Clinton to Jeffrey Epstein Misconduct

The document largely recaps existing reporting and court‑record reviews, noting that no hard evidence directly ties former President Bill Clinton to criminal activity by Jeffrey Epstein. It does highl Clinton appears on 13 documented flights on Epstein's private jet, often accompanied by Epstein aide Attorney Jack Scarola warned of “extortionate threats, power, wealth or political pressure” when a

10p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.