Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00621400DOJ Data Set 9Other

Case 09-34791-RBR

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00621400
Pages
28
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 1603-1 Filed 04/08/11 Page 1 of 28 EXHIBIT A Jane Doe 102 v. Jeffrey Epstein Complaint EFTA00621400 Case 9:09Cois864M3-4(Ni-Utkunfainf I 6CLenlereEiMik tidckeqW04/2(A§ Page 1 of 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE No. 102, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 09-80656 Civil Action No. CIV-RYSKAMP FILED by it, D C. INTAKE MAY - 1 2009 MAGISTRATE JUDGE s vEN _Aiomokk VITUNAC of FLA Miatili s DST CT COMPLAINT AND Defendant. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, brings this Complaint against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and states as follows: PARTIES. JURISDICTION, AND VENUE 1. At all times material to this cause of action, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a resident of Palm Beach County, Florida. 2. This Complaint is brought under a fictitious name to protect the identity of Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, because this Complaint makes sensitive allegations of sexual assault and abuse of a then minor. 3. At all times material to this cause of action. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, had a residence located at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach. Palm Beach County, Florida. 4. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. is currently a citizen of the State of Florida, as he is currently incarcerated in the Palm Beach County Stockade. 5 At all times material to this cause of action, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, was an adult male born in 1953. Podhurst Orseck, EXHIBIT 25 West Hagler Street Suite MO. Miami, FL 33130.Mtam Fort Lauderdale 951.463.4346 EFTA00621401 Case 9:09Q4$ 612thregikOkfteddckeF09fta/Ple Page 2 of 27 6. This Court has jurisdiction over this action and the claims set forth herein pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255. 7. This Court has venue of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), as a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred in this District. STATEMENT OF FACTS 8. At all relevant times, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, was an adult male, spanning the ages of 45 and 55 years old. Epstein is known as a billionaire financier and money manager with a secret clientele limited exclusively to billionaires. He is a man of tremendous wealth, power, and influence. He owns a fleet of aircraft that includes a Gulfstream IV, a helicopter, and a Boeing 727, as well as a fleet of motor vehicles. Until his incarceration, he maintained his principal place of residence in the largest home in Manhattan, a 51,000-square-foot eight-story mansion on the Upper East Side. Upon information and belief, he also owns a 56.8 million mansion in Palm Beach, Florida, a $30 million 7,500-acre ranch in New Mexico he named "Zorro," a 70-acre private island known as Little St. James in St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, a mansion in London's Westminster neighborhood, and a home in the Avenue Foch area of Paris. The allegations herein concern Defendant's conduct while at his lavish homes and/or numerous other locations both nationally and internationally. 9. Upon information and belief, Defendant has a sexual preference for underage minor girls. He engaged in a plan, scheme, or enterprise in which he gained access to countless vulnerable and relatively economically disadvantaged minor girls, and sexually assaulted, molested, and/or exploited these girls, and then gave them money. 10. Beginning in or around 1998 through in or around September 2007, Defendant used his resources and his influence over vulnerable minor girls to engage in a systematic pattern of sexually exploitative behavior. 7 Podhurst Orseckal. 25 West Hagler Street, Suitt 800. Mama FL 33130. Miami 305.358 MD Fax 3093582382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4346 EFTA00621402 Case 9:o9W8d61-0-1FA-91/41 ire unINF116133ri&regilftijkg9P0OckS69Thi/2631/49 Page 3 of 27 II. Defendant's plan and scheme reflected a particular pattern and method. Defendant coerced and enticed impressionable, vulnerable, and relatively economically less fortunate minor girls to participate in various acts of sexual misconduct that he committed upon them. Defendant's scheme involved the use of underage girls, as well as other individuals, to recruit other underage girls. Upon information and belief, Defendant and/or an authorized agent would call and alert Defendant's assistants shortly before or after he arrived at his Palm Beach residence. His assistants would call economically disadvantaged and underage girls from West Palm Beach and surrounding areas who would be enticed by the money being offered and who Defendant and/or his assistants perceived as less likely to complain to authorities or have credibility issues if allegations of improper conduct were made. The then minor Plaintiff and other minor girls, some as young as 12 years old, were transported to Defendant's Palm Beach mansion by Defendant's employees, agents, and/or assistants in order to provide Defendant with "massages." 12. Many of the instances of illegal sexual conduct committed by Defendant were perpetrated with the assistance, support, and facilitation of at least three assistants who helped him orchestrate this child exploitation enterprise. These assistants would often arrange times for underage girls to come to Defendant's residence, transport or cause the transportation of underage girls to Defendant's residence, escort the underage girls to the massage room where Defendant would be waiting or would enter shortly thereafter, urge the underage girls to remove their clothes, deliver cash from Defendant to the underage girls and/or their procurers at the conclusion of each "massage appointment," and, upon information and belief, take nude photographs and/or videos of the underage girls for Defendant with andlor without their knowledge. Defendant would pay the procurer of each girl's "appointment" hundreds of dollars. 3 Podhurst Orseck, 25 West Plaster Street. Swat 803, Wan FL 33130, Miami 305358.2800 Fax 305.358.2382 • Fort Lauderdale 951463.046 I www.padhurstcout EFTA00621403 Case 9:09WICA-0-031-FiMinPak 6Ptileregigg kg980 1OkeFt)50/9666 Page 4 of 27 13. Epstein designed this scheme to secure a private place in Defendant's Palm Beach mansion where only persons employed and invited by Epstein would be present, so as to reduce the chance of detection of Defendant's sexual abuse and prostitution as well as to make it more difficult for the minor girls to flee the premises and/or to credibly report his actions to law enforcement or other authorities. The girls were usually transported by his employees, agents, and/or assistants or by a taxicab paid for by Defendant in order to make it difficult for the girls to flee his mansion. 14. Upon arrival at Defendant's Palm Beach mansion, each underage victim would generally be introduced to one of Defendant's assistants, who would gather the girl's personal contact information. The minor girl would then be led up a flight of stairs to a room that contained a massage table and a large shower. The staircase leading to the room was plastered with nude photographs of young girls, including some photographs depicting two or more young girls engaged in lewd acts. Upon information and belief, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, had such photographs in each of his six homes and/or on his computers. IS. At times, if it was the girl's first "massage" appointment, another female would be in the room to "lead the way" until Defendant would have her leave. Generally, Defendant would start his massage wearing only a small towel, which eventually would be removed. Defendant and/or the other female would direct the girl to massage him, giving the minor girl specific instructions as to where and how he wanted to be touched, and then direct her to remove her clothing. He would then perform one or more lewd, lascivious, and sexual acts, including masturbation, fondling the minor's breasts and/or sexual organs, touching the minor's vulva, vagina, and/or anus with a vibrator and/or back massager and/or his linens) and/or his penis, digitally penetrating her vagina, performing intercourse, oral sex, and/or anal sex, and/or coercing or attempting to coerce the girl to engage in lewd acts and/or prostitution and/or 4 Podhurst Orseck, EFTA00621404 Case 9:09WlTOWEAIA-tarri lafiEll6gii6regiA dkgeieoldckerMlk2680 Page 5 of 27 enticing the then minor girl to engage in sexual acts with another female in Defendant's presence. The exact degree of molestation and frequency with which the sexual exploitations took place varied and is not yet completely known; however, Defendant committed such acts regularly on a daily basis and, in most instances, several times a day. In order to facilitate the daily exchanges of money for sexual assault and abuse, Defendant kept U.S. currency readily available. 16. Defendant, Epstein, traveled to his mansion in Palm Beach for the purpose of' luring minor girls to his mansion to sexually abuse and/or batter them. He used the telephone to contact these minor girls for the purpose of coercing them into acts of prostitution and to enable himself to commit sexual battery against them and/or acts of lewdness in their presence, and he conspired with others, including assistants and/or his driver(s) and/or pilot(s), and his socialite friend/partner, Ghislaine Maxwell, to further these acts and to avoid police detection. Defendant's systematic pattern of sexually exploitative behavior referred to in paragraph 10 and described in paragraphs I 1 through the present paragraph occurred in all of Defendant's domestic and international residences and/or places of lodging and/or modes of transportation. 17. Consistent with the foregoing plan and scheme, Defendant used his money, wealth, and power to unduly and improperly manipulate and influence the then minor Plaintiff. A vulnerable young girl, Plaintiff was working as a Meking approximately S9 an hour when she was first lured into Defendant's sexually exploitative world. In or about the summer of 1998, when Plaintiff was merely fifteen years old while attending to her duties at Plaintiff was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell, who lived, traveled, socialized, and worked with Defendant. Ms. Maxwell asked Plaintiff if she was interested in learning massage therapy and earning a great deal of money while learning the profession. Plaintiff's father, who 5 Podhurst Orseck, 25 West Flatlet Sind, Suite 800, Miaow FL 33130, Miami 305358.2800 Fax 305358.2382 • Fat Lauderdale 9544534346 EFTA00621405 Case 9:090YOggaaA -FeamgRE116gibrega dk liBedotkeraRi/258c Page 6 of 27 was not apprehensive because he felt comforted that an older woman had approached Plaintiff with this opportunity. As a result, Plaintiff's father dropped off Plaintiff at Defendant's mansion that same day. Ms. Maxwell met Plaintiff and her father outside of Defendant's Palm Beach mansion, where Ms. Maxwell assured the minor girl's father that Ms. Maxwell would provide transportation home for his teenaged daughter. Ghislaine Maxwell led Plaintiff up a flight of stairs to a spa room with a shower and a massage table. Defendant was lying naked on the massage table. Plaintiff was shocked, but, with no experience with massages, thought this could be massage therapy protocol. Ms. Maxwell then took off her own shirt and left on her underwear and started rubbing her breasts across Defendant's body, impliedly showing Plaintiff what she was expected to do. Ms. Maxwell then told Plaintiff to take off her clothes. The minor girl was apprehensive about doing this, but, in fear, proceeded to follow Ms. Maxwell by ;he was then ordered to The encounter escalated, with Defendant and Ms. Maxwell sexually assaulting, battering, exploiting, and abusing Plaintiff in various ways and in various locations, including the steam room and shower. At the end of this sexually exploitive abuse, Defendant and Ms. Maxwell giddily told Plaintiff to return the following day and told her she had "lots of potential." Defendant paid Plaintiff hundreds of dollars, told her it was for two hours of work, and directed one of his employees to drive her home. 18. Defendant and/or his procurers thereafter lured the then minor Plaintiff to his Palm Beach mansion every day for the next two weeks in order to engage in a similar pattern of sexual exploitation. Defendant and/or his procurers arranged at the end of each incident the transportation and scheduling for the following day's appointment. Additionally, Defendant telephoned the minor Plaintiff himself and/or had Ms. Maxwell telephone Plaintiff to make arrangements. Plaintiff was often times driven to and from Epstein's mansion by Epstein 6 Podhurst Orseck, 1C ICC,., WTI 1.11....• CI 11111 121C IC, 'DAM C.• 16C 'KO ttel / OKI ALI EFTA00621406 Case a9.-.347.91 RBR Doc '1603-1 Filed.04/018L11 Paae.8 of.2B Case 9:09-cv-a0non-rwi uocument 1 tntered on i-Lsu uocket usiott/zuus Page 7 of 27 himself or his driver. Alternatively, Defendant or Ms. Maxwell would arrange and pay for Plaintiff's transportation home by taxicab. 19. During Plaintiff's second incident of being sexually exploited and assaulted by Defendant at Defendant's Palm Beach mansion, Defendant asked Plaintiff to quit her job a= and travel with him to earn much more money while learning the massage profession. Thus. Plaintiff, an impressionable and vulnerable young girl of modest means, quit her job as a vas lured by Defendant, and continued to be victimized by Defendant, who immersed the minor Plaintiff into Defendant's lewd and abusive lifestyle. Under Defendant's dominion and control, Defendant continuously "groomed" the minor adolescent. Defendant's daily routine required the minor Plaintiff to Plaintiff had absolutely no say as to when, how many times, or what was done during each sexual encounter. Often, Plaintiff was joined by Ms. Maxwell, Ms. Maxwell's assistant, and/or a countless army of young women who would be brought to one of Defendant's homes for the sexual trysts and then be sexually exploited by Defendant. 20. The first time that Defendant transported Plaintiff to another state in order to engage in sexual acts with her occurred when she was merely fifteen years old and after only two weeks of daily sexually abusive encounters with Defendant. Defendant used his private jet to transport the minor Plaintiff to Manhattan, where he provided her with spending money and accommodations with him at his mansion. From the time that Plaintiff was 15 years old, Defendant abused her to serve his every sexual whim, obtaining and purchasing passports and whatever was needed for her to travel with him and/or for him. Defendant transported Plaintiff in his private jet to locations that included Palm Beach, New York City, Santa Fe, Los Angeles, San Francisco, St. Louis, and numerous other domestic destinations, as well as international 7 Podhurst Orseck, ■ 25 Wen Hasler Sent, Suite 800, MIMS, FL 33130. Muni 305.3%2800 Fax 305.358.2382 • Fat Lauderdale 954.463.4346 EFTA00621407 Case 9:099MIOMMI -FRQua1 161:Pideregilaidagalkeqgra/268 Page 8 of 27 destinations, including Europe, the Caribbean, and Africa. He provided accommodations with him in order to have her available to him at all times wherever he went, including while transporting the minor Plaintiff on his private jet. Each time they would travel to one of these destinations, the same pattern of sexual abuse would occur, often with a vast array of aspiring models, actresses, celebrities, and/or other females, including minors, from all over the world. Upon information and belief, Defendant transported minor girls from Turkey, the Czech Republic, Asia, and numerous other countries, many of whom spoke no English. To Plaintiff's knowledge, the only females specifically excluded from Defendant's sexual escapades were African-Americans. 21. In addition to being continually exploited to satisfy Defendant's every sexual whim, Plaintiff was also required to he sexually exploited by Defendant's adult male peers, including royalty, politicians, academicians, businessmen, and/or other professional and personal acquaintances. Whenever Defendant transported Plaintiff with him in his private jet to any destination, Defendant would pay Plaintiff a flat rate per day while he and/or his above- mentioned associates would sexually exploit and abuse minor Plaintiff. 22. Most of these acts of abuse occurred during a time when Defendant knew that Plaintiff was approximately 1$, 16, and 17 years old, and, after years of daily sexual exploitation, continued into her adulthood. Despite Defendant's stating shortly before Plaintiff's sixteenth birthday that he soon would have to trade her in because she was getting too old, Defendant continued to sexually exploit Plaintiff until she fled at age 19. Defendant's predilection for young girls was well known to those who regularly procured them for him and to his circle of friends. On one of Defendant's birthdays, a friend of Defendant sent him three I2-year-old girls from France who spoke no English for Defendant to sexually exploit and abuse. After doing so, they were sent back to France the next day. 8 Podhurst Orseck, E. 25 West aisle Street. Suite 800, Miami. FL 33130, Manta 305358 2800 Fax 305358 2382 • Fort Lauderdale 954163.4316 EFTA00621408 Case 9:ONS3190titiagARBOCtin4r5 160i -nlereqlgi Vaigcrk AlagolagoV Page 9 of 27 23. Any assertions by Defendant that he was unaware of the age of the then minor Plaintiff are belied by his own actions, and are rendered irrelevant by the provision of applicable federal statutes concerning the sexual exploitation and abuse of a minor child. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, at all times material to this cause of action, knew and should have known of Plaintiff's age of minority. Defendant and Ms. Maxwell acknowledged and celebrated Plaintiff's lot" birthday. Defendant's preference for underage girls was well-known to those who regularly procured them for him. 24. As previously stated in paragraph 14, Defendant displayed nude photographs of underage girls throughout his homes in New York City, Palm Beach, Santa Fe, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, saw photographs of naked young girls in each of Defendant's homes, including a photograph of herself naked at Defendant's home in Palm Beach. When she asked Defendant about it, he stated dismissively that he had naked photographs of her in all of his homes. 25. Upon information and belief, some of the photographs in Defendant's possession were taken with hidden cameras set up in his home in Palm Beach. On the day of his arrest, police found two hidden cameras and photographs of underage girls on a computer in Defendant's home. Upon information and belief, Defendant may have taken lewd photographs of Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, with his hidden cameras and may have transported lewd photographs of Plaintiff (among many other victims) to his other residences and elsewhere using a facility or means of interstate and/or foreign commerce. In addition, while Plaintiff was a minor teenager and upon Ms. Maxwell's insistence after Ms. Maxwell rejected as inappropriate photographs that Plaintiff presented of herself fully clothed, Ms. Maxwell photographed Plaintiff naked in different sexually explicit positions. Ms. Maxwell then presented these nude photographs of Plaintiff to Defendant as a birthday present for Defendant from Ms. Maxwell. 9 Podhurst Orseck, 25 West Flagler Sweet, Soar 803, Miami. Ft 33130, Miami 305.358./900 Fax 3116 358.2382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4346 I wvolV podhuntcom EFTA00621409 Case 9:o9CRSAiial-SQurnDecni T 6Thlere5trY kg-IICkeFtVO4)28hi8 Page 10 of 27 Upon information and belief, one or more nude photographs of Plaintiff that were taken when she was a minor were confiscated by the Palm Beach Sheriffs Office during its execution of a search warrant of Defendant's Palm Beach mansion on October 20, 2005. Upon information and belief, those photographs are still in the custody of law enforcement. 26. It is virtually impossible to calculate the exact number of times that Defendant sexually exploited and abused Plaintiff. From the age of IS. Plaintiff was sexually exploited and abused by Defendant on a daily basis and, most often, multiple times each day. While some of the precise dates these acts occurred are unknown to Plaintiff, these dates are known to Defendant, as he is reported to have kept a written log of each instance in which he engaged in these lewd acts with then minor Plaintiff and others. Upon information and belief, these logs are also in the custody of law enforcement. 27. In or around September 2002, Defendant purchased a commercial round-trip airline ticket, and provided a passport, U.S. currency, and accommodations for Plaintiff to fly to Thailand. While thousands of miles away from Defendant on this extended trip alone for the first time in more than four years, Plaintiff met, fell in love, and married a young man. She escaped from Defendant's abuse with the help and insistence of her new husband and, instead of returning to Defendant, boarded a plane to Australia with one suitcase. 28. Since November 2002, Plaintiff has lived a modest life in Australia, while maintaining lines of communication with her family and without contact with Defendant or any of the people in his entourage. However, suddenly, in 2008, Plaintiff received numerous phone calls from one of Defendant's agents. During these phone calls to Plaintiff, he repeatedly asked whether she knew anything about the civil cases against Defendant, whether she knew any of the females who were proceeding with the civil suits, whether she was planning on filing suit, whether she was communicating and/or cooperating with anyone against Defendant, and whether I0 Podhurst Orseck, c Wo•tclo•lor Grow. C.O. on, IkAi•mi Ll 11111 Mi•rebi VC Wit Cww VIC W 11A, . Cow• 1 otel.olwl. Ott /Al MI • • EFTA00621410 Case_09:3.47,91:RaR Doc 1603:1 Filed 04/08/11 Page 12 of 28 Case 9:0u-cv-auEDE-rsism Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009 Page 11 of 27 she would return to the United States to testify. Terrified by Defendant's demonstrated ability to track her down on her changed cell phone number halfway across the world, Plaintiff attempted to reassure Defendant's agent that she would remain quiet. During the course of one of these phone calls from Defendant's agents, Defendant himself spoke on the phone, continued to question her intentions, and, upon being reassured by Plaintiff, thanked her for not getting involved. 29. Around January 2009, Plaintiff received a letter from the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, informing her of her potential civil claims against Defendant under 18 U.S.C. § 2255. Plaintiff contacted undersigned counsel within days and diligently and repeatedly pursued a good faith viable settlement of her claims against Defendant. Unable to reach a settlement, this lawsuit followed. 30. As a result of these encounters with Defendant, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's controlling and manipulating her on a daily basis for years into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. 31. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed the above-referenced acts upon Plaintiff in violation of federal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, transport of child pornography, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated 11 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flatlet Street. Suite 800, Minor, FL 33130, Miami 305 358 2800 Fax 305358 2382 • Fart Lauderdale 954.463 4346 EFTA00621411 Case 9:09c-evs-gAglaiing&anDeoni 1 60grierld"4?,R PATEIgcke7N70:41728f0i8 Page 12 of 27 in 18 U.S.C. § 2421, § 2422(a), § 2422(h), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), § 2423(e), § 2251, § 2252, § 2252A(a)(1), and § 2252A(gX1). 32. In June 2008, after investigations by the Palm Beach Police Department, the Palm Beach State Attorney's Office, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, entered pleas of "guilty" to various Florida state crimes involving the solicitation of minors for prostitution and the procurement of minors for the purposes of prostitution in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, is in the same position as if he had been tried and convicted of the sexual offenses committed against Plaintiff and, as such, must admit liability unto Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102. Plaintiff hereby exclusively seeks civil remedies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255. COUNT ONE (Cause of Action for Coercion and Enticement of Minor to Engage in Prostitution or Sexual Activity pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C.§ 2422(1)11 33. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, rcalleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 32 above. 34. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, used a facility or means of interstate and/or foreign commerce to knowingly persuade, induce, entice, or coerce Jane Doc No. 102, when she was under the age of 18 years. to engage in prostitution and/or sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempted to do so, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). 35. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. pursuant to this Section of the United States Code. 12 Podhurst Orseck,- 25 West nattier Street. Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130. Miami 305.3502800 Fax 105358.2182 • Fort Lauderdale 9S4A63 4346 I EFTA00621412 Case 9 09C-cVg0gifial -FaCtumeIPIF 11613ritieregiloendaS861eickablgi8 Page 13 of 27 36. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury. pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT TWO (Cause of Action for Transportation of Minor with Intent to Encase in Criminal Sexual Activity pursuant to 1$ U.S.C. 6 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. 6 2423110) 37. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 32 above. 38. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, knowingly transported then minor Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, in interstate and/or foreign commerce, with the intent that Plaintiff engage in prostitution, or in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, in violation 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a). As previously stated in paragraphs 20, 21, and 27. I3 Podhurst Orseck, ■ 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130. Alianu 305.358 2800 Fax 305 358 2382 • Fort Ltuderdak 954463.4346 I www podhurstcont EFTA00621413 9:09 -34791-RBR Doc 160-1 Filed 04/93/11 PacLe 15 of 28 Case 9:09-cv-aub5u-KAM Document Entereci on FL5D Docket 05104/2009 Page 14 of 27 Defendant transported Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, across state lines and across international borders numerous times from the time that Plaintiff was merely 15 years old through adulthood with the primary intent of sexually exploiting her. 39. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code. 40. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life for a minor. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, fbr all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. 14 Podhurst Orseck,- B West Hagler Street, Suite 800, Miami, Ft 33130, Miami 305.358 2800 Fax 305 358.2382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4316 I www.podhuritcom EFTA00621414 easeD9-34791-RBR Doc 160- d 04/08/11 Page 16 of 28 Case 9:09-cv-aub5b-KAM Document Entered'on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009 Page 15 of 27 COUNT THREE !Cause of Action for Travel with Intent to Enna, is Illicit Sexual Conduct pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 8 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. 6 2423(b11 41. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 32 above. 42. Upon information and belief, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, traveled in interstate and/or foreign commerce with the intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2423(0, with minor females, including the then minor Plaintiff, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2423(b). 43. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code. 44. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, I5 Podhurst Orseck, 25 West Meer %eft, Suite SOO. Mama FL 33130. Miami 305.3582800 Fait 305 358 2382 • Fon Lauderdale 954 463 4346 EFTA00621415 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 1603-1 Filed 04/08/11 Page 17 of 28 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009 Page 16 of 27 actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT FOUR (Cause of Action for Coercion and Enticement to Entitle in Prostitution or Sexual Activity pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 6 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. 8 2422(411 45. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 32 above. 46. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, knowingly persuaded, induced, enticed, and/or coerced Jane Doe No. 102 to travel in interstate and/or foreign commerce to engage in prostitution and/or sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempted to do so, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(a). 47. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in I8 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code. 48. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn 16 Podhurst Orseck.. 25 West Flagler Street, Suite M. Miami. Fl. 33130, MWnt 305.358 2800 Fa 305.358 2382 • Fon Lauderdale 954.463 4346 EFTA00621416 Case 9:0920f1MOGRA lan Eerf116(intieregWVAl lotkerdir0:14W 8Page 17 of 27 income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy lift. These injuries are permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper. and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT FIVE (Cause of Action for Transportation with Intent to Entaae in Criminal Sexual Activity Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 6 2255 In Violation of 18 U.S.C. 4 2421) 49. Plaintiff. Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 32 above. 50. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, knowingly transported, or attempted to transport, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, in interstate and/or foreign commerce, with the intent that Plaintiff engage in prostitution and/or in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2421. As previously stated in paragraphs 20, 21, and 27, Defendant transported Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, across state lines and across international borders numerous times from the time that Plaintiff was merely 15 years old through adulthood with the primary intent of sexually exploiting her. 51. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code. 52. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered. and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, 17 Podhurst Orseck, 25 West Flatlet Street. Suite KO. Muni, F1.33130. Miami 305358 28C0 Fax 305.358 2382 • Fort Lauderdak 954.463.4346 www.poclkutcom EFTA00621417 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 1603-1 Filed 04/08/11 Page 19 of 28 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009 Page 18 of 27 psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life for a minor. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT SIX fiCause of Action for Sexual Exploitation of Children pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 5 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. & 2251) 53. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats. realleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 32 above. 54. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, knowingly persuaded, induced, enticed, or coerced the then minor Plaintiff to engage in sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing a visual depiction of such conduct, in violation of IS U.S.C. C 2251. As previously stated in paragraphs 14, 24, and 25. Defendant kept and displayed a myriad of nude photographs of underage girls throughout his homes, including his homes in New York City, Palm Beach, Santa Fe, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, saw photographs of naked young girls in each of Defendant's homes, including a photograph of herself naked at Defendant's home in Palm 18 Podhurst Orseck, 25 West Meer Street Suite 800. Miami, FL 33134 Maul 305.356 2800 Fax 305356.2382 • Fort Lauderdale 954463.4366 1 wvnv.pocnnuipt can EFTA00621418 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 1603-1 Filed 04/08/11 Page 20 of 28 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009 Page 19 of 27 Beach. Upon information and belief, many of the photographs in the possession of Defendant were taken with hidden cameras set up in his home in Palm Beach. On the day of his arrest, police found two hidden cameras and photographs of underage girls on a computer in Defendant's home. Upon information and belief, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, may have taken lewd photographs of Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, with his hidden cameras and may have transported lewd photographs of Plaintiff (among many other victims) to his other residences and elsewhere using a facility or means of interstate and/or foreign commerce. Upon information and belief, one or more nude photographs of Plaintiff that were taken when she was a minor were confiscated by the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office during its execution of a search warrant of Defendant's Palm Beach mansion on October 20, 2005. Upon information and belief, those photographs are still in the custody of law enforcement. 55. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code. 56. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn 19 Podhurst Orseck, ' Wo•I Paolo., Ghee, Gut. Pal Mimeo R 111111 MiAlTi 111514I 714111 Fa. MC VA 77 • Fart I auelenble OM 441/144 www rewIl•mmt eflirIk EFTA00621419 Case 9:o9-c&gon-63-441.1 -WcturnERfil6Wrtiwenencata86101cheragabe6i8Page 20 of 27 income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT SEVEN (Cause of Action for Transport of Visual Depiction of Minor Enduing_ is Sexually Explicit Conduct pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 6 2255 In Violation of 18 U.S.C. 2252(2)(1)1 57. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, =lieges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 32 above. 58. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, knowingly mailed, transported, shipped, or sent via computer and/or facsimile in or affecting interstate and/or foreign commerce at least one visual depiction of the minor Plaintiff engaging in sexually explicit conduct, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)( I). As previously stated in paragraphs 14, 24, and 25, Defendant displayed a myriad of nude photographs of underage girls throughout his homes, including his homes in New York City, Palm Beach, Santa Fe, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, saw photographs of naked young girls in each of Defendant's homes, including a photograph of herself naked as a minor at Defendant's home in Palm Beach. As previously stated in paragraph 24, Defendant told Plaintiff that he had photographs of her naked in all of his homes. Upon information and belief, many of the photographs in the possession of Defendant were taken with hidden cameras set up throughout his home in Palm Beach. On the day of his arrest, police found two hidden cameras and nude photographs of underage girls on a computer in Defendant's home. Upon information and belief, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, may have taken lewd 20 Podhurst Orseck, lc CI sear c•••••• C. ' WWI IC sun; CT 11•1(1 Mann. LK IN -AM C,. 'a; llA 11AI • ten* I •t•Aerel +le lICA •••••••••• eet.ntly..••• EFTA00621420 Case 9:099aVOR63-4KAVttcurne 'RE116`WeregibendaS 8OcickeVanZ86 8Page 21 of 27 photographs of Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, with his hidden cameras and may have transported lewd photographs of Plaintiff (among many other victims) to his other residences and elsewhere using a facility or means of interstate and/or foreign commerce. Upon information and belief, one or more nude photographs of Plaintiff that were taken when she was a minor were confiscated by the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office during its execution of a search warrant of Defendant's Palm Beach mansion on October 20, 2005. Upon information and belief, those photographs are still in the custody of law enforcement. 59. As previously stated in paragraph 23, any assertions by Defendant that he was unaware of the age of the then minor Plaintiff are belied by his actions and rendered irrelevant by the provision of applicable federal and state statutes concerning the sexual exploitation and abuse of a minor child. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, at all times material to this cause of action, knew and should have known of Plaintiff's age of minority. Defendant's preference for underage girls was well-known to those who regularly procured them for him. 60. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code. 61. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in I8 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and 21 Podhurst Orseck, 25 West Hagler Street, Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Wand 305.358 2800 Fat 305 358.2382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.461.4346 www.podhuntcom EFTA00621421 09a . :9 7 J:RBR Doc 1603-1 Filed 04/08/11 Page 23 of 28 Case 9:0Q-EaUbb64-KAm Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 0/04/2009 Page 22 of 27 psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant. Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT EIGHT 'Cause of Action for Transport of Child Pornography pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 6 2255 iq Violation of IS U.S.C. 6 2252/Valli)) 62. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 32 above. 63. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, knowingly mailed, transported, shipped, or sent via computer and/or facsimile in or affecting interstate and/or foreign commerce child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(aX 1). 64. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code. 65. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress. psychological andior psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and 22 Podhurst Orseck, 25 West Flatter Stmt., Suite 800, Abaft, FL 33130, Miami 305358 MOO Fax 305358.2382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4346 www.podhurst.com EFTA00621422 Case 9:0Q-2033806elaktiRBFoicurRA 160i-dtereFdled Q4/ / 1 Papte 24 of 28 on i-LSU Docket Ub/04/2009 Page 23 of 27 leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to cant income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the funze. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT NINE (Cause of Action for Flinfirlff in a Child Exploitation Enterprise pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 in Violation of IS U.S.C. d 2252Mall 66. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 32 above and Counts One through Eight above. 67. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, knowingly engaged in a child exploitation enterprise, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(g)(2), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(gX1). As more fully set forth above, Defendant engaged in actions that constitute countless violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1591 (sex trafficking of children), Chapter 110 (sexual exploitation of children in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2251, 2252(a)(1), and 2252(A)(a)(1)), and Chapter 117 (transportation for illegal sexual activity in violation of 18 G.S.C. §§ 2421, 2422, and 2423). As more fully set forth above in paragraphs 9 through 32, Defendant's actions involved countless victims and countless separate incidents of sexual abuse, which he committed against minors, including Plaintiff, in concert with at least three other persons. 23 Podhurst Orsecic, 25 West Flasks Street, Suite ROM Miami, FL 3300. M4m11053S12900 Fax X5.358.2382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463 4346 1 EFTA00621423 Case 9:016, 86612 ,41/4441 68Lralif 116(1ti‘reEiM#S9Alcickel'ogtb 8638 Page 24 of 27 68. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code. 69. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. Date: May I, 2009 24 Podhurst Orseck, ■ aLadaC, 12.1_ FtadE Robert C. JosefsWerg, ar No.6408563 Katherine W. Ezell Bar No. 114771 Podhurst Orseck, 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, Florida 33130 (305) 358-2800 (305) 358-2382 fax rjosefsber& 25 West Flag* Street, Suite 806 %third, FL 33130, Miami 305.358 2800 Fas 305358 2782 • Fort Lauderdak 954 463 4146 EFTA00621424 Case 9:4-R-73806RiakiRgeuri4-5 i6°LitereFdlgg PI4Igtdlektta0S)2492%foV Page 25 of 27 Kcal= .4ttorneys for Plaintiff DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff demands to have her case tried before a jury. Rod Ixttit e Ir-t-44 4"S Ity-L-R444 Robert C. Josettberg, Bar No. 040856 Katherine W. Ezell, Bar No. 114771 Podhurst Orseck, 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, Florida 33130 (305) 358-2800 (305 358-2382 (fax) Attorneys for Plaintiff 25 Podhurst Orseck, ZS West Plaster Street, Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Miami 305.358 28C0 Fax 305.358.1382 • Fort Lauderdale 054.463.4346 EFTA00621425 Case 9:0 % I • ifia lf Ra RcurRini 160gnierecitg PLIE6OckeVOW/21110i8 Page 26 of 27 441544 Mo. MOS/ CIVIL COVER SHEET The IS 44 ci• el covet shag addle information contused how neitherMOWaer SI“lernele the Mal Ind Serviceof plaidinctot tithes papers as inquired by law, except es provided by local Soot coon. This km approved by the/41dgC Conference of the United SW= in Seotonker I 974. Is mann& leer the use pulseClete of COun 10( the ourpose of mamma the civil docket sheet (SEE INSTRUCTIONSON THE REVERSE OF THE FORMS NOTICE: Ana-lien MUST ladkate All Re-filed Can Below. I. (a) PLAINTIFFS Jane Doe No. 102 (b) County onteadence of Fen LOS Plaintiff West Palm Beach (EXCEPT IN OS PLAINTIFF CASES) (1) Allorney's (Fa Nam lam and Telephone tearben Robert C. Josef Esq./Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Ossetic, M. 25 W. Elegies St., Suite 800 Miami FT vim OAS ea/ Sans (d)Check County Where Action Arose. 7MIAMI. DAM 1 o ON ROE ^I OR DEFENDANTS Jeffrey Epstein County of Resadence of El* Lined Defendant West Palm Beach 042 US PLAINTIFF f• •ors. LANDCONOEMNATION WikaglIQ ACT LAND INVOLVED. Al77010 0111(sana lack A. Goldberger. Esq., Atterburi Goldberger, et al.. 250 S. ti 1 2009 Australian Ave., #1400, West Petra? asteELNyreardifftoben D PAW BEACH MARTIN 0 Sr. LUCIE I, INTVERDWIELA 110111111043E• HIGHt ANDS II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION tPleee in - X- in one Da onlyl 0 I US. Covenerens X13 Fedminhconn Naiad, (U.S. COWYMVItill Vol. Pero) 0 2 US GereaTeliteR 0 4 Dlverlily Deferalmt of Pangs (knee,Orizemage m arm III) III. C TIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIESPlace al 04" vs One Boa rot PemenIT Foe Chterpty Caws Only) is One Om foe Defendant) ITV DEE MY ors fatten dna Stew 7 I ". I Incorporawd ,a Pnrcuel PWce 0 4 0 4 of Booms la near Suiee Chien of Araby Moe 0 2 3 2 lecoreceeted ond Pnitypal Place 0 5 0 5 of Rasmus In Anode/ Sin Citizen or Subsea ail 1 3 1 3 7nevP Nano 0 6 0 6 Foram Cower IV. NATURE surr &Seem 'X- in One ElontiZi I PNIF/171.14LPLNAIJS_ AANKAL /ICY OTIIPR STA TOP S l 0 6I0 Arcanum 0 620 Other food! One. O 625 Drug Related Scanty of hooray 21 VSCIMI O 630 liquor Ins O 640 R R & That O 650 Auhre Rep. O 6400cropenond Seferplareltb 0 690 Otte 1101rdwarre 120 Marine 110 Miller Au I/O Verne* Immanent 150Rn:over/ of Oaermarneal 48 Enfortereent a Admen III Medicare Ad 172 Raceway of Defeund Stedere Lam (Eut Vetenna o 153 Recovery olOverpayerent Voene's Benefits PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL POI RV (I DO *Igor& 0 )62 Personal lenity • 0 315 Attplene Product Med Malpredsce hatnlity 0 )65 Parsed barmy • 0 320 Assault. Ltd & Product Lisbdily Sender 3 MS Asbnros Periods' 0 330 Federal Fenian:IV Iljury /Soda" liability L Sabo 0 MO Maw PERSONAL PROPERTY 0 347 Monet PI tdiel 0 770 Oren nod Liability 0 131 nub in Lending 0 370 Moon Vebak 0 310 Other Pmona 0 351 Motor Wince napery,/ Dane Pita." I *Hay O )85 Properly Oemette IP MO Other Primal Ntatet I utility Injury O 412 Aimee 21 USC 158 O 423 Witlekerel VI USC I57 0 400 saw vt4ponneenere 410 Aar/as( 410 lint •-.1 limbed 450 Commerce 460 Deportee.. 470 Radom Influnned and Camp thgunapriom 410 Camara, Coedit 490 C ableiSte TV 110 Weal.* Sark, IISOSomitiesfonencdnies. EscMee 875 Clioloeur thellerig NM J:ICe41814:1;t1111. 0320 I .->nglil 0 630 Pane 0 144) hideout LABOR SOCIAL B.CIARITV 0 710 For It Marisztle Act 0 in Labor Ming Relaters 0 730 Latamddsm Ryon ng & Disclosure Act o 740 Railway It Act 0 790 Othea labor Lortatioa 0 791 Empl Res Inc Secomy Act 0 861 111A (1195f1) 0 862 Bleck IAN (923) C1 863 DIWCOIWW (405101 1 664 SSID Ink XVI 1 865 RS1(405(a0) or 0 160 Sic/Midas' Suits 0 190 Other Cessna 0 195 Coronet Product 1 stony 0196 Buskin 12 1/W1410 1900terStamory Actions 191 Apiculture! Acts $92 Economic Subilmmon Act 891 Emstonmentel Menem 894 Emmy Allocation so 191 Fotedmn of Infonnumn Act 900Appeal of Fee Umennmsoon Under Fuel Access so lattice 0 950Constinatemlay of SUR Sumo ) REAL Tamen CIVIL RIGHTS PRISONER rermOrds FEDERAL TAX sass O 210Lel Coodemnetem O 220 Fortdowre 0 250 Rem Uwe & Eioarvent 1 240 Tons ay Laid O 245 Ton ftv4scl Lib* 0290 Al101ba Rol Propeily 0 441 'loons 17 442 Employ went 0 443 Hoag. Acconinndeesons 3 444 Ware 0 445 AMT. %/Disabilities - neOlnymar* O 446 Amer. ansedines • Otive 0 44000er Card Rights 0 510 Maims to Vac Santee Habeas Lorna: 0 BO Genera 0 535 Death Sooty 3 $40 Madan & Otis/ fl Mena Pallas 0 555 Paso. Condom'. 18x5 fuel(') S Plesait or Defeo/are) 1 871 IRS--Owel Poly 26 OW 7609 V. ORIGIN Bent an 'X'Ore Bet 044y) Transferral from 4711 Onsmel 1 2 Removed 1mm rJ 3 Rc-filal 0 4 Ronal« a 5 another district 06 %%loam:Kt Proceeding Sone coon Uwe VI Morn Reopened DPOCID) I thorium Appeal to Diu at 7 Judge from M3.sincc ludernent VI. RELATED/RE-FILED CASE(S). (See ,ease pp' a) Re-filed Case Cl YES 0 NO JUDGE Kenneth A. Marra b) Related Cases OYES 0 NO DOCKET See Attached NUMBER ' VII. CAUSE OF ACTION Ctie the LI S. Civa Statute under whsh you are filing and Write a Doe( Stumm of Cause (Do sot Ole jot( id k 'Joe el I te fu «I seem dhenky): 18 U.S.C. 2255 (Predicate Statutes 18 U.S.C. 2422(b), 2423(b). 242.3(e). 2231. 2232, 2252A(aX 2252A(g)( I ) LENGTH OF TRIAL .Bs4 days estimated (for both odes lo ley ewe case) VIII. REQUESTED IN O CHE.CKIF 11 IS A CLASS ACTION DEMANDS CHECK YESunlytfdenndcd in complaint COMPLAINT: UNDER F. 23 JL'RY DEMAND: RI Yes r No ABOVE INFORMATION IS TREE & CORRECT TO THE. BEST OF MV KNOWLEDGE. Ski( TI { RI Ot ‘TTORNLY Pir( LA) • DAB eEVICE we olio, AMOV4T1:1 L RFCFIPT / 2) 6 p ) ci ovle /or/ EFTA00621426 B.Ft Doc 1603-1 Filed 04/08/11 Page 28 of 28 Case 9:0Wliagaita R uocument I Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009 Page 27 of 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION ATTACHMENT TO CIVIL COVER SHEET FOR: Jane Doe HYL.v. Jeffrey Epstein VI: RELATED/RE-FIELD CASE(S): 08-80069 08-80119 08-80232 08-80380 08-80381 08-08804 08-80811 08-80893 08-80993 08-80994 08-80469 09-80591 EFTA00621427

Technical Artifacts (49)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:09-CV-80656-KAM
Domainwww.podhurst.com
FaxFax 305 358 2382
FaxFax 305 358.2382
FaxFax 305.358 2382
FaxFax 305.358.1382
FaxFax 305.358.2382
FaxFax 305356.2382
FaxFax 305358 2382
FaxFax 305358.2382
FaxFax 3093582382
Phone(305 358-2382
Phone(305) 358-2382
Phone(305) 358-2800
Phone2423110
Phone305 358 2382
Phone305 358 2800
Phone305 358.2382
Phone305.3502800
Phone305.356 2800
Phone305.358 2382
Phone305.358 2800
Phone305.358.1382
Phone305.358.2382
Phone305.3582800
Phone305356.2382
Phone305358 2382
Phone305358 2782
Phone305358 2800
Phone305358.2382
Phone305358.2800
Phone3093582382
Phone358.2182
Phone358.2382
Phone463.4346
Phone6408563
Phone951.463.4346
Phone954 463 4146
Phone954 463 4346
Phone954.461.4346
Phone954.463 4346
Phone954.463.4316
Phone954.463.4346
Phone9544534346
Phone954463.4346
Phone954463.4366
Wire Refreference
Wire Refreferenced
Wire Refreflected

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01905212

5p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01838551

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, [REDACTED - Survivor], Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
Dept. of JusticeDec 19, 2025

GRAND JURY [EFTA00008998]

GRAND JURY EXHIBIT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. S1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Entice Minors to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts) The Grand Jury charges: OVERVIEW The char...

1p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01682184

186p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Epstein Reputation Management Email Reveals Paid SEO/Hacking Campaign to Suppress Negative Coverage

The email provides concrete details about a paid operation to manipulate search results for Jeffrey Epstein, including payments, specific tactics, and references to high‑profile associates. It suggest Epstein hired a contractor (Mike) for $2,500 plus a pending $7,500 to run SEO and hacking services. The operation involved removing negative articles, altering Wikipedia, replacing mug‑shot images, a

3p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.