Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00621305DOJ Data Set 9Other

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00621305
Pages
7
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION -AG CASE NO. 502009CA04080(0OOO1MB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. MOTION FOR ENTRY OF ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT COMES NOW, the Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned attorney, and requests that this Court enter the proposed Order on Motion Summary Judgment attached hereto and as good grounds would show: 1. A hearing was held before the Court on January 27, 2014 regarding EPSTEIN's Motion for Sutnmary Judgment. 2. The Court granted EPSTEIN's motion. 3. The Court directed the undersigned attorney to prepare a proposed order and directed that certain language be included in the order. 4. The undersigned obtained a transcript of the hearing and followed the direction of the court in preparing the proposed order attached hereto as Exhibit "A". 5. The attorney for Counter-Plaintiff has objected to the proposed order and suggested additional language to which Counter-Defendant cannot agree. EFTA00621305 CASE NO. 502009CA0408003OO{XMB 6. It therefore becomes necessary that the court review portions of the transcript and the proposed order and enter an order that the Court deems appropriate. WHEREFORE, Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, requests that this Court enter an order regarding its ruling on Counter-Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by eservice to those listed on the attached Service List, this 4lb day of February, 2014. Is/ W. Chester Brewer. Jr. W. CHESTER BREWER, JR. Florida Bar No.: 0261858 W. Chester Brewer, Jr., E. Attorney for Counter-Defendant Suite 1400 250 Australian Avenue South West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 EFTA00621306 SERVICE LIST CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB-AG Jack Scar Es re Searcy Denney Scarola et al 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack "M a rEsquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weir 250 S. Australian Avenue Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Marc Nurik, Esquire 1 East Broward Blvd. Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale FL 33301 Bradlkilvard o sakm Staff. Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N. Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Fred Haddad Es Esquire 1 Financial Plaza Suite 2612 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Tonja I lad I d Coleco Esquire Law Offices of Tonja Haddad, 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 EFTA00621307 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION -AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ORDER GRANTING COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THIS CAUSE came before the court on Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S, Motion for Summary Judgment regarding the Fourth Amended Counterclaim filed herein by Counter- Plaintiff and the court having reviewed the file and applicable precedent, having heard argument of counsel and being otherwise advised in the premises, it is hereupon ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. Mr. EPSTEIN filed suit against Mr. EDWARDS and Mr. EDWARDS thereafter filed a Counterclaim against Mr. EPSTEIN. Mr. EPSTEIN later dismissed his Complaint without prejudice. The Counterclaim proceeded and went through several amendments. The Fourth Amended Counterclaim at issue here contains two causes of action. Those causes of action are abuse of process and malicious prosecution. 2. The issue before the court is whether the absolute litigation privilege applies to causes EXHIBIT "A^ EFTA00621308 CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXJCXMB of action for both abuse of process and malicious prosecution. 3. The court has reviewed Levin. Middlebrooks. Moves & Mitchell, v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co., 639 So.2d 606, 608 (Ha. 1994), Echevarria, McCalla. Raymer, Barrett & Happier v. Cole, 950 So2d 380 (Ha. 2007) and Wolfe v. Foreman, 38 Fla. L. Weekly D1540 (July 17, 2013). The court finds these cases to be not only persuasive but binding. The court is bound by the holding of Levin, that all actions occurring during the course of a judicial proceeding, so long as the act has some relation to the proceeding, are absolutely privileged. This proposition was reaffirmed in Echeyarria. The Third District Court of Appeal in Wolfe, quoting in large part from Echevarria, found specifically that the litigation privilege applies to malicious prosecution claims and acts occurring during the course of a judicial proceeding, if those acts bear some relation to the proceeding. 4. During the hearing on this matter, it was conceded by counsel for Counter-Plaintiff that all of the allegations made in both the abuse of process claim and the malicious prosecution claim are of acts occurring during the course of a judicial proceeding and bear some relation to the proceeding. 5. The court therefore finds that the absolute privilege applies to both the abuse of process claim and malicious prosecution claims made herein. 6. The Counter-Plaintiff urged the court that Olson v. Johnson, 961 So.2d 356 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007), is in conflict with Wolfe and that this conflict would allow this court to "peruse" other issues. However, the court finds Olson inapplicable because that case dealt with extra judicial false statements that were made to a police officer. The statements were not made during the course of a EFTA00621309 CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB judicial proceeding and were therefore not privileged. For the reasons stated above, the Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this day of , 2014. CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE Copies famished to those on the attached service list. EFTA00621310 SERVICE LIST CASE NO. 502009CA040800000CMB-AO W. Chester Brewer, Jr., Es wcbc W. Chester Brewer, Jr., 250 S. Australian Avenue Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Jack Scare! Es uire Searcy Denney Scarola et al 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Goldbe str Attetbury, Goldberger & Weiss, . 250 S. Australian Avenue Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Marc Nurik, Esquire 1 East Broward Blvd. Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale. FL 33301 Bradl Edwards m uds uire Fanner Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N. Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Fred Haddad Es [email protected] I Financial Plaza Suite 2612 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 ad Coleman Esquire e lin Law Offices of Tonja Haddad, 315 SE 76 Sheet, Suite 301 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 EFTA00621311

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Extensive RRA Contact List Linking Donald Trump's Attorney and Multiple Epstein‑Case Lawyers

The document provides a detailed roster of attorneys, paralegals, investigators, and staff associated with the RRA (presumably a law firm or litigation consortium) handling Jeffrey Epstein‑related mat Alan Garten is identified as "Donald Trump's attorney" within the RRA contact list. Multiple attorneys are listed as "Counsel for other Epstein Victims," indicating a broader litigatio The list inclu

2p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Attorney alleges Rothstein used Epstein lawsuits to lure investors and links high‑profile associates to alleged child‑molestation scheme

The passage provides a potentially actionable lead that a law firm partner (Scott Rothstein) may have marketed litigation against Jeffrey Epstein to attract investors for his Ponzi scheme, and it name Attorney joined Rothstein’s firm in April 2009 and brought clients with lawsuits against Epstein. Allegations that Rothstein presented those lawsuits to investors to fund his Ponzi scheme. Claims tha

1p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Bradley J. Edwards files renewed motion for summary judgment in Jeffrey Epstein civil case

The passage merely restates a routine procedural filing without revealing new evidence, financial flows, or connections to high‑level officials. It offers minimal investigative value beyond confirming Edwards seeks summary judgment, claiming no genuine issue of material fact. Alleges no evidence of fraud by Edwards against Epstein. References three alleged victims of Epstein linked to Edwards.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Counsel list filing for Jeffrey Epstein case (House Oversight document)

The document only provides attorney contact information and a case number for a filing related to Jeffrey Epstein. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to high‑lev Case number: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Multiple law firms listed as counsel for Jeffrey Epstein Filing appears to be a notice of supplement in a court proceeding

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

BuzzFeed Review Finds Little Concrete Evidence Linking Bill Clinton to Jeffrey Epstein Misconduct

The document largely recaps existing reporting and court‑record reviews, noting that no hard evidence directly ties former President Bill Clinton to criminal activity by Jeffrey Epstein. It does highl Clinton appears on 13 documented flights on Epstein's private jet, often accompanied by Epstein aide Attorney Jack Scarola warned of “extortionate threats, power, wealth or political pressure” when a

10p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.